Re: [WISPA] 700 Mhz.

org'" mailto:wireless@wispa.org>> Subject: [WISPA] 700 Mhz. Does anyone recommend a site where I can list and advertise a bunch of 700 Mhz. equipment? Thanks, Preston Meyer General Manager [cid:image001.jpg@01CFC6C9.7B8AE4E0]<http://www.nktelco.net/> New Kn

[WISPA] 700 Mhz.

Does anyone recommend a site where I can list and advertise a bunch of 700 Mhz. equipment? Thanks, Preston Meyer General Manager [cid:image001.jpg@01CFC6C9.7B8AE4E0] New Knoxville Telephone Company NKTelco, Inc. 301 W South Street, PO Box 219 N

Re: [WISPA] 700 Mhz license area

-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of chris cooper Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:15 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WISPA] 700 Mhz license area How large a geographic area is granted under a single 700 mhz license? The area in question is a non-metro mark

[WISPA] 700 Mhz license area

How large a geographic area is granted under a single 700 mhz license? The area in question is a non-metro market if that makes any difference. Thanks Chris Cooper WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wis

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz winners list

Thanks Mac! On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Mac Dearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those of you interested in seeing the winners of the 700MHz auction > 73: > > http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-595A2.pdf > > > > Mac > > > > >

[WISPA] 700 MHz winners list

For those of you interested in seeing the winners of the 700MHz auction 73: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-595A2.pdf Mac WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---

RE: [WISPA] 700 mhz spectrum auction

ould to be avoiding any conversation or mention of these auctions on list and off list! Mac > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Rick Harnish > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 5:27 PM > To: 'WISPA General List' >

RE: [WISPA] 700 mhz spectrum auction

AU Docket No. 07-157 Report No. AUC-07-73-F (Auction 73) The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (“Bureau”) reminds applicants for the upcoming auction of 700 MHz Band licenses (“Auctions 73 and 76”) of the confidential nature of certain information, such as an applicant’s upfront payment amount,

RE: [WISPA] 700 mhz spectrum auction

from competition. Respectfully, Rick Harnish Moderator -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Van Dolson Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:53 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] 700 mhz spectrum auction Fellas, I'm pretty n

RE: [WISPA] 700 mhz spectrum auction

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Van Dolson Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:53 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] 700 mhz spectrum auction Fellas, I'm pretty new to WISP technology and such, and I'm sure this h

[WISPA] 700 mhz spectrum auction

Fellas, I'm pretty new to WISP technology and such, and I'm sure this has already been answered, but how do you all feel about the auctioning off of the 700 mhz spectrum? How do you think it'll affect the business of WISPs across the nation? Thank you, Ryan V. -

[WISPA] 700 Mhz bidders list

http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071219/FREE/663757278/1005/newsletter03 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---

[WISPA] 700 MHz Anti-Collusion Rules

In sync with John’s recent comments, here are the list rules in regard to the 700 MHz Anti-Collusion Rules. These rules will be enforced on all WISPA listservs with immediate suspension from the listservs as well as possible financial liabilities and responsibilities that may be incurred by WISPA

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

Steve, I actually read your arcticle this time, and have a further response. I agree with a large part of what you wrote. Although it may be unpopular or discouraging with many WISPs, it brings up some fair valid arguements and likely outcomes. My response is... Life is hard, and chances are

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

- Original Message - From: "Steve Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View Scriv: I disagree your statement that "If they use [700 MHz] to sell broa

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

John: I didn't say that no use was being made of 700 MHz. Yes, there is, mostly by rural telephone companies, and of course, Qualcomm's MediaFlo television system. But those are the exception - to my knowledge, Aloha Partners (the largest owner of 700 MHz spectrum...) hasn't deployed any systems

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

On 7/9/07, Steve Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Scriv: I disagree your statement that "If they use [700 MHz] to sell broadband wireless Internet then by definition those parties will then become WISPs." I doubt that Verizon Communications (landlines) and Verizon Wireless would consider themsel

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

Tom: Agreed that WISPs can make very effective use of license-exempt spectrum. And if I thought that it was a reasonable thing to posit that 700 MHz should become mostly license-exempt (public safety portion being the exception), I would do so. But, that 700 MHz will be auctioned off to the high

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:55 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View Scriv: I disagree your statement that "If they use [700 MHz] to sell broadband wireless Internet then by definition those parties will

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

Steve/John: I worked with local rural WISP operator in rural foothills Nothern California. He told me that the large carrier told him they typically seek at least a block of 10,000 rural customers before entering a rural space. This is anecdotal and I searching the web for evidence of this rule of

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

Scriv: I disagree your statement that "If they use [700 MHz] to sell broadband wireless Internet then by definition those parties will then become WISPs." I doubt that Verizon Communications (landlines) and Verizon Wireless would consider themselves WISPs merely by acquiring more spectrum - any m

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

John, Thank you for the posting. Most know 700 mhz but if not, I included a weblink on 700 Mhz explained: http://gigaom.com/2007/03/14/700mhz-explained/ ...including interesting Comments section. Also, Aloha Partners is reputed to be the largest owner of 700 MHz spectrum; including 700 MHz plans f

[WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

Steve Stroh and I usually see things the same way. We have somewhat varying views on the 700 MHz auction coming up. Here are his views on the upcoming 700 MHz auction. http://www.wispnews.net/2007/07/my-take-on-700-.html It is important to note that part of what is going to happen is that the

[WISPA] 700 MHz war: Frontline challenges VZ

700 MHz war: Frontline challenges Verizon while AT&T mulls auction plans By Jeffrey Silva Story posted: June 29, 2007 http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070629/FREE/70628013/1005/allnews The 700 MHz debate has suddenly turned both interesting and nasty in the lead-up to next m

[WISPA] 700 MHz Auction update

http://tinyurl.com/25jxek -- Regards, Peter Radizeski RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate 813.963.5884 http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archiv

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

e specific for how this would best be provided. Rich - Original Message - From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:27 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC I think we can all appreciate that you a

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

muni broadband be able to use the > spectrum when public > safety is quiet? If not then why not? > Thanks, > Scriv > > > > Rich Comroe wrote: > > > > > - Original Message - From: "Mark > Koskenmaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To:

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC Justin... I am aware of the problems revolving around the inability to talk to each other via voice radio. I would tend to agree that frequency coordination seems to be a terrible i

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

not then why not? Thanks, Scriv Rich Comroe wrote: - Original Message - From: "Mark Koskenmaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC Justin... I am aware of the pro

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

Mark Koskenmaki wrote: I didn't read it all, just scanned a bit and read some summaries, but there's NOTHING GOOD in it for us. Not much good in it for consumers, either. The fact that it's 200 pages looks a bit daunting, but once you learn how to use the magic FCC Decoder Ring, it gets a lot

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

- Original Message - From: "Mark Koskenmaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC Justin... I am aware of the problems revolving around the inability to talk to

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

Message - From: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 9:51 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC > Ug. > > Won't be reading THAT one anytime soon! > marlon > &

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

Ug. Won't be reading THAT one anytime soon! marlon - Original Message - From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:00 PM Subject: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC 196 page decision <http://hraunfos

RE: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

, saves lives. Who is to say? Apparently, the wrong folks. . . . J o n a t h a n -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Koskenmaki Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 7:06 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 4:53 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC > ...well, first of all, the obsession with full duplex via a non-failsafe > centralized system was a substantial part of the blame. The sa

RE: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

h a n -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Koskenmaki Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:49 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC Justin... I am aware of the problems revolving around the inability to talk to each othe

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

ubject to all the same issues as telco outages, broadband outages, etc, etc... ??? - Original Message - From: "Justin Comroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:58 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC > >

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

- Original Message - From: "Mark Koskenmaki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 5:22 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC I hate to say it, but it looks like the FCC is going to squander massive opportunit

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

cause it'll be "down" or something. - Original Message - From: "Peter R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:00 PM Subject: [WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC > 196 page decision > > <http:/

[WISPA] 700 MHz decision at FCC

196 page decision SERVICE RULES FOR THE 698-746, 747-762, AND 777-792 MHZ BANDS, ET. AL. The Commission adopted rules governing wireless licenses in the 698-806 MHz spectrum band, commonly referred to as the "700 MHz Band". (Dkt

[WISPA] 700 MHz -- FCC -- COMMENTS !

WE NEED TO GET TOGETHER COMMENTS ON A CONSISTENT BASIS AND POST THEM. I WILL START A PHONE CAMPAIGN TO DO THIS AS WELL AS GET MORE WISPA MEMBERS IF SOMEONE GETS ME A LIST TO WORK FROM. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, April 26, 200

[WISPA] 700 MHz

The FCC announces today about the first of 2 700 MHz auctions. Article describing the problems: http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070423/FREE/70419016/1005/allnews -- Regards, Peter Radizeski RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate 813.963.5884 ht

[WISPA] 700 MHz guard-band licensees push for public-safety network

700 MHz guard-band licensees push for public-safety network By Heather Forsgren Weaver Oct 2, 2006 WASHINGTON—Guard-band licensees in the 700 MHz band late Friday asked the Federal Communications Commission to scrap the current band plan and to instead offer bidding credits for entities that wish

Re: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

Butch, On the airspan thing I would agree on the pricing is a bit more reasonable. On their unlicensed product, it still seems quite a bit expensive. ( wipll and wimax ) . The thing we found in testing waveIP is while it is a decent Amount of throughput, the channel size is a nightmare and brings

Re: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

On Tue, 23 May 2006, jeffrey thomas wrote: Actually, on the Ap Side Airspan is around 5000.00 and 400 or so for the CPE. It was about a year ago that I got pricing on these. This is a much more competitive price model than what I was quoted back then. At that price, they would be a viable

Re: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

And I run my own wisp! > 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) > www.odessaoffice.com/wireless > www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Brad Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'WISPA General List&#x

Re: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

Actually, on the Ap Side Airspan is around 5000.00 and 400 or so for the CPE. - Jeff On Tue, 23 May 2006 08:43:29 -0500 (CDT), "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, 23 May 2006, Jon Langeler wrote: > > >If your looking for equipment manufacturers, you'll be looking at > >companies

Re: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:01 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License Most of these muni projects are basing the 700 Mhz on the public safety band that is not yet available. High speed roaming is t

RE: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

n the last 2 months does not want a proprietary approach. They want standards based gear. Brad -Original Message- From: Butch Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:43 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License On Tue, 23 May

Re: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

On Tue, 23 May 2006, Jon Langeler wrote: If your looking for equipment manufacturers, you'll be looking at companies like IPwireless, Flarion, etc... Typically $50-100K per base station/sector deployment... WaveIP and Airspan both have gear in the 700MHz band. WaveIP is around $1500 for AP

Re: [WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

If your looking for equipment manufacturers, you'll be looking at companies like IPwireless, Flarion, etc... Typically $50-100K per base station/sector deployment... Jon Langeler Michwave Tech. Gino A. Villarini wrote: Gino A. Villarini Hello, The local government holds a license for 700 mh

[WISPA] 700 mhz Public Safety State License

Title: 700 mhz Public Safety State License Gino A. Villarini Hello, The local government holds a license for 700 mhz public safety with 2 12 mhz channels, anyone have any pointers on how to develop a network on such frequencies? Anyone knows of  federal funds available for such endeavor? Hom