[wsjt-devel] Fortran error on Fedora 40+

Doing some test builds of current RC4 and seeing build failures: /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-2.7.0/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/decode0.f90:6:28: 6 | real*4 dd(2,NSMAX),ss(400,NFFT),savg(NFFT) |1 Error: Variable ‘nfft’ cannot appear in the expression at (1)

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC3 and Hamlib +Flrig

Dave just posted a new alpha, I'll test with it first to see if it's resolved. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC3 and Hamlib +Flrig

On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 10:16 PM Black Michael wrote: > What rig? For some reason that call is not returning any value for your > rig when getting the current mode. > FT-991A Thanks, Richard ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

[wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC3 and Hamlib +Flrig

I decided to test out the RC3 release and everything comes up fine but as soon as I try to change TX frequency in the waterfall or make a contact I get something like this: Rig Control Error Hamlib error: Content-length: 168 xml_parse2: value returned='' xml_parse2: xml=' '

Re: [wsjt-devel] Hamlib fork repository

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:27 PM Matt Melling via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I am hacking on the WSJT-X package in NixOS, and looking at how we can > split out the hamlib fork in to a separate package that can be shared > with our js8call package. > On Fedora

Re: [wsjt-devel] COPR build for 2.7.0 RC1

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 9:42 AM Jeff Stillinger via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Yes, I think we need a focused effort as a whole ham radio community on > 9. I love what they have done with Rocky 9 (RHEL 9) so far. It was > just the "face lift" that 8 needed.

[wsjt-devel] COPR build for 2.7.0 RC1

I have just completed builds for all released versions of Fedora and EPEL 8. Let me know if there's any interest in EPEL 9. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/build/5941850/ Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compile fails

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 6:59 AM Brian Morrison via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Sun, 21 May 2023 21:31:44 -0500 > Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel wrote: > > > On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 9:13 PM jarmo via wsjt-devel < > > wsjt-deve

Re: [wsjt-devel] Compile fails

On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 9:13 PM jarmo via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Did git pull for wsjtx, tried to compile, failed... > > /home/oh1mrr/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90:23:39: > >23 |ndepth,ndiskdat,neme,newdat,nfa,nfb,nfcal,nfshift, >& > |

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.6.1

Packages are built and working their way into the repo. F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-cdac6441cd F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3877f14b73 Currently they are in the "pending" state but once they hit testing they can be installed: $ sudo dnf

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.6.1

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:38 AM Brian Morrison via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:12:23 +0200 > jarmo via wsjt-devel wrote: > > > So far working here... Compiled from GIT. > > Anyone seen Fedora 37 rpm yet? > > Well, I built and installed rpms for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Link to latest WSJT-X source .tgz for use on the command-line?

On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 11:56 AM Kari Sillanmäki via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi Onno, > > I've been poking around the SourceForge webpages but could not find a way > to download latest tgz with one single command. > Umm I posted this earlier, are my emails not

Re: [wsjt-devel] Link to latest WSJT-X source .tgz for use on the command-line?

This works for sourceforge, just substitute the name and version: https://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] End of line character changed?

Trying to build RC3 test packages for Fedora I get: + desktop-file-validate /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/wsjtx-2.6.0-0.3.fc38.x86_64/usr/share/applications/message_aggregator.desktop /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/wsjtx-2.6.0-0.3.fc38.x86_64/usr/share/applications/message_aggregator.desktop: error: file

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-991A WSJT-X unusable for me

On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:56 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > There was a bug in the FT991 capabilities which has been fixed. Waiting > to hear if it fixes the chatter. > So far so good. Trying to work Puerto Rico on 20m right now. Next I'll try

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-991A WSJT-X unusable for me

On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:03 AM DG2YCB, Uwe via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Richard, > > > > Can you rule out that this is not an RF interference? Because my FT-991 > runs flawlessly with WSJTX v2.5.4 on Linux Mint 20.2. > Nothing else appears to be affected. Fldigi

[wsjt-devel] FT-991A WSJT-X unusable for me

Fedora Linux 35 hamlib master (as of a couple of days ago) WSJT-X 2.5.4 That being said, this has been a problem for some time for me over the last couple of hamlib releases and several WSJT-X releases. Mike has worked with me a couple of times to fix this, but it never STAYS fixed. When trying

[wsjt-devel] Fedora + FT-991A can't get 2.5.0 to work

I had a few minutes to do more investigation and I just can't get 2.5.0 (or 2.5.1) to work while 2.4.0 does. Here's my observations: WSJT-X 2.5.1 / Hamlib master - FT-991 1. Radio does not immediately set split operation. 2. Using band dropdown or settings->Radio->Test CAT, OK starts split

Re: [wsjt-devel] Some minor issues.

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 9:08 AM Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Il 17/10/21 03:47, jarmo via wsjt-devel ha scritto: > > Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:15:00 + (UTC) > Black Michael via wsjt-devel > > kirjoitti: > > Hi Mike > > Compiled latest git version 4.4

[wsjt-devel] No audio (RF) output with 2.5.0

I need to go back and read the posts about this but right now I'm doing this as a "me too" post. Fedora 34 with WSJT-X 2.5.0, built in my COPR as the WSJT-X maintainer for Fedora. I get no RF output and have triple checked my settings. Fldigi and pat/ardop (winlink client) work fine. Thanks,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0 GA Release

Until I have time to personally test the Fedora build I have made it available through my COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/ Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.5.0 GA Release

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 9:45 AM Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Your build has many compiler options we have not tested with, do you > really need to use them all? > > -grecord-gcc-switches > -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Blocked?

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 8:31 AM jarmo via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:06:36 -0500 > Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel > kirjoitti: > > > You can use my COPR test packages if using Fedora, or worst case > > download and un

Re: [wsjt-devel] Blocked?

You can use my COPR test packages if using Fedora, or worst case download and unpack the RPM to get the source: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/build/2365258/ $ rpm2cpio .rpm | cpio -idmv Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Call for information about PC systems being used for WSJT-X

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:33 PM Alan wrote: > With 30% extra CPU power consumption those running on battery power might > want to think twice about use of these extensions, and some on mains power > might also not want to add additional thermal stress and/or electricity > consumption, if it's

Re: [wsjt-devel] Call for information about PC systems being used for WSJT-X

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:27 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Is there some reasons to think we get a notable performance boost from AVX? > I can't say for WSJTX, but for the 700C FreeDV mode, it's the difference between slower and/or ARM devices being

Re: [wsjt-devel] Call for information about PC systems being used for WSJT-X

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 7:20 PM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 09/06/2021 01:02, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:44 PM Bill Somerville > wrote: > >> >> The technology we will use is called AVX and that is present on all >> Intel CPUs branded Core i

Re: [wsjt-devel] Call for information about PC systems being used for WSJT-X

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:44 PM Bill Somerville wrote: > > The technology we will use is called AVX and that is present on all > Intel CPUs branded Core i3/i5/i7/i9 (circa 2010 to present), it is also > present on AMD CPUs since the Jaguar or Puma based CPU models (some late > Athlon-II CPUs, all

Re: [wsjt-devel] Two program releases: WSJT-X 2.3.1 (GA) and WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc4

Version 2.3.1 packages built and submitted for update in Fedora: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=wsjtx NOTE: This is likely the last build for Fedora 32 which will go EOL a couple of months after Fedora 34 is released (currently in Beta). Version 2.4.0 RC builds will be done

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release candidate: WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc2

WSJTX 2.4.0 RC2 has been built for Fedora and EPEL has been built for those wanting to test. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/ Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

[wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.4.0 RC1 for Fedora/EL

For those interested I have built wsjtx 2.4.0 RC1 in my WSJT COPR for Fedora (31-33) and EL 8. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/ Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] Version 2.3.0 and Fedora 32

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:43 AM jarmo wrote: > Has anyone managed install version 2.3.0 into F32? > 2.3.0 has depencies to BOOST 1.73 and in F32 > there is BOOST 1.69. > So anyone solved this? > I just kicked off the official Fedora build. I was working on the hamlib 4.1 release earlier.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc4

RC4 has been built for Fedora/EPEL https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/ Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc3

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:00 AM jarmo wrote: > Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:41:57 -0500 > Joe Taylor kirjoitti: > > > The third public candidate release of WSJT-X 2.3.0 is now available > > for download and use by beta testers. Changes from the second > > release candidate include an improved FST4W

Re: [wsjt-devel] Latest Fedora32 Hamlib update

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:48 AM jarmo wrote: > Some days ago, got update of hamlib, > > hamlib-4.0-0.12.fc32.2020gitc7de6e8b19.x86_64 package. > > Now, when changing TX during transmission from waterfall > I loose rigcontroll. Popup says, do you want to regonfigure ?? > Happens every

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc2

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 3:07 PM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 16/11/2020 12:43, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:36 AM Bill Somerville > wrote: > >> On 16/11/2020 12:27, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:44 AM Bill Some

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc2

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 8:14 AM Claude Frantz wrote: > On 11/16/20 2:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > I know re-installation can be a pain, but I wonder how many people > running > > a 32bit distro in 2020 are doing it on 64bit hardware... Likely mo

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc2

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:46 AM Claude Frantz wrote: > On 11/16/20 1:32 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > > >> Note that Fedora 30 is EOL and Fedora 31 will go EOL in the near > >> future now that Fedora 33 is released :) > > No, Fedora 30 is the latest release supporting the 32 bit architecture. >

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc2

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:36 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 16/11/2020 12:27, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:44 AM Bill Somerville > wrote: > >> >> Note that the 32-bit RPM package we provide is built on Fedora 30 >> without issues.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc2

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:44 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > > Note that the 32-bit RPM package we provide is built on Fedora 30 > without issues. > Note that Fedora 30 is EOL and Fedora 31 will go EOL in the near future now that Fedora 33 is released :) Thanks, Richard KF5OIM

Re: [wsjt-devel] Why fortran 3?

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 2:06 PM Daniel Uppström wrote: > Hi, > I am on Mint 20 Ulyana, which is based on Ubuntu 20.04. > And with the help of Duckduckgo I can see that I am not the only one > having this problem.. > > Thanks also to G4WJS for your reply! > I am not too keen on installing all

[wsjt-devel] Test RC builds for Fedora / EL 8

I have created a COPR[1] to perform test builds for upcoming wsjtx 2.3.0. Currently I'm planning on supporting 64bit only (ARM and x86) but can enable any arch COPR supports by request. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.3.0 RC1 hamlib compile error

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:59 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 28/09/2020 21:57, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:27 PM Bill Somerville > wrote: > >> Hi Richard, >> >> thanks for the update, clearly I messed up the compatibility fixes in >>

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.3.0 RC1 hamlib compile error

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:27 PM Bill Somerville wrote: > Hi Richard, > > thanks for the update, clearly I messed up the compatibility fixes in that > patch. I'll checkout the relevant Hamlib version and sort it out for the > next WSJT-X release. You surely won't be the only one to suffer this

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.3.0 RC1 hamlib compile error

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:02 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 28/09/2020 13:33, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 7:22 AM Bill Somerville > wrote: > >> On 28/09/2020 13:13, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> Looking at building test packages for Fedora a

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.3.0 RC1 hamlib compile error

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:28 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Do you have an older hamlib installed on your system? > Define older :) I've been contemplating updating to latest git but you've been making a LOT of commits lately :) Currently Fedora is

Re: [wsjt-devel] 2.3.0 RC1 hamlib compile error

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 7:22 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 28/09/2020 13:13, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Looking at building test packages for Fedora and ran into this: > > /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-2.3.0-rc1/wsjtx/Transceiver/HamlibTransceiver.cpp: > In member fun

[wsjt-devel] 2.3.0 RC1 hamlib compile error

Looking at building test packages for Fedora and ran into this: /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-2.3.0-rc1/wsjtx/Transceiver/HamlibTransceiver.cpp: In member function 'virtual int HamlibTransceiver::do_start()': /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-2.3.0-rc1/wsjtx/Transceiver/HamlibTransceiver.cpp:612:69:

Re: [wsjt-devel] FST4/W

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 7:27 PM SWL_JN37 wrote: > Dear developers, > > I find it problematic that there are modes in use in amateur radio, > whose specifications are not publicly available (-> can not be decoded > by everybody, without a lot of reverse engineering effort). > In some countries

Re: [wsjt-devel] Low audio (input & output)

I figured it out... x10. I had the inputs and outputs reversed. Apparently there was enough bleedover to even make a contact which is why I thought it was hooked up correctly. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, Richard > ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] Low audio (input & output)

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:02 PM Bill Somerville wrote: > maybe it's a problem with the driver for the sound card chip, it could be > setting the gain stage before the ADC incorrectly. Are there a master > device level sliders on the pavucontrol devices tabs? > Also set to 100%. I don't want to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Low audio (input & output)

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:28 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > > > > At home I have to set the volume levels to ~50% and adjust the audio > > slider in WSJT-X down quite a bit to keep output around 35W. While > > connected to my laptop, both the input and output audio signals are > > very low. I have

[wsjt-devel] Low audio (input & output)

I've setup at Fall Creek Falls State Park in Tennessee to teach the Radio Merit Badge to scouts in my troop. With the exception of the computer I'm using (a laptop) the setup is exactly the same as my setup at home. I have a 4-port USB hub with two USB->Serial adapters (one CAT, on PTT) and a USB

[wsjt-devel] Terminal output for Wayland users

It doesn't seem to cause a problem (unlike on MythTv, which I also maintain), but a user reported the following terminal output when running 2.1.2: "qt.qpa.wayland: Wayland does not support QWindow::requestActivate()" Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X build error on FC32, 64-bit

On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:45 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On Friday, June 5, 2020, 06:36:13 PM CDT, Josh Rovero < > josh.rov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Any hints? > Unless you just really want to build from source yourself you can use the Fedora

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.2.0 GA release

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 2:51 AM Saku wrote: > Joe Taylor kirjoitti 2.6.2020 klo 16.53: > > The WSJT Development Group is pleased to announce the general availability > (GA) release of WSJT-X Version 2.2.0. A brief summary of new features is > provided here; for further details see the Release

Re: [wsjt-devel] Coming soon: WSJT-X 2.2.0-rc1

Just to check, does this include the fixes for gcc/gfortran 10? Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fedora updated to hamlib 4.0 prerelease

On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 5:20 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Make sure you update to the latest swig > I'm not the maintainer for swig so I have what I have to work with :) The problem with CentOS 7 is it has v2, but has 3.0.12 in the "extras"

[wsjt-devel] Fedora updated to hamlib 4.0 prerelease

Just to let everyone know, I've build hamlib 4.0 prerelease for Fedora 30, 31, 32, 33 (Rawhide) and also rebuilt all 11 dependencies for each branch (whew!). The only fallout was grig and it doesn't seem to have been updated since 2015. I plan to update EL 7 and 8 as well but working on a build

[wsjt-devel] Fedora: Building with hamlib 4 progress

After some back and forth with the other maintainer of wsjtx we have decided to try upgrading hamlib in Fedora rather than use the bundled copy. It's been built in a side tag (which let's me work on all the dependencies without breaking things). Ironically I had to apply the following patch to

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X install on Centos 7

If you don't want to wait two weeks for 2.1.2 (the required time for a package to be in testing before being pushed to stable on EPEL) then you can do a: yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update wsjtx Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X install on Centos 7

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 7:25 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > $ sudo dnf install http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx.html > http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-2.1.2.x86_64.rpm > Of course, then I wrote dnf because I'm so used to it. But looks like it's symlinked to yum

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X install on Centos 7

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:18 AM Ron White wrote: > All, > > I feel that this can't be as complicated as I’m making it. I’ve been on > Ubuntu for a couple of years and just getting back into the Centos/RedHat > world again so i'm a little rusty with yum and it's repos. > > I'm running Centos 7

Re: [wsjt-devel] Polling hamlib when flrig is being used?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:27 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > 4.0 breaks the ABIergo the major version bump. > > I see that Fedora does not mandate shared library usage > > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] Polling hamlib when flrig is being used?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:20 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > Hi Mike and Richard, > > that message was added in Hamlib commit 6fbe4a5f which means it was used > from WSJT-X v1.7.0. It was removed in commit 7062b67 which means it was no > longer in WSJT-X from v2.0.1 onwards. > > Unless this is in a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Polling hamlib when flrig is being used?

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:46 PM Black Michael via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > What version of WSJT-X are you running? > > I don't see that message in V2.1.2 or in the hamlib code for v2.1.2 > $ rpm -q wsjtx wsjtx-2.1.2-1.fc31.x86_64 But it's linked against system

[wsjt-devel] Polling hamlib when flrig is being used?

I switched from hamlib to flrig some time ago and just happened to check my journal on my Fedora 31 box and I'm getting one of these about every second... journalctl -f -- Logs begin at Tue 2020-03-24 17:13:20 CDT. -- Mar 25 19:25:50 hobbes.localdomain wsjtx[25855]: Hamlib: flrig_get_mode

[wsjt-devel] Fortran build error with GCC 10

Just a heads up: Error: (occurs twice) /builddir/build/BUILD/js8call-2.1.1/lib/ft8/filt8.f90:32:14: 12 | call four2a(x,NFFT,1,-1,0) !r2c | 2 .. 32 | call four2a(cx,nfft,1,1,-1) !c2r | 1 Error: Type mismatch between

[wsjt-devel] Fortran error with GCC 10

I just wanted to give you guys a heads up that wsjtx will fail to compile with gcc 10 due to a fortran issue. Details here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/GVGNKHJFMEZVEOQVTUSDYPEELJUULLTL/ Thanks, Richard KF5OIM

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.1.1 and Fedora 31

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 1:36 PM JD Delancy wrote: > Are you aware that recently released Fedora 31 breaks some functions in > WSJTX 2.1.0/1 or vice versa? > > When I go to setting and colors to adjust the various messages priority, > the drag and drop function to move a selection up or down does

Re: [wsjt-devel] Confusing build errors 2.1.0

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 5:49 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 26/09/2019 00:28, Barry Jackson wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > Just looking at 2.1.0 package for Mageia. > Since Mageia is RPM based (correct?) you can look at the spec file I maintain for Fedora as a template as I build against system

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.1.0 Fedora packages

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:39 PM Bill Somerville wrote: > fast work indeed! Thanks for that. > Just keep in mind it may be tomorrow before they make it into the testing repository, hence the reason for the link. You can see the status is currently "Pending" Once in testing then the usual "dnf

[wsjt-devel] wsjtx 2.1.0 Fedora packages

Packages have been built for F29 through Rawhide, EL 7 and have been submitted as updates: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=wsjtx Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx build failure with GCC 9: Arguments of 'iand' have different kind type parameters

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:20 AM Christoph Berg wrote: > Hi, > > I'm one of the Debian maintainers for wsjtx. The gcc maintainers have > reported that wsjtx is failing with the upcoming gcc 9: > This was already reported based on Fedora Rawhide and 2.0.1 contains the fix. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM

Re: [wsjt-devel] ft8code from wsjtx-2.0.1.x86_64.rpm fails

On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 2:51 AM Saku wrote: > Is something preventing a normal dnf update from picking it up? > > Hi! > > Not now, but at the time 2.0.1 appeared rpm was only at Joe's web page. > And that is the time I installed it. > I'm a bit behind of updates. Need to do complete backup

Re: [wsjt-devel] ft8code from wsjtx-2.0.1.x86_64.rpm fails

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:42 AM Saku wrote: > Installedwsjtx-2.0.1.x86_64.rpm > to my > Fedora 28 some time ago and the wsjt-x works without problems. > > Today I tried to start ft8code, but it fails: > ft8code: error while

[wsjt-devel] WD timer engages even on reply

Small nit... I use my WD timer to limit the number of time I try to reach a station, I currently have it set to 3 minutes. One thing I've noticed is that the WD timer still kills TX if the station responds on the cycle following the WD timer running out. I assume it would not be difficult to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request - xmit below 200 hz

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jim Brown wrote: > On 2/20/2019 3:48 PM, Ken Miller wrote: > > I like to utilize the lower portion of the FT8 bands down to 0 hz. > > When transmitting that low, your signal is outside the RX bandwidth of > many transceivers that are tuned to the standard

Re: [wsjt-devel] Where can I find a web page with the wsjtx stable release versions listed?

Not sure if this helps but you can use release-monitoring.org... https://release-monitoring.org/project/16118/ It also has HTTP and Python APIs... https://release-monitoring.org/static/docs/api.html Thanks, Richard ___ wsjt-devel mailing list

[wsjt-devel] Fortran errors with GCC/GFortran 9.0.0

Guys, Fedora Rawhide has updated to gcc 9.0.0 and as usual the compiler gets more pedantic about code and has raised some new errors with the fortran code of wsjtx. Since it stops at the first error and I've already seen two with different compile attempts it may take a few iterations to fix them

Re: [wsjt-devel] Packaging 2.0.0

What libraries are different? I've been building for Fedora for some time now without issue and I should be running newer versions of most libraries than most. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bug in qra64.c

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 10:45 PM Nico Palermo wrote: > if ((x[9]&0x80)==1) >> return; >> warning: bitwise comparison always evaluates to false > > > Nothing really important but I would have appreciated more a warning like > this: > > warning: bitwise comparison always evaluates to false,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Qt Version

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:16 AM nick wrote: > Probably a silly question, but must I rebuild wsjtx-2.0.0 from scratch > with Qt 5.9.7 for it to run using Qt5.9.7? > Wish I could tell you what the problem is but I can tell you that I build WSJT-X for Fedora and it works fine with Qt 5.11.1.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v2.0.0 Build Failure: Ubuntu 14.04 via Bootstrap

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 7:22 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > > Thanks again for the PPA updates so quickly after the v2.0.0, you and > Richard, KF5OIM, are doing a great job making WSJT-X available as binary > packages across many popular Linux distributions. > I'll keep supporting CentOS 7 as best

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0.0: GA release

wjstx 2.0.0 has landed in the Fedora testing repositories for Fedora 28, 29, Rawhide and Fedora EPEL 7 (CentOS,SL,etc) This includes builds for ppc, ppcle, aarch64, armv7hl, s390 on Fedora. If you have a Fedora account and can give the package +1 karma then I'll be able to push it to stable

Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate release WSJT-X 2.0.0-rc5 (on CentOS 7.5)

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:11 PM Mark Klein wrote: > Builds OK from source and I was successful in a quick QSO on 20m. > > I tried the Fedora RPM, but the shared library dependency versions are > different between Fedora and CentOS, so the resulting install wouldn’t load. > I have been building

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx-2.0-rc4 on CentOS7

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:01 PM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 14/11/2018 18:43, Mark Klein wrote: > > Hi group. > > > > I had some issues building wsjtx-2.0-rc4 on CentOS7.5. First note that > > I have fldigi and the standard hamlib RPM installed on that VM. My > > understanding is that there is

Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate release WSJT-X 2.0.0-rc4

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:35 AM Bill Somerville wrote: > On 13/11/2018 15:16, Richard Shaw wrote: > > BUILDSTDERR: In file included from > > /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-2.0.0-rc4/wsjtx/models/FoxLog.cpp:13:0: > > BUILDSTDERR: > > /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-2.0.0-

Re: [wsjt-devel] Candidate release WSJT-X 2.0.0-rc4

I'm seeing the following error when building for EPEL 7 (CentOS/SL/Etc) /usr/bin/c++ -DBIGSYM=1 -DCMAKE_BUILD -DQT5 -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG_OUTPUT -DQT_NO_WARNING_OUTPUT -DQT_PRINTSUPPORT_LIB -DQT_SQL_LIB -DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -DUDP_STATIC_DEFINE

[wsjt-devel] 2.0.0 RC3 - Rebooted, all CQ lines are still green

Compiled from source on Fedora 28 x86_64... Thanks, RIchard KF5OIM ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] 2.0.0 RC2 for Fedora

I have built RC2 in my COPR[1]. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/ ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2.0 RC1 Bug?

Sorry if it was already discuessed but I don't remember seeing it. I was operating with RC1 and FT8 in the 75bit mode on 80m. Everything was working fine other than my persistent issue with PulseAudio changing from my USB Audio to main sound card for "Recording" which happens after a few transmit

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0.0 RC1 Test builds

For those on Fedora who want to test the pre-release version of WSJT-X I have completed RC1 builds in my COPR[1]. I will not be updating the mainline Fedora package until the final release. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/WSJT/

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio out on Fedora 28

Claude Thank you for the very detailed instructions. I'm a Fedora packager for several years so I understand most of the ins and outs of pulseaudio. Unless the also device was chosen for both input and output I would not see anything pop up in Playback when transmitting, even for "Tune". There

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio out on Fedora 28

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:06 PM Saku wrote: > Barry Jackson kirjoitti 17.06.2018 klo 20:23: > > Closing wsjtx leaves a running instance and lockfile which has to be > killed manually. > > That is because it leaves a "pulse" sub process hanging. > > This have been noticed already a month ago with

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio out on Fedora 28

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 9:16 AM Claude Frantz wrote: > > can you type "pacmd list-sources" and see if there is anything abnormal. > Nothing jumped out at me... $ pacmd list-sources 4 source(s) available. index: 2 name: driver: flags: DECIBEL_VOLUME LATENCY DYNAMIC_LATENCY state:

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio out on Fedora 28

Ok, while good, this is very frustrating... Went back and build current git, waterfall locked up, no audio out, process hung on exit... Went back and changed it from Release to Debug and changed the QT option for debug output, make clean, make, make install - waterfall lockup after tune, no

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio out on Fedora 28

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:56 AM Claude Frantz wrote: > On 06/16/2018 10:26 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Hi Richard & All, > > > I had that problem early on with WSJT-X but not for the last several > > releases. When I say I don't get any audio, I mean zero. The Applic

Re: [wsjt-devel] No audio out on Fedora 28

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 11:01 AM Claude Frantz wrote: > On 06/16/2018 03:44 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Then I tried updating and rebooting and how now matter what I try, > > pavucontrol, alsamixer, etc. I can't see any attempt to send audio. > > > > Fedora

Re: [wsjt-devel] SVN repository failure?

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:05 PM Barry Jackson wrote: > On 09/06/18 19:23, Bill Somerville wrote: > > > the WSJT svn repository is back up and running now, sorry for the > > extended outage, reorganization is complete. > > > > Just ran my regular script to create a 1.9.1 tarball which uses >

  1   2   >