a) This is incorrect
b) how many years would "for several years" encompass?
David
On 9/5/17, Joseph Seddon wrote:
> WMF hasn't shown fundraising banners to logged in users for several years.
>
> Regards
> Seddon
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guideline
vid,
>
> Would you mind elaborating on the first point? I vaguely recall test
> banners being shown to logged in users, but don't recall seeing one myself
> while logged in for a while.
>
> Best,
> Lodewijk
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:16 PM, David Emrany wrote:
>
>&g
eddon
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I would refer to my answer I gave on the forked thread relating to this
> topic.
>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2017-
> September/088570.html
>
> Regards
> Seddon
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Davi
ing that up in a *separate* thead.
>
> you're going more and more off topic. I suggest that we return to the
> question
> at hand: the two stage loading problem.
>
> lodewijk
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:41 AM, David Emrany
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Joseph
>
I am appalled that anybody is seriously suggesting "paid editing" be
institutionalized.
The real issue to be addressed are the large number of trustees,
staff, Arbcom members, and
administrators who are undisclosed paid editors and who ensure that
uninterested editors are driven away.
What do you
Hi Brion
When you refer to patches with other movements / affiliates, are you
proposing that WMF sponsors more Gibraltrapedias ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibraltarpedia
Have we forgotten so soon the adverse media publicity about these
stealth PR campaigns
"Once Wikipedia becomes a pay-to-pl
Hi David,
It would be even nicer if we have more editors editing voluntarily
instead of driving them away.
In the present scenario a University of Minnesota report by Aaron Halfaker says
"The declining number of editors is not due to the site's inability to
keep longtime editors contributing. Ins
Dear Anne
As a community member *I* am interested in knowing if WMF (or Jimmy)
is selling to Google - or to anybody else ... like the Chinese.[1]
David
[1] http://wikipediasucks.boards.net/post/762
On 3/1/16, Risker wrote:
> On 29 February 2016 at 20:43, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar
Dear Richard
Free as in beer ..or paid as in PR !!!
This is exactly the sort of PR paid editing for which Wikimedia-UK
(and the UK centric paid editing cabals) are notorious for.[1],[2],[3]
Do you seriously expect the community to believe that promoting a
web-page which starts off with an invest
Dear Erik,
Wikimovement veterans recall your invaluable assistance in arranging
the 3 million grant from the Sloan Foundation to WMF, so reading your
email, we also recall these quotes from the time of the Stanton
Foundation fiasco ? [1]
"The Executive Director and Chief Revenue Officer agree tha
uld be the simplest thing for WMF to insist on verification of WMF
user accounts, to ensure that minors cannot edit, or else to ensure
that anonymous editors must take responsibility for defamatory/biased
content..
David
On 3/1/16, Erik Moeller wrote:
> 2016-02-29 23:19 GMT-08:00 David Emrany :
&g
Dear David
I respectfully disagree. My point is that the "community" you refer to
is not a representative community at all. for eg. voices from Asia and
Africa are not properly represented here.
The community is incapable of policing itself because (to quote a
prominent WP criticism site) "the in
eone "tangentially involved" can state facts
with "absolute certainty".
Dave
On 3/1/16, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
> On 16-03-01 03:57 AM, David Emrany wrote:
>> What nobody is prepared to acknowledge is that only under Lila's term
>> some of the most blatant
Philippe
There is no public evidence of your misleading statements re years of
careful planning.and execution.
What there is public evidence of is that the WMF has systematically
evaded its enforcement responsibilities under the Terms of Use.
To cite 1 specific instance, Sue Gardner was repeated
Oliver
I have also been in the movement for over a decade, and I am sick of
people on all sides distorting facts, gaming the system / manipulating
the community.
IMO, this came to a boil in Dec 2006 when WMF altered its structure
and purpose and relocated followed by the "COO scandal" [1] and ot
Hi Adam
I believe you better understand how the robbery happened by studying
the way the composition of the Board and WMF's senior functionaries
rotated between 2005 to 2010. You can access these online from the
government websites where WMF filed them
David
On 3/9/16, Adam Wight wrote:
> I nee
Hi Adele
Can we have a clear picture of Wikimedia's ‘complicated’ relationship
with net neutrality - 1year on from the Washington Post story [1]
Can we also have specific figures on how much of WMF's traffic has
been lost / gained from key markets in Latin America and Asia after
regulators have b
Hi Eloquence
Since the "Mediawiki" trademark was lost to WMF the day you and
Anthere placed the logo into public domain [1], how can the WMF now
spin-off this new organization ?.
Am I correct in assuming the Mediawiki software can be forked by
anybody interested along with attribution ?
Regard
to do as you suggest as
> it is fully contrary to what we aim to achieve.
>
> What we are experiencing is a bump in the road. We have to deal with it but
> throwing the baby with the washing water? REALLY !!
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 19 March 2016 at 15:03, David Em
stakes are made and when that is a problem go elsewhere. When there is a
>> meaningful discussion anything is on the cards. So far this is not one.
>> Thanks,
>>GerarddM
>>
>> On 24 March 2016 at 09:04, David Emrany > > wrote:
>>
>> > Dear G
Hi Doc
Your sig
> The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
> www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
McAfee Site advisor tags it as a dangerous phishing site trying to
steal information.
Ploughing through the link leads instead to "a" Wikipedia web book on
"health care" which is edited mainly by you.
"Boo
You are aware that copyright law of India has specific procedures to
be followed for relinquishment or assignment of copyright and which
involves Registrar of copyrights or public notice (as defined in
Indian law) ?
Dave
On 5/5/16, sailesh patnaik wrote:
> Dear Nataliia ,
> Sharing the images un
Thanks Lodewikj for your excellent catches.
1. The form-990 covers the period from 01-July 2014 to 30-June 2015.
During which the payments of US$ 300,000 to Sue Gardner
(SpecialAdvisor) was comparable to Lila Tretikov's (E.D.)
2. The largest contractor was "Jones Day" US$ 1,742,916 (almost 2
mill
23 matches
Mail list logo