RE: [WSG] A few questions needing answers

2004-03-05 Thread Peter Firminger
And I'll add a bit: Forms on Websites Is there a good place that explains/makes available the coding involved for putting simple forms on sites? My programming knowledge doesn't go beyond css, xhtml and using JavaScript nuggets, but I've always wanted to be able to put contact forms on

RE: [WSG] Email Standards?

2004-03-04 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi Lorenzo, Firstly thanks for joining! You wrapped up one of the two continents we were missing in our members. Only Antarctica to go now (I think?). You could try looking at the document on http://webstandardsgroup.org/go/resource135.cfm Regards, Peter PS: While I'm at it a quick member

[WSG] classguide

2004-02-26 Thread Peter Ottery
hiya, I noticed that the much publicized new qantas airline - http://www.jetstar.com/- launchedtheirsite with a css layout. I havent had a real look at the code, but my question is more about class and id names. when you have a pretty complicated site and you end up using some sort of

RE: [WSG] A new standards based smh.com.au/technology

2004-02-25 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: [WSG] A new standards based smh.com.au/technology Hi Tim, thanks for yr kind words :) I was going to send a note around to the list when we fixed a few things up with it but just havent had time... ok, so few points: * yep, the new tech section is our first live site

RE: [WSG] A new standards based smh.com.au/technology

2004-02-25 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: [WSG] A new standards based smh.com.au/technology I'd certainly like to use them if you have no objections. of course not, its an important message. gotta get it out there :) we're going to try to put together a whats new about the design page on the site with some more

RE: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Peter Firminger
Good question Peter! Absolutely. The metadata is about the page not the site and should be unique (at least the title and description) for every page. Depends on how much metadata you use. This leads to a really deep discussion about metadata that we may have at some point, but in the mean time

RE: [WSG] silly question about meta tags

2004-02-25 Thread Peter Firminger
PS. Not all search engines read nor care about meta keywords In fact, we believe that only one (not too significant) SE looks at them at all and they would be far down the decision list there anyway as they are perfect spambait for spamming the engines with incorrect metadata. There is some

[WSG] XHTML Basic 1.0

2004-02-25 Thread Peter Firminger
In looking for some other stuff on W3, I stumbled across this pagehttp://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/ The DTD is "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN" Anyone had anything to do with this? I hadn't heard of it at all (maybe I'm ignorant and should spend more time trawling the W3 site). P

RE: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?

2004-02-24 Thread Peter Firminger
Jaime, this is not a CSS list so no apology required. You are definitely on-topic. Unless you want to tell your client to go all the way I suggest you tell them that they are clutching for buzzwords by demanding XHTML 1.0 Strict (or anything beyond XHTML 1.0 Transitional). If they continue to

[WSG] double quoting

2004-02-24 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: double quoting Hi guys, theres a CMS (content management system) I'm dealing with that is converting some double quotes to single quotes, so this... div id=content ...becomes... div id='content' ...when published. this is on a XHTML transitional page. Now, I'm a bit

RE: [WSG] double quoting

2004-02-24 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: [WSG] double quoting James wrote: So, as far as I can tell, single quotes on your attribute values are perfectly acceptable (for xhtml1). Havent done any real testing in browsers, but I'd say it is a non-issue. nice! hey thanks for digging that up :) very

RE: [WSG] Debrief and thanks to Russ Peter

2004-02-23 Thread Peter Firminger
://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/benefits/ Peter: Hope to see the photos on the website soon! As requested... a few snapshots: http://webstandardsgroup.org/go/event6.cfm Thanks again everybody. Looking forward to the next WSG meeting. -- tim Next, to Melbourne on 8th March for our

RE: [WSG] IE bug

2004-02-20 Thread Peter Firminger
So move your form out to surround an area that isn't pixel-perfect critical.. the whole page if necessary.. P From: Chris Stratford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 2:36 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] IE bug Is that why when you close

[WSG] WSG Member Countries

2004-02-19 Thread Peter Firminger
Just thought you all may be interested in the WSG user base. 136 Australia 2 Austria 6 Belgium 8 Brazil 8 Canada 2 Denmark 1 Finland 1 France 8 Germany 1 Iceland 3 India 1 Indonesia 1 Iraq 4 Italy 1 Jordan 4 New Zealand 1 Norway 1 Peru 2 Philippines 1

RE: [WSG] Opera

2004-02-18 Thread Peter Ottery
problems as IE anyway. Interested ... Peter

RE: [WSG] Opera

2004-02-18 Thread Peter Firminger
I keep biting my tongue on this subject. Let me state first... I have no particular love of IE. It's what the vast majority of my audience uses and therefore it's my default browser. If Mozilla or something else takes the market share, I'll change my default (as I did when Netscape 4.x lost

RE: [WSG] Hover issue

2004-02-16 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi JG, If you validate the page using the HTML validator, there is a link to check the CSS as well and this parses the page to validate the CSS (easier than validating all the CSS files individually if you have more than one and more correct as it uses the parsing tree). So go to:

RE: [WSG] Cool No-delay image rollover technique

2004-02-16 Thread Peter Firminger
I know I have my browser (IE 6 WinXP Pro) set to not cache anything, but this method doesn't work for me. Over a second delay on rollover and roll off with a blank space in the meantime. It makes no difference to a _javascript_ preload at all. Much better code though so I'm not canning it.

RE: [WSG] WHYYY??? WHYYYY???

2004-02-16 Thread Peter Firminger
! Thanks Peter * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *

RE: [WSG] CSS Rules - Naming Conventions

2004-02-15 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: [WSG] CSS Rules - Naming Conventions yeah I'm known to use id=wrap id=masthead id=nav id=sidebar id=footer etc etc all the time trying to keep the names non-specific to the layout (like id=lefthandnav) cause when/if it changes later to a horizontal nav across the top i'd feel a

RE: [WSG] Tenth AIMIA Awards announced

2004-02-10 Thread Devlin Peter W
Mark wrote: creating an additional award is not going to make the main award events stand up and go duh, we've been coming at this from the wrong angle. I also feel that hall of shame type stuff is not a great solution either - I'm seriously wondering what the right approach would be - I really

RE: [WSG] Tenth AIMIA Awards announced

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
Stick with it David. Our time will come. The benefits of going through the (hard) process of getting your standards codebank together far outweigh the pain. Once you have it, you start with a base codeset and then, creating a new site is a much easier process. Whether you pass the savings on to

RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi Chris, You need to escape any with amp;(even in URL query strings). Links to the relevant files/validator results would help so we could see the code. P From: Chris Stratford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:01 PMTo: Web Standards

RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
The other suggestion is to validate the CSS file(s) separately at http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri.htmlrather than parsing the xhtml for the linked files. P I have an interesting problem here...i try and validate the CSS of my XHTML website...and the CSS page says i

RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
It's good practice to do it for (amp;) and (quot;) in the text all the time (HTML or XHTML). Also be aware of em-dashes, en-dashes, epsilons (...) and the curly varieties of and ' (which I hate and always strip back to the plain text version). If it's your own blog software, make sure to

RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
, how embarrassment! But I'd rather stick with 3 dots (...) as I have seen this one break badly in a search result or text browser or something, can't remember where now. May just be a stubborn bad habit. Sorry if that worries Peter (UH) as well. P

RE: [WSG] code for a form

2004-02-09 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi Peter, That really should happen on the server using whatever programming language you're equipped with (ColdFusion, PHP, Perl, ASP etc.) It is possible to do it from the client using JavaScript or simply submitting the form to an email address but it's really dodgy and I strongly recommend

RE: Opening pages in new windows... was Re: [WSG] XHTML (OT??)

2004-02-08 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: Opening pages in new windows... was Re: [WSG] XHTML (OT??) p.s. I don't work for f2.com.au i do :) although before i look at the code behind that example (*preparing to grimace*) I'll let you know we have got a fair way to go with standards in general. we are on it though.

[WSG] RE: Opening pages in new windows... [We're done here]

2004-02-08 Thread Peter Firminger
We can probably shut this one down now folks. It's gotten way OT. Browser set-up preferences isn't really on-topic at all. New windows are a personal/professional preference rather than a standards topic (though the conversation did start on-topic when related to target in XHTML and the handy

RE: [WSG] Second try with [a name]

2004-02-04 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: [WSG] Second try with [a name] Taco wrote: my suggestion was to put nbsp; between the tag, and then set its style to not display so it does not take up any space, something like a name=c44 class=anchor/a If you set display:none on the links opera and mozilla wont

RE: [WSG] Could someone please do a little testing for me?

2004-02-04 Thread Peter Firminger
Netscape isn't tied to the OS like IE is on Windows, so it isn't an issue. You can load any number of other browsers, but without the aforementioned installations, you are generally stuck with one version of IE unless you set up a dual-boot system. P From: Universal Head

RE: [WSG] Last error on Validator

2004-01-30 Thread Peter Firminger
Title: Message Absolutely, one of the big ones in designing a CMS (or blog)or making sure a static site is standards compliant (see http://www.webboy.net/presentation/validation.cfm) Also all " in the text should really be quot; (and no I really don't see the need for the curly varieties,

RE: [WSG] What Causes Selection Problems In IE.

2004-01-29 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: [WSG] What Causes Selection Problems In IE. Russ wrote: Here is a test page to show you. Check it with Win/IE6: http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/css/try-and-highlight-me.htm mmm, interesting, without wanting to sound like an IE fan ;-), I can select that text no problem using

RE: [WSG] What to do? [Now OT]

2004-01-29 Thread Peter Firminger
Yes it's interesting but not a web standards discussion. Please reply to this thread off list. Peter * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *

[WSG] CMS Discussion

2004-01-28 Thread Peter Firminger
in a separate list just on Content Management (and yes this includes Dreamweaver as it is a valid tool to manage content), please let us know at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and if we get more than 10 interested participants, I'll set it up. Regards, Peter (ListDad

[WSG] Mail problem this morning and CMS list

2004-01-28 Thread Peter Firminger
gone astray as well. So rather than bother with it any further, it's done. If you want to be on the CMS mailing list please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with Subscribe cms (no quotes) in the BODY of the message. Regards, Peter Sent this message before 10am today, and it seems to have

[WSG] a horizontal ol drops the numbers..?

2004-01-19 Thread Peter Ottery
gurus, can anyone tell me why this code... - style type=text/cssli {display: inline}/style ollisome text/lilia little more text/lilianother bit/lilieven a bit more/li/ol - ...drops the numbers from the start of each list item as soon as you make the list run horizontally? I

RE: [WSG] Russ' point from last night's meeting

2004-01-16 Thread Peter Firminger
In some Government organisations, Netscape 4 is still used as the default browser generally to the use of the Netscape email client and because they paid a site licence for corporate use (which is why Netscape had to bring out an update to 4.7? last year). If one of these organisations is your

RE: [WSG] big trouble...still!

2004-01-14 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: [WSG] big trouble...still! Can someone please check again for me? yep, its good to go, it did crash my IE6 on Win2k before, but all is fine now. pete

[WSG] ordered list for events

2004-01-13 Thread Peter Ottery
Hi all, I've got a simple list of events with dates and am trying to keep it as a simple ordered list. http://www.c41.com.au/test.htmlshows my example with everything else stripped out. (the css is inline just for ease of creating the example.) I thought I had it sorted until I

RE: [WSG] ordered list for events

2004-01-13 Thread Peter Ottery
Title: RE: [WSG] ordered list for events thanks everyone! in response to a few of those questions: Gary wrote: I realise you have said you want to keep it as a simple ordered list - but I am not sure of the reason why. glory ;-) nah, I guess I'm just getting a real kick out of not

RE: [WSG] A few links...

2004-01-08 Thread Peter Firminger
We are thinking about this, the problem is that many people have sigs with their url in them and other people post links to sites with their questions. If we automate the link stripping, we'll get those too. I suggest (actually Russ did) we make sure we post the links in the resources area so

RE: [WSG] Small bug

2004-01-05 Thread Peter Firminger
Title: Small bug Hi Peter, Much obliged y'all. Hey, and work in progress exhibited on this list is confidential, right? Members of the list would adhere to this I'm sure, but remember that the list is publicly archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/wsg%40webstandardsgroup.org

[WSG] XHTML Repost

2004-01-04 Thread Peter Firminger
It may be a good time to repost this from Russ on 5th July 2003: repost Peter and I have been (endlessly) discussing the pro's and cons of XHTML over HTML4.01. We made the move from HTML4.01 transitional to XHTML 1.0 transitional mid last year, and while the transition was quick, we have been

RE: [WSG] XHTML Repost

2004-01-04 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi Nick, Ah ok... so the type must be sent in the headers before the page is even generated (i.e. by the web server). So how would the presence of meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 / or the xml prolog affect the process afterwards? Presumably by then they

RE: [WSG] Need Assistance...

2004-01-03 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi Adam, To send the header, I believe it is cfcontent type=application/xhtml+xml I use cfcontent type=text/xml for XML and RDF AGLS harvest control lists and metadata. e.g.: http://gtconnect.webboy.net/meta/index.cfm (HCL) and http://gtconnect.webboy.net/meta/metadata.cfm (metadata for other

RE: [WSG] What have I missed here?

2003-12-21 Thread Peter Firminger
Gulp! Yeah. Well by the time I've fixed all those I might just have fixed whatever the problem is. Thanks Peter. Cheers Mike Kear -Original Message- From: Peter Firminger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 21 December 2003 1:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

RE: [WSG] What have I missed here?

2003-12-20 Thread Peter Firminger
sorting those issues out first as this will eliminate some of the problems and make troubleshooting easier for others. A doctype is very important as it affects how browsers render the page. Regards, Peter -Original Message- From: Michael Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday

RE: [WSG] Site Issues

2003-12-16 Thread Peter Firminger
Title: FW: [WSG] Site Issues Bouncesare only sent to the sender of a post (and us), not the list. Please do not send errors back to the list as they are then permanently archived into the public archive at mail-archive.com (we can't delete posts from this archive). Please post list issues

RE: [WSG] [OT everso slightly] Gramophone web site

2003-12-11 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi Jonathon, It has dynamic menus that you're not getting in Safari. A good illustration of not testing (or caring about) cross platform compatibility. This is also a good time to point out that if you use these types of dynamic menus, you must point the initial link to a meaningful address (a

RE: [WSG] OT: Opening documents in _blank window

2003-12-11 Thread Peter Firminger
If you force a user to save the file locally instead of opening it in the manner in which their browser is set up to handle it you're taking away their control of default behaviours. I really recommend against this. Let the browser handle it. If they have only the Acrobat Reader,a PDF

RE: [WSG] Fixed Width Design

2003-12-11 Thread Peter Firminger
We must remember the origin of the Home Page. This was the page that your old Unix shell account browser saved their bookmarks to (the two I used to use were lynx and I believe the other was simply www). This page was (by default) the index document in your account directory

Re: [WSG] Generated Content

2003-12-10 Thread Peter Neal
display the generated content. Peter. Moose wrote: I'm wondering if anyone out there can point me to an article or crib-sheet discussing the current support for generated content in CSS2. Such as are discussed here http://www.richinstyle.com/guides/generated2.html. I would like to use

RE: [WSG] Re: px em pt ???

2003-12-09 Thread Peter Firminger
Also FWIW (a good generic audience) take a look at the AM Online stats breakdown of browsers and platforms for November 2003 http://www.amonline.net.au/website/reports/amonline/0311/index_08_b.htm Regards, Peter * The discussion list for http

RE: [WSG] Scrollbar Colouring...

2003-12-02 Thread Peter Firminger
-validator/validator?uri=http://virginblue.com.au/CSS/virginblue.csswarning=1profile=""> I recommend against it. I wouldn't have written just to say that, so the real message is: Is everyone else getting everything twice or is it just me? (please answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Re

RE: [WSG] CMS question [Now OT]

2003-10-27 Thread Peter Firminger
that the user simply edits the text without having to know the entities. Thanks, Peter (ListDad) * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *

<    1   2   3   4   5   6