No im not falling for that trap. Your example used a 100% node to node
connection rate, that is not reasonable for wireless.
2 to 5 radios/node is. This reduces the network update messages. My idea
with a 3 radios is 1 BH AP, 1 BH CPE, 1 Client
AP. The BH CPE should be smart enough to know where
John, I hope you didn't have too much Churrasco and Vino ...
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, February 27,
Jack Unger wrote:
You raise some good points... and here are some more differences
between Matt's fully-meshed WIRED network example and the real-world
conditions under which WIRELESS mesh networks are so often deployed
today.
My example actually used wireless P2P links, although it was
Dallas' airBand Communications Inc. is earmarking some of its new $8
million round of funding for an expansion into Austin.
http://www.bizjournals.com/industries/high_tech/internet/2006/02/27/austin_story6.html
Thank you.
Regards,
Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect
Jack,
Let me jump in with some more thoughts on wireless mesh:
I agree with you that RF engineering and RF limitations are not being
fully
considered in most mesh deployments. Most mesh designs I have seen are
theory based and assume the full use of the unlicensed spectrum at
Hi All,
There's the latest that I've gotten from Ellen Burton at the FCC. Hopefully
this explains a bit better about which connections count for the form 477
and who needs to fill them out.
If you have any questions please cc me off list. It's looking like it's
gonna be another really
Thank you, all of you, who worked with WISPA to get those comments on
the 04-186 issue. We all owe a special thanks to our new friend Frannie
Wellings at Free Press also. She has been absolutely key in helping make
this issue appear on the legislative radar. The dream may actually come
true
This is great news. In looking at some info about the bills, I am wondering if want to ask for some of the whitespace to be made quasi-licensed, not unlicensed. I would love to have some channels that I know will not be used by anyone within 50 miles of where I use them. Not sure what it
Brian,
Exactly. You hit the nail on the head. The high noise levels combined
with not enough license-free frequency space combined with
unrealistically high traffic-handling expectations is going to doom most
public Wi-Fi-based municipal networks to extinction while at the same
time,
Thanks Kris!
For those that don't know him, Kris is a telecom attorney who's been a HUGE
friend to the WISP industry.
http://www.lokt.net/
Laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865
Jack,
For myself, loss, physical integrity and possibly swr.
Others might have other things to add.
My own testing here with a repeatable lash up of my own devising has
shown some pigtails being 12db! down from apparently identical
pigtails.
While I can not be sure of the absolute
Jack,
When a dropping the pigtail off the desk breaks the connection to the
N-Femail connector, that is just not acceptable.
SWR should be low if loss is low, but, I have a pigtail here that is
asymmetrical more loss on tx than on rx.In my experience, at
lower frequencies, that is
Hi Blair
I found this company on the star-os site:
Phillip Stiles
Sales
*MRO Electronic Supply Ltd*
5, 1247, 36 Av. N.E.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T2E 6N6
403-291-0501
800-882-9301
FX:403-291-0530
From what was posted, it sounded like they manufacture custom quality
pigtails that are
Can anyone share experiences with the Tranzeo 5824F
series? Looking for a BH solution that supports QoS and is upwards of 50
Mb and reliable. Ive looked at this, Ceragon and Waverider. Any insights
are much appreciated.
Chris Cooper
Intelliwave
--
WISPA Wireless List:
If you never thought you had a voice in D.C. then you were wrong. I was
starting to think a person could not make a difference until I started
seeing what we have seen of late from D.C. The access to television
channels spaces is the biggest step we could have ever hoped to make in
providing
Lonnie,
What I might not have made clear in previous posts, MESH is to broad a term
to discuss. The way most people would deploy MESH networks today, I feel is
flawed.
I'm referring to wireless with large number of hops between end to end
points to blanket an area.
However, I agree and its
Brian, Exactly my thoughts. And I'm with you in the show me category. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Brian Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:01 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Basic Mesh Theory
Jack,
Let me jump in with some
As I recall the 60 GHz band has the problem of major attenuation because the
oxygen molecules resonate at 60 GHz which means normal free space loss
linear calculations have an anomaly at that range (which is why there is so
much spectrum for unlicensed use). You make an excellent point about all
It uses a 5.7-8 GHz radio for backhaul and 2.4 GHz for access.
Thats the first mistake of the gear. It should take advantage of 5.3Ghz and
5.4Ghz, for creating its backhauls. Using 5.8Ghz for short range backhauls,
just means that they plan to go head to head against Super Cell providers.
I am in agreement. Mesh is being abused by some people. Mesh is a
routing mechanism in the same way that RIP and OSPF are routing
mechanisms. You don't build a RIP or an OSPF, but rather you employ
RIP or OSPF to organize and automate your routing. That is all we are
doing with OLSR, just
Roger Peters - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 210-601-7727 - You can call him anytime - he'll answer your call even if he's in the shower ! God he sings horribly !
JohnnyO
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:50 -0500, Blair Davis wrote:
After discovering a 5db variance in the pigtails I have when tested at
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
I am in agreement. Mesh is being abused by some people. Mesh is a
routing mechanism in the same way that RIP and OSPF are routing
mechanisms.
No. OLSR is a routing protoco like RIP/OLSR. Meshis a network design
like Bus, Star and Ring.
Mesh is overloaping Stars
22 matches
Mail list logo
