IMAIL 10 FAQ
http://tinyurl.com/8ytj4b
A) First make sure that your server meets the system requirements for the new
version of IMail. For instance, it would be a
good idea to make sure IIS is up and running with at least the default site.
Also, make sure that IIS is configured to use
.Net
Yes, you have an option through the setup wizard on the master side for
Link Symmetry
Options are, Symmetric Data Rate (1 to 1) Asymmetric Data Rate (2 to 1)
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Alan Long
Good question...We searched for a long time to find good 5.X wide band
omnis. Some were horrid, and others were good, but there are not a lot of
chocies.
The winner was Terrawave, distributed by Tessco.
http://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=321805eventPage=3
They are nicely
The TerraWave antenna looks exactly like the PacWireless model.
Perhaps it is manufactured in the same place in China, but is sold under
a different brand name?
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Good question...We searched for a long time to find good 5.X wide band
omnis. Some
Good advice Bob, but I'll add There is a purpose for each model, and for
that matter also a specific manufacturer, and all ODU is not always the best
choice.
For example... Trango boasts several core benefits, for some circumstances.
Its Giga Split archetiecture allows Coax installs to
Matt,
Yes, it looks similar. I as well guess that Terrawave might be OEMing them.
But...
Note: We have had good experience with PacWireless Omnis. But most all the
PAcwireless units are spec's as narrow band (5.3 or 5.8, not 5.1-5.8). This
does not mean that the PacWireless units can't do
Dennis Burgess, Steve Coran and myself attended Animal Farm last week. I
would like to thank Chuck McGown and the staff of Wireless Beehive for
producing a very well run show. I would like to announce the following new
members that joined at Animal Farm. Motorola also joined as a Vendor Member
I just found one more new member, bringing the total to 19!
Applicant Name: David McBride
Applicant Company: SkyWire Communications
Please go to http://signup.wispa.org if you have not yet joined WISPA.
Respectively,
Rick Harnish
Tom, Are you the one behind http://www.tomshardware.com?
I elect you Grand Poobah of wireless hardware -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Poobah :)
All kidding aside, I find your post to be most descriptive and
informative. I most truly appreciate it!
-RickG
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:00 AM,
Thanks man.
PS. I am not affiliated with Tom's hardware, but I have respected him since
my earliest PC days.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent:
I just received an email from a vendor that sells competing products to
Trango. The email said: I don't know if you are aware of this but Trango
just recently let their complete engineering staff go so you may want to
consider another product.
Can anyone confirm/refute this? I have been
I have heard this a few times myself... although from what I heard it was
mostly their point to multipoint product engineers.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
Rick Harnish wrote:
I just found one more new member, bringing the total to 19!
I thought they weren't members until they actually paid?
(I know this sounds like a smart-ass remark, but the distinction may be
relevant in the future. If there were an election next week, say, they
wouldn't be
This is completely UNTRUE! I would like to find out who sent you this
email because it is absolutely false and slanderous. If you don't mind
I would really appreciate if you could send me a copy of the email
off-list. Thank you very much.
John Seaman
Trango Systems, Inc.
John, as you know we also heard this rumor some time ago and brought it to
your attention. It'll be interesting if it's the same source.
You know you're making an impact when the competition stoops to a level like
this.
Keep up the good work!
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From:
Umm. Coming from a competitor, I would not trust that comment.
I have no knowledge of what engineering staff Trango has or hasn't recently
let go.
I know that the typical people that I deal with at Trango are still there,
and have been there for years.
I will say, Trango has always made their
Officially you are correct. However, after visiting face to face with these
applicants at Animal Farm, I tend to trust that they will make good on their
commitment to join WISPA.
Respectfully,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
I believe (but not sure) Ceragon was the first with a DPRM mount.
But agree with everything else
:-)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:32:12
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
I'd like to point out that my comment comes from some things I heard
probably 6 months or so ago...
Guess its one of those rumors that won't die :-)
I'd also be interested who said it... interesting that someone feels that
they need to say something like that to win your business.
Daniel White
Or shame them in to joining. Whatever works.
LOL
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Rick Harnish rharn...@greatamericanbroadband.com
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:46:33
To: 'WISPA General List'wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Additional New Member
I was browsing around Newegg over the weekend and ran across this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16825184001
XOHM Modem by ZyXEL - $75
Is that pricing typical for 2.5GHz Wimax CPE? Is it locked down for
use with XOHM?
thanks
A lot of the more expensive radios out there let you do bandwidth
throttling by device - instead of throttling by IP address, or device
MAC (because you could have several MACs behind one radio), you simply
say this radio gets X down/Y up and you're done.
Is there a simple way to do this with
You can use Radius and MAC authencation to deliver up and down bw at the
AP/CPE ... Need to have a MT client though.
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik
I replied back to John offlist with the basic source. I am glad to know it
is not true.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:21 PM, John Seaman j...@trangosys.com wrote:
This is completely UNTRUE! I would like to find out who sent you this
email because it is absolutely false and slanderous. If you
Tom,
The last quotes I have done have put Bridgewave much cheaper than Dragonwave
for 1.2Gpbs... although Dragonwave by far has a range benefit to it.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Or radius and a pppoe client.
On 1/19/09, Dennis Burgess - Linktechs.net dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
You can use Radius and MAC authencation to deliver up and down bw at the
AP/CPE ... Need to have a MT client though.
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik
On Jan 19, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Charles Wu (CTI) wrote:
3. No -- while you *could* do PtMP -- problem is antenna beamwidth
requirements (and interference protection minimums)
Use the side lobes Luke.
-Matt
Hi Jason,
no experience with that but we have 5Ghz antennas covered with many
different hum.. outdoor disgusting thing and it still works fine.
So, unless the ashes are mixed with iron or E.M. metal, I think it would
not change much.
Just my 2 cents.
Anyone have experience with 2.4 gear
Is there a way to limit the bandwidth by the user registration table.
Example: All users in registration table get x download and x upload
unless other changed manually.
Is this possible? I've been wanting something like this as well.
-Cameron
-Original Message-
From:
You're refering to Fly Ash. Be careful inhaling that stuff, it can
cause some serious problems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly_ash
-Chad
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Jason supp...@azii.net wrote:
Anyone have experience with 2.4 gear getting coated with ashes? Really
fine coal ashes
Last I checked the DragonWave fell short of BridgeWave in raw
throughput/payload capacity. The AR80X-AES we have deployed will produce
line speed 1000Mbps with AES256 encryption. I don't think DragonWave can
pull that off. If so, please share the details as we're close to deploying
another
With MT clients, yes this is possible. If you have a simple subnet you
can do PCQ as well in in your queues if you wish too.
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc --
If you are using Mikrotik for both AP's and CPE's, you can use the
Default AP/Client Tx Rate settings under the wireless tab on your
wireless interface properties.
If you're not using Mikrotik clients it will only be able to control the
AP Tx(client download) speeds.
If you add the customers
We are using MT AP's with Nanostation SU.
-Cam
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gerard Dupont III
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Really Simple Mikrotik shaping?
If you
then down yes, up no. The Nanos, you can use pCQ to do a default rate
limit.
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services*
*Office*:
Thanks Brad! I guess the rumor mill is running out of new rumors so
they are recycling some old ones.
As I mentioned, our engineering resources are well intact. In fact for
anyone interested, I would like to make an invitation to come see for
yourself and visit us at our facilities in the
Daniel
So for a Duo link, I need what kind of license? Channel size?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of 3-dB
Channel size depends on the band... but you need whatever the largest
channel size is.
Then you need four licenses basically... V pol and H pol with two different
frequencies.
As I said Bridgewave is a much cheaper solution... but depending on what you
need the Dragonwave solution might be more
Charles,
Thanks for the clarification on no ptmp.
However, it should be noted that 24Ghz PtMP does exist, via other product
lines. My understanding is that XO currently does it here in DC, at one of
our cell sites. I can't remember what gear they use to accomplish it. (maybe
Hughes?) I do not
24 ghz? Maybe 28 Ghz
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:12 PM
To:
Good point Matt.
My original comment/thoughts were not to bypass licensing requirements per
link.(meaning in PtMP, with 2 CPEs and one shared radio, it would require
two path analysises). It was to minimize interference, and colocation fees,
when installing multiple links to several Customer
If it matters any I know Exalt has played around with reusing 6GHz licenses
since I guess they cover a pretty wide area... the gear is now much better
than the rules are. I don't recall all of the details except that if you
had once license you could be able to sneak another link in using the
Brad,
Well, it can't with 2 radios. But it can with Dragonwave DUO combining 4
links for a total of 1400mbps. And Trango Apex at 700mbps is getting pretty
close.
But that is not my point. I personally do not think that peak capacity is
the big factor in a buying decission for WISPs..
Once you
24GHz was setup specifically for PtP. However, I'd like to see 60GHz have a
PtMP product. I understand the range would be limited, but it would give a
lot of bandwidth in that short range. Great for office parks.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:31 PM, 3-dB Networks wi...@3-db.net wrote:
If it
We currently use Radius to apply up and down BW throttling at the MT AP,
without MT clients. Some are some are not, but works the same. Also as
mentioned through the Access List you can set the throttling on the wireless
link rather than through a queue.
Best Regards,
Joel
Message: 17
Date:
A customer came to us looking for gigabit speeds between buildings and had
the money to pay for it. So, we quoted an 80GHz link w/2ft antennas with
over 2 hours of down time and a licensed Dragonwave link that would do
300Mbps w/5 minutes of downtime at half the price.
Once they saw both in the
I think you'll find the products which are sold as
inverters (Xantrex for example) which have built in battery chargers
will have a quicker recharge time because they are engineered for
folks who run a generator for a few hours and then invert off the
batteries the rest of the time. Most
Tom,
Wow?!? Four links as in eight radios or two links and four radios? Either
way that'll require some real estate!
You're making assumptions that 1Gbps isn't needed at the time of
installation and ROI is pushed out. Neither could be the case. (e.g. It
wasn't in our selection of BridgeWave)
I fully agree.
I'll add... the value of millimeterwave is 80Ghz, to actually have a license
for next to free. The FCC created that for provider's benefit, not for
manufacturers to charge us more and put the savings in their pockets. The
truth is that 80Ghz takes the same cost to make as
Well Brad,
I never said Bridgewave didn't have a viable market. Nor that Bridgewave
wasn;t a good decission for your application.
When someone actually needs a GB, its a heck of a good deal.
I can give an example of a WISP that has a cell tower, that agregates
300mbps licensed links, but needs
Half mile? Ours is almost 2.5miles in an RF unfriendly rain zone. The link
has been up for more than a year and the client has been thrilled. So
thrilled in fact that we've got another planned for them with a roadmap of
more to follow.
They're happy with the price and we're happy with the
Thank You! Nuf said!
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:34:51 -0500
Or radius and a pppoe client.
On 1/19/09, Dennis Burgess -
Many client radios can do pppoe as well as Windows has it's own pppoe
client I am told that works quite well.
On 1/20/09, Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com wrote:
Thank You! Nuf said!
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: Josh Luthman
53 matches
Mail list logo
