[WISPA] MikroTik as Load Balancer?

Hello. I was thinking of using MikroTik rb450g to balance four 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines to replace TP-Link TL-R480+ which locks up from time to time. Just wanted to know how many of you use MT routerOS for load balancing and how is working out for you. Thanks. --

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

I have had problems with SR9 cards when cold. On a few units, also in the Arc enclosure, I have put 2 14-volt light bulbs in series and powered them from the 24 volt POE to the 411. Not a problem since then with the 2 I have tried this on. On 2/5/2011 5:04 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: > The

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

How cold? It has gotten to probably -10 since I started deployment of 411s. Other than lightning, which damaged things other than the RB411, I haven't had a problem. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 2/5/2011 12:41 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: > I

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

They started failing at 0F.Temps got to -25F in a few places. I'm running the R52 cards in ARC Wireless enclosures. Prebuilt by my vendor. Someone on another list suggested using a more powerful card as the extra heat is enough to keep the board warm. They are all running fine now, but

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411 We too have several hundred in the air in ARC cases here in northern MN, no issues. Ryan On Feb 5, 2011, at 1:57 PM, "Travis Johnson" wrote: > Matt... we have over 1,000 of the regular 411 boards in the air... > including man

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

We don't have a ton right now, but the ones that are up were no problem during the recent cold spell here in New England...now Tranzeo on the other hand; I will be glad when we get that crap out of the network!!! On 02/05/2011 03:01 PM, Ryan Goldberg wrote: > We too have several hundred in the a

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

We too have several hundred in the air in ARC cases here in northern MN, no issues. Ryan On Feb 5, 2011, at 1:57 PM, "Travis Johnson" wrote: > Matt... we have over 1,000 of the regular 411 boards in the air... > including many point to point backhaul links. We saw temps down to -30F > this l

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

Matt... we have over 1,000 of the regular 411 boards in the air... including many point to point backhaul links. We saw temps down to -30F this last week and didn't have a single failure. Travis Microserv On 2/5/2011 11:41 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: > I just wanted to take this opportunity

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

How cold are you talking? -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 12:42 PM To: Mikrotik discussions; WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik RB411 I just wanted to take

[WISPA] Mikrotik RB411

I just wanted to take this opportunity to mention that the Mikrotik RB411 boards are pieces of crap.Half of the ones I have failed during the cold spell this last week and it turns out that lots of other people have had the same problems.It is very frustrating to see that not all of the

Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Squid for Video - videocache

I haven't seen this. I'll check it out. Thanks. Another one I should mention is ThunderCache (http://www.thundercache.com.br/). Again, we worked with this when it was open source and had modified it to provide caching of certain Akamai content. We tried making TC cache Windows Updates but could

Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Squid for Video - videocache

There's another software with similar goal that's worth taking a look (and also worth contributing, since it's open source): http://incomum.sourceforge.net/ Mailing List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/incomum-users []s Roney Eduardo

Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Squid for Video - videocache

This works pretty well. We use it in place with PFSense - and it is amazing how much it actually saves :-) http://cachevideos.com/install-videocache-pfsense PFSense is really nice as well as it is a decent router - but even more - an excellent firewall - especially for free. On Nov 19, 2010

Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Squid for Video - videocache

Website is up today. -- Blake Covarrubias On Nov 18, 2010, at 9:26, Blake Covarrubias wrote: > Matt, > > Yes I used to run this back in version 1.9.2 when it was open source. It > worked well, but constantly required updating as the content providers were > always making changes to the way t

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Webbox

On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:04 -0600, Jeremie Chism wrote: > Does anyone here know an easy way to make the Webbox only > available internally or change the port it is accessible. > I have a range o ip addresses (one of which is 212.156.98.214) > that have been trying continuously to login. Would b

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Webbox

You can make one white list range with ip services, or complicated stuff in the firewall. On Nov 17, 2010 11:08 AM, "Chuck Hogg" wrote: > IP -> Services. > > Regards, > > Chuck > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote: > >> Does anyone here know an easy way to make the Webbox o

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Webbox

Thanks. Sent from my iPhone4 On Nov 17, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > IP -> Services. > > Regards, > > Chuck > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote: > Does anyone here know an easy way to make the Webbox only available > internally or change the port it is a

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Webbox

IP -> Services. Regards, Chuck On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote: > Does anyone here know an easy way to make the Webbox only available > internally or change the port it is accessible. I have a range o ip > addresses (one of which is 212.156.98.214) that have been trying

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Webbox

RouterOS" -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: November 17, 2010 10:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Webbox Does anyone here know an easy way to make the Webbox only available intern

[WISPA] Mikrotik Webbox

Does anyone here know an easy way to make the Webbox only available internally or change the port it is accessible. I have a range o ip addresses (one of which is 212.156.98.214) that have been trying continuously to login. Would be nice to block those ip's but I'm sure they would try from anoth

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Filters Question

These kind of questions get my curiosity up. Is there any advantage to splitting out multiple backhauls from my main tower to separate interfaces on my router? Or perhaps even separate routers? -RickG On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > A while back I had asked a similar ques

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

Not sure, was a guess. On Nov 15, 2010 7:42 PM, "Butch Evans" wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:13 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: >> In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one >> dhcpc on each bridge? > > Unless this has changed, an interface cannot be on more than one bridg

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:13 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: > In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one > dhcpc on each bridge? Unless this has changed, an interface cannot be on more than one bridge. --

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Filters Question

awesome thanks! I didn't realize you could specify a != that simplifies a bunch of other filters I have setup before. On 11/15/2010 04:06 PM, Butch Evans wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 14:46 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote: > >> I have 6 virtual wlan interfaces. I want to prevent traffic form any >

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

I think you guys are overlooking his statement that he does not control the DHCP server, and was looking to add multiple DHCP *clients* on a single interface using the same MAC in the DHCP requests. A few of us have stated multiple times is not currently possible with MikroTik. The solution is

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

You cannot add a single interface to multiple bridge's. My failed solution I provided to Matt did involve adding ether1 to a bridge, then setting auto-mac=no and admin-mac on the bridge to something other than ether1. -- Blake Covarrubias On Nov 15, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > In

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

I think Chupaka has posted on the MikroTik forms about having luck doing by turning RADIUS on for DHCP requests, and then setting up a freeradius server to handle the assignments. You can set up freeradius to match just about anything. Not the easiest thing in the world, but... -Kristian On Mon

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

In terms of requests? Can you add ether1 to multiple bridges, put one dhcpc on each bridge? On Nov 15, 2010 7:00 PM, "Butch Evans" wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:23 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote: >> In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik > > You cannot do multiple dhc

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Filters Question

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 14:46 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote: > I have 6 virtual wlan interfaces. I want to prevent traffic form any > wlan interface to reach any other wlan interface. This includes the IP > address of the wlan interface. Besides creating 42 (I think) filters to > do this is there any

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Filters Question

Thanks for the reply. None of these wlan interfaces are in a bridge. Each is NATed separately On 11/15/2010 02:51 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > A while back I had asked a similar question .. Butch was kind enough to > provide a great answer.. see below:- > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet& Tel

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:23 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote: > In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik You cannot do multiple dhcp-clients, either (which is what you'd need). -- * Butch Evans

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Filters Question

On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 17:51 -0500, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > A while back I had asked a similar question .. Butch was kind enough to > provide a great answer.. see below:- Awww, shucks! :-) -- * Butch Evans *

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

ubias Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 5:33 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface? A bit more detail…Matt also needs both DHCP clients to operate from the same source MAC address. I sent him a solution that uses two MAC addresses on the same physical port

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

A bit more detail…Matt also needs both DHCP clients to operate from the same source MAC address. I sent him a solution that uses two MAC addresses on the same physical port and does not involve VLANs, although its obviously of no use because it does not meet his requirements. What MikroTik nee

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik On 11/15/2010 03:16 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface.  You'll need to do vlans. On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, "Matt Jenkins" wrote: > Ok simplification of

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface. You'll need to do vlans. On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, "Matt Jenkins" wrote: > Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP > address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1 > static address, so why n

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1 static address, so why not more than 1 dynamic address? On 11/02/2010 01:15 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote: > How do I create a subinterface on an ethernet port

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Filters Question

A while back I had asked a similar question .. Butch was kind enough to provide a great answer.. see below:- Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom - On 9/17/2010 10:50 AM, Butch Evans wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 00:11

[WISPA] Mikrotik Filters Question

I have 6 virtual wlan interfaces. I want to prevent traffic form any wlan interface to reach any other wlan interface. This includes the IP address of the wlan interface. Besides creating 42 (I think) filters to do this is there any way to group interfaces into a filter template or something?

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

If you mean like eth0.1 and eth0.2 then you need to use a vlan switch, else once its on the wire, there is no way to know what comes from who. It would be best to place another multi port router inline to give you physical ports, or use vlans. On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote: >

[WISPA] Mikrotik Question: Subinterface?

How do I create a subinterface on an ethernet port on a rb750? Bridged CPE -> Tik Port1 -> Port2 Cust 1 -> Port3 Cust 2 I need to create two sub interfaces on Port 1. One for each customer to receive an IP via DHCP. Then I need to NAT each of those sub in

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

2010 12:36 PM To: wireless Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation Too early to tell. Dealing with one bug at a time ;) From: Jason Hensley [mailto:ja...@jaggartech.com] Sent: 20 October 2010 15:41 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrot

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

Too early to tell. Dealing with one bug at a time ;) _ From: Jason Hensley [mailto:ja...@jaggartech.com] Sent: 20 October 2010 15:41 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation How is v4 working for you other than the potential 2GB issue?

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

M To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation How is v4 working for you other than the potential 2GB issue? I’ve been hesitant to move to it since it’s still beta. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Pau

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation Yes I did. I was unaware that in the migration to v4 it utilized SQLite instead of file storage. Perhaps you can load up another box and downgrade to 3.6 and see if you run into this issue. Are you holding a lot of

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

that they would be on WISPA somewhere ;) I'll bring up a VM tomorrow with > RouterOS just to rule it out of the equation. > > Many thanks, > > Paul. > > -original message- > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > From: Josh Luthman > Date: 19/10/20

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

Paul. -original message- Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation From: Josh Luthman Date: 19/10/2010 9:10 pm First thing I would do is put it on RouterOS and see if it's some sort of Windows issue. If the problem still exists on RouterOS, you have a lot more ground to stand on when b

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

> > > Many thanks, > > > > Paul. > > > -- > > > *From:* Josh Luthman [mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] > *Sent:* 19 October 2010 19:45 > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > &g

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

[mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: 19 October 2010 19:18 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation I gave you a work around, change to RouterOS. I'm not sure where SQlite is involved, but you don't have any options with Dude in terms of storage.

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

--- > > > *From:* Josh Luthman [mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] > *Sent:* 19 October 2010 19:18 > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > > > > I gave you a work around, change to RouterOS. &

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN -Original Message- From: Josh Luthman Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:17:56 To: WISPA General List Reply-To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

bottleneck and is there a work around? Paul. _ From: Josh Luthman [mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: 19 October 2010 19:18 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation I gave you a work around, change to RouterOS. I'm not sure where SQli

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

> > > Paul. > > > -- > > > *From:* Josh Luthman [mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] > *Sent:* 19 October 2010 17:15 > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > > > > I read something

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: 19 October 2010 17:15 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation I read something complaining updates were released every Tuesday for 6 weeks. Updates are definitely good, but on servers you have to manually intervene. I don't wa

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

I read something complaining updates were released every Tuesday for 6 weeks. Updates are definitely good, but on servers you have to manually intervene. I don't want to use my time on that. Biggest patch Tuesday ever was last week or week before, too. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 9

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

Second Tuesday of the month, except for out-of-cycle patches, no? Greg On Oct 19, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Every Tuesday for Windows. > > How often for RouterOS? I still have 2.9.x boxes out there. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

Every Tuesday for Windows. How often for RouterOS? I still have 2.9.x boxes out there. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:00 PM, David E. Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:23, Josh Luthman > wro

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:23, Josh Luthman wrote: > This is what I was referring to. I don't want to spend my nights updating > Windows. Spending your nights updating FreeBSD or Linux isn't any better. No matter what you're running, it probably will need occasional updates. I almost always try

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

rg [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *Greg Ihnen > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:10 AM > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > > > > Do you recommend turning on automatic updates? > > > > Soft

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

al.com and Avira was the only one that picked up on it being a bad file. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Greg Ihnen Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 10:10 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation Do you

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

> > > > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Josh Luthman > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:51 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > > I've only rebooted min

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

gt; > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:51 AM > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > > > > I've only rebooted mine for

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

r on an RB? From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:51 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation I've only rebooted mine for upgrades and enabling/disabling

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

> > > > > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:28 AM > > > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > > >

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

n Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 9:32 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation Web interface is on mine, ROS 3.30 Dude 3.6. I check it with my Droid X from time to time. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

ack to an XP machine. > > > > > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2010 7:53 AM > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation &g

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation What features? It's the exact same application. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Jason Hensley wrote: I had issues with Dude on Rou

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

The reason we used it on WinXP was so it could link easily with a mobile to forward SMS alerts. _ From: Josh Luthman [mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: 19 October 2010 14:28 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation What features? It'

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

t; Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2010 7:53 AM > *To:* WISPA General List > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation > > > > Use RouterOS? > > On Oct 19, 2010 8:46 AM, "Paul Hendry" > wrote: > > Hi all, > > >

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 7:53 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation Use RouterOS? On Oct 19, 2010 8:46 AM, "Paul Hendry" wrote: > Hi all, > > > > We have be

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

Use RouterOS? On Oct 19, 2010 8:46 AM, "Paul Hendry" wrote: > Hi all, > > > > We have been using the latest beta version of the Dude to > monitor bandwidth on some devices and have hit a slight snag. It seems > that when the SQLite back-end database hits 2GB it will no longer run. > File system is

[WISPA] Mikrotik Dude 2GB Limitation

Hi all, We have been using the latest beta version of the Dude to monitor bandwidth on some devices and have hit a slight snag. It seems that when the SQLite back-end database hits 2GB it will no longer run. File system is NTFS so it shouldn’t be an issue from that point of view. An

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Access List

once you enable open access, you can go to /interface wireless registration and do an export from there. I could also provide you with an snmp script that will pull all the macs from the wireless reg table. Just doing the snmp walk won't get it as you have to know where to look and then translate f

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Access List

I would enable default authentication so you're not worried about the list preventing them from getting on. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Jim Patient wrote: > /interface wireless access-list> pri

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Access List

/interface wireless access-list> print or /interface wireless access-list> export And you can copy/paste it to word or another program that gives you a search option. Jim Patient Cell: 314-565-6863 Desk: 636-692-4200 YIM: jeffcosoho www.wlan1.com www.linktechs.net www.wifimidwest.com On 10/1

[WISPA] Mikrotik Access List

Sorry Jim, perhaps I didn't say it right, we had default authenticate on so everyone could associate, then transferred it over to the access list as you said but we still appeared to have 10 or so radios not associating at the time we did the cntl-A. Now I want to open default again but I do

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

on the interface that has the same IP subnet as the VPN On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote: > If this was asked earlier in the thread I missed it. On which interfaces > should arp-proxy be enabled? Just on the local net or on the public > interface(s) as well? > > Greg > On Sep 2

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

Thanks, all. I'll be working it later again.. Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Butch Evans Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:07 AM To: fai...@snappydsl.net; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

If this was asked earlier in the thread I missed it. On which interfaces should arp-proxy be enabled? Just on the local net or on the public interface(s) as well? Greg On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:38 AM, Butch Evans wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 22:51 -0400, Francois Menard wrote: >> Are you saying

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 22:51 -0400, Francois Menard wrote: > Are you saying that the VPN server should not be in the > same subnet as the subnet to which access is sought for ? No...I said that IF you are using IPs that are part of an existing subnet, then you WILL need to use proxy-arp to make i

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:09 -0400, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > Let me clarify... > > As long as you get a valid IP on your PPTP client, from the PPTP Server, > and the default route to the PPTP server, then you should be able to get > to any of the IP's (public or private) being routed on that MK bo

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 23:07 -0400, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > I am not sure what type of configuration you folks are talking about. > > For my PPTP dial-in, I setup a IP Pool with a hand full of IP's from the > same subnet as to what I am connecting to. > > The Local IP on the PPTP server is from t

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

Can we see ppp secret print (KEEP IN MIND THE PASSWORDS ARE PLAINTEXT HERE!!!)? Then /ip addr pr Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > Let me clarify... > > As long as you get a v

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

Let me clarify... As long as you get a valid IP on your PPTP client, from the PPTP Server, and the default route to the PPTP server, then you should be able to get to any of the IP's (public or private) being routed on that MK box. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom On 9/21/2010 10:54

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

I am not sure what type of configuration you folks are talking about. For my PPTP dial-in, I setup a IP Pool with a hand full of IP's from the same subnet as to what I am connecting to. The Local IP on the PPTP server is from the same subnet (Gateway IP), and Proxy-arp is enabled. (Setup a bri

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

Usually no. I suggest a different subnet. On Sep 21, 2010 10:51 PM, "Francois Menard" wrote: Are you saying that the VPN server should not be in the same subnet as the subnet to which access is sought for ? its basically if there is a bridge, rather than a routed relationship between the VPN c

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

Are you saying that the VPN server should not be in the same subnet as the subnet to which access is sought for ? its basically if there is a bridge, rather than a routed relationship between the VPN client and the VPN server ... thus the need for Proxy-ARP in that case ? ??? F. On 2010-09-

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 20:28 -0400, Robert West wrote: > Okay, fighting this nightmare of setting up a MT 411 board as a VPN. > Anyone have a script of a step by step? > > > > I can connect remotely but can never see anything on the network. > Throwing in the towel yet again. 99.9% probability

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

r 21, 2010 9:18 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script > > What type of VPN? Could you give a bit more info on the network layout? > > I could probably shoot you over a config if I had that info. > > -- > Blake Covarrubias > > On Sep 21

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

nto the private network. Missing something simple > here. > > > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:18 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject:

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:18 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script What type of VPN? Could you give a bit more info on the network layout? I could probably shoot you over a config if I had

Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] FTTH Show

W I N ! From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jayson Baker Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:51 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Cc: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] FTTH Show Wanted to go. Registered. Went there. They never

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

thman Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:34 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script Probably want to masquerade the subnet. What ips did you use for the tunnel in relation to the other interfaces? On Sep 21, 2010 8:29 PM, "Robert West" wrote: Okay, fighting

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

What type of VPN? Could you give a bit more info on the network layout? I could probably shoot you over a config if I had that info. -- Blake Covarrubias On Sep 21, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Probably want to masquerade the subnet. What ips did you use for the tunnel > in relatio

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

Probably want to masquerade the subnet. What ips did you use for the tunnel in relation to the other interfaces? On Sep 21, 2010 8:29 PM, "Robert West" wrote: Okay, fighting this nightmare of setting up a MT 411 board as a VPN. Anyone have a script of a step by step? I can connect remotely

[WISPA] Mikrotik VPN Script

Okay, fighting this nightmare of setting up a MT 411 board as a VPN. Anyone have a script of a step by step? I can connect remotely but can never see anything on the network. Throwing in the towel yet again. Me-

Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] FTTH Show

Wanted to go. Registered. Went there. They never took the money. So I used it to gamble instead. :-) On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: > Anyone here going to this show? > > http://www.ftthconference.com/FTTH10/public/enter.aspx > > Still deciding whether I should

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik

I use PPTP all the time without any issues. I often use my laptop or another Mikrotik. I know other people use IPSec with and to replace Cisco and haven't heard anything after they get it configured. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik

I use PPtP and L2TP tunnels in quite a few places without issue using MikroTik. Regards, Chuck On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote: > I was wondering how mikrotik vpn's performed compared to other routers. I > have had nothing but problems out of some of the other cheaper rou

[WISPA] Mikrotik

I was wondering how mikrotik vpn's performed compared to other routers. I have had nothing but problems out of some of the other cheaper routers. Anybody with experience with this? Sent from my iPhone4 WISPA Wants

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >