Thank you for your email. TMP will be closed on July 4th in observance of
Independence Day. I will return your email when I am back in the office on
Thursday, July 5th.
***
List Guidelines:
)
Dan
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Kevin Rapley
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 7:28 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: Teddy Knoy
Subject: Re: [WSG] which tag to use for link to reference?
I would go with David Dorwood's suggestion
Thank you for your email. I will be out of the office on June 25-27. I will
have no access to email and voicemail at that time. If you need is urgent,
please contact mark.er...@tmpgovernment.com. For all VAforVets related items,
please contact tahlia.cummi...@tmpgovernment.com.
Thank you for your email. I will will be out of the office Monday, June 18. I
will have limited access to email and voicemail at that time. If you need is
urgent, please contact mark.er...@tmpgovernment.com. For all VAforVets related
items, please contact tahlia.cummi...@tmpgovernment.com.
?Some Title/h?
ul
liItem 1/li
liItem 2/li
liItem 3/li
/ul
/section
-Dan
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf
I wouldn't recommend that. It may look OK stylistically, but not
semantically. I believe H? before the list makes the most sense.
- Dan Freeman
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of coder
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 1
Tables are used to present data. So I think it makes perfect sense to
simply put the data in the cells, and not wrap them in p tags. Would
there be a reason to have a table of paragraphs?
Dan Freeman
e-Commerce Manager
800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE)
330.655.0341 (DIRECT)
www.lexi.com http
This is my favorite tool:
http://utilu.com/IECollection/
Dan Freeman
e-Commerce Manager
800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE)
330.655.0341 (DIRECT)
http://www.lexi.com/ www.lexi.com
lexicomp-email-sig
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Adam
Yes, search engines will put more strength on the first few words in your
title tags.
So I'd recommend:
Steel Fabrication, Pipework, Welding - ABC Engineering Ltd
Dan Freeman
Webmaster ERP Administrator
800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE)
330.655.0341 (DIRECT)
www.lexi.com
-Original Message
I agree ... Bulletproof Web Design is highly recommended.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Jon Reece
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 8:05 PM
To: wsg
Subject: Re: [WSG] HTML/CSS reference
They may be a little old
I will be out of the office starting 11/02/2011 and will not return until
21/02/2011.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and
I will be out of the office starting 24/12/2010 and will not return until
04/01/2011.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and
:
wasDan MacFadyen/ACT/IMMI/AU
received
If you use PNG's and negative margins, this would allow you to piece
together images, but how would you handle hovering or clicking? For
example, if you had a circle image with a transparent background, how
would you identify hovering or clicking only on the circle piece?
Dan Freeman
Has anyone got this to work? I tried several times yesterday and it just
stuck at 44%.
Also, what do you mean by wasteful?
Dan Freeman
Webmaster ERP Administrator
800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE)
330.655.0341 (DIRECT)
http://www.lexi.com/ www.lexi.com
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
pAugust 12, 2010/p
/header
p Article copy here. Article copy here. Article
copy here. Article copy here./p
footer
pBy: Dan Freeman/p
/footer
Considering the link doesn't even look right in IE8, I'm not sure I'd use
it to build anything.
Dan Freeman
Webmaster ERP Administrator
800.650.6506 (TOLL FREE)
330.655.0341 (DIRECT)
www.lexi.com
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
--
Vasquerity
(Daniel Dan)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh
up and told my boss yea, I can make you a website, and then
wonderened how the heck to do it, I headed down the Web Standards
path.
They're generelly pretty technologically aware, and do the best with
what they have.
dan.
***
List
Thanks Jelina and David for prompt replies.
I'll continue to do encode them.
cheers,
dan.
Jelina wrote:
As far as I'm aware, this is still necessary. (etc)
David wrote:
Yes (etc)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:39 PM, I wrote:
Hi folks,
Years ago, I use to painstakingly
is to insert 100s of instances of
the (almost) same URL which contains ampersands; just one part of the
URL needs to be different for each item it belongs to, so it's not a
simple find/replace job.
cheers,
dan.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Dan Webb libweb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jelina
Hi folks,
Years ago, I use to painstakingly and religiously convert to amp;
when ever I encountered it (HTML 4.01 Strict doctype).
It's still pegged as invalid by the W3C validator, but is it really
still necessary these days? What could possibly go wrong in modern
browsers?
I'm talking
, because the validators don't even
_use_ JS: they look at the source the way it's originally served up,
before any possible JS modifications.
Or is this incorrect? Do any of the validation tools revise their
validation states based on JS interaction?
:Dan Dorman
partners and the font
for the gallery text is 80% in times new roman, times, serif. what i am
seeing in safari windows beta is what i described above and the font is
arial.
The Agora image is left justified in every Windows browser I've tried
it on: IE6, Firefox 2, and Safari.
:Dan Dorman
On 6/21/07, Dan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
function alternateRows(tableID,numberOfColors,colorArray){
[snipped]
if (table) {
var trs=document.getElementById(tableID).getElementsByTagName(TD);
[snipped]
}
}
}
Whoops! I got a little careless. The line starting with var
to find a version of the OED through which I
could search.
If the OED says it, I'll buy it. Thanks, Nick!
Dan Dorman
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
-w.com/dictionary/acronym
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym#Nomenclature
Dan Dorman
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help
on the matter, since this is getting
awfully pedantic, but I am genuinely curious: if anyone has some
concrete sources on the subject, please let me know; off list would be
fine.
Dan Dorman
***
List Guidelines: http
flowcharts.
Rather than Flash, however, the task seems better suited to XML and/or
perhaps SVG. A cursory Googlin' turned up [1], which might do the
trick, but of course you run into the already mentioned problem of
user agent support (the last news update at the site referenced was
3 August 2004).
Dan
Hi Maxine
Have a check to see
if it works in Safari. Last time I used multiple classes I has some serious
problems with Safari, but of course they could be two unrelated
things.
Cheers
Dan
specific links).
Anobvious
downsidemight bethat the user cannot see at-a-glance what the
options are, and may bypass the menu altogether, although if the menu was well
signposted, this might not be an issue.
I'd be interested to
hear your views on this.
Cheers,
Dan
articles with Pat Griffiths of HTMLDog.
So, anyone up for a (web standards) beer?
Cheers,
--
Dan Webb
http://www.danwebb.net
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
=wrapper
div id=container
!--- .. --
!--- .. --
/div
/div
Any body know whats going on here, or could point me in the right
direction to a article on this type of thing?
Thanks
Dan
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org
.
If anyone can shed a little light on these problems, for me or point
me in the right direction I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks
Dan
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
WebDesigner
¬¬¬
http://www.meucarronovo.com.br
(new site under construction)
--
Dan Webb
Web Developer and Internet Consultant
www.danwebb.net
07957 234544
39 Roseberry Gardens, London, N8 8SH
**
The discussion list for http
, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Dan Webb
Web Developer and Internet
Sounds good, you've sold it to me. It's update time!
Quoting Mark Harwood WebMail@, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:50 , Dan Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
You're preaching to the converted here, mate :) On this list, IE is only
ever
mentioned in vain. I've got Firefox 0.9.2
. PPK has established some pretty good practices
but we need to go further. If anyone else has an interest in this get in
contact as I'd like to take it forward in some way.
Cheers,
Dan Webb
http://www.danwebb.net
Quoting Mark Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Justin,
You can also use the simpler
. It really is a massive pain in the
a*se...
Im not sure of the link to the article explaining the conditional IE comments
and haven't got time to root it out at the moment but Im sure one of friendly
list dudes will know it...
Cheers,
--
Dan Webb
Web Developer and Internet Consultant
to put a test page
together (with images in the CSS that point to
http://localhost:8000/whatever) then I'm up for doing a bit of testing.
Cheers,
Dan W
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Justin French
Sent: 19 July 2004 19:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
what you think. Most of the scripts Ive seen that do this kind of
thing are immense and I do see why. Mine is quite similar to the one below but
is more compact and has the facility to pre open to a selected node.
Cheers,
Dan
Quoting Mike Foskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerhard,
You could try
this to the WCAG 2.0 Accessible
scripting group so any feedback would be great.
Cheers,
Dan
Quoting Mike Foskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dan,
I'm gonna have to spend time digesting that article.
Thanks for reminding me why I like this forum.
mike 2k:)2
It's at a bit of a tangent but why do people think it's better to use a very non
standard .htc behaviour rather than add this behaviour using standard DOM
scripts. I really dont see the advantage but these HTCs seem to be most
peoples weapon of choice.
Are we not trying to use only standards
applications (and
widely used) and are more useful because users are normally trained (or are
practiced) in its use.
Thanks for the feedback,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Foskett
Sent: 12 July 2004 16:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Also, on Firebird you can't copy and paste the email address which is a bit
annoying. Also, it would be a bit annoying to deploy on site where the email
address links are generated dynamically, you'd need to generate a bit of CSS as
well as the link.
All in all, I wouldn't use that method.
I've been trying to use Dreamweaver for years now but it's never cut it with me.
Nearly all the annoyances have been ironed out with the new version except for
one major one:
The preview window just doesnt handle heavy use of CSS to layout pages. For
some reason, the preview window gets it
this on the article as a fair amount
of people have brought it up and the answer is buried in the article comments.
Cheers,
Dan
Quoting Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
awesome - thanks so much! Does that change have any negative side-effects?
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:27:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
I think any of us that have worked in big companies know just how slowly things
move in terms of technology.
Im working on a redesign of a fairly high profile site now and, although the
company Im working for and the client are both reasonably knowledgable about
standards and realise there
If we are going to make sites that only work in certain browsers why not just
code to IE's standards and not bother with the obscure browsers like firefox
and opera. That way we don't need standards at all! I can have my marquee
tag back and my ActiveX controls - Ill be able to do all kinds of
Thanks Noa,
I've been noticing a few weird things with using left. top appears to be alot
better. We'll change it..
Quoting east [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've found a potential CSS incompatibility with the dropdowns. On my 'About
Me' page http://eastsdomain.com/site/people/noa/, when the
50 matches
Mail list logo
