Re: [Wikimedia-l] Freedom of panorama today approved by Belgian parliament

So can an image of Atomium be finally posted to Commons? :) בתאריך 17 ביוני 2016 02:39,‏ "Romaine Wiki" כתב: > Hi all, > > Great news! > > Freedom of panorama has been voted today in the Belgian parliament. > A mayority voted in favour of freedom of panorama, including

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Commons-l] Freedom of panorama today approved by Belgian parliament

Congratulations! I can't wait to see next year's Wiki Loves Monuments calendar from Belgium! On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote: > Fantastic news! Kudos to Dimi and everyone else who worked hard to > promote this. :) > >A. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

I think the project evolved over time. It may be that this page did not exist in the first version. Clearly, the site has been modified recently because the name changed from WIGI to WHGI. And I see the main four pages has been updated. If you look at "Gender by language" for example, it

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Freedom of panorama today approved by Belgian parliament

WOW, wonderful news indeed! Best regards, antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv Wikimedia Ukraine 2016-06-17 1:38 GMT+02:00 Romaine Wiki : > Hi all, > > Great news! > > Freedom of panorama has been voted today in the Belgian parliament. > A mayority voted in favour of freedom of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Commons-l] Freedom of panorama today approved by Belgian parliament

Fantastic news! Kudos to Dimi and everyone else who worked hard to promote this. :) A. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Romaine Wiki wrote: > Hi all, > > Great news! > > Freedom of panorama has been voted today in the Belgian parliament. > A mayority voted in favour

[Wikimedia-l] User session reset due to security issue

Due to a programming error, users who logged in to a Wikimedia project wiki between 2016-06-07 and 2016-06-14 may have had the "Keep me logged in (for up to 30 days)” setting inadvertently selected, despite the checkbox not having been checked. In order to prevent unauthorized access to user

[Wikimedia-l] Freedom of panorama today approved by Belgian parliament

Hi all, Great news! Freedom of panorama has been voted today in the Belgian parliament. A mayority voted in favour of freedom of panorama, including commercial use. Soon images of artworks and modern buildings in Belgium can be restored on Commons. But first the law needs to be published in

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

Hi, Giuseppe. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Giuseppe Profiti wrote: > Thanks Asaf, it is quite interesting. > I have a couple of questions and one comment: > - why is Italian wikipedia missing? Is there a problem with wikidata links? > Just an oversight -- I

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

So interesting this list Asaf. 2016-06-16 16:14 GMT-03:00, Asaf Bartov : > Hullo everyone. > > I was asked by a volunteer for help getting stats on the gender gap in > content on a certain Wikipedia, and came up with simple Wikidata Query > Service[1] queries that pulled

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

Thanks Asaf, it is quite interesting. I have a couple of questions and one comment: - why is Italian wikipedia missing? Is there a problem with wikidata links? - is this kind of analysis possible also to the average user? The comment is about measuring such ratio in other similar products

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

Hello Asaf Just making sure that you knew about WHGI : http://whgi.wmflabs.org/gender-by-language.html Do you know if there are differences in analysis between the two analysis ? I checked a few figures and it fits pretty well. Flo Le 16/06/16 à 21:14, Asaf Bartov a écrit : Hullo

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

This is so cool! Thanks. :-) (CCing some wiki-women from He-Wiki). Shani. On 16 Jun 2016 23:29, "Alex Wang" wrote: > Thanks, Asaf! > > This is very useful and interesting. There is much work to be done. > > Cheers, > > Alex > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Anna

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

Thanks, Asaf! This is very useful and interesting. There is much work to be done. Cheers, Alex On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Anna Stillwell wrote: > Thank you for this, Asaf. Very useful. > /a > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Asaf Bartov

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

Thank you for this, Asaf. Very useful. /a On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote: > Hullo everyone. > > I was asked by a volunteer for help getting stats on the gender gap in > content on a certain Wikipedia, and came up with simple Wikidata Query >

[Wikimedia-l] Fresh data on the gender gap in content

Hullo everyone. I was asked by a volunteer for help getting stats on the gender gap in content on a certain Wikipedia, and came up with simple Wikidata Query Service[1] queries that pulled the total number of articles on a given Wikipedia about men and about women, to calculate *the proportion of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Community survey to support the WMF ED search starts right now

Thank you! Hopefully there will be a good range of viewpoints! I look forward to reading a summary of the feedback! Fae On 16 June 2016 at 11:25, Alice Wiegand wrote: > Update: The survey is still open! > In order to hear from more people, the search team decided to

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Community survey to support the WMF ED search starts right now

Update: The survey is still open! In order to hear from more people, the search team decided to hold the ED search survey [1] open until Friday, June 17. If you haven’t already, please take a few minutes to fill it out before then. Thank you for your participation! [1] - ED Search Survey: