RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-04 Thread Marketing
Regards, Ben Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 11:45 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Ben, A) Will these fit the models

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-04 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 7:47 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Hello Mark, Yes, the new model will work fine with the stock that distributors have on hand or parts that have been shipped in the past

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-04 Thread Marketing
: Thursday, January 04, 2007 9:22 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Thanks...to confirm... It sounds like the only thing that is different is the L-Bracket to make it the HDGD5X-XX? Mark Nash Network Engineer UnwiredOnline.Net 350 Holly Street Junction City

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-04 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
- From: Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:53 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion The L-Bracket is the main difference. The hardware included in the kit is also a bit different due to the fact that the L

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-04 Thread Marketing
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 9:58 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion ok, we're close... Help me out. I'm not familiar with your grid antennas at all, and therefore not familiar with your mounts, and I'm sure

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-04 Thread George Rogato
know if there are any other questions. Thanks, Ben Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 9:58 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-04 Thread Marketing
-bolt. Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Rogato Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:41 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Does this mount fit around a 2 galvi pipe? I think a 2 galvi

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-03 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 10:32 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Hello Tim, When purchasing the grids the next time, select the HDGD58-29 antennas. These come with a new L-Bracket that attaches

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2007-01-02 Thread Marketing
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Kerns Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 6:48 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Mac, Have PacWireless made any changes to the mount on the 29db grids... I have 4 in use

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-31 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Mac, Have PacWireless made any changes to the mount on the 29db grids... I have 4 in use and the mount isn't very solid. The grid deflects a lot in the wind. I can

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-31 Thread chris cooper
Can you share the method you use to link them up so quickly over such a distance? Thanks Chris I have aligned 5.8ghz links up to 73 miles (and even a test link at 137 miles) within 5 minutes start to finish. Is it possible you have another problem? -- WISPA Wireless List:

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-31 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, We use either a GPS at each side, or just bearing coordinates and a compass. I have aligned several links at 20+ miles only doing one side and then going to the other side and having a perfect signal. :) And actually the longer the distance the easier it becomes... most 5.8ghz dishes

[WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
I have usually used Trango backhauls, so I have not had to worry about 5 GHz antennas and what to choose. Now I'm going to try a MikroTik backhaul with a CM9. Currently, I've got two applications: 1. 2-mile link that I can perhaps use 5.3GHz over. 2. 8-mile link that I'll go 5.8GHz over.

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Travis Johnson
The PacWireless dishes, panels and grids (depending on the gain you need, mounting, etc.) all work well. Also, you don't need to adjust the power settings in the MT... just leave it default, it works better. Travis Microserv Mark Nash - Lists wrote: I have usually used Trango backhauls, so I

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Mac Dearman
dual polarity ext's. Mac Dearman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 1:12 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion I have usually used Trango backhauls, so I

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:18 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Mark, I have several 8 mile 5.3GHz links (YMMV) using PacWireless 26dbi grids, MT CM9's. IMHO you can't go wrong using the PacWireless antennas. I have built a wireless network that covers 12% of Louisiana

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Mac Dearman
unless you have to have the extra db that comes with a dish. Mac Dearman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 2:28 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:53 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion I do use their dishes where I have a large enough tower, water tower or a roof. I will tell ya though - - the 29dbi grids are mighty fine, much

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Gino A. Villarini
787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 5:07 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Thanks Mac and Travis... This does sound like a no-brainer

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Mac Dearman
:07 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Thanks Mac and Travis... This does sound like a no-brainer. How about a 12-mile link with 5.3 or 5.8? Mark Nash Network Engineer UnwiredOnline.Net 350 Holly Street Junction City, OR 97448 http://www.uwol.net 541-998

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Mark Nash - Lists
: Saturday, December 30, 2006 1:21 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion I have several 18 20 mile links using the MT RB532/SR5 w/Pacwireless Dish on one side and a 26dbi (was out of 29dbi) with complete success Mac Dearman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Mark McElvy
: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion I have usually used Trango backhauls, so I have not had to worry about 5 GHz antennas and what to choose. Now I'm going to try a MikroTik backhaul with a CM9. Currently, I've got two applications: 1. 2-mile link that I can perhaps use 5.3GHz over. 2. 8

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread George Rogato
success Mac Dearman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nash - Lists Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 3:07 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Thanks Mac and Travis... This does sound like

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Tim Kerns
PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:53 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion I do use their dishes where I have a large enough tower, water tower or a roof. I will tell ya though - - the 29dbi grids are mighty fine, much less

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Scott Reed
: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:53 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion I do use their dishes where I have a large enough tower, water tower or a roof. I will tell ya though - - the 29dbi grids are mighty fine, much less expensive than a solid dish, wind load is no comparison

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Tim Kerns
] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 6:21 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion Is it the mount or the grid itself. I haven't noticed it with the mount, but I know moving the wire grids around they will deflect. Get a couple of the die

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Lawrence E. Bakst
1. Does anyone have any experience with the XtremeWave MPR Series from PCTEL/MaxRad? 2. Can anyone comapre the PacWireless offerings to the XtremeWave MPR Series? I suspect the MPR's are more expensive/ 3. Some of the MPR's have side lobes that make alignment challenging. In this case we

Re: [WISPA] 5.3/5.8 GHz Antenna Suggestion

2006-12-30 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, Having personally aligned many, many 2ft and 3ft dishes at 5.3ghz - 5.8ghz, I can say that I have never actually found a "side lobe" with any of our links. The signal starts low and goes up as we find center, and then slowly drops down on the other side. The only links I have ever