Hi Bert
Thanks for the suggestions.
I'm not quite a CSS expert, but I'm not sure that images, being replaced
elements can officially have padding, since padding goes inside the
element
I am following, to some degree, Russ' tutorial:
Hmmm... I have tried to hide the border of an input field in Opera, but
it flatly refused:
input{border:0;}
This is Opera 7.23
oh, that bug. Fixed in 7.50 or 7.60...
For Opera 7.2 use:
input {border: 0 solid;}
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The
G'day
I am following, to some degree, Russ' tutorial:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0208.htm
So it is possible to style an image to have padding and a border.
I don't see image padding mentioned, at least not on that page.
Just not sure why my version isn't working in
OMG...I'm not worthy.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
on 12/17/2004 5:44 AM Leslie Riggs said the following:
Now THIS is what makes designing with CSS fun!! I just love this.
Leslie Riggs
Hi again
I am following, to some degree, Russ' tutorial:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0208.htm
So it is possible to style an image to have padding and a border.
I don't see image padding mentioned, at least not on that page.
The CSS code on Russ' tutorial highlights
The url: http://www.azapi.com/
Just a quick thank you to all that gave comments and suggestions!
Kind Regards
Jacobus van Niekerk
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.4 - Release Date: 2004/12/15
G'day again.
The CSS code on Russ' tutorial highlights the padding as per below:
.floatright
{
...snip...
padding: 10px; /* This line uses the padding */
border: 1px solid #666;
}
As I've been saying, that's the container, not the image:
div class=floatrightimg ...
Hi Folks,
I'm creating a simple vertical nav bar using a styled list. Should be
pretty easy as it's something I've done a hundred times. However this
time I've run into problems with browser rounding errors.
I've come up with another way of doing it, but it's not as elegant as
the initial
On 17 Dec 2004, at 8:45 pm, Andy Budd wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm creating a simple vertical nav bar using a styled list. Should be
pretty easy as it's something I've done a hundred times. However this
time I've run into problems with browser rounding errors.
http://www.message.uk.com/test/nav/
Talking about NN4, it seems that the updated OptusNet Helpdesk (for those
O/S - Optus is .au's 2nd largest Telco) has started (not fully - still some
layout tables) to move to Web Standards and not bothered with NN4 prettiness
(the header fails). But the site seems to be doing something a
In my Firefox .9.3, both sites only show text and some colored backgrounds. I
had to view them in IE to see the wow factors.
Christie Mason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 1:51 AM
To: [EMAIL
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:27:16 -0600, Christie Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my Firefox .9.3, both sites only show text and some colored backgrounds.
I had to view them in IE to see the wow factors.
Christie Mason
I am absoultely sure you did not see real wow factors with IE - for
the
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
Why do you let 8-year-old browser to stop you from making good pages?
I agree that webpages should be accessible to all - they should work
without CSS and JavaScript.
I don't :)
I just use the @import; rule to prevent NN4 from loading the
stylesheets, and a bit of
Very nice! Nice colour scheme also.
And Azapi sounds like a great product also.
One feature I particularly like is the ability to easily resize the screen
font size. As it nears dawn (about 12:30am now) and your eyesight starts
fading that is a really nice touch.
I tried it with FireFox 1.0
Just have time for a quick glance, but I think it looks nice, it
validates, and it doesn't have unintelligible markup so my screen reader
doesn't struggle with it. Just to make sure, you're not going to keep
the Heading Two, Heading Three, etc. right? Because in my screen
reader it says
On 17 Dec 2004, at 03:29, Hugh Todd wrote:
Anyone come up with, or implemented, a 3-column layout of this sort in
which the left and right columns also stretch as a percentage of the
page width?
I refer you to Zoe Gillenwater
(http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?page=1cid=AFC58). I
The diver doesn't show up in my version of IE6. I'm thinking that's by
design.
Rimantas Liubertas has created a disturbance in the Force.
I felt its presence on 12/17/2004 8:44 AM.
Its substance was as follows:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:27:16 -0600, Christie Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my
Yes, I did use the correct URL, you may want to use something like Tiny URL
for future links. I may have missed some opacity in IE but I didn't really
feel like I missed anything, the page was still very wow. Unfortunately,
I'm not fond of wow.
Christie Mason
-Original Message-
From:
what if you want one of the columns to have a border around it, say the right column. How can this be done?
Bruce Gilbert
webmaster
DPS-Original Message- From: Mani Sheriar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Dec 16, 2004 6:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] The Holy Grail ... CSS Liquid
I'm getting weird things in Safari 1.2.3 OS X.3.5. Safari either shows
no flashlight turning on *or* the bg to the diver is a tall column,
almost the reverse of the ocean gradient, and the flashlight works. FF
1.0 Mac works great.
Anyone else??
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
Christie Mason wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:27:16 -0600, Christie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my Firefox .9.3, both sites only show text and some colored
backgrounds. I had to view them in IE to see the wow factors.
I am
what if you want one of the columns to have a border around it, say the
right column. How can this be done?
If you want one of the columns to have a border, then you just apply the
border property to the column and your 200x1 pixel gif can have that
border on it as well. Should work fine.
One
Hi,
Creating a product catalog/blog for client. It will serve as a site for
posting used construction equipment. In the following name/value
listing what would be the most semantic mark-up.
Product Name:
Product Number:
Product Description:
Product Cost:
CK
__
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:41:12 -0600, Christie Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yes, I did use the correct URL, you may want to use something like Tiny
URL for future links.
URL123 (http://url123.com) is really handy for posting long URLs in
email. It even allows you to save links you've shared,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:46:20 -0500, Michael Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chris Kennon wrote:
In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic
mark-up.
Product Name:
Product Number:
Product Description:
Product Cost:
I'd probably use a definition list:
dl
dtMy
It's not beautiful if you zoom your text.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Hi,
Both are viable solutions, would the dl be more scalable for floating
an image with caption beside it. With the table you mentioned Lynx
support, does Lynx choke on dl?
C
On Friday, December 17, 2004, at 09:09 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:46:20 -0500, Michael Wilson
Everything has a weakness
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vaska.WSG
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Another amazing css zen garden entry
It's not beautiful if you zoom your text.
Todd Baker wrote:
hang on a sec.. Ill just pick my jaw up of the ground
Thats amazing.
those bubbles own :)
seriously, awesome job.
But, its not balanced at all. Until i got to the bottom i was like ok,
what's the big deal?. Perhaps thats a feat in and of itself...
That so rocks. Too bad it won't get listed on there, because it causes
IE problems.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:01:30 -0500, Brian Cummiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Todd Baker wrote:
hang on a sec.. Ill just pick my jaw up of the ground
Thats amazing.
those bubbles own :)
I was able to achieve the border on my right column with adding a border to by
bgimage, thanks Mani. One problem I am having though. I have a header image
that is exactly 800px, so I want my whole page to be no more than 800px wide. I
have set my #wrapper to 800px. In IE my right column
Yes both are viable.
I would use the dl when I was expecting to have a few per page
type layout that would be more like a brochure layout.
I would use the table when what I wanted was - you guessed it - a
table layout.
My own personal guideline for table VS anything else is simply
asking myself
And please, please, if using a table remember to include row and column
scope. On a table as small as this it is not really essential, but once the
table grows (or if served from a database where it could be any size) good
column and row headings with scope attributes are essential.
table
Hi,
Any browser idiosyncrasy with dl? I'm hoping none exist with tables.
CK
PS
Thanks for the many viable solutions
On Friday, December 17, 2004, at 01:49 PM, Graham wrote:
And please, please, if using a table remember to include row and column
scope. On a table as small as this it is not really
And please, please, if using a table remember to include row and column
scope.
What is the default scope?
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Hi Charlie
RE: http://www.xert.com.au/workshop/pbyron628/
Just have time for a quick glance, but I think it looks nice, it
validates, and it doesn't have unintelligible markup so my screen reader
doesn't struggle with it. Just to make sure, you're not going to keep
the Heading Two,
I know I'm way out on a limb with this one, but the ocean thing really
doesn't do anything for me... The diver/flashlight effect is cool
(even though it looks a bit nasty as it goes over the gradient) and
the rendered ocean floor has really nice lighting, but besides that...
Comments like I'm not
I know I'm way out on a limb with this one, but the ocean thing really
doesn't do anything for me... The diver/flashlight effect is cool
(even though it looks a bit nasty as it goes over the gradient) and
the rendered ocean floor has really nice lighting, but besides that...
I have to agree with
Some of us are pretty impressed and even mystified at the guy's technical
creativity at utilising standards-based techniques to achieve the effects
of the diver and the light and the bubbles and the crab.
It is that sense of seeing art at the cutting-edge of science that makes us
go wow.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 14:58:11 +1100, J4Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
When I first saw it, I thought ooh this is a nice color scheme and use
of animated gifs and that was about it. It is quite creative.
Francesco Sanfilippo, Developer / Designer
---
On 17 Dec 2004, at 10:01 am, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
divinput//div
div {background: darkcolor url(darkimage);}
input {opacity: 0.5; -moz-opacity: 1; background: lightcolor
url(lightimage);}
As far as I know currently it is quite safe, but it will start to
cause trouble when Opera implements
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Wittenbergh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 18 December 2004 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] accessible image form buttons
What is wrong with solution 3:
input type=image src=Searchbutton.gif alt=Search title=search
/
It is that sense of seeing art at the cutting-edge of science that makes us
go wow.
Good point John, I can't argue with that :) The backgrounds are great,
the css is cutting edge. That doesn't make it a great design though.
Could the people who think it is so non-wow, please explain to us in
43 matches
Mail list logo
