Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
http://lachy.id.au/log/2005/12/xhtml-beginners
I am prohibited from getting comments through to that article.
That's weird, if you contact me off list and let me know what error you
received I might be able to do something about it. If you send me
Sorry, just the map you used. My comment was meant light-heartedly.
Your location map looks very like the one that can be got from
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/. As these are crown
copyright, I assume that you haven't got an agreement with them to use
their data unattributed. Eve
Christian Montoya wrote:
doesn't work! You are all viewing text/html. Pretty soon everyone on
this list will think they are serving xhtml.
Yes, and a large percentage of them will serve complete garbage :-)
I'll get it started right:
DID NOT work in every single browser. Version 0.1 to 1000.
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
You may as well just use valid HTML 4.01 Strict. See "XHTML is not
for Beginners", the MIME type issue is just one of the many reasons.
http://lachy.id.au/log/2005/12/xhtml-beginners
(yes, I'm aware of the irony that the article itself is XHTML as
text/html, but that's the
Duh? Stephen?
Stephen Stagg wrote:
Apart from using copyrighted images without attributing them :).
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See ht
On 12/7/05, Mike Foskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mac report:
>
> Worked fine in Safari v1 - bottom margin of about 1.5em, same as top
> Worked okay in IE v5.2 - the bottom margin was extended 10em approx.
> Worked fine in Opera v8.51 - bottom margin approx 3em
>
> Personally I'd ignore the m
2005/12/7, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> So is the best thing to target xhtml browsers? Like, specifically
> Opera, Safari, Konquerer, etc? How exactly would one do content
> negotation with PHP?
>
You may try this: http://keystonewebsites.com/articles/mime_type.php
On the other hand
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Stagg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 December 2005 15:39
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] page check please - mime type!
Designer wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Forgive my labouring the point, but after our discussions I have d
On 12/7/05, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you choose to do content negotiation and serve application/xhtml+xml
> to browsers that support it and text/html to those that don't, be aware
> that it prevents incremental rendering in Mozilla.
So is the best thing to target xhtml browsers
Designer wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Forgive my labouring the point, but after our discussions I have done
what Gunlaug did, i.e., made a page as xhtml, with the headers as below:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
The Area
I saved as xhtml an
Looks fine in Mac Firefox 1.5 and Safari 2.02.
Best regards,
Marilyn Langfeld
Langfeldesigns
http://www.langfeldesigns.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 7, 2005, at 8:13 AM, designer wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Forgive my labouring the point, but after our discussions I have
done what Gunlaug did
designer wrote:
Forgive my labouring the point, but after our discussions I have done
what Gunlaug did, i.e., made a page as xhtml, with the headers as below:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
The Area
Changing the MIME type in the meta ele
It looks ok. It is validated.
2005/12/7, designer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Forgive my labouring the point, but after our discussions I have done
> what Gunlaug did, i.e., made a page as xhtml, with the headers as below:
>
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dt
Dear colleagues,
Forgive my labouring the point, but after our discussions I have done
what Gunlaug did, i.e., made a page as xhtml, with the headers as below:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
The Area
I saved as xhtml and IE went daft. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
