Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread Gary McDuffie
> On Jul 24, 2017, at 8:24 PM, igwt1939 wrote: > > The biggest problems I have is it jumping around and I think it confuses the > other op so that sometime they don't come back to the finish ,but I still > enjoy it but will be glad when it gets stable. Could you explain what you mean by jumpi

[wsjt-devel] DXCC not displaying?

2017-07-24 Thread Neil Zampella
Hi all, not sure if this is me, or something that reverted in the code somewhere, but I was seeing DXCC information on r7937, but I'm not on r7939. I've not changed anything on the system, and only move the BIN directory after building a new version, unless I see something changed in the inc

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread igwt1939
The biggest problems I have is it jumping around and I think it confuses the other op so that sometime they don't come back to the finish ,but I still enjoy it but will be glad when it gets stable. KO4PU Robert - Original Message - From: "Richard Lamont" To: Sent: Monday, July 24,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Tx5 Tab1 Message

2017-07-24 Thread dgb
... and that is a wonderful trick Bill tnx 73 Dwight NS9I On 7/24/2017 3:51 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: On 24/07/2017 21:38, Neil Zampella wrote: don't know if this has anything to do with the latest changes in r7939, but when I press F4 to clear the DX data, the Tab 1 messages clear except f

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Richard, Richard G4DYA wrote: Ubuntu MATE 16.04 amd64 1.7.1-devel r7939 Auto seq and call 1st enabled Tried it and it looks as though FT8 now has a two-pass decoder, which is nice. Since you're providing feedback on development code, you should not need to guess or make inferences abou

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread Bill Somerville
On 24/07/2017 23:10, Richard Lamont wrote: On 24/07/17 20:35, Bill Somerville wrote: Currently it is only in the development branch but I urge those brave enough to build the development branch to try it and report back. You should note that the development branch also contains FT8 decoder chang

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread Richard Lamont
On 24/07/17 20:35, Bill Somerville wrote: > Currently it is only in the development branch but I > urge those brave enough to build the development branch to try it and > report back. You should note that the development branch also contains > FT8 decoder changes that are not yet finalized and may

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread charlie
Hi Bill I just built r7939 and Sh messages in JT4 and QRA64 now seem to be working correctly with Type 1 compound mycall. 73 Charlie > Hi All, > > I have finally got to a point where I can commit the large round of > changes that came from doing the above. The change (r7939) comment is > this:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Tx5 Tab1 Message

2017-07-24 Thread Neil Zampella
OK . wasn't sure it was a 'byproduct' of that change or intentional. Figured it was best to report it and see :) Neil On 7/24/2017 4:51 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: On 24/07/2017 21:38, Neil Zampella wrote: don't know if this has anything to do with the latest changes in r7939, but when I pr

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 multiple decodes

2017-07-24 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Mark, On 7/24/2017 5:12 PM, Mark Turner EI3KD via wsjt-devel wrote: I'm currently trying to capture some examples where the WSJT-X waterfall appears to become corrupt with multiple images of signals, along with multiple decodes - I see this fairly frequently when using FT8, and have also se

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 multiple decodes

2017-07-24 Thread Mark Turner via wsjt-devel
Bill, I'm currently trying to capture some examples where the WSJT-X waterfall appears to become corrupt with multiple images of signals, along with multiple decodes - I see this fairly frequently when using FT8, and have also seen it very rarely with JT65, including on older versions of WSJT

Re: [wsjt-devel] "S" of split

2017-07-24 Thread Bill Somerville
On 24/07/2017 22:05, Alessandro Gorobey via wsjt-devel wrote: I have a strange GUI with the "S" of split. The radio is FT857 and use "Fake it" with hamlib Tested only with last week releses. If I start program it is missed. It appear if I change TX frequency, eg. from 700 to 701 or press F2 an

[wsjt-devel] "S" of split

2017-07-24 Thread Alessandro Gorobey via wsjt-devel
Hi, I have a strange GUI with the "S" of split. The radio is FT857 and use "Fake it" with hamlib Tested only with last week releses. If I start program it is missed. It appear if I change TX frequency, eg. from 700 to 701 or press F2 and exit without changing anything. Is not a big problem,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread Tom-KQ5S
Thanks Bill. That is what I thought the "policy" was. Just clarifying. 73, Tom - KQ5S On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 24/07/2017 21:50, Tom-KQ5S wrote: > > I built and installed 7939. You mentioned " Auto sequencing has been > made generic such that it can be

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread Bill Somerville
On 24/07/2017 21:50, Tom-KQ5S wrote: I built and installed 7939. You mentioned " Auto sequencing has been made generic such that it can be used for more than one mode if desired." Does this mean JT9/65? If so where do you toggle it on? Hi Tom, the "if desired" refers to the developers

Re: [wsjt-devel] Tx5 Tab1 Message

2017-07-24 Thread Bill Somerville
On 24/07/2017 21:38, Neil Zampella wrote: don't know if this has anything to do with the latest changes in r7939, but when I press F4 to clear the DX data, the Tab 1 messages clear except for the Tx5 message. It stays at 'dxCall MyCall 73'. Hi Neil, that's intentional. The 73/free text mess

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread Tom-KQ5S
Thanks Bill. I built and installed 7939. You mentioned " Auto sequencing has been made generic such that it can be used for more than one mode if desired." Does this mean JT9/65? If so where do you toggle it on? 73, Tom - KQ5S On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > Hi

[wsjt-devel] Tx5 Tab1 Message

2017-07-24 Thread Neil Zampella
Bill, don't know if this has anything to do with the latest changes in r7939, but when I press F4 to clear the DX data, the Tab 1 messages clear except for the Tx5 message. It stays at 'dxCall MyCall 73'. Neil, KN3ILZ

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: review of message reply and sequencing logic

2017-07-24 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi All, I have finally got to a point where I can commit the large round of changes that came from doing the above. The change (r7939) comment is this: + Add the option to ALT+click a decoded CQ or QRZ message which only moves the Rx frequency to theirs

Re: [wsjt-devel] Tx5 Blank Standard Message

2017-07-24 Thread dgb
Same thing has happened here numerous times over numerous versions. I found by shutting off the Automatic system I'm able to from a macro insert a 73 message. Of course, all this takes time, after the other station has sent RRR - pia at any rate. 73 Dwight NS9I On 7/24/2017 9:54 AM, Ed Wilso

Re: [wsjt-devel] Tx5 Blank Standard Message

2017-07-24 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
This patch fixes that problemautoseq really opened a bag of worms which Bill is working on making it more robust.This one is an edge case that Bill may want to look at. Index: mainwindow.cpp===--- mainwindow.cpp      (revision

[wsjt-devel] Tx5 Blank Standard Message

2017-07-24 Thread Ed Wilson via wsjt-devel
I have been testing WSJT-X rc2 on FT8 over the past few days and noted that it has the same defect that I reported earlier of the Tx5 line in the Standard Messages seemingly randomly showing-up and transmitting blank. I built r7935 yesterday and noted today that the same issue continues to exist