Airspan has an 802.16a 4.9 product ( Not wimax, because there is no interoperability and no profile for interop in 4.9 for wimax ) that they just got certified with the FCC. Give me an email if you want some pricing.-JeffOn Apr 10, 2006, at 4:14 PM, Jason Hensley wrote: Anyone have some pricing
Guys;
These all sound great. I was reading just a couple months back about a WISP
operator that had a severe problem. Just a few yards away, maybe 300 feet,
another guy put up his tower. I think they were both on 2.4 GHZ, and
someone suggested a different AP that would not even be
So... Who makes them?, how much?
Hi Richard,
This cloaking mechanism is the 5MHz and 10MHz channel sizes that
George was referring to on the Star WAR boards. Works really well and even
seems to improve signal quality.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All the details are on the Valemount web site
http://www.staros.com/starvx/
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Goodin
Sent: 11 April 2006 09:15
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/73487
*Avoiding MIMO*
/Professor warns: stick with 802.11g/
Posted 2006-04-10 13:22:06
Incorrectly advising users that new 802.11n gear won't work with old
hotspots, an article in the Boston Globe
Richard Goodin wrote:
Guys;
These all sound great. I was reading just a couple months back about
a WISP operator that had a severe problem. Just a few yards away,
maybe 300 feet, another guy put up his tower. I think they were both
on 2.4 GHZ, and someone suggested a different AP that
Hi,
Does anyone know actual TCP throughput with StarOS on their 533mhz
boards in just a point to point config, using 20mhz of spectrum?
Travis
Microserv
Paul Hendry wrote:
All the details are on the Valemount web site
http://www.staros.com/starvx/
Cheers,
P.
-Original
Anybody heard anything about this?
http://www.shorecliffcommunications.com/magazine/news.asp?news=4404
There is some movement right now as well to consolidate 158.7 Mhz. Its
licensed, guard band and a good chunk of it is almost empty with the
decline of national paging carriers. I haven't
I sure hope the hundreds of licenses on there don't get
upset
Still pretty active most places I travel.
- Original Message -
From: chris cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 8:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Xmax?
Travis, it's been awhile, but I think we got almost 40megs on the built
in star tcp test across 533 5gig PtP link.
Let me find the screen captures.I'm not positive.
Right now all my wars are running at 5MHz and 10MHz channel spacing,
unless theyare talking to wrap boards.
George
Travis
Richard Goodin wrote:
I have been planning my WISP for about a year, and have yet to begin
delivery of bandwidth to customers.
Since Canopy hasn't been mentioned yet, I'll mention it.
You really can't go wrong with a canopy installation. It works, even in
the presence of noise that would
I have installed my first MT system (RB532 w/daughterboard) and am happy
with it but using it only as an ethernet router at this point. It seems to
perform better than the Cisco L3 switch (C4840G) we replaced.
But I have not used the Mikrotik for an AP or PtP links. What about Mikrotik
That guy needs to do more research. AirGo MIMO is far better then the
other MIMO's products. Netgear
dumped the majority of its older MIMO in lue of AirGo because of these
reasons. Its pure misunderstanding
about AirGo mimo not working with old hotspots. I bought a Pre-N card
the week they came
As a former Canopy user, I would like to point out a couple of issues
not mentioned here.
1) Canopy is limited to vertical polarity in PTMP deployments. Trango
and many other systems can be deployed in horizontal polarity, pretty
much avoiding any Canopy in the area.
2) Canopy systems
Replies inline below:
Richard Goodin wrote:
I have been planning my WISP for about a year, and have yet to begin
delivery of bandwidth to customers. My choice for service delivery was
802.11b, but with increased competition from other services nearby
(about 5 miles away) I am wondering how
John Scrivner:
Sadly the best Wifi solutions available do not have 100% FCC
compliance. There are some that do though. Tranzeo is a good example.
Look at Tranzeo for your Wifi based gear needs.
Tranzeo is 100% FCC legal? I've been looking for the certs...
Jason
--
WISPA Wireless List:
Might I inquire as to where the dishes can be had for $40?
On 4/10/06, Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's on quantity 30 $149 each. 5.8ghz, dual polarity, up to 3
miles (add $40 for a dish and it goes up to 13 miles) and delivers up to
10Mbps. Hard to beat! And with
I sure thought I saw certs once on their site. I guess maybe you could
call them and ask for the URL to their FCC certs? If you see this then
passing those along here would sure be nice.
Thanks,
Scriv
Jason Wallace wrote:
John Scrivner:
Sadly the best Wifi solutions available do not have
To clarify,
I was looking specifically for AP's that were certified for 120deg
sectors. I Searched the FCC database and couldn't find anything about
the Tranzeos. YMMV, however. Can anyone clear this up? A link?
Jason
John Scrivner wrote:
I sure thought I saw certs once on their site. I
John Scrivner wrote:
I sure thought I saw certs once on their site. I guess maybe you could
call them and ask for the URL to their FCC certs? If you see this then
passing those along here would sure be nice.
Tranzeo in the past has played fast and loose with certificates besides
what they
Canopy will run with 3db of signal to noise separation, which is more
robust than 802.11b
For signal levels typically found in deployed equipment this is not true,
nor has it ever been true. The Canopy 3dB C/I is measured at stronger
signal
than typical deployment (unless all your SMs have
As we grow we have more of a need to outsource the billing/collections or hire
somebody inhouse
Is anybody outsourcing the billing?
Dan Metcalf
Wireless Broadband Systems
www.wbisp.com
781-566-2053 ext 6201
1-888-wbsystem (888) 927-9783
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
No
I believe that the atheros chipset is
capped at 35Mbps, although users of MT have claimed higher using very fast cpus.
I have several atheros/MT/nstream links
(PTP and PTMP) that push 30Mbps. Pretty impressive throughput, plus adjustable
channels, plus QoS for VoIP and all the other
Dan,
We had this discussion a few weeks ago, although it may have been on
another wireless list.
What processor and setup are you using to get 30Mbps? The fastest I
have seen with routerboard 532's in a p2p config is 20Mbps of TCP
traffic passing thru the RB's. Do you have outdoor
Im using a standard RB532, IP conn-track
off, I am using the pacwireless outdoor enclosures or the MTI pocket antennas
SR5 cards, nstream enabled, framer policy
dynamic size, limit-3200 is default 4000 works a little better but have
not tested w/ voip
Routing is faster than bridging
I use a lot of different hardware from
Trango, Karlnet, Proxim, and mikrotik polling systems generally perform
better than non-polling gps sync may scale even better
When I first used the trango 900 series I
liked having the simple design and very easy install unlike karlnet. But I
Using the 533 MHz IXP-420 we can get an Atheros to just over 35 mbps
of non compressible data and almost 90 mbps of compressible data.
Lonnie
On 4/11/06, Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan,
We had this discussion a few weeks ago, although it may have been on
another wireless list.
Dan,
I have talked with many people (including Butch Evans that is the MT
consultant) and he has never seen anything over 21Mbps with the RB532.
I have the exact configuration you have described running on a 9 mile
link and 17 mile link. With the 17 mile link, I have MT routers on
either
Lonnie,
Is that TCP or UDP?
Travis
Microserv
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
Using the 533 MHz IXP-420 we can get an Atheros to just over 35 mbps
of non compressible data and almost 90 mbps of compressible data.
Lonnie
On 4/11/06, Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan,
We
It is TCP. We do not use UDP since it gives a reading that will never
be seen by a customer doing an FTP download. We are looking at
building in iperf so we should be able to do tcp or udp tests in
future.
I have a network from Valemount, BC to McBride, BC that has about 100
km of repeater
How is any product qualified as 'Carrier-Grade'? What is it about
Alvarion VL that makes the cut vs. Canopy? Lord knows Motorola produces
far more 'Carrier-Grade' equipment than Alvarion ever will - so where
did they go wrong with Canopy?
Also, I've heard lately several complaints that Waverider
That is very impressive... :)
Travis
Microserv
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
It is TCP. We do not use UDP since it gives a reading that will never
be seen by a customer doing an FTP download. We are looking at
building in iperf so we should be able to do tcp or udp tests in
future.
I have a
Travis,
I have a StarOS PTP link using the 533mhz
WAR boards that get up to 33Mbps (TCP). Thats using CM9 atheros
cards and 2 PacWireless Dishes.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 8:28
AM
To: WISPA
Chad,
Based on your post, I just purchased a couple 533mhz boards with CM9
cards from Lonnie. :)
Travis
Microserv
Chad Halsted wrote:
Travis,
I have a
StarOS PTP link using the 533mhz
WAR boards that get up to 33Mbps (TCP). Thats using CM9 atheros
cards and 2
34 matches
Mail list logo
