>
>
> I'm not quite sure I understand that. Can you maybe explain how the
> Committee does currently determine the recommended amount? I mean,
> practically speaking. I would have guessed that you do discuss indiviual
> aspects and quantify the impact on your recommended allocation.
>
>
>
Practical
r feedback. I am not certain, though,
if we will be able to do so in the future in all cases (but we may try,
when possible).
best,
dariusz "pundit"
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:43 PM, pajz wrote:
> Hi Dariusz,
>
> On 23 November 2014 at 14:04, Dariusz Jemielniak
> wrote:
or myself, I believe that the more our movement is relying
on various resources (including technologies) the better.
best,
dariusz "pundit"
--
__________
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i centrum badawczeg
hi Gerard,
you seem to mix two things: one is the FDC, the other is WMF and its funds
processing practices. I can only speak for my part in the FDC (but I
generally agree that funding scheme and policies require thinking over, and
I definitely do not think there should be a "second class citizens
s who submitted
annual plan grant proposals to the FDC.
On behalf of the FDC,
Dariusz Jemielniak ("pundit", FDC Chair)
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Proposals/2014-2015_round1
[3]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants
i/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
__
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry
Jessie has been a tremendous help in the FDC process, and her
professionalism will be difficult to replace. I hope she'll be back!
Dariusz Jemielniak "pundit"
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Anasuya Sengupta
wrote:
> Dear friends and colleagues,
>
> Many of who have a
for smoother communication).
My experience within the FDC has shown that volunteer-driven bodies are
quite effective at such tasks, when provided with necessary organizational
support.
best,
dariusz "pundit"
--
______
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik kate
. but
> we all know from our daily lives that we do tend to not like these levels
> and bureaucracy.
>
> erik, please can you tell me one good reason what hinders you to tackle the
> source of all this, and rework the mediaviewer use case(s)?
>
> devils adcocate mode out.
>
> r
s.wikimedia.org/pipermail/rcom-l/2013-December/000600.html
> > [3]
> >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Research_talk%3ASubject_recruitment&diff=9220467&oldid=9220082
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mai
at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
__
dr hab. D
rg
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
imedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> _______
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wi
rk, and central to our mission, but here was lumped
> > > > in with administration. The last point is indicative of a larger
> > > > blind spot, I think.
> > > >
> > > > I also appreciate the emphasis on regular checks of our work against
> a
&
stance, from start '''1 April 2014''').
* The complaint should be submitted on wiki, through the FDC portal page
designated for this purpose [5]
* The ombudsperson will receive and publicly document the complaint, and
investigate the complaint, as needed.
___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailt
a.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lane Rasberry
> user:bluerasberry on Wikipedia
> 206.801.0814
> l...@bluerasberry.com
> __
ica. The
> quarterly reporta could help a lot, and they indicate required metrics, but
> don't specified them. I could og dreper into this If required.
>
> Erlend
>
> Den lørdag 10. mai 2014 skrev Dariusz Jemielniak
> følgende:
>
>> hi Erlend,
>>
>> th
uest,
> > > and
> > > > implies that the FDC itself had no role in this decision.
> > > >
> > > > The WMF/FDC staff have made it very clear that they have not
> completed
> > > any
> > > > assessment report in relation to the WMF r
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
is reasonable to involve a separate entity, and
the second largest one in the movement seems to us as a good choice.
In any case, I understand your concerns. In our collective decision the
pros prevailed over cons, simply.
best,
dariusz "pundit"
--
__
d
n
where they assess a project which includes their own department. WMDE staff
has a lot of experience in using different metrics, and understands our
movement. The FDC can request any the movement stakeholders specifically
for comments, and so it did.
best,
dariusz "pundit"
--
_
scribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https
l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> _______
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimed
ikimedia Foundation itself)
> > >
> > > >
> > > > As a side note, this is the only point that I will keep from Rupert's
> > > > email: this decision completely ignores international cultural
> > > &
תנדבים הפעילים גם בקבוצות עבודה בינלאומיות - אנחנו
> צריכים כל דקה פנויה שלכם, וצריכים שתשקיעו את מרב המאמצים שלכם בבית - עזרו
> לוויקימדיה ישראל להתאושש, להתחזק ולהוכיח לתנועה שהיא יכולה לממש את רוב
> תכנית העבודה שהכריזה עליה, אך גם לבנות תשתית שתאפשר תלות עתידית נמוכה יותר
> בהחלטות חד צדדיות חריפות שכא
hus I don't think it is reasonable
to narrow the possibilities that much. What Mike Peel wrote in the other
thread makes sense though and is an option that the Board may consider (if
they find it useful).
best,
dj "pundit"
--
______
dr hab. Dariusz Jemiel
list
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing
ia Deutschland e.V.
> > > Tel.: +49 - 30 - 219 158 260
> > > Twitter: @pavel
> > > _______
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://list
n place could not be the
> ideal to ensure fair participation (where all stakeholders are present, and
> individual volunteers are not inconvenienced by having to pay from their
> personal pockets for either food, travel or accommodation just to
> participate).
>
> Best regards,
> B
ribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.w
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Craig Franklin
wrote:
>
>
> I was thinking more along the lines of a centralised disclosure list where
> people can say "My name is X, my user account is Y, and I am doing paid
> editing on article Z". Such a thing would of course invite a lot more
> scrutiny on
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
> Yes, but the question is how to enable such a system. If the rules for
> paid editors were to be very strict - many paid editors would have
> still decide to do it in secrecy anyway,
oh, but there will ALWAYS be those lurking in the shado
t; VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-r
expense of the movement.
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikim
for the
community, and then withdraw.
best,
Dariusz Jemielniak "pundit"
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Geoff Brigham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The consultation<
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Logo/Request_for_consultation
> >has
> been closed on the
t;
> On 29 November 2013 14:01, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
>
> > hi Nicole,
> >
> > thank you for the correction, and many apologies that a lack of prompt
> > communication from the side of the FDC and FDC staff has resulted in
> some
> > misunderstanding in this
...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
>
> --
> Nicole Ebber
> Leiterin Internationales
> Head of International Affairs
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
> Tel. +49 30 219158 26-0
>
> http://wikimedia.de
>
>
On behalf of the FDC,
"pundit" Dariusz Jemielniak (FDC Chair)
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Framework_for_the_Creation_and_Initial_Operation_of_the_FDC
[2]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_round1
[3] https://meta
ocal discussions of wider importance
should be referred to the wider community, etc).
best,
dj "pundit"
--
______
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i centrum badawczego CROW
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
hi Theo,
Actually, no. The board and WMF both have a legal existence and basis. FDC
> as a committee, albeit a board mandated one sits on the same or equal
> footing as Langcom or Comcom, slightly above OMGcom, as far as I'm
> concerned. It has little to no real world existence. Second, the WMF b
e made to
> recruit more women to the committee.
>
> I hope now you see the source of my impressions of the FDC, and why I am
> skeptical about certain parts of its role and execution.
>
>
>
--
__
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kie
and the Board overrules them,
the community will decide which of these two bodies went wrong.
best,
Dariusz Jemielniak ("pundit")
--
__
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i centrum badawczego
t for 2014-2015.
After internal considerations within FDC and discussion with key
stakeholders including Sue herself, FDC has now taken the below position
regarding WMF participation in FDC process.
best,
Dariusz Jemielniak ("pundit")
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue
org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l>,
> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@**lists.wikimedia.org<
> wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org>
> >> ?subject=**unsubscribe>
-
> Wikimédia France | Association pour le libre partage de la
> connaissance | Visitez notre blog http://blog.wikimedia.fr
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
>
> Thanks for the question. I believe it's already answered in our message:
> «If *the WMF and community* need time to find the right solution [...]»
> etc. (bold added).
thank you for the answer! It was not entirely clear to me - and
es
> * [4]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-September/045702.html
>
> ___________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
>
> All the options of "external training" I'm aware of are cheaper than
> international workshops (I don't know about Boardsource and specially-hired
> consultants).
you mean locally organized training? Perhaps, especially if the boa
l-request@**lists.wikimedia.org<
> wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org>
> > ?subject=**unsubscribe>
> >
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/m
at in some cases the results will not
be easily quantifiable. As long as entities realize that and reflect on the
reasons of the impossibility to measure results, I myself would not see any
problems with accepting such an approach.
Typically, all good ideas have some outcomes that can be quantifie
/>
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> >
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedi
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
>
>> hi Florence,
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry
>>
>> sockpuppeting is using more than one account in the same time. There are
>> legitimate situations when users have a
ikimedia-l mailing list
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org
>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l>
>>
>>
>
>
> __**_
>
verse about "overheads" and
> > staffing.
> >
> http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pallotta_the_way_we_think_about_charity_is_dead_wrong.html
> >
> > With Wiki-Love,
> > Deryck
> >
> > PS. I wish there was an approp
hi Jeromy-Yu,
thank you for sharing this personal note.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Jeromy-Yu Maximilian Chan <
jerry.tschan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As we aware of problem, we are run out of way to improve, it is bottleneck
> we need to tackle. So the FDC decision suggests chapter like us s
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Moreover, it's well known that the FDC decisions are based also on
> "context" i.e. private information not part of the proposals or discussions
> thereof.
> It's normal for people outside WMF not to understand them fully, and after
>
hi Federico,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> 1.5. In summary, I must protest against the narrative of Deryck's letter,
>> wherein WMHK's proposal was rejected by malevolent WMF staff with a secret
>> anti-WMHK agenda [...]
>>
> I didn't read anything like that in
hi Asaf,
a short comment on two things:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> 1.4. It is my understanding, from reading the FDC recommendation (and
> without any "inside information" -- I was not part of the deliberations),
> that the FDC has reviewed the WMHK application with
this helps our colleagues understand the context in which the FDC
> > recommendations were made, and I am sorry I was forced to dwell on points
> > of weakness, but it seems to me our public process and this public
> > discussion have left no other choice. Like everyone else, I'd much
>
hi Erlend,
I want to shortly comment on your letter, which raises legitimate concerns,
in my view, and I would like to address them.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Erlend Bjørtvedt wrote:
> However, the gap between the legitimate demands of a donation-backed
> funding process, and the resour
___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
--
__
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania
t; >
> > This sort of disastrous outcome seems, IIRC, precisely what chapters
> > were expecting, and were up in arms about, when the WMF first asserted
> > absolute control of the funding. These arguments being what WMF staff
> > decided they weren't interested in l
On behalf of the FDC,
"pundit" Dariusz Jemielniak, (Chair)
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Framework_for_the_Creation_and_Initial_Operation_of_the_FDC
[2]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2012-2013_round2
[3]
h
________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.
le concern for
> community members.
>
> -- Tomasz
>
>
> __**_
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l<https://lists.wi
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
--
__
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynar
tz
> >
> > Um abc
> > B.
> >
> > --
> > Barbara Dieu
> > http://barbaradieu.com
> > http://beespace.net
> >
> > ___
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > U
hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Guillaume Paumier
wrote:
> or more probably the Advisory board :)
> https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Advisory_Board
I meant the Board of Trustees, as I think that Sue's experience would be
really beneficial there (probably, for a "specific expertise"
on about Wikimedia-l:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> ___
> WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
> wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l
> ___
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:17 AM, James Heilman wrote:
> This case partly pertains to how we see as the Wikimedia Movement see
> the interactions between Jimmy Wales, the Wikipedia community and
> Arbcom. It would be interesting to get the perspectives of other
> language versions of Wikipedia.
well put. I think that clearly WMF legal department assumed that having the
trademark registered is such a good idea that it does not require a
dialogue with the community, while the symbolic beginnings and the history
of logo creation make such a move, especially without a prior discussion
and exp
can mute this dispute, as it diverts from the endowment
issue.
best,
dj
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Fae wrote:
> On 18 March 2013 13:24, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
> > Fine, let's call it strategy. Off-the-record, can you name some other
> > organizations, preferably
d any doubt it is also a good
reason to have an endowment for.
best,
dj
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Fae wrote:
> On 18 March 2013 12:14, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
> ...
> > As long as it is not really a strategy creation exercise, but rather an
> > imagination
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Fae wrote:
> As I have a MBA specializing in international strategy, hand in hand
> with a couple of decades as a consultant, I would count myself as
> having a basic understanding. ;-)
>
I'd assume it goes way beyond basics.
> Developing a strategy would requ
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> And I still don't see anything in your arguments supporting your theory
> that "in our case any vision and strategy of a
> long time horizon is a grave mistake", except the claim that, probably,
> all the institutions with endowments
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> I disagree. The "horizon for strategic planning" in the case of business
> is just making profit, so you can build dams or power plants with a 50 or
> 100 years timeframe in mind, sell them all ten years later to buy banks or
> other
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Fae wrote:
> The "sum of human knowledge" is not about internet technology of the
> moment, or limited to the next 5 years.
>
Absolutely! And this is a great vision. But adjusting strategy to this
vision requires understanding current technologies. Thus, it is
ustry we're in. It just does not make much
sense to create strategies and visions 100 years into the future in our
case.
best,
dj
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> Dariusz Jemielniak, 18/03/2013 10:03:
>
>> [...]The
>>
>> only business
gt;
> Thanks,
> Fae
> --
> fae...@gmail.com
> Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/mfae
>
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
--
___
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
> Of course it can legitimately represent only its members, while Jan-Bart
> suggests to claim that it somehow represents also non-members that don't
> mind participating in its discussions, by pretending they were invited to.
>
just a
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Nathan wrote:
> The model of voting delegates the casting of votes to members of the
> council; which are individuals, chosen by chapters. Purely from a
> practical perspective, it may not be possible for chapters to get
> council members in order by the deadline
hi Theo,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Theo10011 wrote:
> Why don't you start by asking those questions to WMF, then WMDE then WMUK
> and any other chapter filing a budget with FDC. This organization just had
> the bare minimum personnel spending it needed to accomplish the goals at
> the ti
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> Sorry, is it possible to identify in this "strange world" the key decision
> makers?
>
>
I don't understand what you mean. The Board is responsible for all
financial decisions of this sort also in terms of legal duty, it cannot
cede it to a
hi Fae,
> ... Is it fair to assume that the WMF will take a dim view of
> > FDC-allocated funds being transferred to the WCA? I'm sure no chapters
> > anticipating an FDC allocation would like to put that at risk.
>
> Would someone sitting on the FDC like to pick this one up?
>
there's nothing t
While I think I would definitely like to see WMF raise resources besides
the year-to-year needs so as to gradually build an endowment fund (clearly
it would have to be clear to the donors when contributing) I believe that
trying to maximize the fundraising each year could be dangerous (jeopardize
t
wrote:
> I spent the last twenty minutes writing that mail in English and now you
> say it is irrelevant? Boo...
> (by the way, in my last mail I was talking more general about the
> movement, not only about the FDC)
>
>
> 2012/11/16 Dariusz Jemielniak
>
>>
>> Also
ng list
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> >
> ___
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists
and the decision of the FDC.
> >>
> >> I sincerely hope for improvement in this area. It would be sad if the
> FDC
> >> would not be as transparent in its arguments as it could be. If you're
> >> unwilling to make this improvement at this point (since all
, I feel it would be a waste of your efforts if the
> arguments are so shallow.
>
> I am still hopeful you will change your mind, and add more reasoning to
> the cases.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Lodewijk
>
>
> 2012/11/15 Dariusz Jemielniak
>
>> hi Lodewijk,
&
's initial recommendation.
- Other members of the WMF Board may participate in the investigation if
approved by the Chair of the WMF Board.
on behalf of the FDC
Dariusz Jemielniak (Chair)
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2012-2013_round1
[2]
http://meta.wik
__
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
>
>
--
__
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
participating chapters. As expressed
>> earlier: this is the future of our funds dissemination and we will refine
>> the process, but this first round has exceeded my expectations on all
>> levels. Thanks everyone!
>>
>> Jan-Bart
>> (who now goes di
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dariusz Jemielniak
Date: Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:25 PM
Subject: FDC recommendations on funds allocation, Round 1, 2012-13
To: wikimediaannounc...@lists.wikimedia.org
The inaugural Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) is pleased to announce
Hi,
as the newly appointed Chair of the FDC, but expressing my personal
understanding, I support Anders' view. The narrowed focus means more
activities done through the chapters, and the community at large. Of course
the specifics will have to be established, but now WMF applies for their
non-core
_
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
>
>
>
--
__
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzani
201 - 296 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
