http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/03/31/proper-flash-embedding-flashobject-best-practices/
if your not adverse to using some javascript, no ones be able to prove
any draw backs to using this system yet
certainly much easier than merthods you re trying!!
designer wrote:
OK, I'm getting a bit
G'day
OK, I'm getting a bit confused and I need help from someone
with a clear
head!
I haven't got one of those - it's full of grey matter (some of it
sticking out ;-) However...
What surprises me is that the non flash content in the Jessey
example works when it's not IE you are
for another point of view here's a link tothe Flash gurus at the
Flashnewbie list
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/
they're extremely knowledgeable when it comes to Flash
ByteDreams
- Original Message -
From: David McKinnon
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17,
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Neerav
Sent: Wednesday, 18 August 2004 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Valid Flash state of play
The following is valid XHTML transitional, and seems to work fine in the
browsers I've checked (IE6, Mozilla, Opera)
object
codebase=http
]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Valid Flash state of play
The following is valid XHTML transitional, and seems to work fine in the
browsers I've checked (IE6, Mozilla, Opera)
object
codebase=http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.ca
b#version=6,0,0,0
type=application/x-shockwave-flash
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Valid Flash state of play
The following is valid XHTML transitional, and seems to work fine in the
browsers I've checked (IE6, Mozilla, Opera)
object
codebase=http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.ca
b#version=6,0,0,0
type=application/x-shockwave
]
-Original Message-
From: James Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 August 2004 08:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Valid Flash state of play
Hi
I have a feeling that the inconsistencies in valid xhtml markup for
embedding (object) Flash were from general badness in the ActiveX
Hi
Try writing the necessary, but bloated flash code dynamically from a
linked JS file as a function. Then call the function within the
document. Safe, reliable and valid.
C
On Tuesday, August 17, 2004, at 05:20 PM, David McKinnon wrote:
Does anyone know if anyone has managed to produce a valid
Try writing the necessary, but bloated flash code dynamically from a
linked JS file as a function. Then call the function within the
document. Safe, reliable and valid.
...and it doesn't work without JavaScript enabled. Also, in reality that's just
tricking the validator and still supplying
Hi,
This is for embedding quicktime, but it may put you on to something.
http://realdev1.realise.com/rossa/rendertest/quicktime.html
And flash doesn't work with plug-in's and this doesn't work, without
that.. Six in one hand half-dozen in the other. The aforementioned
method may be slight of
The following is valid XHTML transitional, and seems to work fine in the
browsers I've checked (IE6, Mozilla, Opera)
object
codebase=http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,0,0;
type=application/x-shockwave-flash
data=http://www.example.com/flash.swf;
Could anybody confirm if this new method solves the non-streaming problem
of the Flash Satay method ? http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay
Cheers,
P
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk
-Original Message-
Hi
Looking at the code (from source URL below)
object classid=clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-44455354
codebase=http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0;
width=300 height=120
param name=movie
For some things the lack of streaming can be very restrictive as there
are several things you cannot do with a loaded movie. Sure modularising
the movie is a good plan, but there are times that you need access to
that root level of the movie.
What I don't understand is why someone would
://keystonewebsites.com/
- Original Message -
From: scott parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Valid Flash...
What I don't understand is why someone would bother... to me flash is
not a W3C standard, thus it will not validate... but maybe that is just
me
James
Following this tread, reading the satay article, and looking up the
XHTML 1.0 spec for the object tag, it seems to me, that I could put all
this code inside an external CSS. My questions are [1] am I right? [2]
would keeping the flash code out of the HTML using id's on the object
scott parsons wrote:
For some things the lack of streaming can be very restrictive as there
are several things you cannot do with a loaded movie. Sure modularising
the movie is a good plan, but there are times that you need access to
that root level of the movie.
Not that this is a Flash
Leo
There are a few things happening here:
* The object tag is HTML so you'd need to leave quite a few attributes
in the tag structure. A few of the presentational elements could go in a
stylesheet (like bgcolor, width and height), I believe.
* IE for Win completely barfs when multiple object
18 matches
Mail list logo
