=footerpThis is all the copyright stuff./p/div
So, it makes me wonder: Is there a way I should be formatting my code to
avoid browser rendering problems such as this one?
Cheers,
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http
rendering in
IE. I find this very odd.
cheers,
Hope Stewart
On 21/2/05 11:48 AM, Lothar B. Baier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds like uncollapsed margins. Eric A. Meyer has a good article
on that:
http://www.complexspiral.com/publications/uncollapsing-margins/
HTH
Lothar
:
http://www.harbourmarine.com/draft/products/capstans2.html
But I believe this is an inappropriate and unnecessary use of a table. How
do I replace this table with divs? There will be many product pages like
this one, but the photos will vary in size.
Hope Stewart
machines I have,
italic is rendered very jaggedly even though on my old Mac it looks
beautiful -- but at least 99% of the client's customers seem to be using
Windows, so it's got to look good for them!)
Thanks for your help!
Hope Stewart
On 28/3/05 12:43 PM, Vicki Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My personal approach is to use put captions in a p inside the div, and
style that separately. (So if your div is #image, then just use #image p
which will style all ps inside that div.)
The reason I do this is because I may want to
of the
Eiffel tower in Parc Mini-France
/div
Can someone explain?
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Say you want to create this two-column layout:
div id=leftContent for id left Goes Here/div
div id=rightContent for id right Goes Here/div
What, if any, are the advantages and/or disadvantages of (1) floating
neither column compared to (2) floating one column? Sample CSS:
(1) floating neither
On 25/4/05 5:26 PM, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The biggest drawback of absolute positioning is that it is removed from the
normal flow of the document. This means that any other content below will
ignore the absolutely positioned content. For example, a footer may slide up
On 25/4/05 8:09 PM, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem here is the first rule: you forgot the ;, so a parser
could read this:
#right {
width: 45%;
border: 1px solid black;
}
D'oh!!
now you might wonder why this does not fit side-by-side in FF, OP, but
in IE.
could have a look for me, particularly in regards to
the drop-downs.
The drop-downs do not work in IE5.2/mac, but each of the first level links
will go to a page containing all the links in the drop-downs. So,
accessibility is not reliant on the drop-downs.
Regards,
Hope Stewart
Thanks Thierry for your detailed reply! I've implemented all your
suggestions except the IE5/mac dropdowns -- I haven't had time to look at
the suggested link yet, but I will.
Regards,
Hope
On 28/4/05 2:27 PM, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ope Stewart wrote:
comments. The design
On 28/4/05 6:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2 errors in home page
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rowinghistory-aus.info/world-u23-
championships/index.html
Thanks for this. Just goes to show that I need to validate EACH time I make
changes!
Cheers
Hope(less)
On 28/4/05 8:46 PM, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I really don't like is that when you click a link the top
menu disappears and the only way I can get it back is to click the Back
button. (I'm using IE6)
If you click one of the links in the top green menu, it takes you to a
On 29/4/05 1:30 PM, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems fine on this end, although I can't for the life of me figure
out what the bw image is that appears to be a grasshopper?
Haha - It's a grasshopper wearing a jail bird stripy outfit- haha..
Actually, looks like people rowing -
to select the text main content goes here, I can't
do it in Design View. I have to go into Code View. When there are a few
lines of text in the editable DIV region, then it's no problem.
I never had this problem with templates using table-based layouts.
Regards,
Hope Stewart
On 7/5/05 4:42 PM, Joshua
,
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Thanks for your suggests, James. I'm currently reading through the w3.org
spec whose link Lachlan Hardy gave:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/tables.html
I'll then give the table another go and if I'm still having problems will
certainly cry out for help again. I like figuring out things for
enlighten me?
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
equivalent to the alt attribute?
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Thanks Daniele. I'll give it a go.
On 30/6/05 3:19 PM, INFOPRE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if browser doens't have plug-ing, you can insert a tag image
with alt attribute that describe use of flash in your site.
If you are interested to create an accessibile flash site,
this is for you
want
the text in the table to be the same size as elsewhere! What am I doing
wrong??? Could someone please enlighten me?
A mock-up of the page is here:
http://hopestew.customer.netspace.net.au/
And the css is here:
http://hopestew.customer.netspace.net.au/css/style1.css
Hope Stewart
Thanks, Russ! I've fixed the doctype on the real page and it works
beautifully now.
The page is on a site with a non-web standards design that I've inherited.
It's due for a revamp in a couple of months when I plan to introduce
standards. I thought I'd start to experiment with this new page but
On 4/7/05 1:23 PM, Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was bugging me for ages too. I don't know _why_ it does it but my
workaround to-date has simply been to implicitly set font-size for p, td and
li. My table and list text usually display larger when I only set the
font-size in the body
On 4/7/05 2:42 PM, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope could just have easily changed from an incomplete HTML4.01 Transitional
doctype to a complete version. This is not a criticism of Hope, as she may
have had other reasons for moving to XHML.
This was not a conscience nor
?
cheers,
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
for that paragraph:
.normal { color: black }
But I find this doesn't work. For it to work, I have to define the class
with the div ID, like this:
#hilite .normal { color: black }
What is it about the laws of inheritance that means the class alone won't
work??
Hope Stewart
Thanks Russ Joe. It all makes sense now! I had never come across the
specificity rules before. (Then again, a year ago I had never heard of web
standards.) This is a rather handy thing to know.
Cheers,
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list
the pros cons of various requests by the client and
may recommend other alternatives. But in the end, the client has the final
say. That is the reality. -- But we can still try to make the site as
accessible as possible within the client-defined framework.
Hope Stewart
On 26/7/05 7:07 PM, Mugur Padurean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, but how do you keep your site local on the web?
And what if my bussiness in Romania on dial-up finds your services in
Australia (aimed at local broadbanders) so attractive that wants to do
business with you? Hey, maybe this way
I haven't tested it in *every* browser.
Are there any advantages of using p class=clearnbsp;/p over
div class=clear/div? I've never put a nbsp; inside the
div class=clear/div. Should I?
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http
Geoff,
One problem that I've found in both Firefox Safari is that when I increase
the font size the search box and its button disappear from the page.
Hope Stewart
On 4/8/05 7:18 PM, Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for all the comments on the new ABC home page. I did
clicking or scrolling
away.
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
with list-style-type set to none, would
this be semantically correct? Is there a better way?
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
. But when the logo is a background image, it is one of the last
things to load. From a marketing point of view, this is not desirable.
What do others think? I am quite happy to be persuaded otherwise by a sound
logical argument/discussion!
Cheers,
Hope Stewart
cleaner and the css
has one less item by using br /. (I like the less-is-more concept.)
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
of that. And if images
are turned off, at least you'd have the alt text.
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
-release-hooks.html
http://www.harbourmarine.com/css/print.css
http://www.harbourmarine.com/css/products.css
Not particularly elegant but it works.
Hope Stewart
On 10/10/05 12:01 PM, Richard Czeiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, there is an argument that has the logo in the CSS particularly
On 10/10/05 3:38 PM, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read this aloud:
909 anystreet
ithaca, new york
Did you stop at the line break? Did it matter? My point is that we don't need
to make the line break obvious to the screen reader.
For this address it doesn't matter, but for
or painting because I
like its text-based description.
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
On 27/10/05 2:41 PM, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
Melbourne WSG
-
Date: Thursday 10 November, 2005
http://webstandardsgroup.org/go/event48.cfm
(snip)
-
2. Sydney WSG
-
Date: Thursday 10
but there are still
some instances where they can be user-friendly.
Horses for courses.
Hope Stewart
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
41 matches
Mail list logo
