Peter, all of these would be useful . The most useful of all would be a
list of those that have been deleted as drafts that were not improved for 6
months--I havre a partial list, but there is no easy way of screening it. A
spreadsheet with links to the deleted versions and to the google scholar
Quiddity,
Thank you for your reply!
On 3/19/19 9:06 PM, quiddity wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 3:58 AM Svetlana Belkin
wrote:
Hello all,
I know there is a FOSS portal
Links/examples almost always help!
I'd guess you mean this page or the pages it links to:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 3:58 AM Svetlana Belkin
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I know there is a FOSS portal
Links/examples almost always help!
I'd guess you mean this page or the pages it links to:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FLOSS-Exchange
but many other people won't know what you're referring
Dear fellow Wikimedians,
In the coming weeks, we will host community conversations[1] around the
Movement Strategy Process[2]. To follow up on Nicole’s earlier email[3], we
invite you to join in to gain a deeper look at the work done by the nine
working groups and to bring the perspective of your
Hello all,
I know there is a FOSS portal but are there any portals for other Open *
topics, such as Open Science (including citizen science), Open Access,
ect.? The rationale behind is to have these portals as umbrella groups
for resources and what's there in these big movement topics and
Dear fellow Wikimedians,
In 2017, we set ourselves an ambitious goal of becoming the essential
infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge, and now we need a
path for how we get there. In the spirit of what got us started – we
will work together to find our path.
We now have a fundamental
Hoi,
I read the blogpost and it utterly misses the point. The point is that this
is NOT about English Wikipedia, for them another approach will work better.
At the same time when you read my blogpost, you will find that the elephant
in the room is that we consider articles to be synonymous with
