Hi Andy...Yes it happens all the time..BY DESIGN, apparently. I find it
most frustrating and bordering on rude. Technically the return 73 is not
required for a valid QSO, however it is the polite thing to do. At the
very least if confirms to your operating partner that all was received.
I would
Agree 100%Allan - VK4QGOn 28 Jun 2021 10:09 am, "Laurie, VK3AMA" <_vk3a...@vkdxer.net> wrote:I second this request!
I see this very frequently in the PSKReporter spot feed utilized by
HamSpots.
de Laurie VK3AMA
On 28/06/2021 9:36 am, Peter Sumner wrote:
> Hello to the WSJT-X community,
>
Firstly, thanks to Joe for increasing the JT4 SNR to something more usable.
Our local beacons run JT4D on 70cm and JT4F on 23cm. I have noticed that
if I choose a Tol of less than 100Hz I get a realistic SNR. 100Hz Tol or
greater results in something 15 or 20dB weaker reported.
I have tested thi
I have recently built WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc2 r8084 and am finding that
_everyone_ calling CQ is coming up as a new DXCC.
r8069 behaves as expected. Have I missed something or is this a possible
bug?
Allan VK4QG
--
Check ou
Thanks Bill, Mike...works a treat now
Cheers,
Allan
VK4QG
Sent from my Windows 10 phone
From: Bill Somerville
Sent: Monday, 5 June 2017 8:52 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Fw: Issues with recent WSJT-X releases
On 03/06/2017 14:31, Black Michael wrote:
Patch
Hello Gentlemen,
The undesired issues described below, all appear on three different
computers. A 64bit Windows 10 pc, 64 bit Windows 7 pc and a Windows 10
laptop; using revisions r7688 and r7698.
*Issue 1. Waterfall controls.* The controls below the MSK144 Waterfall
disappear after a mode
or JT9 modes.
Did you edit the ini file while wsjt-x was running? If you did that
probably explains why the setting kept reverting. I bet the program
rewrites that file on quit.
On Nov 6, 2016, at 20:13, Allan Downie <mailto:vk...@westnet.com.au>> wrote:
fter editing and saving
which as I remember for me did unlock
it?
The original behaviour you described could then be initiated by
swapping modes and going back to JT65.
73
Charlie
----
*From:*Allan Downie [mailto:vk...@westnet.com.au]
*Sent:* 06 Novemb
Hi Charlie and all,
Many thanks for your reply and all comments noted.
I did as you suggested, I edited the WSJT-X.ini file to change to
/LockTxFreq=*false*./ Interestingly, after editing and saving the .ini
file and confirming that indeed the edit has taken place, closing WSJT-X
and restarti
Hi Joe and all,
I originally started this enquiry on Yahoo Groups 'wsjtgroup' and very
kindly received a possible solution from Joe K1JT. However I seem to be
having great trouble with Yahoo, so I am continuing on here. I hope that
is okay.
My Original posting was something like: -
/I curre
... and that's using 1.6.0 or 1.7.0?
I have been decoding a good number of -26/-27dB signals with the new decoder in
1.7.0 . Nice work Gents, many thanks.
Allan
VK4QG
-Original Message-
From: "Joe Taylor"
Sent: 27/11/2015 0:26
To: "wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject
Hi Joe,
Possible page format change -
Headings '10.7.2 File menu' on page 32 and '10.7.7 Help menu' on page 33 would
be better placed at the top of the following pages.
Allan
VK4EME/VK4QG--
__
Typo page 25, under 9.2 Free Text Messages: -
'messages' is spelt 'nessages'
VK4EME/VK4QG--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge
I am not sure if this problem has been mentioned before, but here goes.
I (and others), have had an issue with the templates in WSJT 10.0 for
some time now. Any templates which may be modified by the user, are
reset to the default templates when changing from one mode to another
and then
Thanks Bill, I'll give it a go.
Allan
VK4QG
-Original Message-
From: "Bill Somerville"
Sent: 23/04/2015 11:41
To: "wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.5-rc1 (Release Candidate 1) PTT problem
On 23/04/2015 00:47, Allan Down
e: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.5-rc1 (Release Candidate 1) PTT problem
On 23/04/2015 00:06, Allan Downie wrote:
> Hi Gents,
Hi Allan,
>
> I appear to have a problem with this latest version regarding the PTT. I
> don't have any!
>
> I am not using CAT control. The transceiver use
Hi Gents,
I appear to have a problem with this latest version regarding the PTT. I
don't have any!
I am not using CAT control. The transceiver uses a hard-wired PTT from
the RTS pins to a real com port i.e. no USB adapters
My PTT settings have worked on all previous versions (1.4, 1.5 and 1.6)
Hi Gents,
The 'colors' tab under 'settings' is missing. In this current version
there is little difference in colour between 'worked before' and 'not
worked before'.
Allan VK4QG
On 5/04/2015 1:49 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> To:
> CC: WSJT software development
>
> The WSJT Development Group is
Hi Joe,
Along with WSJT-X, I usually run JT65-HF HB9HQX Edition in rx only (I
usually obtain slightly better decodes with JT65-HF, although the gap is
decreasing).
I have noticed the 'CQ 000 ' decode for quite some time
now on each revision of WSJT-X. I have looked into this and found that
i
Hi Gents,
I have installed today r5007 and I'm somewhat impressed with the speed and
sensitivity improvements you've implemented over r4976.
However I have had a couple of instances of not being able to automatically
move to the frequency of, and enable TX, on a station calling in the format C
20 matches
Mail list logo
