Or how about automatic sector failover that puts no traffic on the network
when things are working correctly. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Lonnie Nunweiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 12:02 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mesh Equipment
I was wondering what switch has the largest mac address table. I don't
need more than 6 ports, but the $19.95 cheapy switches that my AP
Bridges all go into might be hurting my performance, I am thinking. If
shelling out $100 or so for a good switch makes sense, I am willing to
get one, but I d
We use Cisco 3550. Not gonna fall into the $100 price range I'm afraid.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pete Davis
Sent: Sat 2/25/2006 10:05 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Switch recommendations
I was wondering what switch has the largest mac a
OLSR does put its handshaking on the sectors, but you are right, no
data traffic goes down that alternate until the primary fails. The
changeover is typically within 15 to 30 seconds.
The other cool thing is being able to add ADSL backups into the
system, at various spots (could be T1, cable, etc
We run Foundry FES2402-Premium's. Obviously more than $100, though.
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pete Davis
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 9:05 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Switch recommen
Dell seems to make switches that deliver good performance for the cheap
price you pay. Whenever we don't need the capabilities of a Cisco
switch, but want something managable that won't fall down we go with Dell.
-Matt
Pete Davis wrote:
I was wondering what switch has the largest mac address
I see MikroTik has their MUM (MikroTik Users Meeting) scheduled for Dallas,
Texas May 4-5th as well as a
3 day training before that - - anyone here going to attend other than me? I
aint bashful and would share a room
with someone :-) if they dont snore as loud as myself or BUTCH EVANS
M
Has anyone seen issues between the two? I have a situation
where I replaced a staros box with a MT box (I’m
running rip) and the routes are getting distributed, I can pass traffic on to
the internet, but I can’t do anything past the MT box in the direction
going away from the internet. Now
There has been so much talk about this, I might be inclined to help the FCC
find those WISPs that are snubbing their noses at the law. This is a
professional list and those here should be abiding by the law. I wonder if it
would be a good thing to "kick out" those that promote illegal activities
We are still waiting to deply Cisco mesh, so I can't vouch for it *yet*. We
will be installing for the City of Gilroy Ca. probably in the next 4 weeks.
This is currently only a partial deployment, but they plan on lighting the
whole city. I can tell you that the equipment is expensive -$3500 per
Yes, unfortunately, the Cisco mesh is only using 5.8 for backhaul right now.
Since they recommend 16-18 mesh boxes per square mile, 5.25 GHz and up would be
a much better choice
John
>-Original Message-
>From: Jack Unger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006
I don't think WISPA should police WISPs. The organization does encourage
conforming to FCC regs, and we've seen numerous postings from Marlon and
others answering difficult rule interpretation. That's the best focus
for our energies as a WISP organization - that is; making FCC links and
docs av
Where are these being used? If it is at the customer edge, it will be
different than if at your core. The Netgear FS726T runs between 100 and 200
dollars and supports up to 8000 MAC adresses.
John
>-Original Message-
>From: Pete Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, Feb
Do you report people to the authorities for not wearing their seat
belts? How about for speeding?
Both of those can result in direct harm to people. Filing or not filing
form 477 will not directly harm anyone. It might result in the non
filer getting in trouble. But that is HIS or HER prob
- Original Message -
From: "John J. Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st
> There has been so much talk about this, I might be inclined to help the
FCC find those WISPs that are sn
John J. Thomas wrote:
There has been so much talk about this, I might be inclined to help the FCC find those
WISPs that are snubbing their noses at the law. This is a professional list and those
here should be abiding by the law. I wonder if it would be a good thing to "kick
out" those that p
AMEN !
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 1:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 477 Due March 1st
Do you report people to the authorities for not wearing their seat
belts?
Hey John Thomas -Were you the hall monitor in school ? Did you take names for the teacher when she walked out of the classroom ?
JohnnyO
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 19:04 +, John J. Thomas wrote:
There has been so much talk about this, I might be inclined to help the FCC find those WISPs that
I 2nd that one Bob ! - Noone likes a lil tattle tale - I think John Thomas just let his alligator mouth overload his mockinbird butt on this one. Definitely lost my respect.
JohnnyO
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 18:49 -0500, Bob Moldashel wrote:
John J. Thomas wrote:
>There has been so much talk a
19 matches
Mail list logo