On 5 jul 2004, at 22.43, ckimedia wrote:
I've read this, and found it useful but isn't it retrograde making
div's into table cells so we can style non tabular data in a table ?
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200406/
equal_height_boxes_with_css_part_ii/
I made that example to show that
Hi,
I'd just like to plug OZEWAI 2004 (http://www.ozewai.org/2004/). It would
be great if people from the Web Standards Group could bring their experience
and expertise to this conference. It's an annual event.
Geoff
*
The discussion list
You're in luck - ALA did an article in Accessible Image maps recently
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/imagemap/
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 12:49:30 -0600, Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks good. Is there a way to specify more links with one image?
What I mean is, can you make a
Note that its running :
1, 2 and 3 December 2004 at La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria.
So I guess most attendees will be Victorians.
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav
Geoff Deering
Hi all,
I'm about to rewrite the technical standards for the acceptance of external, and
independent, web resources.
At present they are only guidelines and they suggest:
. Compliance to WAI priority one (plus a little).
. W3C validated coding with allowable exceptions. E.g.
Hi,
I have almost completed an e-commerce site using XHTML/CSS and have one
last little niggle after testing on Windows IE 6. I have spent half
the day googling, applying different floats, overflows, divs and
clearing divs but I can't get anything to work so here's your chance to
save me from
Geoff Deering wrote:
I'd just like to plug OZEWAI 2004 (http://www.ozewai.org/2004/). It
would
be great if people from the Web Standards Group could bring their
experience
and expertise to this conference. It's an annual event.
I think one big problem people associate with accessibility is
AH...
You my friend are a star!
I tried every other combination I think, but not after the form element
- I was concentrating on the image and creating more divs and floats
separately for the image and text...
If I was still in the UK I'd shout you a pint!
Thanks again...
Christiaan
On
Mike Foskett wrote:
I'm about to rewrite the technical standards for the acceptance of
external, and independent, web resources.
At present they are only guidelines and they suggest:
. Compliance to WAI priority one (plus a little).
. W3C validated coding with allowable exceptions. E.g. Flash /
Thanks for the response Andy.
Great quiz by the way. Made me think and laugh.
You are suggesting the guidelines as they stand now with cases of must replacing
should.
The problem is they're set too high.
If applied strictly then even the DRC's website would fail.
Here's an extended scenario:
I havent tried this, but it sounds interesting
http://www.phoenity.com/newtedge/hide_email_spambots/
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav
thats actually very good :)
Thanks :)
___
Cameron W (aka t94xr)
http://www.t94xr.net.nz/
XHTML CSS Compliant.
Taupo, NZ.
- Original Message -
From: Neerav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:50 AM
Subject: [WSG] Hiding email
Here's the situation: Sliding doors, right justified. Works fine in
Firefox and IE/Win 5.01+. In Opera 7.23 all the tabs line up
vertically. According to the ALA article IE/Mac does something similar.
The solution there is to float the anchors, but it doesn't help here.
The only thing which
Ive lost a reference to another excellent article I
read about how to guarantee that two or three columns will go all the way to the
bottom of the page, regardless of the length of any of the columns. Can anyone
help?
The article Im looking for shows how to have columns
styled all the
Michael Kear wrote:
Ive lost a reference to another excellent article I read about how to
guarantee that two or three columns will go all the way to the bottom of
the page, regardless of the length of any of the columns.Can anyone
help?
You can do this by cheating a bit with the background,
El mar, 06-07-2004 a las 15:45, Michael Kear escribió:
I've lost a reference to another excellent article I read about how to
guarantee that two or three columns will go all the way to the bottom of the
page, regardless of the length of any of the columns.Can anyone help?
Could it be the
Michael Kear wrote:
Ive lost a reference to another excellent article I read about how to
guarantee that two or three columns will go all the way to the bottom
of the page, regardless of the length of any of the columns. Can
anyone help?
Was it
-Original Message-
From: Mike Foskett
Hi all,
I'm about to rewrite the technical standards for the acceptance
of external, and independent, web resources.
At present they are only guidelines and they suggest:
. Compliance to WAI priority one (plus a little).
. W3C
Neerav wrote:
I havent tried this, but it sounds interesting
http://www.phoenity.com/newtedge/hide_email_spambots/
Two problems: doesn't allow mailto:; and doesn't work in IE.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Also, on Firebird you can't copy and paste the email address which is a bit
annoying. Also, it would be a bit annoying to deploy on site where the email
address links are generated dynamically, you'd need to generate a bit of CSS as
well as the link.
All in all, I wouldn't use that method.
Hi,
Thanks, it is truly enlightening hearing from the author. So this is
not an example of how to convert div's to cells but just vertical
alignment without the need for images, so semantically all is good with
this technique?
C
On Tuesday, July 6, 2004, at 12:08 AM, Roger Johansson wrote:
I use the following javascript. It works well for me.
script language=JavaScript!--
var name = insert username;
var domain = insert domain name;
document.write('a href=\mailto:' + name + '@' + domain + '\');
document.write(name + '@'
No it wasn't that one Mordechai, but it's a terrific article. That's a
fantastic resource. And it can build your styles automatically too!!
Thanks for finding it.
I never fail to be astonished at the worthwhile and downright practical
ideas coming from this list, day after day.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Ted Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use the following javascript. It works well for me.
Ted
-
the downside beign they dont use a JS enabled browser? They cant contact
you.
Better is a PHP Contact Form
John Wyles has one - a very good one indeed.
On the H1 issue, there are many
people that think using an H1 around the logo or hidden text.
Unfortunately, that is improper. Your H1 should be visible and should support the title of the
page.
Yes it does... but
I'm also quite confused. I thought the way I set up the page
How's about:
pso-and-soscriptdocument.write(@anywhere.com)/scriptnoscript@anywhere.com/noscript/p
At least you're covered whether or not JavaScript is enabled.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Let's discuss some issues for a moment and perhaps some light will shine
upon some comments.
Drew [qoute]The vague discussion of some people not approving of
skipped levels does not say that a hierarchy of headings is
required.[/quote]
The vague discussion of some people refers to the
Hi Drew,
Thank you for your very detailed explanation. It was actually just what
I needed because I'm almost running over with reading specs from W3 and
numorus other sources. (It's now saved in my useful folder on my
backup drive)
Anyway your last paragraph did it for me because that just
Didn't want to get sucked into this issue but thought ... bugger :o)
Headings go from h1 ~ 6 with no gaps; neither should they run anything other
than h1 down to h6, meaning h1, h3, h2 is not permissible ordering.
Headings assist with scanning whether or not using AT or dealing with
impaired as
Let's discuss some issues for a moment and perhaps some light will shine
upon some comments.
Drew [qoute]The vague discussion of some people not approving of
skipped levels does not say that a hierarchy of headings is
required.[/quote]
The vague discussion of some people refers to the
You're most welcome. Good luck with it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kim Kruse
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG]headers
Hi Drew,
Thank you for your very detailed explanation. It was actually
On 06 Jul 2004 17:16:02 +0200, Manuel González Noriega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a blog? Blogmarks. That way i can keep track of interesting
links while sharing them with the world.
Other people will suggest surely a service like http://del.icio.us/ or
plain old bookmarks :)
I
Hey Friends,
Thought I'd pop in and thank Tim for noticing the redesign.
Iza, I am definitely aware of the text-size issues and am
working diligently to get them resolved ASAP. I would love to
include a style-sheet switcher but have been unable to get
the go ahead for that and the designers
There are more than W3C standards. While the W3C standards are great, they
leave too much to interpretation. Hence the problem that arises here.
Lee [quote]However, once you start approaching any attempt to comply with
WCAG you need to follow the standards correctly.[/quote]
Drew
Neerav wrote:
I havent tried this, but it sounds interesting
http://www.phoenity.com/newtedge/hide_email_spambots/
Nice concept -- but -- all it takes is for a spammer to start harvesting
based on the \40 string and stream substitute it for the @ into
their DB.
Given the incompatibility with
Hey Kay
I have a wiki on my site, so that I can categorize and annotate my
bookmarks. It's become a huge organic sprawling beast in less than a
year, but *so* useful.
The resources section of the WSG site is meant to be just this type of
beast (http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/) except
HI All
My thoughts on this issue are here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05509.html
If doesn't really matter what obfuscation method you use:
- If its visible to users spam harvestors can get it if they really want to.
- The more you hide it (via js, css or what ever else)
Frstly thanks to everyone that answered
How about this for a crazy thought reguards getting a footer connected
to a external style sheet,
If I made a small image map ...called it a background image and placed
it at bottom centre.
Is there any reason why that could/would not work?
Ern Marshall
Kay Smoljak wrote:
On an almost completely unrelated and off-topic topic, I find it
interesting that the word Favourites has never become as popular as
Bookmarks, even amongst casual non-technical users, despite the fact
that IE has like 110% market share. I guess it's because you can't use
Mark Stanton wrote:
- If its visible to users spam harvestors can get it if they really want to.
Of course. The point is just to make it more difficult. A car alarm
doesn't stop car theft, but with all else equal, the thief will choose
one without an alarm.
Of course. The point is just to make it more difficult. A car alarm
doesn't stop car theft, but with all else equal, the thief will choose
one without an alarm.
That's fine true but by making it difficult for spam bots you also
make it difficult for your users.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty
41 matches
Mail list logo
