I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
the backhauls. Turned that off and CPU usage has dropped dramatically and is
now hanging around 10-15% consistent. Pings times are much better going
through this now. 2-3ms.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus,
What version of routeros are you running on the backhauls, and are you
using the wireless-test package?
Randy
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
the backhauls. Turned that off and CPU usage has dropped dramatically and is
now
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded? SOLVED
What version of routeros are you running on the backhauls, and are you
using the wireless-test package?
Randy
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
the backhauls. Turned that off
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded? SOLVED
What version of routeros are you running
-router.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor unit
I
would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections.
Besides on the radar stuff
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Eje,
The way DFS is designed in MT it will never be
able to get certified.
Pleasse elaborate, thats a strong statement. If it were true it would
means
that the DFS limit was hardware or 802.11a
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Eje,
The way DFS is designed in MT it will never be
able to get certified.
Pleasse elaborate, thats a strong statement
Eje Gustafsson wrote:
Well as it stands to day it will not be able to because one of the
requirements is continuously looking and detecting radar signatures. In
their current implementation they only look for a short period after the
interface been enabled but before it start transmitting.
on it. I do not
know.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:25:00
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Besides the fact that MT should
On what freqs you have all those wireless cards?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent:
Is this doing any NAT? Is connection tracking enabled? Do you have all
unneeded packages disabled? We have a few RB600's out there and they do
fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and all of
them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
-Kevin Neal
-Original
Gino - Top right corner.
Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would cause a lot
of usage or not. Most any MT box I've seen is 5% CPU. A lot of NAT as was
mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
Josh Luthman
unltil it his 100% and stays there, its not overloaded hahahaha .
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
WISPA
Unless it has run out of memory, that should be true.
Dennis Burgess - LTI wrote:
unltil it his 100% and stays there, its not overloaded hahahaha .
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member -
5180.hmmm!!!
Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an
illegal channel
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Gino - Top right corner.
Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been
Part of the 5.2 band. All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
certified.
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support
-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Part of the 5.2 band. All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
certified
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Part of the 5.2 band. All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
certified
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Gino - Top right corner.
Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would cause a lot
of usage
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor unit I
would suspect he is suffering from
, 2009 5:31 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
What I was thinking too. 5180 is a allowed freq, but should be FCC
certified and has to have DFS2.
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:55 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Plus
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:55 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Plus that many radios that close together is a almost a guaranteed to create
self interference especially
It is not, it's indoor use only with a 200 mw eirp
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Dennis Burgess - LTI dmburg...@linktechs.net
wrote:
Part of the 5.2 band. All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
certified.
*
.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit
Are you using Adaptive Noise Immunity? If so, that will cause the cpu to
skyrocket on even lightly loaded ap's..
Gerard
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
-
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:45:01
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Cc: e...@wisp-router.com; WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
To clarify
5150 - 5250 indoor 200mw eirp
5250 - 5350 outdoor 1w
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gerard Dupont III
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 8:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
Are you using Adaptive Noise Immunity? If so, that will cause the cpu to
skyrocket on even lightly loaded ap's..
Gerard
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I
28 matches
Mail list logo
