The deadline for filing your Form 477 reports is rapidly approaching. Below
are several links to assist you.
http://www.fcc.gov/form477/ Form 477 Resources for Filers - FCC
www.fcc.gov/form477/Share
Jul 5, 2012 - Form 477 Resources for Filers. ... Activities / Broadband Data
and
Powercode has a one click button for it.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org wrote:
The deadline for filing your Form 477 reports is rapidly approaching.
Below are
This is a reminder that the FCC Form 477 Report is due September 1st. All
broadband service providers, (telecommunications, cable, and broadband over
power line providers) must report broadband services by census tract, type
of technology, and upload and download speeds on the FCC's Form 477.
a couple of months ago I put a survey up about form 477. Last week someone
emailed and asked about final results. following is the raw data. I don't
think there is any identifying information that will upset anyone, if there is,
my sincere apologies
Link to the origional survey is
I know it's not Form 477 panic season, but I am just working on a few
items in my database to get a cleaner count next time, and I ran across
something I had not noticed before.
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form477/477tutorial.pdf
On page 26, it instructs:
Include census tracts within your
Just wanted to add a couple more things to be aware of. The csv files
should not have around the values. They should be:
first,last,address,city,state,zip
for the desktop geocoder and:
first,last,address,city,state,zip,lat,lon,up_rate,dn_rate,tech_code
for the upload file.
XL and Open
This is a reminder to file your form 477. It was pretty easy this time, I just
had to geocode new customers and note what tracts where I lost customers...
then I just copied the cells over from the last filing, making adjustments as
necessary.
Maybe WISPA should have an auto reminder each
So I have all my info, census track, speed, etc., my FRN and I go to the FCC
site: http://www.fcc.gov/formpage.html#477The information page says that I
should click on the form in the left hand column but there is no link.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Victoria Proffer
CEO
St. Louis Broadband,
What did you use to bulk process the census track info?
Regards
Michael Baird
So I have all my info, census track, speed, etc., my FRN and I go to the FCC
site: http://www.fcc.gov/formpage.html#477The information page says that I
should click on the form in the left hand column but there is no
Microsoft Mappoint.
After further reading of the FCC site, I see that the electronic filing
version is not available. I thought the deadline was March 2nd...?
Victoria
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
What did you use to bulk process the census track info?
Broadband
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 5:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477
Microsoft Mappoint.
After further reading of the FCC site, I see that the electronic filing
version is not available. I thought the deadline was March 2nd...?
Victoria
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of St. Louis Broadband
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 5:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477
Microsoft Mappoint.
After further reading of the FCC site, I see
again why it's good that we become a regulated public
utility?
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: D. Ryan Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form
, July 15, 2008 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
On Jul 15, 2008, at 8:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why on earth would you want to be a public utility?
Because I serve the public? Because that is how I was able to get my
franchise with the gov't
Jack Unger wrote:
delete
That only works if you do it silently. By publicly posting that you're
deleting an email, you in fact draw more attention to it.
David Smith
MVN.net
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Agreed...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
Jack Unger wrote:
delete
That only works if you do it silently
Thanks
David E. Smith wrote:
Jack Unger wrote:
delete
That only works if you do it silently. By publicly posting that you're
deleting an email, you in fact draw more attention to it.
David Smith
MVN.net
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
This is an excerpt from a comment filed by a state representative from
Kansas:
As a state policy-maker attempting to develop incentives that will induce
broadband
providers
- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
This is an excerpt from a comment filed by a state representative from
Kansas
15, 2008 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
This is an excerpt from a comment filed by a state representative from
Kansas:
As a state policy-maker attempting to develop incentives that will induce
broadband
providers (particularly the larger DSL and cable companies
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
Then I guess you do not want to evolve into a public utility
: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
This should be the mechanism to inform competition. And use the
information
to establish Grant programs for small Providers.
WISPA
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
Why on earth would you want to be a public utility?
There are no small businesses in the public utility sector.
There are no small business entries into the public utility sector
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
This should be the mechanism to inform competition. And use the
information
to establish Grant programs for small Providers
On Jul 15, 2008, at 8:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why on earth would you want to be a public utility?
Because I serve the public? Because that is how I was able to get my
franchise with the gov't for right of way access.
There are no small businesses in the public utility sector.
I am
Dear Members and NonMembers:
For those that may be filing comment on the Form 477 NPRM, please be
reminded that comments on the Section IV(B), which seeks comment on the
adoption of a national broadband mapping program and the Commission's
tentative conclusion that the Commission collect
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA's FCC Committee' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
'Motorola Canopy User Group' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List'
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:06 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
Dear Members and NonMembers:
For those that may
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
I'm going to ask that we oppose this in its entirety, due to it giving
away
information we really don't need given away
These forms are due Sept 4th.
The form required for this filing is at HYPERLINK
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form477/477.xlshttp://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form477/4
77.xls and the detailed reporting instructions are at HYPERLINK
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form477/477instr.pdfhttp://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form
David E. Smith wrote:
Matt Liotta wrote:
I'm surprised no one has complained about their use of Microsoft
Excel. Form 477 does not work with OpenOffice. They sent me a PDF to
fill out instead.
Microsoft Office, while not necessarily the best software, is a /de
facto/ standard, and keeping a
Kris Twomey wanted to remind everyone that FCC Form 477 is due today.
Thanks. I know some of you have been spreading the word on the FCC Form 477.
It's due tomorrow and all WISPs should be filing it. It'll only take 10
minutes to fill out but the info is vital for the FCC to know that the WISP
Don't think it made it to the isp-wireless list
George
Rick Harnish wrote:
Kris Twomey wanted to remind everyone that FCC Form 477 is due today.
Thanks. I know some of you have been spreading the word on the FCC Form 477.
It's due tomorrow and all WISPs should be filing it. It'll only take
I'm in a rabble rousing mood today so I vote that if you don't fill out your
Form 477 you are OUT of WISPA right after you got kicked out already for not
have all stickers on your equipment.
Stiring the Pot just for fun,
Forbes Mercy
President - Washington Broadband, Inc
the hazard of
Forbes Mercy wrote:
I'm in a rabble rousing mood today so I vote that if you don't fill out your Form 477 you are OUT of WISPA right after you got kicked out already for not have all stickers on your equipment.
Stiring the Pot just for fun,
Forbes Mercy
President - Washington Broadband, Inc
He ain't lying. I just filled out my first ever 477 and it took exactly
10 minutes. I filled in like 15 fields and hit send. I might have
don't it wrong but oh well. At least I did it.
Brian
Rick Harnish wrote:
Kris Twomey wanted to remind everyone that FCC Form 477 is due today.
Rogato
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 7:08 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
Don't think it made it to the isp-wireless list
George
Rick Harnish wrote:
Kris Twomey wanted to remind everyone that FCC Form 477 is due today.
Thanks. I know some of you have been
. Where did you guys send it and how did you send the 'required signed' by email?
Forbes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 7:08 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
Don't
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
He ain't lying. I just filled out my first ever 477 and it took exactly
10 minutes. I filled in like 15 fields and hit send. I might have don't
it wrong but oh well. At least I did it.
Brian
Rick Harnish wrote
BRIAN,
We always fill it out, print it, sign it, scan it and then send it.
Mac
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
In the upper right side of the form is says send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't sign anything. I just filled out the few fields I understood and
hit send.
Brian
Forbes Mercy wrote:
17 pages of instructions and no where does it include the address, fax
, March 01, 2007 2:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
In the upper right side of the form is says send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't sign anything. I just filled out the few fields I understood and
hit send.
Brian
Forbes Mercy wrote:
17 pages of instructions
Message -
From: Forbes Mercy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
I'm in a rabble rousing mood today so I vote that if you don't fill out
your Form 477 you are OUT of WISPA right after you
I've never signed mine. Just emailed it.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
Oh well, better I did something than nothing like
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
I've never signed mine. Just emailed it.
Technically, then, it's not considered filed. You have to either mail
or fax the Certification Statement (i.e. page 14 of the instructions),
in addition to either emailing or snail-mailing a floppy or CD with the
spreadsheet.
Broadband, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
I've never signed mine. Just emailed
. Smith
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 2:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 Due Today
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
I've never signed mine. Just emailed it.
Technically, then, it's not considered filed. You have to either mail
or fax the Certification Statement (i.e
Matt Liotta wrote:
I'm surprised no one has complained about their use of Microsoft
Excel. Form 477 does not work with OpenOffice. They sent me a PDF to
fill out instead.
Microsoft Office, while not necessarily the best software, is a /de
facto/ standard, and keeping a copy around is, I'd
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:37:53 -0500, Matt Liotta wrote
I'm surprised no one has complained about their use of Microsoft
Excel. Form 477 does not work with OpenOffice. They sent me a PDF to
fill out instead.
I complained to the list at the first filing date, which got me a
revised .xls which
: [WISPA] Form 477 Confidentiality Challenged in Court
That's a good view Tom. Until a decision is made one way or another, we
probably shouldn't jump to conclusions. However, we should keep a keen
eye
for a comment period concerning this issue.
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:37 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Form 477 Confidentiality Challenged in Court
It looks as though the confidentiality of Form 477 information is being
challenged in court. Anyone with further insight that has comments
It looks as though the confidentiality of Form 477 information is being
challenged in court. Anyone with further insight that has comments, they
are appreciated. Our office received this document via email today.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th St., S.W.
Message -
From: Rick Harnish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Form 477 Confidentiality Challenged in Court
It looks as though the confidentiality of Form 477 information is being
challenged in court
, 2006 1:07 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 477 Confidentiality Challenged in Court
ThatÂ’s a good view Tom. Until a decision is made one way or another, we
probably shouldn't jump to conclusions. However, we should keep a keen eye
for a comment period concerning this issue
' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Form 477 Confidentiality Challenged in Court
It looks as though the confidentiality of Form 477 information is being
challenged in court. Anyone with further insight that has comments, they
are appreciated. Our office
The Center for Public Integrity is suing under FOIA (Freedom of
Information Act) for access to the 477's because they do not believe
that the broadband data that the FCC reports is true and they want to
add that raw data to their media report at
http://www.publicintegrity.org/telecom.
: [WISPA] Form 477 Confidentiality Challenged in Court
I got one also
Jory Privett
WCCS
- Original Message -
From: Rick Harnish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Form 477 Confidentiality Challenged
: Rick Harnish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:37 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Form 477 Confidentiality Challenged in Court
It looks as though the confidentiality of Form 477 information is being
challenged in court. Anyone with further
(net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: Brian Rohrbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 6:03 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Form 477 goes
Seems like this scenario was the biggest argument against the form. Not
that we can do much. It's the law.
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/78404
In an effort to get more accurate data, the Center for Public
Democracy has sued
http://www.publicintegrity.org/about/release.aspx?aid=64 the
: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 goes public
I wonder how or if the privacy checkbox will effect the released data if
they win.
Also the information will be relatively worthless
60 matches
Mail list logo
