RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-14 Thread Web Dandy Design
Hi,

Came across this link: http://www.enablepdf.com/ which might also be useful
in making accessible PDF documents.

I haven't looked into costs etc, just happened across the site while
browsing through The Register.

Kind regards,

Elaine
http://www.webdandy.co.uk
http://www.webdandy-access.com

-Original Message-
From: Web Dandy Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 May 2007 11:27
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

Hi,

A couple of links that maybe useful:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/pdf_accessibility
http://www.planetpdf.com/search_results.asp?words=accessibility&SearchString
=storepdftoolsforumgeneral

Another option maybe to convert the PDF content to HTML:
http://tinyurl.com/2fema

Kind regards,

Elaine
http://www.webdandy.co.uk 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael MD
Sent: 09 May 2007 10:30
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question


>  how do you make the pdf accessible???
> 
> 

I guess it probably depends if it has unencrypted text in it... 

some pdf's might only contain images or other stuff...







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread Gary Barber


Yes, I think you will find if you look into it you will find that having 
no JavaScript does not equate to no screen reader.


Depending on the the way you use the DOM and the the way you script 
obtrusive or  unobtrusive (I hope the latter) and the object type there 
are documented instances where Screen readers cope with JavaScript just 
fine.  Screen Readers are not JavaScript blind.  However there are 
instances when it can lead to confusion.


Also using a unobtrusive hijax method of JavaScript does not equal the 
old horror story popups.  JavaScript can be used for good.


The real under lying question here is the document flow.   Usually a PDF 
or other media type document is seen as a take-away from the web and 
hence as an adjunct to the sites main document flow. Or when you get to 
the document  that is a PDF its often the end of that information 
Branch.  Often people may like to launch this in a separate window so 
they preserve the site document flow on screen with the navigation etc. 
The question (and this topic is constantly reoccurring) is do you let 
the viewer use the browser controls to launch a new tab or window or do 
you the designer decide to open it in a new window for them


Gary Barber
radharc
radharc.com.au
manwithnoblog.com


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I can't make up my mind whether you are agreeing with me here or
disagreeing?

The important point is that this type of script assumes that  no
JavaScript == screen reader
which is patent nonsense.
It also assumes that screen reader users are the only ones who might
dislike pop-ups, which is even more ridiculous.

Regards,
Mike
 

  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz

Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 3:35 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question


The script can do much more than just adding the event. It 
can add a title 
attribute, plug an icon or even add some text within the anchor tags.
That way the info about the behavior is plugged only if the 
behavior is 
available.


---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


  




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread Philip Kiff
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
> The script can do much more than just adding the event. It can add a
> title attribute, plug an icon or even add some text within the anchor
> tags. That way the info about the behavior is plugged only if the
> behavior is available.

Frank Palinkas wrote:
> You can find more info on the use of unobtrusive DOM/JavaScript in
> Jeremy Keith's book [...] and James Edwards and Cameron Adams book [...]

While I personally agree with Michael that such scripting is not really
something to be encouraged, nor something that can be done in a way that
really meets accessibility standards 100%, I would point to the following
test site by Bill Posters as the closest I've seen to a "best practices"
method of doing this:
http://test.newplasticarts.co.uk/dom-js/flag-offsite-links/

No need to buy anyone's book to get caught up on the latest methods!

Phil.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread michael.brockington
I can't make up my mind whether you are agreeing with me here or
disagreeing?

The important point is that this type of script assumes that  no
JavaScript == screen reader
which is patent nonsense.
It also assumes that screen reader users are the only ones who might
dislike pop-ups, which is even more ridiculous.

Regards,
Mike
 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thierry Koblentz
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 3:35 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
> 
> 
> The script can do much more than just adding the event. It 
> can add a title 
> attribute, plug an icon or even add some text within the anchor tags.
> That way the info about the behavior is plugged only if the 
> behavior is 
> available.
> 
> ---
> Regards,
> Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com 
> 
> 
> 
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
> 
> 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread Thierry Koblentz

Perhaps I did not make myself clear - what every script of this nature
does is remove the need for an 'inline' onClick  event handler, by
programmatically inserting the exact same handler after the document has
loaded, by searching for some attribute of the link. While this does a
good job of fooling a dumb validator, which can only work on the raw
source code, it does nothing for the overall accessibility of the
document - quite the reverse; neither the user nor the author can
accurately predict whether a link will be opened in a new window or in
the current window.


The script can do much more than just adding the event. It can add a title 
attribute, plug an icon or even add some text within the anchor tags.
That way the info about the behavior is plugged only if the behavior is 
available.


---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread michael.brockington
Perhaps I did not make myself clear - what every script of this nature
does is remove the need for an 'inline' onClick  event handler, by
programmatically inserting the exact same handler after the document has
loaded, by searching for some attribute of the link. While this does a
good job of fooling a dumb validator, which can only work on the raw
source code, it does nothing for the overall accessibility of the
document - quite the reverse; neither the user nor the author can
accurately predict whether a link will be opened in a new window or in
the current window.

Mike

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Palinkas
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:27 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> I think there is a misunderstanding here. Removing the 
> onclick event handler
> from the markup is all that is being done, thereby the 
> unobtrusive value of
> the exercise. The DOM/JavaScript does not "insert" any links. The link
> remains intact within the markup as it should be. It merely 
> uses the rel
> attribute of the  element as a trigger to launch the 
> new window, as
> would the onclick event handler attribute if it was placed 
> within the 
> element.
> 
> Frank


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread Steve Green
There's no single approach to PDF accessibility. It depends on many factors
such as the number, size, content, resources (all options are expensive but
some are more expensive than others) and the level of accessibility you are
aiming for. For instance an untagged PDF may be accessible to screen readers
as long as the content is predominantly text and the default reading order
is correct, and it may be accessible to most other users as long as you can
change the size and colour of the text and background etc, which is a native
Adobe Reader feature. However, such a PDF lacks any semantic structure so it
may well be inaccessible to software that wants to programmatically access
the content in an intelligent manner e.g. news aggregators.

I am a member of Equal Internet (www.equalinternet.co.uk), a recently-formed
UK-based group of accessibility professionals, and we are starting to
document a methodology that will deal with all the various scenarios. A
couple of guys from Riverdocs (http://www.riverdocs.com/) have joined and
bring a wealth of expertise in this area. I have not used their product yet
but will be evaluating it in the near future.

Gary is right about the source platform. PDFs generated from Word can be
merely painful to make accessible (that's as good as it gets). PDFs
generated from graphical tools like Quark are horrendous beyond words.

Steve



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Barber
Sent: 10 May 2007 09:26
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question


Platforms aside.

Given Steve's comments (thanks Steve) has anyone documented what does work
and what doesn't and a clear way around this problem of PDF accessibility.
I suspect a lot has to do with the rendering source platform from my meager
testing.

Converting it to HTML is not always practical given the business based cost
considerations for say 1000, 200 page documents.

Gary Barber
radharc
radharc.com.au
manwithnoblog.com

Steve Green wrote:
> That document makes it sound so easy but there's s much it doesn't 
> mention. We do heaps of accessible PDFs and have the scars to prove 
> it. The manuals are incomplete, inaccurate and Acrobat Pro is very 
> broken. Version 8 is so bad we uninstalled it and went back to version 
> 7 because at least we know how to work around most of the bugs.
>
> 
>   

> Steve
>
>  
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf Of Webb, KerryA
> Sent: 10 May 2007 00:08
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
>
> Jermayn asked: 
>   
>> and Kerry, how do you make the pdf accessible???
>>
>> 
>
> There are some pointers here
> http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/pdfs/CreateAccessibleAdvanced.pd
> f
>
> Kerry
> (noting the accessibility is relative, not absolute - so probably I 
> should have said "more accessible")
>   
> --
> - This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also 
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the 
> sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any 
> attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any 
> purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person.
> --
> -
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
>   



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread Frank Palinkas
Hi Mike,

I think there is a misunderstanding here. Removing the onclick event handler
from the markup is all that is being done, thereby the unobtrusive value of
the exercise. The DOM/JavaScript does not "insert" any links. The link
remains intact within the markup as it should be. It merely uses the rel
attribute of the  element as a trigger to launch the new window, as
would the onclick event handler attribute if it was placed within the 
element.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2007 15:06 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

Unfortunately, using JavaScript to insert such links is no more than a fudge
- you cannot rely on JavaScript being turned off in a screen-reader users
browser, and this cannot be regarded as 'unobtrusive', or even 'progressive
enhancement' as it is a fundamental change in behaviour.

Mike 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Palinkas
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:35 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
> 
> If I read you right, sure it does. You can use unobtrusive 
> DOM/JavaScript to
> replace the onclick event handler in the (x)html markup with 
> a rel attribute
> in the  element. If the DOM/JavaScript is turned off, 
> the page will
> open through the link supplied as normal in a full, new 
> window. Also, an
> assistive device may read the  element's title 
> attribute (if employed)
> to identify where the link will take them to if chosen. 
> 
> You can find more info on the use of unobtrusive 
> DOM/JavaScript in Jeremy
> Keith's book, "DOM Scripting: Web Design with JavaScript and 
> the Document
> Object Model", and James Edwards and Cameron Adams book "The 
> JavaScript
> Anthology - 101 Tips, Tricks and Hacks". You can check Amazon 
> for reviews,
> etc. on them.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Frank M. Palinkas
> Microsoft M.V.P. - Windows Help
> W3C HTML Working Group (H.T.M.L.W.G.) - Invited Expert
> M.C.P., M.C.T., M.C.S.E., M.C.D.B.A., A+   
> Senior Technical Communicator 
> Web Standards & Accessibility Designer 
> 
> website: http://frank.helpware.net 
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> Member: 
> Society for Technical Communications (S.T.C.) 
> Guild of Accessible Web Designers (G.A.W.D.S.)
> Web Standards Group (W.S.G.) 
> 
> Supergroup Trading Ltd. 
> Sandhurst, Gauteng, South Africa 
> website: http://www.supergroup.co.za
> 
> Work:   +27 011 523 4931 
> Home:   +27 011 455 5287 
> Fax:    +27 011 455 3112 
> Mobile: +27 074 109 1908
> --------------------
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2007 12:11 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
> 
>  
> I believe what Jermayn is asking to keep the web standards 
> intact, without
> opening a new window, as accessibility doesnt allow us to 
> open pages in new
> window.
> 
> suggestions ?
> 
> regards
> -P
> 
> Original Message:
> -
> From: Nirmal Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:21:43 +0530
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
> 
> 
> Hi,
> You can use this code to open the pdf in a new window ...
>click
> here
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On 5/9/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi group,
> > This may only relate to Western Australian people but 
> someone else  may
> > know...
> >
> > I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
> > whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont 
> really care
> > about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet 
> guidlines
> > are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot 
> find anything.
> >
> > Thanks for you rhelp
> > Jermayn
> >
> >
> >
> **
> **
> 
> > The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance 
> Commission of
> > Weste

RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread michael.brockington
Unfortunately, using JavaScript to insert such links is no more than a fudge - 
you cannot rely on JavaScript being turned off in a screen-reader users 
browser, and this cannot be regarded as 'unobtrusive', or even 'progressive 
enhancement' as it is a fundamental change in behaviour.

Mike 

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Palinkas
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:35 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
> 
> If I read you right, sure it does. You can use unobtrusive 
> DOM/JavaScript to
> replace the onclick event handler in the (x)html markup with 
> a rel attribute
> in the  element. If the DOM/JavaScript is turned off, 
> the page will
> open through the link supplied as normal in a full, new 
> window. Also, an
> assistive device may read the  element's title 
> attribute (if employed)
> to identify where the link will take them to if chosen. 
> 
> You can find more info on the use of unobtrusive 
> DOM/JavaScript in Jeremy
> Keith's book, "DOM Scripting: Web Design with JavaScript and 
> the Document
> Object Model", and James Edwards and Cameron Adams book "The 
> JavaScript
> Anthology - 101 Tips, Tricks and Hacks". You can check Amazon 
> for reviews,
> etc. on them.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Frank M. Palinkas
> Microsoft M.V.P. - Windows Help
> W3C HTML Working Group (H.T.M.L.W.G.) - Invited Expert
> M.C.P., M.C.T., M.C.S.E., M.C.D.B.A., A+   
> Senior Technical Communicator 
> Web Standards & Accessibility Designer 
> 
> website: http://frank.helpware.net 
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> Member: 
> Society for Technical Communications (S.T.C.) 
> Guild of Accessible Web Designers (G.A.W.D.S.)
> Web Standards Group (W.S.G.) 
> 
> Supergroup Trading Ltd. 
> Sandhurst, Gauteng, South Africa 
> website: http://www.supergroup.co.za
> 
> Work:   +27 011 523 4931 
> Home:   +27 011 455 5287 
> Fax:    +27 011 455 3112 
> Mobile: +27 074 109 1908
> --------------------
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2007 12:11 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
> 
>  
> I believe what Jermayn is asking to keep the web standards 
> intact, without
> opening a new window, as accessibility doesnt allow us to 
> open pages in new
> window.
> 
> suggestions ?
> 
> regards
> -P
> 
> Original Message:
> -
> From: Nirmal Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:21:43 +0530
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question
> 
> 
> Hi,
> You can use this code to open the pdf in a new window ...
>click
> here
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On 5/9/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi group,
> > This may only relate to Western Australian people but 
> someone else  may
> > know...
> >
> > I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
> > whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont 
> really care
> > about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet 
> guidlines
> > are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot 
> find anything.
> >
> > Thanks for you rhelp
> > Jermayn
> >
> >
> >
> **
> **
> 
> > The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance 
> Commission of
> > Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound
> > transmission.
> >
> > This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and
> > privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
> hereby notified
> > that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
> > (facsimile) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
> > (facsimile) in error please contact the Insurance Commission.
> >
> > Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au
> > Phone: +61 08 9264 
> >
> >
> >
> **
>

RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread Frank Palinkas
If I read you right, sure it does. You can use unobtrusive DOM/JavaScript to
replace the onclick event handler in the (x)html markup with a rel attribute
in the  element. If the DOM/JavaScript is turned off, the page will
open through the link supplied as normal in a full, new window. Also, an
assistive device may read the  element's title attribute (if employed)
to identify where the link will take them to if chosen. 

You can find more info on the use of unobtrusive DOM/JavaScript in Jeremy
Keith's book, "DOM Scripting: Web Design with JavaScript and the Document
Object Model", and James Edwards and Cameron Adams book "The JavaScript
Anthology - 101 Tips, Tricks and Hacks". You can check Amazon for reviews,
etc. on them.

Hope this helps,

Kind regards,

Frank M. Palinkas
Microsoft M.V.P. - Windows Help
W3C HTML Working Group (H.T.M.L.W.G.) - Invited Expert
M.C.P., M.C.T., M.C.S.E., M.C.D.B.A., A+   
Senior Technical Communicator 
Web Standards & Accessibility Designer 

website: http://frank.helpware.net 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Member: 
Society for Technical Communications (S.T.C.) 
Guild of Accessible Web Designers (G.A.W.D.S.)
Web Standards Group (W.S.G.) 

Supergroup Trading Ltd. 
Sandhurst, Gauteng, South Africa 
website: http://www.supergroup.co.za

Work:   +27 011 523 4931 
Home:   +27 011 455 5287 
Fax:    +27 011 455 3112 
Mobile: +27 074 109 1908


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 10 May, 2007 12:11 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

 
I believe what Jermayn is asking to keep the web standards intact, without
opening a new window, as accessibility doesnt allow us to open pages in new
window.

suggestions ?

regards
-P

Original Message:
-
From: Nirmal Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:21:43 +0530
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question


Hi,
You can use this code to open the pdf in a new window ...
   click
here

Thanks

On 5/9/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi group,
> This may only relate to Western Australian people but someone else  may
> know...
>
> I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
> whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont really care
> about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet guidlines
> are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot find anything.
>
> Thanks for you rhelp
> Jermayn
>
>
>


> The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of
> Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound
> transmission.
>
> This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
> (facsimile) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
> (facsimile) in error please contact the Insurance Commission.
>
> Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au
> Phone: +61 08 9264 
>
>
>

*
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


mail2web LIVE - Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
I believe what Jermayn is asking to keep the web standards intact, without
opening a new window, as accessibility doesnt allow us to open pages in new
window.

suggestions ?

regards
-P

Original Message:
-
From: Nirmal Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:21:43 +0530
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question


Hi,
You can use this code to open the pdf in a new window ...
   click
here

Thanks

On 5/9/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi group,
> This may only relate to Western Australian people but someone else  may
> know...
>
> I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
> whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont really care
> about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet guidlines
> are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot find anything.
>
> Thanks for you rhelp
> Jermayn
>
>
>


> The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of
> Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound
> transmission.
>
> This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
> (facsimile) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
> (facsimile) in error please contact the Insurance Commission.
>
> Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au
> Phone: +61 08 9264 
>
>
>

*
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread Nirmal Kumar

Hi,
   You can use this code to open the pdf in a new window ...
  click
here

Thanks

On 5/9/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Hi group,
This may only relate to Western Australian people but someone else  may
know...

I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont really care
about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet guidlines
are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot find anything.

Thanks for you rhelp
Jermayn



The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of
Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound
transmission.

This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email
(facsimile) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
(facsimile) in error please contact the Insurance Commission.

Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au
Phone: +61 08 9264 


*


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-10 Thread Gary Barber


Platforms aside.

Given Steve's comments (thanks Steve) has anyone documented what does 
work and what doesn't and a clear way around this problem of PDF 
accessibility.  I suspect a lot has to do with the rendering source 
platform from my meager testing.


Converting it to HTML is not always practical given the business based 
cost considerations for say 1000, 200 page documents.


Gary Barber
radharc
radharc.com.au
manwithnoblog.com

Steve Green wrote:

That document makes it sound so easy but there's s much it doesn't
mention. We do heaps of accessible PDFs and have the scars to prove it. The
manuals are incomplete, inaccurate and Acrobat Pro is very broken. Version 8
is so bad we uninstalled it and went back to version 7 because at least we
know how to work around most of the bugs.


  



Steve

 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Webb, KerryA
Sent: 10 May 2007 00:08
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

Jermayn asked: 
  

and Kerry, how do you make the pdf accessible???




There are some pointers here
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/pdfs/CreateAccessibleAdvanced.pdf

Kerry
(noting the accessibility is relative, not absolute - so probably I should
have said "more accessible") 
  
---

This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all
copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You
should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any
other person.
---


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***


  




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-09 Thread Steve Green
That document makes it sound so easy but there's s much it doesn't
mention. We do heaps of accessible PDFs and have the scars to prove it. The
manuals are incomplete, inaccurate and Acrobat Pro is very broken. Version 8
is so bad we uninstalled it and went back to version 7 because at least we
know how to work around most of the bugs.

My advice is don't even think about trying unless there's no alternative, in
which case you should seriously consider getting a new job or delegate it to
someone who won't be missed when they become a total basket case.

As for automated PDF tagging solutions, nothing we have seen is even
remotely competent, and nor are any of the PDF to HTML converters we've
seen.

It is possible for PDFs to be highly accessible to screen readers without
being tagged at all, but that very much depends on the size, content and the
way in which they were authored.

I don't consider Word documents to be an accessible alternative either. It's
got to be text or HTML, or RTF at a pinch.

Steve

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Webb, KerryA
Sent: 10 May 2007 00:08
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

Jermayn asked: 
> 
> and Kerry, how do you make the pdf accessible???
> 

There are some pointers here
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/pdfs/CreateAccessibleAdvanced.pdf

Kerry
(noting the accessibility is relative, not absolute - so probably I should
have said "more accessible") 
  
---
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all
copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You
should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any
other person.
---


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-09 Thread Webb, KerryA
Jermayn asked: 
> 
> and Kerry, how do you make the pdf accessible???
> 

There are some pointers here
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/pdfs/CreateAccessibleAdvanced.pdf

Kerry
(noting the accessibility is relative, not absolute - so probably I
should have said "more accessible") 
  
---
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all 
copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should 
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other 
person.
---


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-09 Thread Web Dandy Design
Hi,

A couple of links that maybe useful:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/pdf_accessibility
http://www.planetpdf.com/search_results.asp?words=accessibility&SearchString
=storepdftoolsforumgeneral

Another option maybe to convert the PDF content to HTML:
http://tinyurl.com/2fema

Kind regards,

Elaine
http://www.webdandy.co.uk 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael MD
Sent: 09 May 2007 10:30
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question


>  how do you make the pdf accessible???
> 
> 

I guess it probably depends if it has unencrypted text in it... 

some pdf's might only contain images or other stuff...







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-09 Thread Michael MD



 how do you make the pdf accessible???




I guess it probably depends if it has unencrypted text in it... 


some pdf's might only contain images or other stuff...







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Jermayn Parker
and Kerry, how do you make the pdf accessible???



>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/05/2007 12:50:25 pm >>>
Nick wrote:

>
I would disagree. I believe the pdf  and word issue dates back to 1999
or so, when you needed to upgrade to the latest  and greatest of JAWS at
considerable cost to fully access pdfs. Things have changed in 8 years.
Now you can access pdfs with almost any screenreader (that is less than
8 years old) and a free version of acrobat. For word documents you also
need software to open it and the most common, word costs. 
>

While this is generally true, you need to remember that the creator of
a PDF should do a few simple things to make it accessible.  Most don't.

Kerry

--
Kerry Webb
Policy Office
InTACT
x70239 
  
---
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any
attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose,
nor disclose its contents to any other person.
---


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm 
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm 
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
***


**

The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission
of Western Australia's Email security requirements for inbound
transmission. 

**



The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of 
Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound 
transmission. 

This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and privileged. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email (facsimile) is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this email (facsimile) in error please contact 
the Insurance Commission.

Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au 
Phone: +61 08 9264 

*


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Webb, KerryA
Nick wrote:

>
I would disagree. I believe the pdf  and word issue dates back to 1999 or so, 
when you needed to upgrade to the latest  and greatest of JAWS at considerable 
cost to fully access pdfs. Things have changed in 8 years. Now you can access 
pdfs with almost any screenreader (that is less than 8 years old) and a free 
version of acrobat. For word documents you also need software to open it and 
the most common, word costs. 
>

While this is generally true, you need to remember that the creator of a PDF 
should do a few simple things to make it accessible.  Most don't.

Kerry

--
Kerry Webb
Policy Office
InTACT
x70239 
  
---
This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all 
copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should 
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other 
person.
---


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Nick Cowie

Jermayn

You might want to consider posting the question to the WA Online Services
Interest Group
http://www.dpc.wa.gov.au/psmd/osig/osig.html
It is a very low traffic mailing list for WA public sector. A number of the
people involved in the development of the guidelines are on that list.

The State Government Web Site Guidelines do not mention opening links or
documents in new windows. If I remember correctly it was discussed by the
working group on version 2  of the guidelines and because there where two
quite different opposing views, it was left out of the guidelines.

You need to check section 3.12 which covers content in  pdf, word and other
non HTML formats.

You wrote:

I found a reference about html and pdf
copies as pdf is not accessible (word is)

I would disagree. I believe the pdf  and word issue dates back to 1999 or
so, when you needed to upgrade to the latest  and greatest of JAWS at
considerable cost to fully access pdfs. Things have changed in 8 years. Now
you can access pdfs with almost any screenreader (that is less than 8 years
old) and a free version of acrobat. For word documents you also need
software to open it and the most common, word costs.


--
Nick Cowie
http://nickcowie.com


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Tim

Tamara,

I never look to AGIMO except to see what they are mucking up.

A review of their Finance and Gov pages These AGIMO  pages are a bit  
ordinary for accessibility.


http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/AustWeb.html#agmio

I never look to AGIMO, except to wonder what low standards they are now  
promoting!
They stated to me when I pointed out Centrelink homepage errors, "We  
lead by example"

Special Minister responsible for AGIMO, Gary Nair also states that:
 "Australia leads the world in e-governance". But I proved they are not.

http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/Results.html

On average UK sites had fewer validation errors and more accessibility  
features.
AGIMO do not lead by example, see a review of the AGIMO 2006 awards for  
excellence.


http://www.hereticpress.com/Dogstar/Publishing/AustWeb.html#roadready

Tim

On 09/05/2007, at 1:24 PM, Tamara Jackson wrote:


Hi Jermayn

When in doubt, look to AGIMO and what they recommend. Mostly, they
recommend us looking at W3C, and our obligation there is to fulfil at
least the level one priorities. W3C tells us to avoid opening new
windows as far as is possible (can't remember which priority level that
is!). However, you'll find that many users still close the entire
browser window in an attempt to close a PDF, so it may be better to  
open

it in a new window. To some extent, this decision is more up to each
individual department, and I've seen both practices implemented. Does
your department have specific guidelines?

Tamara :)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jermayn Parker
Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2007 12:37 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

Hi group,
This may only relate to Western Australian people but someone else  may
know...

I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont really care
about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet guidlines
are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot find anything.

Thanks for you rhelp
Jermayn

*** 
*


The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission  
of

Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound
transmission.

This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
email (facsimile) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
email (facsimile) in error please contact the Insurance Commission.

Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au
Phone: +61 08 9264 

*** 
*

*


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




The Editor
Heretic Press
http://www.hereticpress.com
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Tim
Why not let the user decide if they want a new window or not?  It is 
generally a bad idea for accessibility.
National Australian standards also cover WA, HREOC standards which 
follow WCAG Guidelines.


http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/#wc-priority-1
Guideline 10.  Use interim solutions recommends not opening new windows.

I think it also might limit your doctype to transitoional, in Quirks 
mode it may be less reliable in rendering some pages in some browsers.

http://diveintoaccessibility.org/day_16_not_opening_new_windows.html

They should care about Australian laws requiring compliance with at 
minimum WCAG 1.0 Checklists.


Tim

On 09/05/2007, at 1:08 PM, Michael MD wrote:



I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont really care
about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet guidlines
are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot find anything.



no idea about "state guidelines" ... but I hope the page warns people 
that they are pdf's before they click!


One of my pet hates is acrobat reader opening in a browser 
unexpectedly.
It takes a long time to start and the browser is completely locked up 
while it waits for acrobat reader to start.
(acrobat reader had the same problem a decade ago and they never fixed 
it!)


Its especially annoying when looking at government sites - they seem 
to use pdf for almost everything

(including a lot of stuff that could have just been put there as html)

If it's a pdf I prefer to just download it and open it in acrobat 
reader without using the browser -
much less hassle and I can still browse while waiting for acrobat 
reader to start!






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



The Editor
Heretic Press
http://www.hereticpress.com
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Jermayn Parker
Karl and mdagn

yes we do have some publications that are currently in html format and
going through the state guidlines I found a reference about html and pdf
copies as pdf is not accessible (word is), so im think we may just do
that even though the five odd publications are 60 plus pages each...




>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/05/2007 11:14:36 am >>>
Jermayn,

I think that it really depends on the end user. I know that any .pdf I
open within my copy of Firefox or Safari will always open up a
separate instance of Acrobat Reader or OSX Preview.app anyway (= new
window). It might have something to do with how Acrobat Reader is
installed by the end user, i.e Either as a plugin or standalone app.

As a side question, why use PDF? As a governmental body (assumption
made by examining your email address), why are you putting your public
information into a proprietary format that requires a proprietary
reader to read?

Can someone tell me how accessible PDF documents are to people with
special needs? I'm assuming that it's not hopeless with the likes of
the accessibility features within Windows and OSX, or am I wrong?

Karl


The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of 
Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound 
transmission. 

This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and privileged. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email (facsimile) is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this email (facsimile) in error please contact 
the Insurance Commission.

Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au 
Phone: +61 08 9264 

*


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Tamara Jackson
Hi Jermayn

When in doubt, look to AGIMO and what they recommend. Mostly, they
recommend us looking at W3C, and our obligation there is to fulfil at
least the level one priorities. W3C tells us to avoid opening new
windows as far as is possible (can't remember which priority level that
is!). However, you'll find that many users still close the entire
browser window in an attempt to close a PDF, so it may be better to open
it in a new window. To some extent, this decision is more up to each
individual department, and I've seen both practices implemented. Does
your department have specific guidelines?

Tamara :)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jermayn Parker
Sent: Wednesday, 9 May 2007 12:37 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

Hi group,
This may only relate to Western Australian people but someone else  may
know...

I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont really care
about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet guidlines
are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot find anything.

Thanks for you rhelp
Jermayn



The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of
Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound
transmission. 

This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
email (facsimile) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
email (facsimile) in error please contact the Insurance Commission.

Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au
Phone: +61 08 9264 


*


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Karl Lurman

Jermayn,

I think that it really depends on the end user. I know that any .pdf I
open within my copy of Firefox or Safari will always open up a
separate instance of Acrobat Reader or OSX Preview.app anyway (= new
window). It might have something to do with how Acrobat Reader is
installed by the end user, i.e Either as a plugin or standalone app.

As a side question, why use PDF? As a governmental body (assumption
made by examining your email address), why are you putting your public
information into a proprietary format that requires a proprietary
reader to read?

Can someone tell me how accessible PDF documents are to people with
special needs? I'm assuming that it's not hopeless with the likes of
the accessibility features within Windows and OSX, or am I wrong?

Karl

On 5/9/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi group,
This may only relate to Western Australian people but someone else  may
know...

I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont really care
about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet guidlines
are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot find anything.

Thanks for you rhelp
Jermayn


The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of 
Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound 
transmission.

This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and privileged. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email (facsimile) is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this email (facsimile) in error please contact 
the Insurance Commission.

Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au
Phone: +61 08 9264 

*


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] wa state guidlines question

2007-05-08 Thread Michael MD


I have a page that has links to a pdf and the client wanted to know
whether it can be linked to a new window or not. They dont really care
about best practises etc but rather what the state Internet guidlines
are. I have looked through the 107 page doco but cannot find anything.



no idea about "state guidelines" ... but I hope the page warns people that 
they are pdf's before they click!


One of my pet hates is acrobat reader opening in a browser unexpectedly.
It takes a long time to start and the browser is completely locked up while 
it waits for acrobat reader to start.

(acrobat reader had the same problem a decade ago and they never fixed it!)

Its especially annoying when looking at government sites - they seem to use 
pdf for almost everything

(including a lot of stuff that could have just been put there as html)

If it's a pdf I prefer to just download it and open it in acrobat reader 
without using the browser -
much less hassle and I can still browse while waiting for acrobat reader to 
start!






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***