Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?

FWIW ... if you received an RR73 .. there is no need to reply. The station is saying that RR I got your last, and 'over and out' ... The other party is not waiting for your reply, they're on to another contact. Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/21/2023 1:14 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win

Re: [wsjt-devel] USS Captain Robert Smalls

I agree this is a great happening, but I believe you sent it to the wrong list :) Neil, KN3ILZ On 4/12/2023 12:44 PM, robert evans LAST_NAME wrote: A Navy ship named for a Confederate victory now honors a Black Union hero : NPR

Re: [wsjt-devel] Possible wsjtx RC5 issue when built from source (No frequency info)

Um ... you need to do this: To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net You can reach the person managing

Re: [wsjt-devel] “Disable Tx after sending 73” not working

That covers the other modes in WSJT-X, not FT8 or FT4. Neil, KN3ILZ On 7/18/2022 7:58 PM, Gene Marsh wrote: Reino, if that is the case, why do you need to check the box “Disable Tx after sending”? 73 de W8NET Miles “Gene” Marsh 3905 Century Club Master #47 3905 Century Club 2022 Eyeball host

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 101, Issue 33

Don't blame me for that line it was in the message that I replied to ... :) I've always had the reminder to log the QSO turned on in WSJT-X. I like to see what I'm logging. Neil, KN3ILZ On 7/16/2022 7:54 AM, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Send wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X close the QSO unilaterally (?)

Yes ... take out the RR73 option double click on the Tx4 button and you switch to RRR ... then turn on the "PROMPT ME TO LOG QSO" option in Settings -> Reporting tab. You'll never get a 'autologged' QSO again as you have to manually OK what is being logged. Problem Solved. Neil, KN3ILZ On

Re: [wsjt-devel] Unwanted CQ in FT8

That can be done using the 'Free Text' area and macros from JT Alert.  No need to add another standard message.  As far as 'unwanted' CQs, uncheck the CALL 1ST checkbox. Neil, KN3ILZ On 7/12/2022 7:31 PM, Henryk Majcher wrote: I propose a small change in WSJT-X. Scenario: The users of

Re: [wsjt-devel] QSO impossible between compound call and /MM station ?

I quote:  "The developers will not allocate the needed spaces in the program to correct the issue. " The issue has NOTHING to do with the 'needed space' in the program, and ALL to do with the 77 bits of the data package being sent.    If it was a simple change in the program it would have been

Re: [wsjt-devel] Enhancement

But you do have Gridtracker available for Linux too . Neil, KN3ILZ On 11/22/2021 2:44 PM, John Korpal wrote: One other thing is JTAlert is only for windows. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 22, 2021, at 1:42 PM, John Korpal wrote:  I was just following the same design that appends the

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

Where are you sending your 'bug report' ... here, or the Groups.io list?   Two different locations. Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/14/2021 1:44 PM, Barry Jackson wrote: On 14/10/2021 19:33, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote: Does this list really take hours to update? sent at: Thursday, 14 October 2021

Re: [wsjt-devel] test mail

Are you getting the digest version? That said, I saw this at 1:54 PM Central time on the 14th Also, your name & callsign is helpful Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/14/2021 1:33 PM, Barry Jackson wrote: Does this list really take hours to update? sent at: Thursday, 14 October 2021 19:32

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request: Hound Mode

Jim Brown via wsjt-devel mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: On 10/10/2021 7:12 PM, Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel wrote: > as F/H specifically requires you to reply to a Fox CQ above 1000 hz, and > since the decoder decodes the entire passband based on the ba

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request: Hound Mode

. Oh and to those that say "grab the source and roll your own" - not everyone can or has the time to write software and roll their own. Regards, Grant VK5GR On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:55 AM Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: In y

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request: Hound Mode

In your case I would suggest create a separate CONFIGURATION for each mode you're using.    You can setup one for regular use, then one for other special modes such as the NA VHF contest, Field Day, Fox & Hound, etc. All you need to do is switch over to the mode you're going to use by selecting

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X and Ham Radio Deluxe (Some Good News)

If you're using the Secondary UDP Server in WSJT-X to do the logging to HRD, then be aware, that is 'deprecated', that is no longer being supported.   Its been that way for a while and still available, but it may disappear in a newer version. Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/4/2021 3:17 PM, Bruce Bohannon

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question, FT8

It's currently optional ... When you send RR73, when the Tx Enable turns off, the operator has the OPTION to click it back on, select the Tx5 message, and have it go out. See ... already implemented.  Just takes TWO clicks. Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/4/2021 7:21 AM, Alex wrote: Hi Jim, Hence the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Windows 11 and WSJT-X Observation

FWIW ... others are running the Windows 11 beta without problems.    Trying to compare HRD and FLDIGI to WSJT-X decoding is apples and oranges. WSJT-X is VERY CPU dependent, it needs a very fast CPU.  What CPU are you using to run it on?   The fact that decoding is having a problem usually

Re: [wsjt-devel] I stand Corrected

How is he harassing you?    He's asking for more details.   Just pasting the pic of the error box does nothing whatsoever.    That same box pops up when I start WSJT-X without having the rig turned on.   The 'More Details" button will supply a lot more information about the cause. Neil, KN3ILZ

Re: [wsjt-devel] Call for information about PC systems being used for WSJT-X

Bill, the CPU-Z program shows that I'm running an AMD Ryzen 4 Mobile 2500U with 4 cores, speed of 1596.76MHz, and it includes instructions for AVX, and AVX2. Hope this helps. Neil, KN3ILZ ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] Receipt of 73 after RR73 sent triggers a 73 reply from CQ caller

Got it ... :) Neil, KN3ILZ On 3/6/2021 8:30 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: On 06/03/2021 14:21, Neil Zampella wrote: Hi, I just installed 2.4.0-RC2 and found an issue with the auto sequencing after an RR73 is sent.    Normally, I'll click on the Enable Tx right after I send the RR73 so

[wsjt-devel] Receipt of 73 after RR73 sent triggers a 73 reply from CQ caller

Hi, I just installed 2.4.0-RC2 and found an issue with the auto sequencing after an RR73 is sent.    Normally, I'll click on the Enable Tx right after I send the RR73 so that the CQ call is immediately sent as the next Tx time slice comes up.    I have the setting to clear the standard messages

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release candidate: WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc2

decides.    However, if you load to an online service, that's harder to correct. That's what I meant about how to log the Q65 QSOs. Neil, KN3ILZ On 3/6/2021 2:03 AM, Claude Frantz wrote: On 3/6/21 2:07 AM, Neil Zampella wrote: Hi Neil, Reino and all, I wouldn't go there yet.   The ADIF

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc2 Mac Version

to work fine. Thus, the problem seems to be isolated to Q65. No Hamlib here. 73, John WA1EAZ On Mar 5, 2021, at 8:09 PM, Neil Zampella wrote: Why did you run the clone to test FT8 .. .wouldn't it be a better idea to see if WSJT-X worked correctly, then reported the issue?Using the clone

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc2 Mac Version

Why did you run the clone to test FT8 .. .wouldn't it be a better idea to see if WSJT-X worked correctly, then reported the issue?    Using the clone does not give the same information as the WSJT-X RC versions often have Hamlib updates that other programs don't. Neil, KN3ILZ On 3/5/2021 1:10

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release candidate: WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc2

Reino I wouldn't go there yet.   The ADIF committee has not yet met to add this mode to the ADIF standard. Neil, KN3ILZ On 3/5/2021 11:28 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote: On 3/5/21 2:54 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: Q65 is designed for two-way QSOs over especially difficult propagation paths such as

Re: [wsjt-devel] clock offset / fudge adjustment, automatic/manual

Mike Black and created a small program/script that will allow you to hand adjust your time.  You can find it on his QRZ page: https://www.qrz.com/db/W9MDB Neil, KN3ILZ On 3/4/2021 11:51 AM, David Smith wrote: again, clarifying the use case: Portable use, no internet. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at

Re: [wsjt-devel] Crash during QSO

David, is it possible to send this as an attachment, rather than a 'cut and paste' into an email? Thanks, Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/28/2021 7:23 AM, David Schmocker wrote: Sending JA7QVI KJ9I R-24. Awaiting RRR    SH message (crash at start of Tx minute)..

Re: [wsjt-devel] ANNOUNCEMENT: update_wsjtx_log.py released

.. and I rest my case. Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/26/2021 9:44 PM, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote: You're pretty brave behind your keyboard. It's a wonder with remarks like yours that anyone bothers to develop and release software for free. On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 10:02 PM Neil Zampella mailto:ne

Re: [wsjt-devel] ANNOUNCEMENT: update_wsjtx_log.py released

Neil Zampella mailto:ne...@techie.com>> wrote: I agree with Marco.    Its not a 'deficiency' if its not in the design parameters of the program.    This is why there are third-party programs, and scripts like your's to ENHANCE the use of the program. Neil, KN3ILZ O

Re: [wsjt-devel] ANNOUNCEMENT: update_wsjtx_log.py released

I agree with Marco.    Its not a 'deficiency' if its not in the design parameters of the program.    This is why there are third-party programs, and scripts like your's to ENHANCE the use of the program. Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/26/2021 3:34 PM, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote: My opinion my words. You're

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 84, Issue 158

I don't believe a  'macro' is used for this. Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/19/2021 2:39 PM, Jim Record wrote: Have you considered adding a downloadable macro capability to let a user program the capability for other contests. Maybe in Python? Jim AD0YO -- Jim Record /Firgenholt Joyner/ (Old English (sort

Re: [wsjt-devel] Widegraph cursor frequency box

You can't ... Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/19/2021 4:30 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: After installing WSJT-X ver 2.3.0 I have a cursor frequency readout box displayed every time my mouse cursor is over the Widegraph window even when no WSJT-X window has focus.   How can I disable this? 73, Andy, k3wyc

Re: [wsjt-devel] Winter Field Day Revisited

Considering the 'sponsor' of "Winter" Field Day had this to say below, I'm not sure its worth it to add this 'contest'.   Not to mention that the sponsor doesn't use the same types of codes that the ARRL Field Day uses.  The codes in WFD would not properly fit in a 77 bit package, so its not an

Re: [wsjt-devel] Email list

Ted, that's not going to work, you need to use the links listed at the bottom of every message to remove yourself. Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/17/2021 6:52 AM, Ted Lawhead Jr wrote: Please remove my e-mail address from your list. ___ wsjt-devel mailing

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x2.3.0 Anwser problem

Hi Rudy, the obvious first question is does the operator have Call 1st checked ? Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/16/2021 10:53 AM, on4...@telenet.be wrote: Hi Joe and colleagues, I have identified a problem here with a colleague PA3GZD. It works with WSJT-X version 2.3.0 in Windows 7. Everything has

Re: [wsjt-devel] Please save the T/R sequence lengths for each mode separately

, 16 Feb 2021 at 17:29, Neil Zampella mailto:ne...@techie.com>> wrote: So .. ?? It's like that for EVERY new mode, probably was like that for JT65 and its various permutations.  You have to setup Q65 at least once to get it up and running for the Q65 permutation you want

Re: [wsjt-devel] Please save the T/R sequence lengths for each mode separately

So .. ?? It's like that for EVERY new mode, probably was like that for JT65 and its various permutations.  You have to setup Q65 at least once to get it up and running for the Q65 permutation you want to try.    Saving that to a configuration takes a selection from a menu, typing a name, and

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: FW: wjst-x trouble report

Since the new GA version 2.3.0 is out, and JT-Alert is now ast 2.16.17, try updating to the new versions to see if this still occurs.   Trying to troubleshoot a superseded version is probably not practical at this point in time. Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/12/2021 9:31 PM, M Bo wrote: Dear friends,  I

Re: [wsjt-devel] Version 2.4.0-rc1

Did you reset the frequency list when you installed the RC? Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/7/2021 1:56 PM, Harry E. Hoffman wrote: I found an issues with the band pull down menu in V2.4.0-rc1. The list will have the frequencies truncated. This stared happening intermittently one moment it would be OK, I

Re: [wsjt-devel] (no subject)

That's not going to work, you have to go to the URL shown at the bottom of each message. Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/5/2021 11:30 AM, John Zantek wrote: unsub ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT - DECODING PROBLEMS

I'd also make sure that you're using the latest version of WSJT-X.  What you have listed is not a authorized RC version, that RC number is more likely a clone version. You should head to this page to get the latest General Availability version, or the current v2.3.0-RC4 beta version.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QRZ Integration

cents... 73, Jim S. N2ADV On Dec 3, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Neil Zampella mailto:ne...@techie.com>> wrote:  There are many for Windows, and I'm fairly sure that Gridtracker does a lookup als

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QRZ Integration

y the file "wsjtx_log.adi" file. Thank you. Regards -- Dave Slotter, W3DJS <https://www.qrz.com/db/W3DJS> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:29 AM Neil Zampella mailto:ne...@techie.com>> wrote: FWIW ... there are plenty of third-party bridge, programs that do this as do many log

Re: [wsjt-devel] Question about QRZ Integration

FWIW ... there are plenty of third-party bridge, programs that do this as do many logging programs.  Adding something that requires Internet access both ways, rather than the PSK Reporter's feed only, may cause other issues, as well as add on to the support issues often seen here. Neil, KN3ILZ

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X won't connect to a COM Port

It is NEVER a good idea to run 'as Administrator' as that raises the permissions of the program and often causes other programs issues as they can't communicate with it. In fact, no well written Windows program should be run 'as Administrator'. Neil, KN3ILZ On 11/6/2020 7:56 AM, John Clark

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 19

True ... I just saw that it said he was on 6 meters ... :( Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/5/2020 5:27 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: On 05/10/2020 03:58, Neil Zampella wrote: Um .. not sure what that is supposed to show.   It shows that you're on 6 meters.  If someone is reporting you on 60 m, that's

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 19

Um .. not sure what that is supposed to show.   It shows that you're on 6 meters.  If someone is reporting you on 60 m, that's their problem, they're reporting you incorrectly.  Has nothing to do with PSK Reporter. Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/4/2020 8:06 PM, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X and Windows CMAKE Versions > 3.14.4

Oh please ... give it a rest ... Neil, KN3ILZ On 8/22/2020 6:35 PM, Stephen VK3SIR wrote: Bill, * Instead you choose to write long rants about the incompetence of the WSJT-X development team.. Long “rants” … People also said that of Washington, Adams, Franklin and Jefferson’s speeches

Re: [wsjt-devel] r2.2.2 Minor Issue with "short" calls that use DX

Um ... you just got it ... :) Neil, KN3ILZ On 8/19/2020 4:44 PM, jbozell wrote: Well! This seemingly innocuous (but useful) thread has suddenly gotten much more interesting. Popcorn please...who has the square for the first person to say “if you don’t like it, scroll down”?  73, WB0CDY

Re: [wsjt-devel] r2.2.2 Minor Issue with "short" calls that use DX

Since Tx5 is can be used for "Free Text", adding any sort of 'callsign check' would be hard to implement as anything can, and often is entered into that message box. The logic would need to be able to distinguish between a valid callsign, and something that LOOKS like a valid callsign but

Re: [wsjt-devel] r2.2.2 Minor Issue with "short" calls that use DX

I suspect its due more to the fact that he was using the Tx5 message with its 13 character limit, and not the Tx6 which allows the addition of up to 4 characters between the 'CQ' and the callsign, and will also include the full 4 character grid in the transmission. Neil, KN3ILZ On 8/18/2020

Re: [wsjt-devel] Changes to the INSTALL file in the 2.2.2 tarball

You need to visit the webpage listed at the bottom of all emails and unsubscribe from there. Neil, KN3ILZ On 8/11/2020 7:13 PM, Jeff Elkins wrote: unsubscribe wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X defect report - Incorrect tab 2 grid message

I have no problem with removing that for the next version.  Would save a lot of time by you and the other developers during contests answering questions about why something was not logged properly. Tab 1 gives the user a full visual display of what they are sending, and should be receiving,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.3.0

I suspect its the developers working on the next release.   Its not available to the public. Neil, KN3ILZ On 7/26/2020 3:23 PM, Steinar Aanesland wrote: Hi all Is there a version WSJT-X v2.3.0-devel out there ? On PSKreporter KA1R seems to use "WSJT-X v2.3.0-devel adafb8" -- This email

Re: [wsjt-devel] Rig verification

Mike See below On 7/16/2020 12:11 AM, Black Michael wrote: If anybody has a rig out there that's in this list and you have it working with WSJT-X...or if you have any bugs to report working with WSJT-X please let me know. Would like to promote as many of these to stable as possible and

Re: [wsjt-devel] Field Day Frequencies

The ARRL has not set any 'different' frequencies for Field Day other than the usual no contests on WARC bands and 60 meters. The standard FT8 & FT4 frequencies should be used.   You can verify this by going to the ARRL website under Field Day rules. Neil, KN3ILZ On 6/23/2020 10:09 PM, Matthew

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 220-rc3 - WSPRnet manual upload issue

Hideo-san, have you tried to contact the admin team on the site: wspr...@wsprnet.org I'm not sure Joe and the team have anything to do with it.   They also have a separate forum area: http://wsprnet.org/drupal/forum Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/30/2020 3:33 AM, JH3XCU wrote: WSJT-X 220-rc3 - WSPRnet

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.2.0 Issue (Both RCs)

FWIW ... its a Windows issue, so I expect the clone to have the same issue if its staying on the code base. Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/27/2020 10:58 AM, Steve Sacco wrote: So the interesting thing is that this *never* happened previous to WSJT-X v2.2.0.  I've been running this hardware setup for nearly

Re: [wsjt-devel] rc2 UI - 2nd email

FWIW ... Tx5 is not cleared just in case you have to resend an RR73 if your QSO partnet did not receive it. Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/26/2020 6:28 AM, Alan Groups wrote: Redundant QSO left over from previous session - using ESC key cleared all fields except TX5.  This cleared itself on a program

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.2.0 rc2

What's your RIG, OM ?? Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/26/2020 2:05 AM, Allan VK4QG wrote: Gentlemen, To start with, my system is a Dell 1650, i7 @3.40 GHz, 16GB RAM, W10 pro 64bit. I do not use CAT but instead use RTS on COM1 for opto-isolated PTT and XFR isolation for audio in and out of the sound-card,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Clicking on RR73 produced wrong TX response msg

Well ... the 73 is what triggers the WSJT-X log panel.    As far as the multiple RRR/RR73s, the RRR users send DO expect a 73 from you (at least the system does), the RR73 users have no clue. Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/21/2020 6:17 PM, Al Pawlowski wrote: Actually, just discovered that WSKJTx already

Re: [wsjt-devel] Clicking on RR73 produced wrong TX response msg

5/19/2020 11:48 PM, Gary McDuffie wrote: On May 19, 2020, at 10:05, Neil Zampella wrote: .. someone sending an RR73 does not expect a reply, the last 73 is a courtesy from you the answering station. I certainly do, in order to let him know I got his RR73 and he needs to sen nothing else.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Clicking on RR73 produced wrong TX response msg

FWIW .. someone sending an RR73 does not expect a reply, the last 73 is a courtesy from you the answering station.    If someone keeps sending RR73, they don't understand the use of that response. Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/19/2020 10:06 AM, Black Michael wrote: What he's describing has happened to me

Re: [wsjt-devel] SNR compare

I believe this was covered in the User Manual for v2.2 "SNR estimates no longer saturate at +20 dB, and large signals in the passband no longer cause the SNR of weaker signals to be biased low. Times written to cumulative journal file ALL.TXT are now correct even when the decode occurs after the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Suggestion: Have Rx following Tx on CQ option?

Um ... all I do is click on the DOWN ARROW next to the Tx location which sets the Rx to the same location.  One click. Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/12/2020 6:24 PM, Stephen Ireland wrote: Folks, One minor suggestion for future RC candidates... I have been calling a station XQ1KN that cannot see me ...

[wsjt-devel] FYI ...

Hi all, just a heads up that when I tried to run the setup of v2.2.0-RC1, AVG did not recognize it as valid, and automatically submitted it to AVG for analysis.   Once its analyzed AVG will allow installation. Takes about 5 or 10 minutes but once done, won't happen again. Notice, it did not

Re: [wsjt-devel] Coming soon: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1

Ken, I am going to assume that if you switch back to normal mode, the original decision will not be 'sticky' and will pop up again. So if you have some lid who insists on using contest mode on the normal frequencies you may have to change bands to escape that person. Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/8/2020

Re: [wsjt-devel] unsubscribe

Rick, at the bottom of each message there is a link, you have to go to that link to unsubscribe. Neil, KN3ILZ On 5/5/2020 4:28 PM, Rick wrote: >>SNIP ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] unsubscribe

You have to do that yourself. At the bottom of each email there is a link to the list's self-service site: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel Neil, KN3ILZ On 4/23/2020 6:26 PM, Rick wrote: please unsubscribe me from this email list. On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:10 PM

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X Bug?

Not a WSJT-X bug ... sounds more like RFI getting into the USB cable Neil, KN3ILZ On 4/2/2020 8:33 PM, Tom Stock wrote: Hello, I'm having a problem with version 2.1.2 68f9 Problem: When in transmit mode, WSJT-X will suddenly switch from my usb codec for output (my signalink usb) to the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Lost red Lotw user in band activity

ink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 *From: *Neil Zampella <mailto:ne...@techie.com> *Sent: *Wednesday, April 1, 2020 9:26 AM *To: *wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> *Subject: *Re: [wsjt-devel] Lost red Lotw user in band activity Head back to the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Lost red Lotw user in band activity

Head back to the COLORS setting tab, and click on the FETCH NOW to update the LoTW user file.  Close then open the program. Should fix this. Neil, KN3ILZ On 3/31/2020 4:30 PM, Barry Bowman wrote: Hello _Running:_ WSJT-X  version 2.1.2 Windows 10 home, version 1809 64 bit Colors: Red

Re: [wsjt-devel] Unsubscribe me please

Don't know how you get info from the list, but at the bottom there is usually a link like this: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel You have to go there to unsubscribe. Neil, KN3ILZ On 3/9/2020 9:31 PM, richard meixner wrote: Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

Re: [wsjt-devel] F/H Feedback from a Fox

Not shooting the messenger, but aiming at the persons sending the message through you. WHY didn't they report this 4 months ago? Did they think it would magically go away over that time frame?   Did they imagine that Joe, Steve, and BIll could 'read their minds' ?? Good GRIEF ... Neil,

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT4 and FT8 Contesting

This is why WSJT-X requires someone in front of the computer to actually use their decision making process to do this. Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/28/2020 9:26 AM, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote: Maybe a small correction to my proposal: IMO wsjt-x should auto-log all incomplete QSOs when all necessary data have

Re: [wsjt-devel] 60 meters

PLEASE do NOT continue this here .. its already causing issues on the WSJT groups.io list, and has NOTHING to do with development of WSJT-X modes. Neil, KN3ILZ On 2/22/2020 12:45 PM, Rich Zwirko - K1HTV wrote: Seannon AG0NY , The FCC rules regarding 60 Meter channelized operation require

Re: [wsjt-devel] RTTY

The only reason you'd add RTTY to WSJT-X is if there were some way to improve it for weak signal work, the program and its protocols were not designed for any other reason.   The other reason is one you overlooked in Dave's post: Quote: 3. Each candidate development task has an "opportunity

Re: [wsjt-devel] Crash in VHF-contest

FWIW ... you should have a saved audio file timestamped for the times the program crashed.I would zip them up and be ready to email to the developers as they would give more information to the developers, than the generic Windows information. Neil, KN3ILZ On 1/7/2020 4:11 PM, Jari A wrote:

Re: [wsjt-devel] 15m

Only goes to show that people don't read the rules.   The ARRL RTTY Roundup page contains a link to the 2019 article by K1JT which lists the frequencies that should be used. I created a new configuration, turned on the contest mode setting for RTTY RU,  and deleted all the non-FT4 and FT8

Re: [wsjt-devel] Intermittent logging issue in RTTY Roundup

Bill, I've seen this too, not sure of the reason for it, but I have seen it more often after I've stopped replying to a station, one or two time periods later, they come back to me with a R xxx report.    I've been keeping an eye on that, and adding the data before I click OK. Neil, KN3ILZ

Re: [wsjt-devel] Cmake Error on Windows

Bill .. He's using v2 of JTSDK .. it has not been updated to use GIT at all. Neil On 1/3/2020 6:39 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: On 03/01/2020 22:37, Albert Gerheim wrote: I'm trying to build WSJT-X after making a tiny change to plotter.cpp.  I need the windows version. I took a couple days,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Cmake Error on Windows

I don't know if you saw my reply of yesterday.    JTSDK v2 is no longer supported, it is obsolete. The latest JTSDK package, V3,  can be found here, https://sourceforge.net/projects/jtsdk/files/win64/ Support and links to documentation can be found at https://groups.io/g/JTSDK Neil, KN3ILZ On

Re: [wsjt-devel] Required packages for JTSDK

FWIW... the latest JTSDK package can be found here, https://sourceforge.net/projects/jtsdk/files/win64/ Support and links to documentation can be found at https://groups.io/g/JTSDK JTSDK v2 is obsolete. Neil, KN3ILZ On 1/2/2020 3:23 PM, Albert Gerheim wrote: The only link I found for Qt is

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-devel

Doesn't work that way.  You need to click on the link at the bottom of the emails: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel Neil, KN3ILZ On 12/19/2019 6:42 AM, JD Delancy wrote: unsubscribe w3...@comcast.net wsjt-devel ___

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Suggestion: Fox Mode

Steve, the 'block' of using the standard frequencies has been in place since DXPedition mode was released back in June 2018. Neil, KN3ILZ On 12/7/2019 4:44 AM, Stephen Ireland wrote: Grant, ØA quick note for your reference about FOX mode. If it is the WSJT-X fox mode and not one of the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with radio's audio input

Could it be the OP is using the 64 bit version and Windows 10? Bill has a message here on about certain audio settings for that combination. Neil, KN3ILZ On 12/2/2019 7:50 AM, Martin Davies G0HDB wrote: On 2 Dec 2019 at 12:27, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: Audio dropout like this is

Re: [wsjt-devel] Building WSJT-X from sources - need help

Uwe, you'd get faster help by heading to the JTSDK support group on Groups.IO. Neil, KN3iLZ On 11/27/2019 9:57 AM, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote: Hi, I am trying to build WSJT-X from sources on my Win 10, 64 bit system, but need some help. I’ve downloaded and installed JTSDK64-Tools-3.1.0 and

Re: [wsjt-devel] REMOVE ALL !!!!!!!

Sorry Stan .. that won't do it. At the top of each email there should be this blurb: " To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Fox and Hound Mode - FOX Mode Operator enhancement request

FWIW ... we've not heard from any of the developers on this yet.   I suspect Bill and Joe may have been busy over the weekend. Wouldn't it be a good idea to first hear from them before any changes are made?    There could be a regression that crept in and they never realized, or other reason

Re: [wsjt-devel] unscribe

Harry, you'll have to do this .. using the URL provided: To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel Neil, KN3ILZ On 10/28/2019 11:10 AM, J. Harry Rees wrote: -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.

Re: [wsjt-devel] Illegal auto mode?

s released it doesn’t have that ability. If someone byte bangs some hack to make it so then your skewed theory would make just about any ham radio software “illegal.” Ryan, N2YQT On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:19 PM Neil Zampella mailto:ne...@techie.com>> wrote: By the software being 'illegal' I

Re: [wsjt-devel] Illegal auto mode?

, David Gilbert wrote: You're changing your story now.  Your previous messages simply said the software itself was illegal, and when I challenged that your argued the point and said I was rationalizing. Just give it up, OK? Dave   AB7E On 8/18/2019 6:12 PM, Neil Zampella wrote

Re: [wsjt-devel] Illegal auto mode?

, but it isn't illegal unless I run it harder than 1,500 watts. You really don't know what you're talking about, and it has nothing to do with me rationalizing anything. Dave   AB7E On 8/18/2019 3:56 AM, Neil Zampella wrote: "Man is not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one!" T

Re: [wsjt-devel] Illegal auto mode?

The software in question is not the software we're referring to. I'm amazed at the reaction to what is an obvious circumvention of the original developers wishes, so much for ethics. Neil, KN3ILZ On 8/17/2019 5:21 PM, Andras Bato wrote: Hi Andy, Plese try to make QSOs using MSHV! (I am just

Re: [wsjt-devel] Illegal auto mode?

"Man is not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one!" The program is designed to make QSOs without someone being there. Illegal in the US, the person who put the program together could have removed the code and left the UI.  He didn't, and added a 'legal notice' which is worth the paper

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Screen Layout

UM ... what's that 'Auto CQ' checkbox there ??    Looks like its setup for an automatic QSO machine?  Looking at the intro on Sourceforge .. "Tool was previously known as WSJT-X SQ9FVE Full-Auto Mod" This is illegal software in the US and probably elsewhere, and should not be used, even with

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Screen Layout

FWIW if you're using JT-Alert, it has a decodes history window that gives you everything you're looking for, and more. I'd want to see what the layout looks on other modes before I would use this.    As someone who used to design screen layouts, this is somewhat busy, how does it work when

Re: [wsjt-devel] WW Digi Contest Practices

Ed. this looks more like an issue on the ww-digi.com site and you should seek assistance there.   However, just to check did you upload a Cabrillo file, or just a standard ADIF log? Neil, KN3ILZ On 8/10/2019 6:31 AM, Doug Bates wrote: Ed, I just tried to upload a log for last nights practice

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging

I seriously doubt that the developers will change the way the logging system works.    It has been stated often enough that they do not want to create an automatic QSO machine, and so they want some human intervention to start a QSO, call CQ, and log a contact. Neil, KN3ILZ On 7/23/2019 12:04

Re: [wsjt-devel] BEST

32 or 64 bit ? On 7/17/2019 10:19 AM, Joe wrote: Win 10 The latest version, V2.1.0 24fcd1 Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 7/17/2019 9:09 AM, Neil Zampella wrote: What version of the program are you using, for what OS ? Neil

  1   2   3   >