On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:50 PM, John Thomas jtho...@quarnet.com wrote:
If you are big enough, or if you are multihomed you can get PI space
But you only get 3.14 addresses at a time. :-) (Sorry, could not resist)
Scriv
: [WISPA] ARTICLE - What's the U.S. Doing Wrong with Broadband ?
Want to truly take nothing? Seriously?
The mere existence of the Internet is due to government funding. The
wires
that connect your little corner of Oregon to the great wide world?
Probably
wouldn't have happened without
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 6:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ARTICLE - What's the U.S. Doing Wrong with Broadband ?
In many ways this is certainly true. Look at the Roman water systems and
roads.
Where are the Romans now?
Oh, never mind.
lol
marlon
rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
This after renumbering and re-routing about 100 clients.So, then, I had
to find a way to revert everyone bak to the OLD provider All that was
on the OLD hardware. I got done (gave up) after getting most of the
clients working about 11 pm. Worked
...@mvn.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ARTICLE - What's the U.S. Doing Wrong with Broadband ?
rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
This after renumbering and re-routing about 100 clients.So, then, I
had
to find a way
BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:51:49
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ARTICLE - What's the U.S. Doing Wrong with Broadband ?
no, don't have my own space yet.
The renumbering isn't
If you are big enough, or if you are multihomed you can get PI space
John
David E. Smith wrote:
rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
This after renumbering and re-routing about 100 clients.So, then, I had
to find a way to revert everyone bak to the OLD provider All that was
The fact is, the only things we're doing wrong, is allowing too much
subsidy, too many barriers to entry into the business, and too much tax
money to be gobbled up.
In all of these countries with so-called great broadband, how much is
ACTUALLY spent by the consumers and taxpayers? Nobody
Want to truly take nothing? Seriously?
The mere existence of the Internet is due to government funding. The wires
that connect your little corner of Oregon to the great wide world? Probably
wouldn't have happened without government subsidies. The same is true
around the world. A lot of the
Why on earth should it be?
End the monopolies and end subsidies.
There's no excuse under the sun for that to be.
NONE
\
insert witty tagline here
You're in the wrong industry to invent a moral highroad about government
subsidisations. Telecomm is
I don't post on DSLreports, but here's my opinions with the various stories
mentioned here and the sometimes illinformed commenters.
1. Painting all broadband providers as greedy isn't accurate. Greed is part of
the problem, but not all of it. Nothing unique about that regardless of the
line of
The statistics might appear to be distorted in favor of whomever has an
agenda.
This country has always has an enormous percentage of immigrants, many of
whom require a generation to acquire the language and economics to
participate in infrastructure, the Internet notwithstanding.
Consequently,
I love it when some pundit tries to compare the U.S. to other developed
countries. Name one with our size population, spread out over such a huge,
geographically diverse, nation. Honestly, it just doesn't matter what Japan
or Korea do...they are smaller geographically than many of our individual
The one I can't figure out is: if the system is so corrupt now that the
incumbent lobbyists have a stranglehold on the nation's goverment,
how is more government regulation going to fix the problem?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
I love it when some pundit
14 matches
Mail list logo
