On 06/05/13 18:12, Guillaume Paumier wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Short version: This mail is fishing for feedback on proposed work on
Gerrit-Bugzilla integration to replace code review tags.
I was wondering: has a decision been made
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Short version: This mail is fishing for feedback on proposed work on
Gerrit-Bugzilla integration to replace code review tags.
I was wondering: has a decision been made regarding this? I'm resuming
work on (notably)
Hi Niklas,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:54:05AM +0200, Niklas Laxström wrote:
On 14 March 2013 01:07, Christian Aistleitner
christ...@quelltextlich.at wrote:
Queries are just a grep away, and setting them can be done through git
as well, until we integrate that into gerrit.
Except that you
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:27:06AM +0100, Krinkle wrote:
Can git notes be changed after merge?
Yes.
Do they show in Gerrit diffs, so we don't accidentally lose them if
someone else pushed an amend without the tags?
No.
At least not yet :-)
Can they be removed after merge?
Yes.
And
On 14 March 2013 01:07, Christian Aistleitner
christ...@quelltextlich.at wrote:
Wouldn't git notes be a good match [1]?
They're basically annotations attached to commits. You can add/remove
them to any commit without changing the actual commit. And support
comes directly with git, as for
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 20:28 -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote:
If the problem is with the rigidity of keywords, one thing I should
note is that, in addition to tagging, there's also the whiteboard in
Bugzilla, which I believe you can use for free form stuff to query. I
believe Andre only enabled that
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:28:25PM -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote:
The Bugzilla-based solution has some of the advantages of the
MediaWiki-based solution. We may be able to implement it more quickly
than something native to Gerrit because we're already working on
Bugzilla integration, and we
Can git notes be changed after merge?
Do they show in Gerrit diffs, so we don't accidentally lose them if someone
else pushed an amend without the tags?
Can they be removed after merge?
Can one query for commits having a certain tag within a repo/branch/author?
(eg. fixme commits by me in mw
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Christian Aistleitner
christ...@quelltextlich.at wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:28:25PM -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote:
The Bugzilla-based solution has some of the advantages of the
MediaWiki-based solution. We may be able to implement it more quickly
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 17:09 +0100, Christian Aistleitner wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:43:44AM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Are there some thoughts already how to make a match between a
project in Gerrit and its related Bugzilla product/component?
[Disclaimer: I'm a fan of DOAP metadata
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Wasn't aware of that. Are there projects in Gerrit that don't use
bugzilla.wikimedia.org? A lot of MediaWiki extensions, I assume?
In that case we're back to the problem that you need a URI value for the
bugtracker.
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks,
Short version: This mail is fishing for feedback on proposed work on
Gerrit-Bugzilla integration to replace code review tags.
I preferred that if we were going to have our own hacky solution, it
should
Hello!
quote name=Guillaume Paumier date=2013-03-12 time=15:03:04 +0100
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks,
Short version: This mail is fishing for feedback on proposed work on
Gerrit-Bugzilla integration to replace code review tags.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org wrote:
4) A Gerrit-based tagging plugin would need some engineering that might
not be apparent at first blush, for example: who can set tags and remove
them? Does that vary by tag? How could I, for example, keep track of all
Doing the tags in Gerrit is the right thing.
Who can change them is not a problem, just make a changetags log. (BTW,
you would have the same problem in bugzilla with people removing that
superimportant tag)
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Hi Guillaume,
Good point. Comments below...
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Guillaume Paumier
gpaum...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Short version: This mail is fishing for feedback on proposed work on
Gerrit-Bugzilla
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:14 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org wrote:
4) A Gerrit-based tagging plugin would need some engineering that might
not be apparent at first blush, for example: who can set tags and remove
Hi Andre,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:43:44AM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Are there some thoughts already how to make a match between a
project in Gerrit and its related Bugzilla product/component?
[Disclaimer: I'm a fan of DOAP metadata files, if used properly.]
While DOAP looks great, is
On 10 March 2013 03:11, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks,
Short version: This mail is fishing for feedback on proposed work on
Gerrit-Bugzilla integration to replace code review tags.
Interesting idea. I can imagine Bugzilla integration working fine for
filing fixmes - not so
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 17:11 -0800, Rob Lanphier wrote:
The solution that Chad and I discussed is an addition to the
Bugzilla-Gerrit plugin that Christian is already working on. The idea
would be that, for any given revision, there would be a file bug
about this revision link. Following that
Hi folks,
Short version: This mail is fishing for feedback on proposed work on
Gerrit-Bugzilla integration to replace code review tags.
Long version:
One feature of our old code review system that was a tagging system
that made it quick and easy to assign a keyword to a revision at any
time.
21 matches
Mail list logo
