Re: [WSG] HELP REQUEST: netscape float:absolute problem

2004-07-09 Thread James Ellis
Hi Scott
Which version of Netscape..? This is important as with Netscape 4 you 
are better off hiding the stylesheet. Netscape 6 is/was a dud so better 
off pressing for an upgrade for the  1 % of users who use it.
If you are targeting Netscape 7 then the problem *should* (touch wood) 
manifest itself in the other various Gecko browsers  - Mozilla, FF, 
Camino etc etc.

p class=assistance
Position : relative is positioning relative to where the item is in the 
span class=examplecontext/span of the document flow. So If I had
/p

.assistance .example
{
 position : relative;
  left : -10px;
  top :  - 20px;
}
would put context somewhere above the is in the ... I think. Haven't 
tested it but it should do that.
See 9.3.1 of the CSS 2 spec for more info.

Cheers
James
Scott Reston wrote:
I'm experincing a problem that manifests only in Netscape (regardless of platform). It 
looks like float:absolute is relative to the viewport, rather than the containing 
parent div block.
 


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help Testing site on Mac - IE Safari

2004-07-08 Thread Rick Faaberg
On 7/8/04 12:09 AM Luke Moulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:

 If anyone with a Mac has a spare sec, would you mind taking a quick look
 at this site template and letting me know if there are any major
 rendering probs in Mac (IE 5+ and Safari).
 
 http://acson.go4.gotdns.com/

I don't see any probs on Safari 1.2.x although red links with other orange
graphics make my brain tumor roll over and squirm. ;-)

The footer is a little messy also and there are at least two fonts in the
footer. Colons and spacing are a bit weird.

Still, Safari renders it all just fine.

Rick Faaberg

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help Testing site on Mac - IE Safari

2004-07-08 Thread Neerav
Luke
FYI The latest versions are:
Firefox 0.9.1
Opera 7.52
Unlike IE users, mozilla/opera users tend to upgrade to the newest 
release quickly so theres no point testing old firefox releases

Also you see what your site looks like in Safari 1.2 at 
http://www.danvine.com/icapture/

Hope that helps
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development  IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav
Luke Moulton wrote:
Hi Group, 

If anyone with a Mac has a spare sec, would you mind taking a quick look
at this site template and letting me know if there are any major
rendering probs in Mac (IE 5+ and Safari).
http://acson.go4.gotdns.com/
The sites is XHTML Transitional and has been tested in IE 5.5+, Opera 7
 Firefox 0.7.
Many many thanks in advance.
Cheers, 
Luke

W www.go4.com.au
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P 03 9530 6658
F 03 9530 6435
M 0418 893 116
PO Box 147
Sandringham VIC 3191
Location
14B Warleigh Grv
Brighton VIC 3186
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help Testing site on Mac - IE Safari

2004-07-08 Thread Mary Wright
Very nice. All looks good in Safari 1.2.2 and IE5.2.
Mary
On 8 Jul 2004, at 08:09, Luke Moulton wrote:
Hi Group,
If anyone with a Mac has a spare sec, would you mind taking a quick 
look
at this site template and letting me know if there are any major
rendering probs in Mac (IE 5+ and Safari).

http://acson.go4.gotdns.com/
The sites is XHTML Transitional and has been tested in IE 5.5+, Opera 7
 Firefox 0.7.
Many many thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Luke
W www.go4.com.au
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P 03 9530 6658
F 03 9530 6435
M 0418 893 116
PO Box 147
Sandringham VIC 3191
Location
14B Warleigh Grv
Brighton VIC 3186


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with making DIVs behave

2004-06-08 Thread Michael Allan
Hi Rosie,
The div's not misbehaving, it's the floated image ... but that's how 
floats are meant to work.

Clearing the float by adding dl { clear:both; } to your stylesheet will 
give you what you want.

Cheers,
Mike
On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 11:46  PM, Rosie Norwood wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for the basic question but I am new to making DIVs behave. I am
converting my old site from tables to DIVs and trying to get a similar
look.
The page troubling me is: http://www.blackwork.com/test/sample.html
The CSS is at: http://www.blackwork.com/test/stitches.css - the rules
relating to the div class site is right at the bottom.
I want the image to fill the div so that the div completely contains it
and the bottom border appears after the image.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help with making DIVs behave

2004-06-08 Thread Trusz, Andrew

Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with making DIVs behave

Hi Rosie,

The div's not misbehaving, it's the floated image ... but that's how 
floats are meant to work.

Clearing the float by adding dl { clear:both; } to your stylesheet will 
give you what you want.

Cheers,
Mike


On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 11:46  PM, Rosie Norwood wrote:

 The page troubling me is: http://www.blackwork.com/test/sample.html
 The CSS is at: http://www.blackwork.com/test/stitches.css - the rules
 relating to the div class site is right at the bottom.

 I want the image to fill the div so that the div completely contains it
 and the bottom border appears after the image.


That will clear the lower image but you'll need to do the same for the
Archbishop Wood dl as well otherwise Techniques is next to the image and
the techniques themselves are below the image at1024 resolution, awkward
looking.

If you want the Techniques next to the images you need to rework the design
with multiple floats. 

In either case, a look at float theory would be helpful:

http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/flow-pos.html

drew
 
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-07 Thread Ryan Christie
Amit Karmakar wrote:
 
The site: http://www.maysvillerotary.org
CSS: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/maysvillerotary.css

It's pretty late over here, and I only brushed over the stuff but
#navcontainer
{
float: left;
width: 199px;
border-right: 1px solid #B4D3DC;
padding: 0 0 1em 0;
margin-bottom: 1em;
font-family: Verdana, Lucida, Geneva, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
/*background-color: #99;*/
background: #C7E4E6;
color: #333;
}
I think your problem has a bit to do with the box model manhandling of IE6's engine. 
When you're using
specified witdths in your CSS, be careful about also specifying the padding -- it'll 
break lots of stuff
in IE. Can get around with Tantek's V-F hack 
(http://www.tantek.com/CSS/Examples/boxmodelhack.html) or
just avoid using width+padding in block elements.
under #navigation li a, I don't think you should need a width:100% .. li will fill up 
the space they reside
in horizontally unless limited by a max-width/width.
--
Ryan Christie| e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harrisonburg, VA | w: http://shadyland.theward.net
---() ()--
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-07 Thread Jose Florido
Hello!
This is my first message to the list, first of all, sorry my bad english,
I'm spanish.

The site seems to be working fine in most browsers except IE6. Bloody
IE
Any help to get it working in IE v6/Win would be appreciated.
People on macs would you mind giving me your feedback too. Thanks.

Try deleting width:100%; in the rule #navcontainer li a I thimk it will
work.

Jose Florido

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-07 Thread Chris Stratford




They are right - you dont need width: 100%

the only adverse effect that will have - now you wont see the HOVER
Effect unless you hover over the TEXT and not the BOX
in IE ONLY...

Most other browsers this will work still...


NOTE:
Im only fairly sure what I said is true.
I have been in similar situations, and the width: 100% was the same
issue.
And removing it - caused what I described above to happen...
:)

Cheers

Chris Stratford

Ryan Christie wrote:
Amit Karmakar wrote:
  
  
  

The site: http://www.maysvillerotary.org

CSS: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/maysvillerotary.css


  
It's pretty late over here, and I only brushed over the stuff but
  
  
#navcontainer
  
{
  
float: left;
  
width: 199px;
  
border-right: 1px solid #B4D3DC;
  
padding: 0 0 1em 0;
  
margin-bottom: 1em;
  
font-family: Verdana, Lucida, Geneva, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
  
/*background-color: #99;*/
  
background: #C7E4E6;
  
color: #333;
  
}
  
  
I think your problem has a bit to do with the box model manhandling of
IE6's engine. When you're using
  
specified witdths in your CSS, be careful about also specifying the
padding -- it'll break lots of stuff
  
in IE. Can get around with Tantek's V-F hack
(http://www.tantek.com/CSS/Examples/boxmodelhack.html) or
  
just avoid using width+padding in block elements.
  
  
under #navigation li a, I don't think you should need a width:100% ..
li will fill up the space they reside
  
in horizontally unless limited by a max-width/width.
  
  






RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-07 Thread Amit Karmakar
Thanks Jose works like a charm!

Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jose Florido
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with IE 6

Hello!
This is my first message to the list, first of all, sorry my bad english,
I'm spanish.

The site seems to be working fine in most browsers except IE6. Bloody
IE
Any help to get it working in IE v6/Win would be appreciated.
People on macs would you mind giving me your feedback too. Thanks.

Try deleting width:100%; in the rule #navcontainer li a I thimk it will
work.

Jose Florido

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 


**
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-07 Thread Amit Karmakar
Thanks Ryan!

Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Christie
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with IE 6

Amit Karmakar wrote:

  
 The site: http://www.maysvillerotary.org
 CSS: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/maysvillerotary.css

It's pretty late over here, and I only brushed over the stuff but

#navcontainer
{
float: left;
width: 199px;
border-right: 1px solid #B4D3DC;
padding: 0 0 1em 0;
margin-bottom: 1em;
font-family: Verdana, Lucida, Geneva, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
/*background-color: #99;*/
background: #C7E4E6;
color: #333;
}

I think your problem has a bit to do with the box model manhandling of IE6's
engine. When you're using specified witdths in your CSS, be careful about
also specifying the padding -- it'll break lots of stuff in IE. Can get
around with Tantek's V-F hack
(http://www.tantek.com/CSS/Examples/boxmodelhack.html) or just avoid using
width+padding in block elements.

under #navigation li a, I don't think you should need a width:100% .. li
will fill up the space they reside in horizontally unless limited by a
max-width/width.

-- 
Ryan Christie| e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harrisonburg, VA | w: http://shadyland.theward.net
---() ()--

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 


**
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-07 Thread Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st









You now have a problem that it doesnt
look correct in IE5 without the 100%



So maybe do something like  in the
actual page:



!--[if IE 5]

style type=text/css media=screen#navcontainer li a{width: 100%;}/style![endif]--





Cheers



Jeff Lowder

Accessibility 1st

Ph: 02 9570 9875

Mobile: 0419
350 760

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au

Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/



DISCLAIMER: This e-mail
and any files transmitted with itmay beprivileged and confidential, and
are intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended
recipient, any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail
and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, pleaseREPLY TO the SENDER to advise the errorAND
thenDELETEthe e-mailfrom your system. Any views expressed in
this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of our
organisation.Ourorganisationdoes not represent or warrant
that the attached files are free from computer viruses or other defects. The
user assumes all responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or
indirectly from the use of the attached files. In any event, the liability to
our organisation is limited to either the resupply of the attached files or the
cost of having the attached files resupplied.







-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Amit Karmakar
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6



AWESOME!



Spot
on Jeff, you're a bottler! 



Thanks,
I appreciate it muchly.









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lowder - Accessibility
1st
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6

This is your problem:#navcontainer li a{display: block;padding: 5px 5px 5px 0.5em;border-left: 10px solid #326263;border-right: 10px solid #92C6C7;background-color: #498485;color: #EDF7F8;text-decoration: none;width: 100%; - you dont need this}





Cheers



Jeff Lowder

Accessibility 1st

Ph: 02 9570 9875

Mobile: 0419
350 760

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au

Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/



DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted
with itmay beprivileged and confidential, and are intended only for the
use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and any
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
pleaseREPLY TO the SENDER to advise the errorAND
thenDELETEthe e-mailfrom your system. Any views expressed in
this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of our
organisation.Ourorganisationdoes not represent or warrant
that the attached files are free from computer viruses or other defects. The
user assumes all responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or
indirectly from the use of the attached files. In any event, the liability to
our organisation is limited to either the resupply of the attached files or the
cost of having the attached files resupplied.







-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Amit Karmakar
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Help with IE 6





People,











I did this
site over the last weekend.Still needs more work though.











The
siteseems to be working fine in most browsers except IE6. Bloody IE











Any help to
get it working in IE v6/Win would be appreciated.





People on
macs would you mind giving me your feedback too. Thanks.











The site: http://www.maysvillerotary.org





CSS: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/maysvillerotary.css











Regards, 
Amit Karmakar 
www.karmakars.com




**

This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain

privileged information or confidential information or both. If you

are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.


This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**






RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-07 Thread Amit Karmakar
I tried to add a 'sublevel' to the exisiting lists in order to bring out
the second level.

Works fine in Opera/Win Mozilla/Win
But shows gaps in IE in the subnavlists.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks people.

URL: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/testindex.htm
CSS http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/textmaysvillerotary.css

Regards, 
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6


You now have a problem that it doesn't look correct in IE5 without the
100%
 
So maybe do something like - in the actual page:
 
!--[if IE 5]
style type=text/css media=screen
#navcontainer li a
{
width: 100%;
}
/style
![endif]--
 
Cheers
 
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Ph: 02 9570 9875
Mobile: 0419 350 760
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au
Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/
 
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with itmay be
privileged and confidential, and are intended only for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or responsible
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and any
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please REPLY TO the SENDER to advise the error AND then DELETE
the e-mail from your system. Any views expressed in this e-mail and any
files transmitted with it are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of our
organisation. Our organisation does not represent or warrant that the
attached files are free from computer viruses or other defects. The user
assumes all responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or
indirectly from the use of the attached files. In any event, the
liability to our organisation is limited to either the resupply of the
attached files or the cost of having the attached files resupplied.
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Amit Karmakar
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6
 
AWESOME!
 
Spot on Jeff, you're a bottler! 
 
Thanks, I appreciate it muchly.
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6
This is your problem:
 
#navcontainer li a
{
display: block;
padding: 5px 5px 5px 0.5em;
border-left: 10px solid #326263;
border-right: 10px solid #92C6C7;
background-color: #498485;
color: #EDF7F8;
text-decoration: none;
width: 100%; - you don't need this
}
 
Cheers
 
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Ph: 02 9570 9875
Mobile: 0419 350 760
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au
Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/
 
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any files transmitted with itmay be
privileged and confidential, and are intended only for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or responsible
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and any
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please REPLY TO the SENDER to advise the error AND then DELETE
the e-mail from your system. Any views expressed in this e-mail and any
files transmitted with it are those of the individual sender, except
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of our
organisation. Our organisation does not represent or warrant that the
attached files are free from computer viruses or other defects. The user
assumes all responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or
indirectly from the use of the attached files. In any event, the
liability to our organisation is limited to either the resupply of the
attached files or the cost of having the attached files resupplied.
 
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Amit Karmakar
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Help with IE 6
 
People,
 
I did this site over the last weekend. Still needs more work though.
 
The site seems to be working fine in most browsers except IE6. Bloody
IE
 
Any help to get it working in IE v6/Win would be appreciated.
People on macs would you mind giving me your feedback too. Thanks.
 
The site: http://www.maysvillerotary.org
CSS: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/maysvillerotary.css
 
Regards, 
Amit Karmakar 
www.karmakars.com 
**


This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain


privileged information or confidential information or both. If you

RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-07 Thread Amit Karmakar
Henry,

Weird, but it works!! Thanks for helping me out. Appreciate that.
http://www.maysvillerotary.org/testindex.htm

Regards, 
Amit Karmakar 
www.karmakars.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Henry Tapia
Sent: Tuesday, 8 June 2004 12:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6

Hi all,

My first email to the list, just joined a couple of days ago..

Amit, that one looks like IE's rendering of a space character between li's
containing block elements ie. a style=display:block , when you have
white space between your lis (as one would).

eg:
lia href=#subitem two/ali
lia href=#subitem three/ali

will leave a space between items, but:

lia href=#subitem two/alilia href=#subitem three/ali

will not result in the space..

I'm not quite sure if there's a tidy solution to this... I'm currently
either putting all lis on a single line of code, or breaking the tags in
an irregular manner. Anyone got anything better?

hank

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Amit Karmakar
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 11:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6


I tried to add a 'sublevel' to the exisiting lists in order to bring out the
second level.

Works fine in Opera/Win Mozilla/Win
But shows gaps in IE in the subnavlists.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks people.

URL: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/testindex.htm
CSS http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/textmaysvillerotary.css

Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 


**
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help with IE 6

2004-06-06 Thread Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st







This is your problem:#navcontainer li a{display: block;padding: 5px 5px 5px 0.5em;border-left: 10px solid #326263;border-right: 10px solid #92C6C7;background-color: #498485;color: #EDF7F8;text-decoration: none;width: 100%; - you dont need this}





Cheers



Jeff Lowder

Accessibility 1st

Ph: 02 9570 9875

Mobile: 0419
350 760

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au

Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/



DISCLAIMER: This e-mail
and any files transmitted with itmay beprivileged and confidential, and
are intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient or responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended
recipient, any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail
and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, pleaseREPLY TO the SENDER to advise the errorAND
thenDELETEthe e-mailfrom your system. Any views expressed in
this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of our
organisation.Ourorganisationdoes not represent or warrant
that the attached files are free from computer viruses or other defects. The
user assumes all responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or
indirectly from the use of the attached files. In any event, the liability to
our organisation is limited to either the resupply of the attached files or the
cost of having the attached files resupplied.







-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Amit Karmakar
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Help with IE 6





People,











I did this site over the last
weekend.Still needs more work though.











The siteseems to be working
fine in most browsers except IE6. Bloody IE











Any help to get it working in IE
v6/Win would be appreciated.





People on macs would you mind giving me your feedback too. Thanks.











The site: http://www.maysvillerotary.org





CSS: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/assets/styles/maysvillerotary.css











Regards, 
Amit Karmakar 
www.karmakars.com




**
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**






Re: [WSG] Help validating a Counter script

2004-06-02 Thread Mark Harwood
Erm im not 100% sure but if you just stick it in a external .js page and doe the
normal Script inclusion wouldnt that get around the nasty JavaScript and let it
validate?


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help validating a Counter script

2004-06-02 Thread Bert Doorn
Title: Message



G'dayA couple of hints...1. Close the meta 
tags: meta 
name="description" content="" 
/ meta name="keywords" 
content="." /2. Escape the forward-slashes (/) in the counter 
script: "img src="" 
href="http:\/\/1ro.cqcounter.com\/cgi-bin\/c?_id=razvan_z=0_r=">http:\/\/1ro.cqcounter.com\/cgi-bin\/c?_id=razvan_z=0_r="+See 
how you go after that.Regards--Bert Doorn, Better Web 
Design[ www.bwdzine.net | www.betterwebdesign.com.au]Fast-loading, user-friendly websites 


RE: [WSG] Help validating a Counter script

2004-06-02 Thread Mark Harwood
I never even checked his actual code :E assumed he knew what he was doing, just
didnt know what to do with the JavaScript...



On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:35 , Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:




Message



G'day

A couple of hints...

1. Close the meta 
tags:

meta 
name=description content= 
/
meta name=keywords 
content=. /

2. Escape the forward-slashes (/) in the counter 
script:

img src=\http:\/\/1ro.cqcounter.com\/cgi-bin\/c?_id=razvan_z=0_r=+

See 
how you go after that.

Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web 
Design
[ www.bwdzine.net | www.betterwebdesign.com.au ]
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites 




*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help validating a Counter script

2004-06-02 Thread Razvan Pop
Check this:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://alegeri-locale.stockapplets.com/2/alegeri-locale-2004.html
Any other ideas?
Bert Doorn wrote:
G'day
A couple of hints...
1. Close the meta tags:
   meta name=description content= /
   meta name=keywords content=. /
2. Escape the forward-slashes (/) in the counter script:
   img src=\http:
http:\/\/1ro.cqcounter.com\/cgi-bin\/c?_id=razvan_z=0_r=
\/\/1ro.cqcounter.com\/cgi-bin\/c?_id=razvan_z=0_r=+
See how you go after that.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
[ www.bwdzine.net | www.betterwebdesign.com.au ]
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites 

 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help validating a Counter script

2004-06-02 Thread Bert Doorn
Title: Message



G'day again Check this: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://alegeri-locale.stockapplets.com/2/alegeri-locale-2004.html Any other ideas?Yep. As the validator says:

  a href=""http://cqcounter.com/?_id=razvan_lo=ro">http://cqcounter.com/?_id=razvan_lo=ro"The 
  mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in which you've 
  placed it; the other mentioned elements are the only 
  ones that are both allowed there and can contain the element mentioned. 
  This might mean that you need a containing element, or 
  possibly that you've forgotten to close a previous element. 

So.. wrap the link in a block level 
element, such as p or div. As it is, the link sits directly indise the 
body element.
diva href=""http://cqcounter.com/?_id=razvan_lo=ro">http://cqcounter.com/?_id=razvan_lo=ro"/div
(Or wrap the whole counter script in a div as 
this error appears more than once in that section).
Tackle the errors one at time, starting from 
the top, sincefixing the first error will often fixothers that 
follow:-)
RegardsBert






Re: [WSG] Help validating a Counter script

2004-06-02 Thread Razvan Pop
Thank you Bert!
It Worked.
Bert Doorn wrote:
G'day again
 

Check this:
   

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://alegeri-locale.stockapplets.com/2/
alegeri-locale-2004.html
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://alegeri-locale.stockapplets.com/2/a
legeri-locale-2004.html
 

Any other ideas?
   

Yep.  As the validator says:
a href= http://cqcounter.com/?_id=razvan_lo=ro
http://cqcounter.com/?_id=razvan_lo=ro;
The mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in which
you've placed it; 
the other mentioned elements are the only ones that are both allowed there
and can contain 
the element mentioned. This might mean that you need a containing element,
or 
possibly that you've forgotten to close a previous element. 

So..  wrap the link in a block level element, such as p or div.  As it is,
the link sits directly indise the body element.
diva href= http://cqcounter.com/?_id=razvan_lo=ro
http://cqcounter.com/?_id=razvan_lo=ro;/div
(Or wrap the whole counter script in a div as this error appears more than
once in that section).
Tackle the errors one at time, starting from the top, since fixing the first
error will often fix others that follow :-)
Regards
Bert




 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] help me please

2004-05-27 Thread Chatham, Will
Hi,
There are several things you could try in an attempt to fix this.

First, validate your XHTML and CSS.  Next, try applying the IE Box Model
Hack (http://tantek.com/CSS/Examples/boxmodelhack.html).  Since you are
using padding and a border on some of your divs, this is likely the problem.
IE5.5 misinterprets the CSS Box Model, and thus a hack is needed.

HTH.

Will Chatham
Webmaster
Ingles Markets

ooOo-o
828.669.2941 - ext.534
www.ingles-markets.com 
--


 please help me guys 
 this design looks fine with mozilla 1.6 and firefox 0.8 
 and IE 6 XP 
 but IE 5 and IE 5.5 screw up 
 Anyone can offer help ?
 
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with positioning

2004-05-25 Thread Sean Sullivan-Daley
I have found another way to do this that is working. I would love to see what I did 
wrong in this example if anyone knows.

Thanks for the help.

-Sean 


On Tuesday, May 25, 2004, at 08:21AM, Sean Sullivan-Daley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OK I guess I need to re-state my problem. I Have a fixed amount of space (55px) at 
the top of my page. I need to have my navigation anchored to the bottom of that 55px 
space. What I have is 2 divs nested in another div. The top div is for info on who is 
logged in the bottom div has another div(topnav) for navigation.

My problem is getting the navigation to be anchored to the bottom of its container. I 
can get it to work for one browser but not the other.

Any suggestions?

http://sean.ashtonweb.com/test/top.html


Thanks, 

-Sean





Sean Sullivan-Daley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 






Sean Sullivan-Daley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with positioning

2004-05-25 Thread Ryan Christie
Sean Sullivan-Daley wrote:
OK I guess I need to re-state my problem. I Have a fixed amount of space (55px) at the 
top of my page. I need to have my navigation anchored to the bottom of that 55px 
space. What I have is 2 divs nested in another div. The top div is for info on who is 
logged in the bottom div has another div(topnav) for navigation.
My problem is getting the navigation to be anchored to the bottom of its container. I 
can get it to work for one browser but not the other.
Any suggestions?
http://sean.ashtonweb.com/test/top.html
Thanks, 

-Sean
 

Not sure if this was what you were looking for, but here's my take on 
what you intended:

http://www.theward.net/test.html
--
Ryan Christie| e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harrisonburg, VA | w: http://shadyland.theward.net
---() ()--
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread Mordechai Peller
russ - maxdesign wrote:
Floats are suppose to extend past bottom of a container.
   

That statement is correct in this instance but might be slightly misleading.
It would be better to say that the heights of floated items are ignored by
the parent container, so there is a possibility they may poke out the bottom
of the parent container. This 'poking out' is dependant on what other
content is inside the container.
 

Thank you; that's what I had meant.
A third method is outlined in great detail here:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
 

While the programmer in me loves JavaScript, the Web pro in me hates it. 
I would recommend doing the sniffing for IE/Mac server side and only 
adding it if needed (I keep both sides happy that way).
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread tony
Quoting Sean Sullivan-Daley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I am trying to float 3 columns next to each other.
 This appearas to be OK in IE6 but is broken in FireFox.
 The columns break out of the container in FireFox.

There's now a new way to clear float containers without the need to use an extra
clearing element.
http://www.csscreator.com/attributes/containedfloat.php

Tony
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread Mike Rainey
Sorry, thought I took that clear:both out of there. My mistake.

As for the font sizes, that is what was specified in the original stylesheet and I 
just copied from the col1 styles down to the end.

 
 From: russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2004/05/19 Wed PM 04:54:50 EDT
 To: Web Standards Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with Float
 
  #col1 {
  width: 253px;
  height: auto;
  border-right: 2px dotted #5D355E;
  float: left;
  margin: 0px;
  padding: 0px;
  clear: both;
  }
  #col1 p, #col2 p, #col3 p {
  font: 12px/16px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
  margin: 0px;
  padding: 5px 10px;
  }
  
 
 Mike, 
 There are two small problems with this example. You are applying the
 clear:both to the #col1 div. This works well in some instances but will fail
 if #col2 or #col3 have much longer content. By fail I mean that the other
 divs will poke out the bottom of their parent container.
 
 You can see this here:
 http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/css/sullivan-daley.htm
 
 Another point (getting picky here, so apologies) is that you are show pixel
 sizes for your font-sizes inside the containers. This is not recommended by
 the WAI as it is not good for browsers that do not support scaling of
 content in pixels (like IE). A better option is to use percents or EM's. A
 really good article on this is here:
 http://www.clagnut.com/blog/348/
 
 Thanks
 Russ
 
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 

Michael Rainey
Blog: http://raineym.dyndns.org/
Resume: http://mrainey.dyndns.org/

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread Manuel González Noriega
El mié, 19-05-2004 a las 21:43, Brian Foy escribió:
 Hi Sean,
 
 Looks like you have to clear those floats.
 
 Try adding a div with clear: both; just below the last column.
 
 Brian
 


Or this nicer method (i don't know where i first read about this, excuse
me if it was on this list :)

Clearing without structural markup
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html

-- 
Manuel trabaja para Simplelógica, construcción web
(+34) 985 22 12 65 http://simplelogica.net 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*



Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread Brian Foy
Hi Sean,
Looks like you have to clear those floats.
Try adding a div with clear: both; just below the last column.
Brian
Sean Sullivan-Daley wrote:
I am trying to float 3 columns next to each other.
This appearas to be OK in IE6 but is broken in FireFox.
The columns break out of the container in FireFox.
Here is a link to the Files.
http://sean.ashtonweb.com/test/
http://sean.ashtonweb.com/test/css/style2.css
What am I doing wrong?
-Sean
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread Mordechai Peller
Sean Sullivan-Daley wrote:
I am trying to float 3 columns next to each other.
This appearas to be OK in IE6 but is broken in FireFox.
The columns break out of the container in FireFox.
Here is a link to the Files.
http://sean.ashtonweb.com/test/
http://sean.ashtonweb.com/test/css/style2.css
What am I doing wrong?
 

What you're doing wrong is that you are assume IE6 is getting it right. 
Floats are suppose to extend past bottom of a container. You could try 
adding br style=clear:both/.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread russ - maxdesign
 #col1 {
 width: 253px;
 height: auto;
 border-right: 2px dotted #5D355E;
 float: left;
 margin: 0px;
 padding: 0px;
 clear: both;
 }
 #col1 p, #col2 p, #col3 p {
 font: 12px/16px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
 margin: 0px;
 padding: 5px 10px;
 }
 

Mike, 
There are two small problems with this example. You are applying the
clear:both to the #col1 div. This works well in some instances but will fail
if #col2 or #col3 have much longer content. By fail I mean that the other
divs will poke out the bottom of their parent container.

You can see this here:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/css/sullivan-daley.htm

Another point (getting picky here, so apologies) is that you are show pixel
sizes for your font-sizes inside the containers. This is not recommended by
the WAI as it is not good for browsers that do not support scaling of
content in pixels (like IE). A better option is to use percents or EM's. A
really good article on this is here:
http://www.clagnut.com/blog/348/

Thanks
Russ

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread russ - maxdesign
 What you're doing wrong is that you are assume IE6 is getting it right.
 Floats are suppose to extend past bottom of a container. You could try
 adding br style=clear:both/.

That statement is correct in this instance but might be slightly misleading.
It would be better to say that the heights of floated items are ignored by
the parent container, so there is a possibility they may poke out the bottom
of the parent container. This 'poking out' is dependant on what other
content is inside the container.

There is a more detailed explanation here:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/floatsample.htm

And here:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/clear.htm

As Brain and Mordechai have said, you need to clear after the floats to
force the container around the floated items. They have suggested two
methods (clear:both inside a new empty div or in a br).

A third method is outlined in great detail here:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html

Russ



*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with Float

2004-05-19 Thread Mike Rainey
Floats are tricky. Try this:

1) Drop your col2 div below the col3 in the HTML markup.

2) Use these values for the col# in the stylesheet:

#col1 {
width: 253px;
height: auto;
border-right: 2px dotted #5D355E;
float: left;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
clear: both;
}

#col2 {
width: 245px;
height: auto;
margin: 0 255px 0 255px;
padding: 0px;
}

#col3 {
width: 253px;
height: auto;
border-left: 2px dotted #5D355E;
float: right;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}

#col1 p, #col2 p, #col3 p {
font: 12px/16px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
margin: 0px;
padding: 5px 10px;
}

It should work in IE and Mozilla/Firefox. I tested it and it works fine.

 
 From: Sean Sullivan-Daley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2004/05/19 Wed PM 03:01:54 EDT
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [WSG] Help with Float
 
 I am trying to float 3 columns next to each other.
 This appearas to be OK in IE6 but is broken in FireFox.
 The columns break out of the container in FireFox.
 
 Here is a link to the Files.
 http://sean.ashtonweb.com/test/
 http://sean.ashtonweb.com/test/css/style2.css
 
 What am I doing wrong?
 
 -Sean
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 

Michael Rainey
Blog: http://raineym.dyndns.org/
Resume: http://mrainey.dyndns.org/

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] help with ie vs the rest

2004-05-03 Thread Craig Stump
There seems to be a few problems with the markup - might want to validate it
first.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/index.p
hp?id=67 

I notice you've got .'s in you class names in the HTML - AFAIK this is not
valid.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Greer
Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 5:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] help with ie vs the rest

Hi All

First - sorry I can't make it to the Melbourne meeting - just too busy.

Second - can anyone help me with some weirdness I'm seeing?

http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/index.php?id=67 has a page. It has CSS at
http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/fileadmin/metTempl/new.css .

Looking at it through IE, I get wrapping in the content block, but the main
block isn't centered. Looking at it in Firefox, the main block is centered,
but the text doesn't wrap.

In a word - Aaaarghhh. Can anyone help? I've run out of beer and
inspiration.

gg

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] help with ie vs the rest

2004-05-03 Thread Gary Greer
oops.
Thanks for the hint - I'll do that and get back to the list!
Craig Stump wrote:
There seems to be a few problems with the markup - might want to validate it
first.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/index.p
hp?id=67 

I notice you've got .'s in you class names in the HTML - AFAIK this is not
valid.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Greer
Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 5:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] help with ie vs the rest
Hi All
First - sorry I can't make it to the Melbourne meeting - just too busy.
Second - can anyone help me with some weirdness I'm seeing?
http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/index.php?id=67 has a page. It has CSS at
http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/fileadmin/metTempl/new.css .
Looking at it through IE, I get wrapping in the content block, but the main
block isn't centered. Looking at it in Firefox, the main block is centered,
but the text doesn't wrap.
In a word - Aaaarghhh. Can anyone help? I've run out of beer and
inspiration.
gg
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [WSG] help with ie vs the rest

2004-05-03 Thread Gary Greer
okay -  it now validates - hurrah!
Just to complicate it, I've got a three column layout working on the 
page called search, which goes quite strange in Firefox.

Call for help!
gg
Craig Stump wrote:
There seems to be a few problems with the markup - might want to validate it
first.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/index.p
hp?id=67 

I notice you've got .'s in you class names in the HTML - AFAIK this is not
valid.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Greer
Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 5:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] help with ie vs the rest
Hi All
First - sorry I can't make it to the Melbourne meeting - just too busy.
Second - can anyone help me with some weirdness I'm seeing?
http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/index.php?id=67 has a page. It has CSS at
http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/fileadmin/metTempl/new.css .
Looking at it through IE, I get wrapping in the content block, but the main
block isn't centered. Looking at it in Firefox, the main block is centered,
but the text doesn't wrap.
In a word - Aaaarghhh. Can anyone help? I've run out of beer and
inspiration.
gg
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


RE: [WSG] help with ie vs the rest

2004-05-03 Thread Chris Gandolfo
You have class bodytext in your html, but it is not defined in your style 
sheet (unless I'm missing something, it is 2:15 in the morning). Also as 
stated before you should remove the periods from your class names in your 
html. From a usability stand point I would consider underlining all of your 
links with a:hover if you are going to do it on the side bar. It will help 
minimize confusion of your users. Aside from that I like the clean, simple 
style.


From: Gary Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] help with ie vs the rest
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 17:03:53 +1000
Hi All
First - sorry I can't make it to the Melbourne meeting - just too busy.
Second - can anyone help me with some weirdness I'm seeing?
http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/index.php?id=67 has a page. It has CSS 
at http://metropolis.muprivate.edu.au/fileadmin/metTempl/new.css .

Looking at it through IE, I get wrapping in the content block, but the main 
block isn't centered. Looking at it in Firefox, the main block is centered, 
but the text doesn't wrap.

In a word - Aaaarghhh. Can anyone help? I've run out of beer and 
inspiration.

gg
 smime.p7s 
_
Watch LIVE baseball games on your computer with MLB.TV, included with MSN 
Premium! 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/mlbpgmarket=en-us/go/onm00200439ave/direct/01/

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help in web-standards Flash insert code

2004-04-20 Thread James Ellis
Andy

Some links:

(not meaning to beat my drum, but..)
http://www.sitepoint.com/articlelist/300
and...

http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/

and...

http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1081798064count=1

HTH
James
Andy Clarke wrote:

Comrades

It's not very often I fire up Flash, but today has been one of those 'rusty' days.

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

2004-03-22 Thread P.H.Lauke
I'd second that...I'll get my Door to my garden prepped for conversion :)
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=041%2F041%2Ecss

Patrick

Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy Budd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 22 March 2004 11:19
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site
 
 
 How about doing a Zen Garden type thing and allow people to skin the 
 WSG site.
 
 Just a thought.
 
 
 Andy Budd
 
 http://www.message.uk.com/
 
 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 * 
 
 
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
*



RE: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

2004-03-22 Thread Amit Karmakar
Sounds good to me :)

Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Budd
Sent: Monday, 22 March 2004 10:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

How about doing a Zen Garden type thing and allow people to skin the 
WSG site.

Just a thought.


Andy Budd

http://www.message.uk.com/

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

2004-03-22 Thread A. R. Templeton
	Good day folks. I'm new to the list and it would be wonderful to be 
able to submit a design 'a la' Zen Garden. Even if not accepted it would 
really be an honor to submit a design amongst such prestigious web 
designers.

	I also look forward to learning alot from this great pool of experience.

Regards,

Ahmaud R. Templeton

Amit Karmakar wrote:
Sounds good to me :)

Regards,
Amit Karmakar
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

2004-03-22 Thread Nick Cowie
Andy wrote:

How about doing a Zen Garden type thing and allow 
people to skin the WSG site.

That would be an interesting task, seeing it would be a 20 odd page site we would be 
skinning.

The first challenge will be to get enough agreement on how to create the basic page 
structure, eg:
do we include extra divs to allow for clearing floats to deal with IE bugs?
who many divs just to contain the page ? one, one inside another or four to allow for 
various corner tricks?
do we have a few extra divs for images ala Zen Garden just incase people want to use 
them and how many?

So if Russ is willing to completely change the rules, we are willing to put up with 
some lively discussions on most suitable page strucutre, I for one am looking 
forward to the opportunity.

Nick



winmail.dat

Re: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

2004-03-22 Thread Tonico Strasser
Nick Cowie wrote:

So if Russ is willing to completely change the rules, we are willing to put up with some lively discussions on most suitable page strucutre, I for one am looking forward to the opportunity.
+1

To discuss the page structure would be very interesting since this is a 
concrete use case and the site is not too complex.

Tonico

--
Tonico Strasser ?:-)
http://Tonico.FreeZope.org
Contact_Tonico at Yahoo dot de
Check out http://www.WebProducer.at
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

2004-03-22 Thread Peter Firminger
H... All very interesting.

To do this we may have to change the functionality of the CMS a bit and
maybe even hard code the pages that rarely change due to the needs of a site
that displays code on the page by default (when pasted in). I don't think
that many outside the core group have actually used it though so this
shouldn't be an issue as any requests for changes to the content could still
be sent to us.

As Russ said it was built very quickly along these lines.

So, we'll now discuss this and get back to you about how we'll proceed.

Thanks for all your input again.

P

  So if Russ is willing to completely change the rules, we
 are willing to put up with some lively discussions on most
 suitable page strucutre, I for one am looking forward to the
 opportunity.

 +1

 To discuss the page structure would be very interesting since
 this is a
 concrete use case and the site is not too complex.


*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



RE: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

2004-03-22 Thread theGrafixGuy
I like this idea! It adds a creative flair to the purpose of the group and
as an artist/programmer instead of a pure programmer it gives others like me
a chance to show the world This is how I would've done it.

Brian

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help us redesign the WSG site

2004-03-20 Thread Tim Lucas
russ weakley spoke the following wise words on 21/03/2004 1:58AM EST:
The WSG site was built very quickly when we first put the group together
(just over a year ago). It is very much overdue for a redesign. In the
spirit of group ownership, we thought it would be a good idea to open the
process up to all members.
Great! I only wish I had more time to encourage my creative side. So 
much of my time is spent doing technical stuff.

Can't wait to see the entries, and who knows... maybe some celebrity 
appearances?

-- tim

www.toolmantim.com

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
* 



Re: [WSG] Help with a bit of code plz

2004-02-09 Thread Ben Bishop
Hi Ryan,

Just as you specified the number of character rows (vertical), you also 
need to specify the number of character columns (horizontal.)
Your mark-up would like something like:

...e=txtMessage rows=5 cols=50 title=Enter your message/textarea

Regards,
Ben
info wrote:

And can anyone plz plz plz explain what this means:

Below are the results of attempting to parse this document with an SGML
parser.
  1. Line 53, column 67: required attribute cols not specified
(explain...).
 ...e=txtMessage rows=5 title=Enter your message/textarea
 

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



RE: [WSG] Help with a bit of code plz

2004-02-09 Thread Mark Stanton

Cols is the number of column that you want in your text areas (similar to
rows) and depending on your doctype - it may be required.

So if you want 50 columns in your text areas you have to add cols=50.

hth


Cheers

Mark


--
Mark Stanton 
Technical Director 
Gruden Pty Ltd 
Tel: 9956 6388
Mob: 0410 458 201 
Fax: 9956 8433 
http://www.gruden.com

*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



<    1   2   3   4