The validator will help resolve and prevent those unexpected results
in your work, such as an element being the wrong colour because it's
inheriting values from somewhere you hadn't anticipated. In that
case, explicitly setting the colour will make sure it's set to the
value you're
will be in the next update.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
-unfriendly.
Yes, very unfriendly:
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/2416.html
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
.456bereastreet.com/archive/200409/
content_negotiation_adsense_and_comments/
The iframe created by the ad script still contains old-skool tag-soup
though. No way around that.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http
On 6 maj 2005, at 08.01, tee wrote:
But it is in the div
Example:
div id=form
form method=post action=form.cgi
input type=hidden name=postmode value=QUANTITYBOXES /
You need a block level element _inside_ the form element:
form
div
input /
/div
/Roger
--
http://www
-level content) and Q is
intended for short quotations (inline content) that don't require
paragraph breaks.
So yes, the p (or some other block-level element) is necessary, and it
goes inside the blockquote element.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com
On 6 maj 2005, at 22.57, Lukasz Grabun wrote:
Roger Johansson wrote:
Unless I'm misreading the W3C Recommendation, blockquote elements can
only have block-level content. That makes the second example
incorrect. From http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#h-9.2.2
:
So yes, the p (or some
/
css_tips_and_tricks_part_2/
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
links.
Neither of these techniques seem to get it all right. At least as far
as I can tell.
So, have any of you implemented a horizontal, single level dropdown
menu that you are completely happy with when it comes to accessibility?
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com
and disadvantages
of drop downs. http://www.alistapart.com/articles/hybrid/ - all code
inclusive.
Hi,
Thanks for responding, but nope, neither of those is what I'm looking
for.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http
IE Doesnt understand margin: auto
IE6 does, as does IE5/Mac. Only if you are worried about IE5.*/Win do
you need the text-align hack.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
elements
with type=image.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
+xml, you may be interested
in something I wrote a while ago:
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200501/
the_perils_of_using_xhtml_properly/
/Roger
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
button, or have a blank one,
but this sort of defeats the purpose in my opinion... ideas?
If you're determined not to show the label, you can use CSS to hide it
from visual browsers.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list
On 17 feb 2005, at 03.14, David R wrote:
I mean, provided you send the document from the server as unicode, why
must we resort to entities for non-reserved characters?
You don't. If you use unicode, you don't have to use character
references.
/Roger
/
flexible_box_with_custom_corners_and_borders/
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Containing Floats article explains it pretty well:
http://www.complexspiral.com/publications/containing-floats/
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
horizontally. I'm guessing that you're floating the tabs and didn't
specify a width for them, which IE/Mac needs.
FYI: I tried taking a look at your old (current) layout, but something
crashes Safari every time. Not sure what causes it.
HTH
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com
.456bereastreet.com/archive/200412/
internet_explorer_is_already_breaking_the_web/#comment2433
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
to that (either because they
aren't allowed to, or because they just don't know).
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
just been lucky?
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
was released in 1994. It's like
checking your stuff in Windows 95. Spend some money on a used iMac or
PowerMac G4 instead. It doesn't have to be very new - basically
anything released after 1998 will do (just make sure it can run Mac OS
X) - so it won't cost you a lot.
/Roger
--
http://www
your own controls).
[1]
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200410/
styling_even_more_form_controls/
/Roger
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
Page Info), and alert you of any well-formedness errors.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
?
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
for the whole document.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/dirlang.html#adef-lang
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
/
[2] http://keystonewebsites.com/articles/mime_type.php
[3]
http://www.autisticcuckoo.net/archive.php?id=2004/11/03/content-
negotiation
Note the function in [3] to convert XHTML to HTML before sending it as
text/html.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com
CSS rules. For each form
control, there are screen shots from a whole lot (well, eleven right
now) of different browsers and operating systems:
http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200409/styling_form_controls/
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com
the mess. I successfully implemented
this in a recent project, so you can make ASP.NET based sites validate
:)
[1] http://aspnetresources.com/
[2] http://aspnetresources.com/articles/HttpFilters.aspx
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com
it to iso-8859-1 and it should work better.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
://www.unfolded.net/webdesign/parker-wasp-t.php using a WaSP
template w/o character encoding.
Both pages display in Safari, with no obvious problems.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud
.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30
/
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30
On 9 sep 2004, at 15.11, JW wrote:
It shows fine in Firefox, Opera 7 and IE6 but it breaks in IE5. Any
solutions?
Probably box model related, if it breaks in IE5 and not IE6.
I don't have IE5/Win handy here to take a look. In what way does it
break?
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com
On 22 aug 2004, at 17.23, Vlad Alexander ((XStandard)) wrote:
Mozilla fans, we need your help. The Mozilla version of the
standards-compliant XHTML WYSIWYG editor XStandard is almost ready.
Will that make it work on the Mac as well? I suspect not, but I'm
hoping :-)
/Roger
--
http://www
you're styling is tabular data, obviously).
If you use a table, you're stuck with a table, and if later on you want
to change the layout, you will probably need to edit the HTML as well
as the CSS.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com
On 5 jul 2004, at 06.58, Hugh Todd wrote:
So, please use plain text in emails if you want to be read.
I second that. Tiny, unreadable text = I hit the delete key.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
*
The discussion list for http
,
Roger
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
*
( with even) the latest
version of Opera for windows.
Has anyone got a way of doing it?
No. Styling form elements the same across platforms and browsers is not
possible, since several browsers use the operating system's native
widgets, and ignore most attempts at styling them.
/Roger
--
http
@import, and will load the css file in the
above example. However, if you specify the URL in a slightly different
way it won't:
@import css/modern.css;
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
*
The discussion list for http
;
}
q:before {
content: ;
}
q:after {
content: ;
}
The above does not work in IE5/Mac, so people using that will get
double quotes.
This way you can use the typographically correct quote marks for the
language used, and not the standard that all browsers seem to add by
default.
/Roger
--
http://www
are
wrapped in the links, and are treated as inline content, they get an
underline on hover, just like the text below them. You can fix it by
adding display:block to the .model img rule.
/Roger
--
http://www.456bereastreet.com/
*
The discussion list
would just like to see some.
If anyone has any other recommended Open Source CMS systems out there please pass them
along as well.
Thanks,
Roger
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
clear:both; in both of the upper div's, is this
the wrong thing?
As always all comments are appreciated.
Roger
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
at the top of the page in
Safari.
I have no idea what its doing in IE6 (if anyone wants to tell me you
can
spare the gory details =) ).
So what is the deal here? I have put clear:both; in both of the
upper
div's, is this the wrong thing?
As always all comments are appreciated.
Roger
.
Original Message
Subject: RE: [WSG] centering rigid content
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, February 15, 2004 2:57 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Roger
The problem you describe is happening in FireFox too. The centerctr div
is
not being cleared - add clear:both
at this in IE6
and tell me how FUBARed it is?
www.desertstandard.net/yv2/
cheers
roger
Original Message
Subject: RE: [WSG] centering rigid content
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, February 15, 2004 9:03 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alright i removed the clear: both; from
itself so much.
thanks again.
Original Message
Subject: RE: [WSG] centering rigid content
From: LC 55 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, February 15, 2004 11:22 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Screenshot from Opera 7 @ http://lc55.co.uk/test/yv.jpg
Sorry Roger, but the search box seems
borrowing heavily from what others have given, what is
the proper way of giving credit?
roger
Original Message
Subject: Re: [WSG] centering rigid content
From: JLE Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, February 15, 2004 5:40 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re pixy.cz approach
but would like to use the nav bar that you
created if you dont mind. I will have to check everything in IE6 first of course,
dammit.
Thanks for your help it is very appreciated.
Roger
Original Message
Subject: Re: [WSG] misbehaving footer
From: Michael Donnermeyer [EMAIL
there is something going on at www.desertstandard.net/yv2/teachers.shtml with the
footer bar. its like a missed closing a div somewhere but I cannot find it.
Anything you guys can recommend about increasing the accessibility as well?
Thanks again,
Roger
Original Message
Subject: RE: [WSG
can see everything but the Nav bar does not work and the upper right
hand image is displaced.
In MAC IE 5.2 everything works great but the background image does not show up.
The CSS validates and the HTML is good save a few img close tags and what not.
Oh please help!
Sincerely,
Roger
ooops sorry,
www.desertstandard.net/yv/
Original Message
Subject: Re: [WSG] horizontal nav bar nightmare
From: Paul Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, February 10, 2004 10:50 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roger,
I am getting a 404 page not found with that URL.
Regards
53 matches
Mail list logo
