: Thursday, April 09, 2009 12:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Releases New Rules on 4.9 GHz
How is this different than what we already had in 4.9 GHz?
Thank you,
John Scrivner
PS. I would watch the presentation if you can forward me a link.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:28 AM
] On
Behalf Of John McDowell
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Releases New Rules on 4.9 GHz
Kevin, does this mean we could see increased power in some of our
4.9-5.2
Redline backhauls in the future?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Kevin Suitor
ksui
It means that the device has been tested and will not interfere with other
electronics with spurious emissions and such.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
If they pay me enough I'll do it despite objections from the wireless
industry and some consumer groups.
Nothing like a big middle finger to the WISPs of the USA.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are
Who gets what in return?
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Drew Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 9:16 AM
Subject: [WISPA] FCC to put Free Wireless web access on table?
If Google would start a partnership program where service providers could
offer a free Internet service in exchange for a revenue split with Google
for ads inserted into web content streams then we would have a viable option
for delivering free Internet. Google has the technology to make this
FCC chairman Kevin Martin gets a lot of free publicity for a goal that
can't be met by an legitimate wireless business. As far as I'm
concerned, it's nothing more than blatant political posturing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who gets what in return?
insert
100% political pandering.
Let's continue work on getting Internet of any sort to all of America,
first. That's not gonna happen for free.
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:20:44PM -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
If they pay me enough I'll do it despite objections from the wireless
industry and some
Travis Johnson wrote:
What is the required notification distance on 18ghz licensing? I have
a tower with 18ghz links, and just found a new tower that went up about
20 miles away with 18ghz and yet I never received notification. Is there
a certain distance that they don't notify?
Did you
I have always received notifications via USPS in the past (even just a
week ago for another company doing some 18ghz stuff in my area).
Travis
Microserv
David E. Smith wrote:
Travis Johnson wrote:
What is the "required" notification distance on 18ghz licensing? I have
a tower
Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:18:47
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC licensing
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
: [WISPA] FCC licensing
I have always received notifications via USPS in the past (even just a week
ago for another company doing some 18ghz stuff in my area).
Travis
Microserv
David E. Smith wrote:
Travis Johnson wrote:
What is the required notification distance on 18ghz licensing
Is there allot of this going on?
John Buwa
Michiana Wireless
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:23:45 PM GMT -05:00 Columbia
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC licensing
Did you confirm whether
, 2008 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC licensing
Is there allot of this going on?
John Buwa
Michiana Wireless
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:23:45 PM GMT -05:00 Columbia
Subject
Marlon,
Good luck with your individual White Space filing.
I urge everyone who believes they have a better, a more constructive or
a more practical idea than WISPA's filing to go to the FCC website and
make an individual filing with the FCC immediately.
Here's the link to file
As one of the active FCC committee members doing this work, I would like to
point out some important things that have taken place in the last few weeks.
The WISPA Licensed-Lite proposal has gained support in full or a large
part by the following organizations and brought them to the table to talk
Please define broadband.
I am waiting for this very eagerly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 6:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'; 'WISPA General List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] FCC Form 477
http://www.fcc.gov/broadband/broadband_data_faq.html
Hope this helps
George
Jason Hodge wrote:
Please define broadband.
I am waiting for this very eagerly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Friday, August 22,
Used to be 200 kbps and above. But now everybody has to file.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Reminder
Please define
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Used to be 200 kbps and above. But now everybody has to file.
More specifically, according to the FCC:
SNIP
A broadband connection is a line (or wireless channel) that
terminates at an end-user location and enables the end user to
receive
Submitted mine yesterday!
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Rick Harnish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a reminder that Form 477 filing is due on Sept 2, 2008. The
instructions can be found at http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form477/477instr.pdf
and the form can be downloaded at
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC geographic search
Chuck,
What exactly are you having problems with? Any FCC ULS searches have been
a
crap shoot for me. Much of the time I find that for any queries to work
well, you need to be as simple as possible. It seems
* Jerry Richardson wrote, On 8/12/2008 11:55 AM:
How accurate is the FCC ULC?
I am searching by call sign for grandfathered earth stations and all
four of the call signs come back not found.
It's not in there except a reference to the grandfathered PDF. The
International Bureau is where
: Re: [WISPA] FCC ULC
* Jerry Richardson wrote, On 8/12/2008 11:55 AM:
How accurate is the FCC ULC?
I am searching by call sign for grandfathered earth stations and all
four of the call signs come back not found.
It's not in there except a reference to the grandfathered PDF
Jerry Richardson wrote:
Thank you
Link for the international bureau search page:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/General_Menu_Reports/
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
Chuck,
What exactly are you having problems with? Any FCC ULS searches have
been a
crap shoot for me. Much of the time I find that for any queries to work
well, you need to be as simple as possible. It seems that if you give it
more complex conditions to filter down the results, it gets
Brian Webster wrote:
Chuck,
What exactly are you having problems with? Any FCC ULS searches have
been a
crap shoot for me. Much of the time I find that for any queries to work
well, you need to be as simple as possible. It seems that if you give it
more complex conditions to filter
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/index.htm?job=alerts#71
Seems like there is always some sort of technical difficulties there.
I enjoy getting pdf reports from ULS that are generated with the
following footer:
ReportMill Evaluation. Call 214.513.1636 for license
:)
Brian Webster wrote:
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
WISPs need to be able
When will we see your equipment?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil
General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
Mike
- You really need to read the full 802.22 spec :) There is A LOT more than
just channel bonding that make 802.22 good.
- 6Mhz is more than enough
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 8:11 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
When will we see your equipment?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
degrees more with another 20Mhz. Its all about mix and
matching.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
What equipment lets
Tom DeReggi wrote:
WISPs need to be able to deploy 10 megabit plus pipes to the home.
People's 25 Mhz 3650 now becomes 45Mhz, when they combine 2155 with 3650.
What is 2155? This is the second mention I have seen of it (both are on
this thread). Google doesn't turn up much at a
Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
Tony,
Real
9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
Tony, the average Wisp is NOT a cellular company and cannot invest 50K per
AP and 800 per CPE.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
I clearly understand this, where did you get $50k per AP and $800 per CPE??
Wimax? I would not care if a WISP had the money of a cellular company,
these
prices would not make scenes in either case. On top of this, cost
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 5:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
What equipment lets me have 1 GB of throughput on a single site in only 20
MHz of available frequency?
WISPs need
@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
I clearly understand this, where did you get $50k per AP and $800 per CPE??
Wimax? I would not care if a WISP had the money of a cellular company,
these
prices would not make
that low.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
Mike
- It's
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 9:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
The problem, here Tony, is that the MAC's and PHY
,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
The problem, here Tony, is that the MAC's
Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-667-7583 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:01 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:10 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
Personally, I really wonder if it is possible
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
Mike
I do not agree with this at all. Most WISP are used to using 20Mhz 802.11
devices which are VERY frequency inefficient. With 20Mhz and a radio
designed to make the most use of the spectrum could easily create channels
://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Member, Lessig Unveil U.S. Broadband Initiative
Hopefully he's not referring
Hopefully he's not referring to the 20 MHz they're trying to make for free
access there.
20 MHz here and there just isn't going to work for broadband. Real
throughput requires that much per sector.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original
The FCC wants to put you out of business by getting someone to provide
internet for free to your customers.
With FRIENDS like that, who needs enemies?
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA
12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Whether it is the job of the FCC to ensure fairness with regards to
telecommunications contracts is yet to be determined. Traditionally,
STATE
COURTS have resolved contractual disputes. However, in 2005, a cell
carrier
named SunCom filed
- Original Message -
From: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
The problem lies in the common belief that one can draft a contract which
imposes a penalty for breach
Sounds like you and your militia buddies better go do sumptin' 'bout it.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
That's really a non-response to the issue.
As a WISP, I
in the short run that's worth all of us vanishing.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:57 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Well, our cheapest install has always been $200 and I just raised it to
$250. Prices go up from there. We also have a 1 month ROI on our
installs. (install fee + 1st month service pays for the install)
We also do not do contracts... everything is month
The government should not restrict a company's ability to charge an early
termination fee. Consumers are offered a lower startup price and lower
monthly price because they commit to being a customer for a specified amount
of time. If the government MUST get involved, perhaps require an option
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
I personally would love to see this pass FCC.
Large companies have a huge advantage over Small providers, because
: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:12 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 12:00 PM
: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
. Just because the FCC rules it on the cell carriers (which I think is still
not right), it should not be passed on to ISP's until the Internet is a
fully regulated industry that falls under their control.
Scottie
was
very good in that instance. Regulation (part-15 rules) is the only way we
exist now.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
That last part about
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Originally the telcos were unregulated. You had Bell, Gray, Home and
others. Market forces started to help settle who the larger players were
but there were still farmer lines
AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
You make my case for me.
If ISP's become fully regulated there will only be the telcos.
Thanks for agreeing.
Our survival DEPENDS on not being 'regulated'.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message
be
able to willingly break a contract.
- Larry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scottie Arnett
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
I still don't get it. If you specifically stated
If ISP's become fully regulated there will only be the telcos.
Thanks for agreeing.
Our survival DEPENDS on not being 'regulated'.
Billions of dollars in government handouts without having to do any real
work? Sounds like a pretty sweet deal to me. I wanna be a telco! :)
David Smith
too.
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
If ISP's become fully regulated there will only be the telcos.
Thanks for agreeing.
Our survival DEPENDS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
If ISP's become fully regulated there will only be the telcos.
Thanks for agreeing.
Our survival DEPENDS on not being 'regulated'.
Billions of dollars
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Chuck, maybe you can shed some light on a thought I had here.
With most of my telco contracts, there is not an early termination fee
involved. Instead, I am
This could turn in to something it shouldn't really fast...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/30/AR2008053002776.html
I agree that this could be a real issue. But one thing that really
irks me though is the under handed(in my opinion) use of auto renewing
contracts.
of the MONSTER they are so charmed by.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
We ARE regulated now
Yep, I got nailed by this once myself.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
This could turn in to something it shouldn't really fast...
http
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 5:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
This could turn in to something it shouldn't really fast...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/30/AR2008053002
776
- Original Message -
From: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
With the mergers of Cingular and ATT and Nextel and Sprint, roughly half
of
all cell phone users in the U.S
Larry Yunker wrote:
but I think that cellular
service is where this all started. Changes in availability, reliability,
packages, and competition in the cellular market has also lead to much of
the push for early termination fee (ETF) reform.
There was a point in time when T Mobile was
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Let's talk about this for a minute.
When I signed up for my $24.95 DSL, ATT *gave* me a free DSL modem- if the
rules change, that won't be able to happen anymore.
If you, as a WISP say here are your options
1. Pay $299 install
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
I think the FCC should drop it and let capitalism take its course.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
will you lose?
John Thomas
-Original Message-
From: Scottie Arnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 02:58 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
I agree Travis. This will "hurt." The FCC seems to be overstepping their bound
: John J. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Let's talk about this for a minute.
When I signed up for my $24.95 DSL, ATT *gave* me a free DSL modem- if the
rules change, that won't be able
I think that the FCC has a bona fide reason for addressing the early
termination fee issue. The underlying concern is that early termination
fees often do not reflect the true cost incurred by the contracting provider
as a result of the subscriber's breach of contract.
In reality, an early
Or really, the consumer could just read the contract before they sign
it. Problem solved. ;)
Travis
Microserv
Larry Yunker wrote:
I think that the FCC has a bona fide reason for addressing the early
termination fee issue. The underlying concern is that early termination
fees often do not
Message-
From: Scottie Arnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 02:58 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
I agree Travis. This will "hurt." The FCC seems to be overstepping their boundaries alot the last few months on m
that a termination fee is
imposed to penalize an unwilling party to the contract, the fee is invalid.
- Larry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 2:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
I think that the FCC has a bona fide reason
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Travis,
I agree wholeheartedly that a customer
of direction with regards to their obligations or
limitations under common law and regulatory regimes.
- Larry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:12 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
Well lets say we can't charge early termination anymore, We are back to
charging $300/install and paying $400 for a cellphone.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Exactly... which will pretty much stop our installs... cable, DSL and
WiMAX providers will continue to do free installs.
Travis
Microserv
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Well lets say we can't charge early termination anymore, We are back to
charging $300/install and paying $400 for a cellphone.
Well, our cheapest install has always been $200 and I just raised it to
$250. Prices go up from there. We also have a 1 month ROI on our
installs. (install fee + 1st month service pays for the install)
We also do not do contracts... everything is month to month.
While the price of the
Hi,
For whatever it's worth, we have often followed the cell companies in
many ways (not intentionally, it just seems to work out that way). We
are often on towers close to their towers, we often follow the same
backhaul paths that they use, etc. We also followed their
activation/billing
I'm sure you are much larger than I!
If I can ask, in that same time period, April, how many disconnects (for
non-payment) and quits did you have?
I've made it a point to avoid churn and most often only loose a user
when cable or DSL comes into his area with their $14.95 a month deal...
I agree Travis. This will hurt. The FCC seems to be overstepping their
boundaries alot the last few months on many issues, and this is another area I
think they should stay out of. Just my 2 cents.
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: Travis Johnson
Travis,
Put a different name on it like Equipment removal fee and drive on.
Frank
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 8:51 PM
Subject: [WISPA] FCC changes
This could turn in
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Travis,
Put a different name on it like Equipment removal fee and drive on.
Frank
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA
: Saturday, May 31, 2008 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
I agree Travis. This will hurt. The FCC seems to be overstepping their
boundaries alot the last few months on many issues, and this is another
area I think they should stay out of. Just my 2 cents.
Scottie
and a *lease* fee of $22 per month, and the WISP owns the
equipment
How will you lose?
John Thomas
-Original Message-
From: Scottie Arnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 02:58 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
I agree Travis
: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
While at it, bill the IRS for your time in filling out their data requests
which they will use against you.
Ditto the census bureau, you must be really steamed when they roll around...
Or perhaps you are one of those
That was what Wesley Snipes thought...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:27 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
Or perhaps
19, 2008 12:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
without just compensation
It is taken every day of the week. And we always provide just
compensation
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
:16 PM
To: ''WISPA General List''
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
It looks like Mark from Neofast is back disguised as muddyfrogwater. How fun is
this? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL
on Youtube.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC
, May 19, 2008 10:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
I don't know if you are aware of this but there is no law requiring you
to
pay income tax, have you ever read any of the U.S. code? Why do you think
they want to pass a federal
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: May 19, 2008 10:45 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
Your wrong, Wesley Snipes is going to jail for 3 years because a JURY felt
he should.
Kurt
201 - 300 of 655 matches
Mail list logo
