Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Part of the vs discussion, has been to define what features are actually required of this element. Primarily this has come down to: a) responsive handling of bandwidth vs image-quality (aka bandwidth vs file-size) b) pixel density of display devices c) art direction [ Did I miss any? ] Breaki

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Very Neat. On May 26, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Justin Avery wrote: > > Trent Walton originally wrote about it with his article, , before Jordan > Moore expanded on the idea with > http://www.jordanm.co.uk/post/21863299677/building-with-content-choreography > and was even nice enough to produce us a

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

You're kidding, right? You're not really arguing about More CSS are you? To quote a popular TV personality: "Bazzinga!" Check the date today, people... Sent from iOS 5 On Apr 1, 2012, at 1:49 PM, "Chris F.A. Johnson" wrote: > On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Chad Furman wrote: > >> Eww. Why is "twenty-

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Chad Furman wrote: Eww. Why is "twenty-five-and-three-quarters percent" better than "25.75%" -- and why is it mandatory? Do you prefer typing 2012-04-01 or 1 April 2012 or ...? Why is putting one attribute per one selector per line cleaner? To me, that is unnessecary

Re: [WSG] RE: WSG Digest

I wonder if there is a way to restrict mobile phone devices from scaling, but allows touchscreen devices (ipad, samsung galaxy etc) do so. Tee On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:31 AM, David Laakso wrote: > On 9/27/11 5:04 AM, Dave Smith wrote: >> >> Hi Tee >> >> When trying the max/min width approach, wa

Re: [WSG] RE: WSG Digest

On 9/27/11 5:04 AM, Dave Smith wrote: Hi Tee When trying the max/min width approach, was the Meta Viewport Tag used? ::trim:: all the best, Dave @davesmiths Try also, simply: ~d -- Desktop. Laptop. Tablet. Mobile! http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Hi Greeting Hope everything of you goes well For now we just updated our website,you can take your time to check http://www.cheap-brands.com now we have a promotion sale,so if you have order,we will give a good discount to you as our customers,you can get best price+good quality items+best servic

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Mevlana, Thank you. This seems to be what I'm looking for. Now I'll just need to experiment with trying to write a javascript (not my forte) that will publish a link to the site on the page if it was not opened as a pop-up and that should fix the problem. Best, Bob > Bob, > > The following s

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (On leave - 12 months)

No you can't unsubscribe by email.  You need to use this link: Hope you can follow these simple instructions otherwise rubbish will keep coming your way. I have previously unsubscribed from this list (vla email) as I am on leave, please

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (On leave - 12 months)

Very good.  Please use this link to rid yourself from us: Hope this helps. No it isn't. My job is there for me. But I will unsubscribe *** List Guidelines: http://w

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (On leave - 12 months)

I have previously unsubscribed from this list (vla email) as I am on leave, please confirm I am removed so I don't get any more of this rubbish. Cheers, Sam >From my iPhone Sam Lawry writer I editor www.7projects.com.au 0418 533 541 On 14/03/2011, at 6:41 AM, Jay Tanna wrote: > > No it

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (On leave - 12 months)

No it isn't. My job is there for me. But I will unsubscribe On 14/03/2011, at 6:41 AM, Jay Tanna wrote: > > No it is another way to say someone has been sacked! > > > 12 months of leave! I need to switch to the public sector... > > 2011/2/21 Sam Lawry > Thank you for your email. > > I

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (On leave - 12 months)

No it is another way to say someone has been sacked! 12 months of leave! I need to switch to the public sector... 2011/2/21 Sam Lawry Thank you for your email. I am on leave from Victoria Legal Aid until March 2012. ***

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (On leave - 12 months)

12 months of leave! I need to switch to the public sector... 2011/2/21 Sam Lawry > Thank you for your email. > > I am on leave from Victoria Legal Aid until March 2012. > > If you need help, please try: > *Online Services (for publishing content or other online queries) – > onlineservi...@vla.vi

[ADMIN] Thread Closed Re: [WSG] RE: WSG Digest [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

I've unsubscribed Ms Fleming - please don't respond to this thread any further. Yes, all reasonable people can unsubscribe all by themselves by visiting: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm When you respond to a digest post, PLEASE trim down to just the part you are responding to

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (was "disallow IE6...")

On 12/20/10 6:57 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: Using IE conditional comments on the html tag, you can target each version of IE. You can does not mean you should... In a comment [1] on "forabeautifulweb", Molly Holzschlag says: "Please, please don’t design for browsers." [1] http://forabeaut

RE: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

> Using IE conditional comments on the html tag, you can target each version of IE.  You can does not mean you should... In a comment [1] on "forabeautifulweb", Molly Holzschlag says: "Please, please don’t design for browsers." [1] http://forabeautifulweb.com/blog/about/universal_internet_exp

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

We all go through this every holiday season Nick. Look at the big picture. Russ provides us with a great resource. For free. 1st auto responder message, and you are gone. Guilty until proven guilty. Just look at the first line, or header, then delete. That's the deal. And Russ could charge. He

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

get jealous while we're stuck here slaving away while you're off sucking back a margarita somewhere's warm and sunny. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year... Cheers, Doug Burt - Original Message - From: "Nick Brown" To: Sent: Monday, December 20, 20

RE: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Seconded. N -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Nicholas Bower Sent: 19 December 2010 07:20 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest Hi Mods can you possibly drop emails from list and digest with subjec

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

I've just resolved the problem. No more discussion on this :) Changing mail lists VERY soon Russ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cf

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:25 PM, wrote: > Hello > > I am on holiday until Monday 9th August.  If you need to speak to someone in > the team before then please contact Richard Garbutt for operational issues > and Dr Andy Jupe for financial or contractual matters. > > Best wishes > > John Cowles

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

> We are closed for the Festive and New Year Season… All I want for xmas is smarter auto-responders for everyone… Sheesh. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.or

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

On 8 Dec 2009, at 22:00, Jen Strickland wrote: > David, that business was from the PRE ELEMENT definition from the > w3c, not a suggestion for the poem formatting. ~ Jen I can't find a definition of the pre element that includes the example you provided on the w3c site. Can you cite a URI

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (Re: [WSG] skip links)

David Hucklesby さんは書きました: ピエールランリ・ラヴィン wrote: Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the accessibility, but it's not completed. I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen readers but: * Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't defi

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

ピエールランリ・ラヴィン wrote: Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the accessibility, but it's not completed. I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen readers but: * Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't define it) * Users may define

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the accessibility, but it's not completed. I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen readers but: * Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't define it) * Users may define preferences keys * Mo

[ADMIN] Thread Closed Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

OK, I've unsubscribed both parties. Thread closed, party over :-P Lea -- Lea de Groot WSG Core Group Member *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubs

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Enough please! Thanks Russ On 04/08/2009, at 7:11 AM, Patrício dos Santos wrote: LET'S DO From: inspiron.patters...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:24:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Oh, that is a good point! Let's do!!! -- Brett P.

RE: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

LET'S DO From: inspiron.patters...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:24:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Oh, that is a good point! Let's do!!! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tony McNulty wrote: Just for that I think

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Acually, reading between the lines it looks like he really wants to stay... Bruce - Original Message - From: Tony McNulty To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest Just for that I think we should keep him on

RE: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

WSG Digest Just for that I think we should keep him on! From: Brett Patterson Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:35:16 -0400 To: Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest Please remove this user from the group ASAP! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Oh, that is a good point! Let's do!!! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tony McNulty wrote: > Just for that I think we should keep him on! > > -- > *From*: Brett Patterson > *Date*: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:35:16 -0400 > *To*: > *

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Just for that I think we should keep him on! -Original Message- From: Brett Patterson Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:35:16 To: Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest Please remove this user from the group ASAP! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan < danielpau

RE: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Monday, August 03, 2009 5:35 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest Please remove this user from the group ASAP! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan mailto:danielpaulro...@googlemail.com>> wrote: Stop emailling me you fucktards i unsubscri

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Please remove this user from the group ASAP! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan < danielpaulro...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Stop emailling me you fucktards i unsubscribed leave me alone! > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM, TapirDesigns > wrote: > >> I am currently away u

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Stop emailling me you fucktards i unsubscribed leave me alone! On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM, TapirDesigns wrote: > I am currently away until 5th August but will get back to you as soon as > possible on my return. > > > *** > List G

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

r...@vanillastorm.co.uk wrote: Thank you for your email. I'm now out of the office until Tuesday 10th March 2009. Who cares? *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstanda

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

On 1/10/09 8:26 AM, "Alan C Whiteman" wrote: > In the end, Flash is not only an obnoxious medium in 90% of its usage ...which is not a problem owing to the platform but rather its authors... (Besides, that's consistent with Sturgeon's Law: "90% of everything is crap.") > it's technically bad for

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Apologies, all, that last message wasn't particularly constructive of me. I'll be more explicit here - my beefs with the use of Flash on anything to do with "education" (or anywhere else, for that matter) are as follows: 1. Adobe's Flash belongs only to Adobe - there is no Flash open standard like

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Alan - thanks for being so clear. I completely agree with your feelings on Flash - particularly its use in education (where people are not known for making informed use of the IT tools they have). Adobe's Flash is the MS Powerpoint of the web - it empowers people to say even less in an even more

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Alan, Font size: hmmm I use the the '100.01% on the body and them 1em on body/table' settings... What resolution are you using? Image Gallery: Thanks. The CSS for the image gallery was somehow deleted during all of the editing. That is fixed now. Thank you for noticing. Images: Hopefully in t

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Nvu is a great choice. I use Bluefish and Komodo Edit , both great, both opensource, both free. Gregorio Espadas gespadas [at] gmail [dot] com On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Delilah Hinman <[EMAI

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Justin Sinclair wrote: I'm curious - I've read something similar to the following quote a bunch of times: Abusing just for italics or just for bolding, when no emphasis is intended is the same *sort of* abuse as using tables for layout. It is only abuse of a slightly lesser degree.

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (Out of office until Tuesday 1 April)

Congratulations! ;-) On Mar 27 2008, at 17:19, Mark Wooldridge wrote: Hi, I am currently away from the office and will return on Tuesday as a married man. I will attend to you email at that time. If the matter is urgent, please contact Elise Fitzgerald on 9268 2962 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

the soundtrack was Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

hi, thanks for the reply but im going go with the a controllable music player that ill do up in flash. The main problem was that he wanted a continuous song going on the site which would have been impossible without frames. But as some members suggested a controllable player is much more standa

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Assuming it's only a "soundtrack" and doesn't require any controlling, ie: play, pause, volume, etc. then a tiny .swf containing the music track (again set to loop, without control) could sit fairly unobtrusive, and marked up, at the bottom of your HTML. However as has been pointed out, without tha

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

On 3 Mar 2008, at 11:52, jay wrote: The javascript in the suckerfish menus is there for the sole purpose of providing a hover attribute to the LIs in the navigation in IE: They work just fine in FF and other browsers with it. Providing the user isn't navigating with the keyboard or needs a t

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

On 29/11/2007, Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could use JavaScript to number your paragraphs: http://signified.net/test/ Another alternative is to use disjoint ol elements with start attributes (or alternatively first child li element with value attribute). Both these attributes are depr

RE: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

> B) Then I use external (unobtrusive) Javascript window.onload to > remove (via DOM Scripting) all the L2 elements*...this works...but I > do see an initial "flicker"..i.e you can discern the original page > momentarily and then the L2 items being removed. I'd not use the onload approach to hide

RE: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Hi Simon, You're most welcome! With this method, turning off scripting in a browser/user agent lets the nested lists degrade gracefully, and all are exposed. Something else you may find useful - besides the expand/collapse image placed left of an expandable list item , I also place a link state

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Chris Knowles wrote: > you need this... > http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2006/06/again/ > in fact, I incorporated this into my own library - I found the order in which the code tests the different browsers to matter - I think if I remember rightly I had an issue with safari on windows if the saf

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Simon Cockayne wrote: > Have you come across this "flickering" problem...is there a better > way? Can I remove the DOM elements before they are displayed? > Hi Simon you need this... http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2006/06/again/ -- Chris Knowles

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Sorry about that, the validator seemed to suggest that you had some image tags that weren't closed and that you were using & instead of & but having validated it again, it appears fine. Strange. I've had problems with the WAI validator in Firefox sometimes as well, it seems that locally it has pro

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Simon Cockayne wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I'd like bother browser to behave the same. > > I can se select() ot maybe change the value of the field to be "". > > But...the HTML is generated...which means a program change...whereas > the javascript is handcoded...so that is the easier change...that's

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

On 9/30/07, Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First, change this: > > > > to this: > > > ISO-8859-1 is a valid charset, why is that change necessary. It is also important that people report the charset they are actually using. Many beginning authors just change the meta content type (o

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

There are about 65 so far. The user has been deleted and we are working on the issue. Apologies to all. Russ on 14/7/07 8:16 AM, Nancy Gill at wrote: > Is there a way to turn this guy off? I just got about 15 of these in my > email. > > Thanks! > > *

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Is there a way to turn this guy off? I just got about 15 of these in my email. Thanks! - Original Message - From: "Till Elsner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:24 PM Subject: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest The recipient will be unavailable until July 15th and will res

Re: [WSG] RE: WSG Digest

Thanks Greg, just taking a look at WebGUI, looks really good. On 11/07/07, Greg Hacke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would avoid CMSMadeSimple It's not a bad CMS but _everything_ is after-market and it is very difficult to maintain as standards compliant. I use WebGUI (www.webgui.org) right now