Hi Graham,
Producing a .doc may seem incongruous, but it is just one of around 150
documents covering all Telstra's online standards including wap,
platform,
styleguides information architecture etc.
Yes, apologies for even alluding to that kind of hackneyed response.
You now have me
On 12 Oct 2005, at 11:58 am, Steve Ferguson wrote:
It does appear that you've killed the Safari FOUC.
You should document this as appears to be somewhat of a mystery.
I'll second this. I haven't followed the discussion, so it is hard to
check for a 'before' and 'after'.
Philippe
---
On 10/11/05, Steve Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does appear that you've killed the Safari FOUC.You should document this as appears to be somewhat of a mystery.Nicely Done!Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com
On Oct 10, 2005, at 11:31 PM, Christian Montoya wrote: Safari
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:52:19 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
Where would I document this?
Do you have a blog?
Write an article there.
If not, just add an article page to your website.
Thinking bigger? Write it up for AListApart, or Evolt or... so many
places.
Even just write up the details and
On 12 Oct 2005, at 3:52 pm, Christian Montoya wrote:
Where would I document this?
Blog ? Own website ?
You could start here as well, or add an item to the CSS-D Wiki:
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=FrontPage
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://emps.l-c-n.com/
On 10/12/05, Philippe Wittenbergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Oct 2005, at 3:52 pm, Christian Montoya wrote: Where would I document this?Blog ? Own website ?You could start here as well, or add an item to the CSS-D Wiki:
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=FrontPagePhilippe---Philippe
:after generated content cannot receive some CSS properties,
including 'position', 'float', list properties, and table properties.
That's CSS2. Can't find that line in CSS2.1.
That's possible, I quoted this from PIE thus I don't know whether it was
ment as a normative restriction, or
(Might be useful to someone else on this list too, otherwise apologies.)
http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/speech/
Apple’s Speech Recognition and Speech Synthesis Technologies now give
speech-savvy applications the power to carry out your voice commands and
even speak back to you in plain
I will be off-campus from Wednesday, October 12 through Friday, October
14. I will return to campus on Monday, October 17.
For technical assistance, or if this is an urgent web-related matter
contact the ITS Helpdesk at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or call
612-659-6600.
Otherwise, I will reply to your
Listers...
Here is the code I am using on a list of links:
#content ul.linklist{list-style-type:none; margin:0 0 20px 0;}
#content ul.linklist li{padding:0 0 .3em 40px;}
#content ul.linklist a{display:block; padding:0 0 0 20px; margin:0 0 0
-20px;}
#content ul.linklist a:hover{display:block;
Float the list, or the containing div, so that the width won't stretch across the page? That should contain the hover effect. -- - C Montoyardpdesign.com ...
liquid.rdpdesign.com ... montoya.rdpdesign.com
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:48:05 -0400, Tom Livingston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|-link text--| hover and link work here
OK I solved the above issue by using display:table-cell and feeding WinIE
display:block inCCs.
But the same fix will not work for this:
#faphomecontent
We tested DW8 recently, Contribute 3 also uses this latest renderer.
Its CSS support is a big improvement over the previous version.
It still has a way to go yet. We picked up some issues with negative
margins and other issues regarding floats. But if you keep these little
issues in mind when
Hi,
I have a lovely new em-based page on Chinese food that works fine in
practically everything apart from Netscape 6.2 and Konqueror 3.05.
My initial template is at http://www.chopstixmedia.com/dev/layout-test.html
Please accept my apologies if it makes you hungry.
Looking at my current
Title: Is a colon after a form label necessary?
We are establishing Web standards for forms and are debating this.
Heres what I have gleaned based on reading the references cited below.
1. Colons are hard to see on a screen. (Reference 1.)
2. W3C does not state a requirement for a colon
1) Is it acceptable to go live with a layout that doesn't work with either
of these two browsers? (I notice that a number of prominent web standardista
websites have done so)
Define doesn't work? [I don't have those browsers to hand]
If it doesn't work in the sense that some of the content is
On 10/13/05, Ian Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a lovely new em-based page on Chinese food that works fine in
practically everything apart from Netscape 6.2 and Konqueror 3.05.
1) Is it acceptable to go live with a layout that doesn't work with either
of these two browsers? (I notice
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McLaughlin, Gail G
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2005 11:19 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Is a colon after a form label necessary?
We are establishing Web standards for forms and are
John wrote:
Define doesn't work? [I don't have those browsers to hand]
If it doesn't work in the sense that some of the content is
invisible or illegible, links aren't clickable etc, then I don't
think I'd say it was acceptable.
Sorry for being unclear. The page is pretty broken with
and the market share of Linux in general in my own web site stats is next
to nil.
Genuine question:
Is this because they visit, it doesn't work, and they don't come back,
forever losing them as a customer?
Craig Rippon
Brisbane, Australia
It makes things easier to associate in my opinion. At the end of the day its just punctuation... like using a full stop to separate content. It may help too when the CSS is turned off.Zach Inglis // www.zachinglis.comOn 13 Oct 2005, at 02:18, McLaughlin, Gail G wrote: We are establishing Web
Sorry for being unclear. The page is pretty broken with overlaid content.
You can see my browsercam output at
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=198424
Got it. Yes, pretty broken!
Fix the display in those browsers if and when you can.
If only I knew where to start... It's taken
My layouts are pretty basic, so I doubt it wouldn't work. I think the
number of people out in the general public using Linux on the desktop
is infintismally (sp?) small.
On 10/13/05, Craig Rippon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and the market share of Linux in general in my own web site stats is next
and the market share of Linux in general in my own web site stats is next to
nil.
Wouldn't a LOT of Linux users now be Firefox users too?
The OS is not the concern here (although Konqueror is Linux exclusive? ), it's
getting things working in (somewhat imperfect) browsers.
Ian is expressing
Kay, thanks. I am a web development student at college and this point came
up in a lecture, just curious to get opinions.
Cheers
Craig R.
-Original Message-
From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2005 12:27 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Craig,
On 10/13/05, Craig Rippon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kay, thanks. I am a web development student at college and this point came
up in a lecture, just curious to get opinions.
While it's important to be accessible to everyone, harsh economic
realities dictate that you have to draw the
Kay Smoljak wrote:
My layouts are pretty basic, so I doubt it wouldn't work. I think the
number of people out in the general public using Linux on the desktop
is infintismally (sp?) small.
Hem
not infinitesimally small, but fewer than Windows. Possibly as many as
Mac. IMHO designers fuss
Ian
I am with Kay on Netscape 6.2 it was based on Mozilla 0.9.4.1 and released in
October 2001. And quickly followed by 6.2.1 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 and then replaced
within a year by Netscape 7 which ran a real Mozilla engine 1.0.1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape
NS 6.2 has not been in my
On 10/13/05, Nick Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to test in Linux, get a copy of Ubuntu live CD, drop the CD into
your drive, reboot from the CD and you have a fully function Linux box,
unfortunately it uses the Gnome desktop which knocks out testing Konqueror,
but there should
but there should be something similar which uses the KDE desktop.
Knoppix uses KDE from (rather rusty) memory
http://www.Knoppix.org
Paul
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I personally think that this will be unrealistic for the time being. But
it's nice to hear that the IE team is starting to take a stand agains
the problems their buggy software created.
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/10/12/480242.aspx
**
On 10/13/05, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personally think that this will be unrealistic for the time being. Butit's nice to hear that the IE team is starting to take a stand againsthe problems their buggy software created.It sounds more like they are taking a stand against the designers
Tom Livingston wrote:
All I want is link text with a backgnd image to show on hover. And
ONLY the text should hover/link. The above again has active blank
space within the href... yes, because of display:block; but I can't
get the effect of text-pushed-over-to-allow-for-hover-bg-image w/o
Craig Rippon wrote:
Kay, thanks. I am a web development student at college and this point came
up in a lecture, just curious to get opinions.
Cheers
Craig R.
Gday,
I am a uni student at University of South Australia.
May I ask you which college/uni teaches web development?
Kat
what do you mean by conditional comments? It seems to me, that css
hacks are not really a good thing since they are called hacks. The
language should just work regardless of browser or computer. I think
thats what standards are for aren't they? So that the language is
standard for everyone??
Did you read the blog post in the link? The writer insists that developers use conditional comments, and even shows how to use them. What I am saying is that IE should be eliminating the need for both conditional comments and hacks. I'm not saying to take their functionality away... it's a nice
Katrina wrote:
I'm sorry, I totally didn't mean to send that to the list.
Kat
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
For what I see in:
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
it seems like FF is loosing terrain, is
w3schools accurate? Or is there anyother place that I can check what the
general public is using.
This is for General Public, I know I can
look in my logs to see my
I read the first part and even went to the websites of the hacks it
gave references to. I thought that was the end of the post and then
only saw the conditional stuff after I had posted so I apologize for
that. Yes, exactly... IE needs to play nice like all the other browsers.
Buddy
On 10/12/05 10:43 PM Helmut Granda [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
it seems like FF is loosing terrain, is w3schools accurate?
It's accurate in my case.
On Mac, I think FF pretty well s*cks - what with stuck menus and stalls and
all that sort of thing. I went back to Safari after about 2
If you've gone against all sane advice and used CSS hacks then you knew
exactly what you were in for with future browsers and potential problems.
I don't want to see an M$ bitch session develop here while Microsoft are
seemingly trying very hard do the right thing (at last). Obviously we have
to
41 matches
Mail list logo