Will this be available online anywhere (either as a live stream or
archived)?
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 10:31 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
It's now mainstream. IWF representative to be present. I look forward
to dropping in the line Wikipedia smells of hammers. ([[Brass Eye]])
-
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:31 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
It's now mainstream. IWF representative to be present. I look forward
to dropping in the line Wikipedia smells of hammers. ([[Brass Eye]])
Apparently the image is on the the deluxe boxed set sold everywhere,
Lemme know when its on youtube so I can give it a listen.
:-D
David Gerard wrote:
It's now mainstream. IWF representative to be present. I look forward
to dropping in the line Wikipedia smells of hammers. ([[Brass Eye]])
- d.
___
WikiEN-l
It would seem that the IWF has backed down:
http://www.iwf.org.uk/media/news.251.htm
And Virgin Media have removed their block, at least. I can now see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer , including the image.
--
Owen Blacker, London GB
Say no to ID cards: www.no2id.net
Get your mits off
2008/12/1 Michael Shilliday mjshilli...@googlemail.com:
I have never commented here before, but why the need for a physical AGM?
Incorporated companies have been having online AGMs for years now. It may
be necessary for a small group of people to be sitting in a room together,
but the voting
On Dec 1, 12:37 pm, Michael Shilliday mjshilli...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I have never commented here before, but why the need for a physical AGM?
Incorporated companies have been having online AGMs for years now. It may
be necessary for a small group of people to be sitting in a room together,
2008/12/14 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
There are advantages in having in person meetings as well, though - it
gives us an opportunity to discuss things more informally and get to
know each other more that you can with an online meeting.
For an AGM, a meeting in person may be appropriate,
I just wanted to hear everyone's views about the role Wiki UK Ltd
played in responding to the IWF issues.
The general consensus among the Board was that we shouldn't really get
involved as we didn't yet have chapter status. Individuals were
encouraged to do what they could but the Board decided
2008/12/14 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
The general consensus among the Board was that we shouldn't really get
involved as we didn't yet have chapter status. Individuals were
encouraged to do what they could but the Board decided to stay stum
itself and leave David and others to take the
2008/12/14 AndrewRT ratur...@yahoo.co.uk:
I just wanted to hear everyone's views about the role Wiki UK Ltd
played in responding to the IWF issues.
The general consensus among the Board was that we shouldn't really get
involved as we didn't yet have chapter status. Individuals were
I would not have bothered to vote if I did not feel the board in some
way represented the community of which I am part.
There is an organization where I am a member for pragmatic reasons but
hate every proclamation they make (the AA: I want breakdown cover, not
rabid pro-polluting lobbying), but
Meetings with a large number of online or teleconferencing participants are
practical, provided those in the aether are receiving but not sending (except
maybe one at a time - for example Email the chair in advance if you want to
pose a question and have the chair dial you in when your slot
2008/12/14 jonathan cardy dah...@yahoo.com:
Meetings with a large number of online or teleconferencing participants are
practical, provided those in the aether are receiving but not sending (except
maybe one at a time - for example Email the chair in advance if you want to
pose a question
On Dec 14, 9:32 pm, Andrew Cates and...@soschildren.org wrote:
... for this kind of thing I think you
should feel we want you to speak and we'll let you know if we
disagree.
Even before we're officially a WMF chapter?
Andrew
___
Wikimedia UK
14 matches
Mail list logo
