Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded? SOLVED

[Travis Johnson]

We run Nstreme on all of our backhauls (over 60 of them) without a
problem. I can easily move 30Mbps across RB532 boards using 20mhz
channel size.

Travis
Microserv

Kurt Fankhauser wrote:

  3.15 - No wireless test

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded? SOLVED

What version of routeros are you running on the backhauls, and are you 
using the wireless-test package?

Randy


Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
  
  
I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
the backhauls. Turned that off and CPU usage has dropped dramatically and

  
  is
  
  
now hanging around 10-15% consistent. Pings times are much better going
through this now. 2-3ms.

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:50 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic

  
  that
  
  
passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP

  
  routes
  
  
might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU

  
  usage
  
  
on it is around 40-50%.

 

 

 

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com

 

 

 






  
  

  
  
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


  
  

  
  
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
  

  
  
  






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded? SOLVED

[Kurt Fankhauser]

3.15 - No wireless test

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded? SOLVED

What version of routeros are you running on the backhauls, and are you 
using the wireless-test package?

Randy


Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
> the backhauls. Turned that off and CPU usage has dropped dramatically and
is
> now hanging around 10-15% consistent. Pings times are much better going
> through this now. 2-3ms.
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:50 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic
that
> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP
routes
> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU
usage
> on it is around 40-50%.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>


>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>   

-- 
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc

work: 435-773-6071
email: rco...@infowest.com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/randycosby





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded? SOLVED

[Randy Cosby]

What version of routeros are you running on the backhauls, and are you 
using the wireless-test package?

Randy


Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
> the backhauls. Turned that off and CPU usage has dropped dramatically and is
> now hanging around 10-15% consistent. Pings times are much better going
> through this now. 2-3ms.
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:50 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU usage
> on it is around 40-50%.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>   

-- 
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc

work: 435-773-6071
email: rco...@infowest.com

http://www.linkedin.com/in/randycosby




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded? SOLVED

[Kurt Fankhauser]

I can't believe no-body asked this question. I was running Nstream on 3 of
the backhauls. Turned that off and CPU usage has dropped dramatically and is
now hanging around 10-15% consistent. Pings times are much better going
through this now. 2-3ms.

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:50 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU usage
on it is around 40-50%.

 

 

 

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com

 

 

 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[eje]

Not so sure about the "smart" comment. Keep in mind it took the FCC until very 
recently to make up their mind how to "properly" test for radar. MikroTik have 
had the DFS feature in for some time (well before the DFS2 requirements) was 
even close to final iteration. When they had come out with their DFS feature 
even the big FCC test labs had no procedure in place to test DFS. 

So for seeing so early in their adaptation they got "burnt". Interesting and 
smart question is rather why have they not come out with and updated version is 
it because it's not doable or are they just simply working on it. I do not 
know. 

/Eje 
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: "Scott Carullo" 

Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:25:00 
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?



Besides the fact that MT should be smarter than to work on a feature that 
was not possible to achieve from the beginning...

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102

 Original Message 
> From: "Tom DeReggi" 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:19 AM
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> 
> Eje,
> 
> >The way DFS is designed in MT it will never be
> > able to get certified.
> 
> Pleasse elaborate, thats a strong statement. If it were true it would 
means 
> that the DFS limit was hardware or 802.11a protocol based, because 
software 
> ALWAYS has the option to be changed and modified to meet a specific 
> requirements. I agree that MT's current DFS2 support would not pass FCC 
> certification. But I don't see why it couldn't be expanded to be 
> certifiable.
> 
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message - 
> From: "Eje Gustafsson" 
> To: "'WISPA General List'" 
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> 
> 
> > And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor 
unit 
> > I
> > would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections.
> >
> > Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will 
never 
> > be
> > able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and 
detect
> > radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at least 

> > did
> > a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures.
> >
> > Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified 
> > radar
> > detecting device.
> >
> > / Eje
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
On
> > Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
> > To: WISPA General List
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> >
> > Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
> > certified.
> >
> > * ---
> > Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> > WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> > Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> > WISPA Vendor Member*
> > *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
> > <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> > */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/*
> > <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
> >
> > The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended 

> > only
> > for the person(s) or entity/entities to which
> > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material. 
> > Any
> > review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of 
any
> > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other 

> > than
> > the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you
> > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
material
> > from any computer.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Gino Villarini wrote:
> >> 5180.hmmm!!!
> >>
> >> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on 
an
> >> illegal channel
> >>
> >> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Gino - Top right corner.
> >>>

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[David E. Smith]

Eje Gustafsson wrote:
> Well as it stands to day it will not be able to because one of the
> requirements is continuously looking and detecting radar signatures. In
> their current implementation they only look for a short period after the
> interface been enabled but before it start transmitting.

Mikrotik already does some crazy things with multiple radios. Wonder if 
you could, say, put a second identical radio card in a system, hooked up 
to a second antenna, that does nothing but listen for radar...

I know, it's probably impractical, but I bet it's not impossible. Is the 
DFS check done in their software, or is it done in hardware (built into 
the Atheros chip, say)?

David Smith
MVN.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Eje Gustafsson]

Well as it stands to day it will not be able to because one of the
requirements is continuously looking and detecting radar signatures. In
their current implementation they only look for a short period after the
interface been enabled but before it start transmitting. Next time it will
look is if you change the interface settings or reboot the unit. 
DFS requires continuously checking and honestly I am not sure that 802.11
based hardware could do this without hardware modifications. But then I'm
not a hardware engineer and not perfectly well versed with all requirements
with the DFS protocol. I just know there are some people that tried to use
MT to get a DFS certified solution and it failed to pass the requirements
with the exception when it saw radar directly after the interface was
enabled. From the looks of things it really never looks for radar signatures
again after it gotten its initial good to go. 

Is it possible to change the functionality in MikroTik to comply with DFS2
requirements on a software level/driver level without hardware changes I do
not know. Just that as it is today it is a clear no go.

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

Eje,

>The way DFS is designed in MT it will never be
> able to get certified.

Pleasse elaborate, thats a strong statement. If it were true it would means 
that the DFS limit was hardware or 802.11a protocol based, because software 
ALWAYS has the option to be changed and modified to meet a specific 
requirements. I agree that MT's current DFS2 support would not pass FCC 
certification. But I don't see why it couldn't be expanded to be 
certifiable.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Eje Gustafsson" 
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?


> And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor unit

> I
> would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections.
>
> Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will never 
> be
> able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and detect
> radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at least 
> did
> a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures.
>
> Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified 
> radar
> detecting device.
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
> certified.
>
> * ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> WISPA Vendor Member*
> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
> <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/*
> <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
>
> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended 
> only
> for the person(s) or entity/entities to which
> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. 
> Any
> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other 
> than
> the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
> from any computer.
>
>
>
>
>
> Gino Villarini wrote:
>> 5180.hmmm!!!
>>
>> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an
>> illegal channel
>>
>> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>>
>>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>>
>>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would
>>> cause a lot
>>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of
>>> NAT as was
>>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Scott Carullo]

Besides the fact that MT should be smarter than to work on a feature that 
was not possible to achieve from the beginning...

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102

 Original Message 
> From: "Tom DeReggi" 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:19 AM
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> 
> Eje,
> 
> >The way DFS is designed in MT it will never be
> > able to get certified.
> 
> Pleasse elaborate, thats a strong statement. If it were true it would 
means 
> that the DFS limit was hardware or 802.11a protocol based, because 
software 
> ALWAYS has the option to be changed and modified to meet a specific 
> requirements. I agree that MT's current DFS2 support would not pass FCC 
> certification. But I don't see why it couldn't be expanded to be 
> certifiable.
> 
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Eje Gustafsson" 
> To: "'WISPA General List'" 
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> 
> 
> > And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor 
unit 
> > I
> > would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections.
> >
> > Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will 
never 
> > be
> > able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and 
detect
> > radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at least 

> > did
> > a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures.
> >
> > Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified 
> > radar
> > detecting device.
> >
> > / Eje
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
On
> > Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
> > To: WISPA General List
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> >
> > Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
> > certified.
> >
> > * ---
> > Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> > WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> > Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> > WISPA Vendor Member*
> > *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
> > <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> > */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/*
> > <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
> >
> > The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended 

> > only
> > for the person(s) or entity/entities to which
> > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material. 
> > Any
> > review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of 
any
> > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other 

> > than
> > the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you
> > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the 
material
> > from any computer.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Gino Villarini wrote:
> >> 5180.hmmm!!!
> >>
> >> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on 
an
> >> illegal channel
> >>
> >> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Gino - Top right corner.
> >>>
> >>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
> >>>
> >>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would
> >>> cause a lot
> >>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of
> >>> NAT as was
> >>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
> >>>
> >>> Josh Luthman
> >>> Office: 937-552-2340
> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343
> >>> 1100 Wayne St
> >>> Suite 1337
> >>> Troy, OH 45373
> >>>
> >>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, 
poorly.
> >>> --- Henry Spencer
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal 
>

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Tom DeReggi]

Eje,

>The way DFS is designed in MT it will never be
> able to get certified.

Pleasse elaborate, thats a strong statement. If it were true it would means 
that the DFS limit was hardware or 802.11a protocol based, because software 
ALWAYS has the option to be changed and modified to meet a specific 
requirements. I agree that MT's current DFS2 support would not pass FCC 
certification. But I don't see why it couldn't be expanded to be 
certifiable.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Eje Gustafsson" 
To: "'WISPA General List'" 
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?


> And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor unit 
> I
> would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections.
>
> Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will never 
> be
> able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and detect
> radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at least 
> did
> a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures.
>
> Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified 
> radar
> detecting device.
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
> certified.
>
> * ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> WISPA Vendor Member*
> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
> <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/*
> <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
>
> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended 
> only
> for the person(s) or entity/entities to which
> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. 
> Any
> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other 
> than
> the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
> from any computer.
>
>
>
>
>
> Gino Villarini wrote:
>> 5180.hmmm!!!
>>
>> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an
>> illegal channel
>>
>> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>>
>>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>>
>>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would
>>> cause a lot
>>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of
>>> NAT as was
>>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
>>> --- Henry Spencer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you
>>>> have all
>>>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and
>>>> they do
>>>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and
>>>> all of
>>>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>>>
>>>> -Kevin Neal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
>>>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
>>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>>> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>>>>

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Kurt Fankhauser]

No it's turned off on all the interfaces. I am beginning to think that this
board has too many wireless cards in it.

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gerard Dupont III
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 8:53 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

Are you using Adaptive Noise Immunity? If so, that will cause the cpu to 
skyrocket on even lightly loaded ap's..

Gerard

Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic
that
> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP
routes
> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU
usage
> on it is around 40-50%.





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[eje]

That is what I though. I guess some people are calling the 5250-5350 spectrum 
5.2 which most people afaik dubbed the 5.3 spectrum? 
But I think most reading the list was under the understanding that we where 
talking about 5180MHz. 

/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: "Gino Villarini" 

Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:45:01 
To: WISPA General List
Cc: ; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?


To clarify

5150 - 5250 indoor 200mw eirp
5250 - 5350 outdoor 1w eirp dfs2 FCC certified

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:51 PM, "Kevin Suitor"  wrote:

> 5.2 is allowed for outdoor - the Redline AN-80i is certified for this
> band.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
> On
> Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor
> unit I
> would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections.
>
> Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will  
> never
> be
> able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and  
> detect
> radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at  
> least
> did
> a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures.
>
> Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified
> radar
> detecting device.
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
> On
> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
> certified.
>
> * ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> WISPA Vendor Member*
> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
> <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/*
> <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
>
> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is  
> intended
> only
> for the person(s) or entity/entities to which
> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged  
> material.
> Any
> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of  
> any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
> than
> the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material
> from any computer.
>
>
>
>
>
> Gino Villarini wrote:
>> 5180.hmmm!!!
>>
>> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on  
>> an
>
>> illegal channel
>>
>> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>>
>>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>>
>>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would
>>> cause a lot
>>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of
>>> NAT as was
>>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it,  
>>> poorly.
>>> --- Henry Spencer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you
>>>> have all
>>>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and
>>>> they do
>>>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and
>>>> all of
>>>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>>>
>>>> -Kevin Neal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun.

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Gerard Dupont III]

Are you using Adaptive Noise Immunity? If so, that will cause the cpu to 
skyrocket on even lightly loaded ap's..

Gerard

Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU usage
> on it is around 40-50%.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Gino Villarini]

To clarify

5150 - 5250 indoor 200mw eirp
5250 - 5350 outdoor 1w eirp dfs2 FCC certified

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:51 PM, "Kevin Suitor"  wrote:

> 5.2 is allowed for outdoor - the Redline AN-80i is certified for this
> band.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
> On
> Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor
> unit I
> would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections.
>
> Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will  
> never
> be
> able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and  
> detect
> radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at  
> least
> did
> a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures.
>
> Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified
> radar
> detecting device.
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
> On
> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
> certified.
>
> * ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> WISPA Vendor Member*
> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
> <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/*
> <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
>
> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is  
> intended
> only
> for the person(s) or entity/entities to which
> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged  
> material.
> Any
> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of  
> any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
> than
> the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material
> from any computer.
>
>
>
>
>
> Gino Villarini wrote:
>> 5180.hmmm!!!
>>
>> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on  
>> an
>
>> illegal channel
>>
>> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>>
>>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>>
>>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would
>>> cause a lot
>>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of
>>> NAT as was
>>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it,  
>>> poorly.
>>> --- Henry Spencer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you
>>>> have all
>>>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and
>>>> they do
>>>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and
>>>> all of
>>>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>>>
>>>> -Kevin Neal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
>>>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
>>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>>> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>>>>
>>>> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces
>>>> are
>>>> bridged, everything is routed and I

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Gino Villarini]

It is not, it's indoor use only  with a 200 mw eirp

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:33 PM, "Dennis Burgess - LTI"  wrote:

> Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not
> certified.
>
> * ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> WISPA Vendor Member*
> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
> <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/*
> <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
>
> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by  
> the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is  
> intended only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which
> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged  
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of,  
> or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by  
> persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is  
> prohibited, If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the  
> material from any computer.
>
>
>
>
>
> Gino Villarini wrote:
>> 5180.hmmm!!!
>>
>> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on  
>> an
>> illegal channel
>>
>> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>>
>>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>>
>>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would
>>> cause a lot
>>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of
>>> NAT as was
>>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it,  
>>> poorly.
>>> --- Henry Spencer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you
>>>> have all
>>>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and
>>>> they do
>>>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and
>>>> all of
>>>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>>>
>>>> -Kevin Neal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
>>>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
>>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>>> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>>>>
>>>> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces
>>>> are
>>>> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the
>>>> traffic that
>>>> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41
>>>> RIP routes
>>>> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that
>>>> much
>>>> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others
>>>> and if
>>>> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know.
>>>> CPU
>>>> usage
>>>> on it is around 40-50%.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kurt Fankhauser
>>>> WAVELINC
>>>> P.O. Box 126
>>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>>>> 419-562-6405
>>>> www.wavelinc.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> ---
>>>> ---
>>>> ---
>>>> --- 
>>>> -
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join to

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Dennis Burgess - LTI]

This woudl be better, as you have a metal indoor case around it. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
<http://www.linktechs.net/>
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
<http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> Do you think that having each card on a RB433 while being installed into an
> indoor enclosure with only 1 card per routerboard with foil around the
> indoor enclosure will solve the self-interference? Assuming that the RB433's
> are still stacked onto each other.
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>  
>  
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:55 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> Plus that many radios that close together is a almost a guaranteed to create
> self interference especially if they are high power radio cards. Those are
> according to MAC Compex radios they do have some highpower but most are not
> so might not really be a problem. 
>
>  
>
> I seen people that put XR5 or SR5 radios for example in the MT's on a single
> board in a metal enclosure that create self interference between the radios
> from what it seems either just to strong side lobes or a internal clock
> frequency leakage between the radios. Putting alu foil between the radios
> helped out but wasn't until one radio was moved to it's own box the problem
> completely was resolved in once instance. 
>
>  
>
> Depending on the powers of the card and it's side lobes you might need
> 60+MHz separation between the center channels in non turbo mode. 
>
>  
>
> In this case here one radio card is on 5745 and the other is on 5785 which
> means 40Mhz between center channels or total of 20MHz between the channels.
> Not very much for the side lobes. If anyone looks at a 802.11a or g signal
> on a SA you will quickly understand why 20MHz might not be enough and why
> you might need at least 40MHz between the "edges" of the signal. 
>
> And on top of this both of these cards are very busy from the look of it
> (one backhaul for the entire system and the other just a very busy AP). 
>
>  
>
> / Eje
>
>  
>
>   _  
>
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Blair Davis
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:40 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
>  
>
> IMHO, too many radios for the cpu speed.
>
> I don't go more than 3 radio for a cpu <1GHz
>
>
>
>
>
> Kurt Fankhauser wrote: 
>
> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU usage
> on it is around 40-50%.
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>   
>
>  
>
>   _  
>
>  
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
>
>   _  
>
>
>
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
> 
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>  
> Subscribe

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Kurt Fankhauser]

Do you think that having each card on a RB433 while being installed into an
indoor enclosure with only 1 card per routerboard with foil around the
indoor enclosure will solve the self-interference? Assuming that the RB433's
are still stacked onto each other.

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:55 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

Plus that many radios that close together is a almost a guaranteed to create
self interference especially if they are high power radio cards. Those are
according to MAC Compex radios they do have some highpower but most are not
so might not really be a problem. 

 

I seen people that put XR5 or SR5 radios for example in the MT's on a single
board in a metal enclosure that create self interference between the radios
from what it seems either just to strong side lobes or a internal clock
frequency leakage between the radios. Putting alu foil between the radios
helped out but wasn't until one radio was moved to it's own box the problem
completely was resolved in once instance. 

 

Depending on the powers of the card and it's side lobes you might need
60+MHz separation between the center channels in non turbo mode. 

 

In this case here one radio card is on 5745 and the other is on 5785 which
means 40Mhz between center channels or total of 20MHz between the channels.
Not very much for the side lobes. If anyone looks at a 802.11a or g signal
on a SA you will quickly understand why 20MHz might not be enough and why
you might need at least 40MHz between the "edges" of the signal. 

And on top of this both of these cards are very busy from the look of it
(one backhaul for the entire system and the other just a very busy AP). 

 

/ Eje

 

  _  

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

 

IMHO, too many radios for the cpu speed.

I don't go more than 3 radio for a cpu <1GHz





Kurt Fankhauser wrote: 

I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU usage
on it is around 40-50%.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

 

  _  

 



 





  _  



 
 
 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Scott Carullo]

5180 in my list says INDOOR ONLY

If that is incorrect somebody please correct me and point me to the 
appropriate documentation

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102

 Original Message 
> From: "Dennis Burgess - LTI" 
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 5:31 PM
> To: "WISPA General List" 
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> 
> What I was thinking too.  5180 is a allowed freq, but should be FCC 
> certified and has to have DFS2. 
> 
> * ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> WISPA Vendor Member*
> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
> <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
> <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
> 
> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended 
only for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than 
the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
from any computer.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Kevin Suitor wrote:
> > 5.2 is allowed for outdoor - the Redline AN-80i is certified for this
> > band.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
On
> > Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
> > To: 'WISPA General List'
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> >
> > And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor
> > unit I
> > would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections. 
> >
> > Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will 
never
> > be
> > able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and 
detect
> > radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at 
least
> > did
> > a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures. 
> >
> > Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified
> > radar
> > detecting device. 
> >
> > / Eje
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
On
> > Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
> > To: WISPA General List
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
> >
> > Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not 
> > certified. 
> >
> > * ---
> > Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> > WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> > Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> > WISPA Vendor Member*
> > *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
> > <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> > */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
> > <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
> >
> > The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is 
intended
> > only
> > for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
> > it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material.
> > Any
> > review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of 
any
> > action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
> > than
> > the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
> > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> > material
> > from any computer.
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> > Gino Villarini wrote:
> >   
> >> 5180.hmmm!!!
> >>
> >> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on 
an
> >> 
> >
> >   
> >> illegal channel
> >>
> >> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"  
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >>   
> >> 
> >>> Gino - Top right corn

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Dennis Burgess - LTI]

What I was thinking too.  5180 is a allowed freq, but should be FCC 
certified and has to have DFS2. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
<http://www.linktechs.net/>
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
<http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Kevin Suitor wrote:
> 5.2 is allowed for outdoor - the Redline AN-80i is certified for this
> band.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor
> unit I
> would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections. 
>
> Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will never
> be
> able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and detect
> radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at least
> did
> a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures. 
>
> Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified
> radar
> detecting device. 
>
> / Eje
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not 
> certified. 
>
> * ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> WISPA Vendor Member*
> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
> <http://www.linktechs.net/>
> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
> <http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>
>
> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended
> only
> for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
> Any
> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
> than
> the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material
> from any computer.
>
>  
>
>
>
> Gino Villarini wrote:
>   
>> 5180.hmmm!!!
>>
>> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an
>> 
>
>   
>> illegal channel
>>
>> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>>
>>
>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"  
>>  wrote:
>>
>>   
>> 
>>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>>
>>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>>
>>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would  
>>> cause a lot
>>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of  
>>> NAT as was
>>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
>>> --- Henry Spencer
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal   
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>   
>>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do 

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Kurt Fankhauser]

Tranzeo has DFS certified radio's in their TR-5a series correct me if I'm
wrong but I heard they spent big dollars on getting that line "certified"
with the DFS.

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor unit I
would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections. 

Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will never be
able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and detect
radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at least did
a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures. 

Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified radar
detecting device. 

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not 
certified. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
<http://www.linktechs.net/>
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
<http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than
the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
from any computer.

 



Gino Villarini wrote:
> 5180.hmmm!!!
>
> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an  
> illegal channel
>
> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"  
>  wrote:
>
>   
>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>
>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>
>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would  
>> cause a lot
>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of  
>> NAT as was
>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
>> --- Henry Spencer
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal   
>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you  
>>> have all
>>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and  
>>> they do
>>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and  
>>> all of
>>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>>
>>> -Kevin Neal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
>>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
>>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>>>
>>> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces  
>>> are
>>> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the  
>>> traffic that
>>> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41  
>>> RIP routes
>>> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that  
>>> much
>>> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others  
>>> and if
>>> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know.  
>>> CPU
>>> usage
>>> on it is around 40-50%.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Kurt Fankhauser]

It bounces from 30% to 50% pretty regular. 

Nothing is on NAT.
Connection tracking is disabled.



Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
 
 

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

Gino - Top right corner.

Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?

I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would cause a lot
of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of NAT as was
mentioned would be the first place I'd look.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal  wrote:

> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you have all
> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and they do
> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and all of
> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>
> -Kevin Neal
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic
that
> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP
routes
> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU
> usage
> on it is around 40-50%.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>


>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Kevin Suitor]

5.2 is allowed for outdoor - the Redline AN-80i is certified for this
band.

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 4:39 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor
unit I
would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections. 

Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will never
be
able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and detect
radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at least
did
a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures. 

Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified
radar
detecting device. 

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not 
certified. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
<http://www.linktechs.net/>
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
<http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended
only
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
than
the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material
from any computer.

 



Gino Villarini wrote:
> 5180.hmmm!!!
>
> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an

> illegal channel
>
> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"  
>  wrote:
>
>   
>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>
>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>
>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would  
>> cause a lot
>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of  
>> NAT as was
>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
>> --- Henry Spencer
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal   
>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you  
>>> have all
>>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and  
>>> they do
>>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and  
>>> all of
>>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>>
>>> -Kevin Neal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
>>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
>>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>>>
>>> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces  
>>> are
>>> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the  
>>> traffic that
>>> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41  
>>> RIP routes
>>> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that  
>>> much
>>> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others  
>>> and if
>>> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know.  
>>> CPU
>>> usage
>>> on it is around 40-50%.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kurt Fankhauser
>>> WAVELINC
>>> P.O. Box 126
>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>>> 419-562-6405
>>> www.wavelinc.com
>>>




---

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Eje Gustafsson]

And 5.2 is not allowed for outdoor usage. So Franks unit is an indoor unit I
would suspect he is suffering from multipath reflections. 

Besides on the radar stuff.. The way DFS is designed in MT it will never be
able to get certified. First of it must continuously look for and detect
radar not just when it first enable the interface. Secondly it at least did
a horrible job in actually detecting radar signatures. 

Besides 5.2 is not part of the band you can use even with a certified radar
detecting device. 

/ Eje

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - LTI
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 3:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not 
certified. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
<http://www.linktechs.net/>
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
<http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than
the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
from any computer.

 



Gino Villarini wrote:
> 5180.hmmm!!!
>
> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an  
> illegal channel
>
> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"  
>  wrote:
>
>   
>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>
>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>
>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would  
>> cause a lot
>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of  
>> NAT as was
>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
>> --- Henry Spencer
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal   
>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you  
>>> have all
>>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and  
>>> they do
>>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and  
>>> all of
>>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>>
>>> -Kevin Neal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
>>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
>>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>>>
>>> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces  
>>> are
>>> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the  
>>> traffic that
>>> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41  
>>> RIP routes
>>> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that  
>>> much
>>> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others  
>>> and if
>>> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know.  
>>> CPU
>>> usage
>>> on it is around 40-50%.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kurt Fankhauser
>>> WAVELINC
>>> P.O. Box 126
>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>>> 419-562-6405
>>> www.wavelinc.com
>>>





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Dennis Burgess - LTI]

Part of the 5.2 band.  All of the radar patters are in MT, just not 
certified. 

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org <http://www.wispa.org/>
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
<http://www.linktechs.net/>
*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
<http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp>

The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Gino Villarini wrote:
> 5180.hmmm!!!
>
> Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an  
> illegal channel
>
> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"  
>  wrote:
>
>   
>> Gino - Top right corner.
>>
>> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>>
>> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would  
>> cause a lot
>> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of  
>> NAT as was
>> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
>> --- Henry Spencer
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal   
>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you  
>>> have all
>>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and  
>>> they do
>>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and  
>>> all of
>>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>>
>>> -Kevin Neal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
>>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
>>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>>>
>>> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces  
>>> are
>>> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the  
>>> traffic that
>>> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41  
>>> RIP routes
>>> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that  
>>> much
>>> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others  
>>> and if
>>> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know.  
>>> CPU
>>> usage
>>> on it is around 40-50%.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kurt Fankhauser
>>> WAVELINC
>>> P.O. Box 126
>>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>>> 419-562-6405
>>> www.wavelinc.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> --- 
>>> --- 
>>> --- 
>>> 
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> --- 
>>> --- 
>>> --- 
>>> 
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>>   
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> 
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>   



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Gino Villarini]

5180.hmmm!!!

Not to bust anyones head but you are using an uncertified device on an  
illegal channel

Sent from my Motorola Startac...


On Apr 20, 2009, at 3:20 PM, "Josh Luthman"  
 wrote:

> Gino - Top right corner.
>
> Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?
>
> I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would  
> cause a lot
> of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of  
> NAT as was
> mentioned would be the first place I'd look.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
> --- Henry Spencer
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal   
> wrote:
>
>> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you  
>> have all
>> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and  
>> they do
>> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and  
>> all of
>> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>>
>> -Kevin Neal
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
>> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>>
>> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces  
>> are
>> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the  
>> traffic that
>> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41  
>> RIP routes
>> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that  
>> much
>> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others  
>> and if
>> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know.  
>> CPU
>> usage
>> on it is around 40-50%.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Kurt Fankhauser
>> WAVELINC
>> P.O. Box 126
>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>> 419-562-6405
>> www.wavelinc.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> --- 
>> 
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Scott Reed]

Unless it has run out of memory, that should be true.

Dennis Burgess - LTI wrote:
> unltil it his 100% and stays there, its not overloaded hahahaha .
>
> * ---
> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org 
> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
> WISPA Vendor Member*
> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 
> 
> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 
> 
>
> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
> for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than 
> the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
> from any computer.
>
>  
>
>
>
> Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
>   
>> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
>> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
>> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
>> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
>> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
>> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU usage
>> on it is around 40-50%.
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> Kurt Fankhauser
>> WAVELINC
>> P.O. Box 126
>> Bucyrus, OH 44820
>> 419-562-6405
>> www.wavelinc.com
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>   
>>
>> 
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> 
>>  
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> 
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>   
> 
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.12.0/2068 - Release Date: 04/19/09 
> 20:04:00
>
>   

-- 
Scott Reed
Sr. Systems Engineer
GAB Midwest
1-800-363-1544 x4000
Cell: 260-273-7239




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Dennis Burgess - LTI]

unltil it his 100% and stays there, its not overloaded hahahaha .

* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member*
*Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net 

*/LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/* 


The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is intended only 
for the person(s) or entity/entities to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action 
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you 
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.

 



Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU usage
> on it is around 40-50%.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>   
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> 
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Josh Luthman]

Gino - Top right corner.

Did the CPU just jump or has it casually been like that?

I've never had 5 radios in any board, I don't know if that would cause a lot
of usage or not.  Most any MT box I've seen is <5% CPU.  A lot of NAT as was
mentioned would be the first place I'd look.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Neal  wrote:

> Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you have all
> unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and they do
> fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and all of
> them have the 564 daughterboard in them.
>
> -Kevin Neal
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?
>
> I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
> bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
> passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
> might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
> sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
> there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU
> usage
> on it is around 40-50%.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> 
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Kevin Neal]

Is this doing any NAT?  Is connection tracking enabled?  Do you have all
unneeded packages disabled?  We have a few RB600's out there and they do
fine for the most part, we don't do any wireless on the 600's and all of
them have the 564 daughterboard in them.

-Kevin Neal



-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:50 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic that
passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41 RIP routes
might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't that much
sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from others and if
there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let me know. CPU usage
on it is around 40-50%.

 

 

 

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com

 

 

 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

[Gino Villarini]

On what freqs you have all those wireless cards? 


Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel  787.273.4143   fax   787.273.4145

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:50 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] is this router overloaded?

I have a RB600 here that I've taken a screenshot of. No interfaces are
bridged, everything is routed and I'm noticing some lag in the traffic
that passes though this device during peak use. I suspect that the 41
RIP routes might have something to do with it as actual throughput isn't
that much sometimes topping out around 8Mbps. Just want to hear from
others and if there is any suggestions on how I might speed this up let
me know. CPU usage on it is around 40-50%.

 

 

 

Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com

 

 

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/