Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-27 Thread Nathan Anderson
Markets Baicells Technologies, N.A. Mobile: +1.972.922.1443 Email: rick.harn...@baicells.com<mailto:rick.harn...@baicells.com> Follow us on Facebook for the latest news<https://www.facebook.com/BaiCells> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> [mailto

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-26 Thread Nathan Anderson
There has been a lot of talk about network performance both just by itself as well as compared to other products, but one thing I would be interested in hearing more discussion on -- assuming Baicells allows for it at this point -- is the configuration and management interface(s). Perhaps

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
Goldstein [f...@interisle.net] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 8:10 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it? On 6/19/2016 10:09 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote: > I believe that Patrick has said as much (not SDR) on the ISP Radio interview > with him back in April.

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
What is Baicells UE default MTU? I am not sure if all of the Telrad devices on the network (Compact & Breezeway) properly support jumbo frames. I can't remember which device it was -- I *think* it was the Breezeway -- but there was one I remember testing and found a hard MTU limit on (IIRC,

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net<mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote: Local offloading is a standard LTE feature. You do need an a device to do it, which in guessing Bai has built into their eNB. > On Jun 19, 2016, a

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
19, 2016, at 16:55, Nathan Anderson <nath...@fsr.com> wrote: > > Yeah, if you're already buying Telrad Compacts then you *probably* have a > Telrad core, so I don't see the appeal of hooking up Telrad eNB to Baicells > cloud core. > > But the idea of hooking up a Ba

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
un...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes [mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 2:20 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it? Local offloading is a standard LTE feature. You do need an a device to do it, which in guessing Bai has built in

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
So it sounds like you have made Baicells eNB talk to a Breezeway for authentication. Very cool. Re: VPLS, I could be wrong (and I haven't actually tried VPLS/VPWS on Telrad), but I don't believe the eNB has anything whatsoever to do with making that work. As far as it is concerned, it is

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
Yeah, if you're already buying Telrad Compacts then you *probably* have a Telrad core, so I don't see the appeal of hooking up Telrad eNB to Baicells cloud core. But the idea of hooking up a Baicells eNB to a Telrad core is interesting, considering the eNB price differential...use Compacts in

Re: [WISPA] Baicells - who's deployed it?

2016-06-19 Thread Nathan Anderson
To the second point, Azure is supposed to be good stuff. But to the first, if your users can't authenticate... -- Nathan From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Adair Winter [ada...@amarillowireless.net] Sent: Sunday,

Re: [WISPA] Look up DID owner

2016-06-13 Thread Nathan Anderson
Have you tried an LRN lookup? Feel free to hit me up off-list with the number in question. -- Nathan From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Chris Fabien Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 2:26 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Look up DID owner We

Re: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM

2014-05-15 Thread Nathan Anderson
Yeah, I've thought about trying a Raspberry Pi as a cheap, IP-only PBX. Should have more than enough oomph for a small office environment. We have had great success running Asterisk directly on MikroTik RouterBoards, inside of a MetaROUTER VM. Of course, both this solution and the Raspberry

Re: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM

2014-05-15 Thread Nathan Anderson
such discussions, and hopeful provide the same for yourself and or others. Agreed on both counts! -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM

2014-05-14 Thread Nathan Anderson
on the same principle? But I digress. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:32 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re

Re: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM

2014-05-14 Thread Nathan Anderson
trying to be consistent in the way that we approach both data and voice services. Treating IP routing one way (local router + LAN) and PSTN routing another (everything is hosted/in the cloud) just doesn't make sense to me. Again, thanks for the discussion! -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet

Re: [WISPA] Small IP PBX - Grandstream UCM

2014-05-14 Thread Nathan Anderson
the voice provisioning problem in the same way that we attack data provisioning, we give customers options and flexibility that allow us to serve customers we would otherwise have to turn away, or who wouldn't even give us a passing glance. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath

Re: [WISPA] OT Fax over Voip

2014-04-02 Thread Nathan Anderson
between the VoIP gateways and when it is plugged straight into an FXS provided to you directly from the CO? What error message does the fax machine spit out at you, if it does in fact spit one out? -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

Re: [WISPA] OT Fax over Voip

2014-04-02 Thread Nathan Anderson
, a dropped audio packet is a lost audio packet, not a delayed or even out-of-order audio packet (although those other two things can happen...they just aren't a result of retransmits, or at least not a retransmit initiated by Layer 4). -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

Re: [WISPA] OT Fax over Voip

2014-04-01 Thread Nathan Anderson
On Monday, March 31, 2014 8:51 AM, l...@mwtcorp.net wrote: I don't want to start a long thread about fax but --RANT [...snip excellent fax rant...] +1 -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless

Re: [WISPA] OT Fax over Voip

2014-04-01 Thread Nathan Anderson
to 14400bps or 9600bps. Hope this helps, -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless