Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-26 Thread Andras Bato
Iztok Saje for President! :D Well done Iztok! All problems solved. Each IARU official is to resign at once! gl de ha6nn Andras On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Iztok Saje wrote: > Hello! > > Summary: Do not over regulate HAM bands! > Please emphasize in doccumantation: >

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-26 Thread Iztok Saje
Hello! Summary: Do not over regulate HAM bands! Please emphasize in doccumantation: "FT8 frequencies are recommendation, not Law". Few different ideas for "FT8 frequencies" discussion. 1. Fresh from CQ WPX SSB. On 80 m, somebody kept telling people calling CQ below 3700: "This frequency is

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-25 Thread Tsutsumi Takehiko
Gary ZL2iFB, Yes, I agree with your proposal to discuss the required spectrum based on scientific approach you described and several FT-8 statistics gathered. I am sure a few of wsjt-x technical group members have such talent to support the activity. I hope the group will be set up soon.

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-24 Thread Rich - K1HTV
OK Gary, You've got the job. :-) When will the report be ready. Then what's next? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see where the number of FT8 users is goingUP, UP, UP!!!FT8 use will continue to expand and with it, the need for additional frequencies. Although it appears that

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-24 Thread Ed Stallman
Od: Bill Barrett <w2pky...@gmail.com <mailto:w2pky...@gmail.com>> Datum: 24.03.18 14:13 (GMT+01:00) Komu: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> Předmět: Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies? Just

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-24 Thread Neil Zampella
>> Datum: 24.03.18 14:13 (GMT+01:00) Komu: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> Předmět: Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies? Just say'n- Strong propagation can make a low power station deco

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-24 Thread gary
ious overs, suggesting communications failures due to factors such as QRM, QRN, QSB etc. * Trends i.e. how these factors vary over time 73 Gary ZL2iFB From: Tsutsumi Takehiko <ja5...@outlook.com> Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2018 12:53 p.m. To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject:

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-24 Thread Andras Bato
Původní zpráva > Od: Bill Barrett <w2pky...@gmail.com> > Datum: 24.03.18 14:13 (GMT+01:00) > Komu: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Předmět: Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies? > > Just say'n- > > Strong propagation ca

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-24 Thread ok2zo
opment <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Předmět: Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies? Just say'n- Strong propagation can make a low power station decode with a high signal report.If you retire the strong signals first you will hear the weak signals under neigh them.Finally, short of check

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread Gary McDuffie
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 12:50 PM, rjai...@gmail.com wrote: > > How do you know we're running power? I said nothing about running power. I said strong signal, wanting to have a way to only allow display or decode of weaker signals, the level of which I determine and set. This is similar to

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread Tsutsumi Takehiko
Hi, I support ZL2iFB Gary’s proposal to setup a separate small group to discuss about default frequencies of wsjt-x from the productiveness. Regards, take de JA5AEA Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread gary
ftware development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies? This is 20M about noon in Tampa Fl area on a ground mounted vertical. This picture is with about 35 decodes every 15 seconds. During the most active times on 20 & 40M I can see nearly

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread rjai...@gmail.com
How do you know we're running power? I run gain antennas including a 3 element beam at height on 30 meters. I get complaints from some that I am running excessive power. (I run 50 watts except on 80/160 and 6m where I will run up to 1500W) Should I just run a G5RV so as not to bend the needle

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread Gary McDuffie
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 2:48 AM, David Alloza wrote: > > The concentration of traffic on the narrow 2.5khz (certainly at excessive > power) causes a significant rise in the noise floor and therefore reduces > the performance of this mode. > I think this is something that

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread rjai...@gmail.com
2.5khz (certainly at >> >> excessive >> >> power) causes a significant rise in the noise floor and therefore >> >> reduces >> >> the performance of this mode. >> >> >> >> I think this is something that needs to be considered

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread George Molnar
The digital mode watering holes are not (as far as I know in most cases) part of any international agreement or national regulation. If a group of operators want to agree amongst themselves to operate on a particular spot, it is incumbent on them to avoid interference with existing operations

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread Andras Bato
eds to be considered for the future of > >> these digital mode. > >> > >> My 73, > >> > >> David, F4HTQ. > >> > >> > >> > >> De : g...@isect.com [mailto:g...@isect.com] > >> Envoyé : vendredi 23 mars 201

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread rjai...@gmail.com
t;> the performance of this mode. >> >> I think this is something that needs to be considered for the future of >> these digital mode. >> >> My 73, >> >> David, F4HTQ. >> >> >> >> De : g...@isect.com [mailto:g...@isect.com] >> Envoyé : ven

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread Andras Bato
; > David, F4HTQ. > > > > *De :* g...@isect.com [mailto:g...@isect.com] > *Envoyé :* vendredi 23 mars 2018 00:41 > *À :* 'WSJT software development' > *Objet :* Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies? > > > >- *“There is no doubt that with the super success of

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-23 Thread David Alloza
software development' Objet : Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies? * “There is no doubt that with the super success of the FT8 mode, it is imperative that additional frequency “Channels” within each HF band be identified for not only the new DXpedition mode, but more importantly

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-22 Thread gary
* “There is no doubt that with the super success of the FT8 mode, it is imperative that additional frequency “Channels” within each HF band be identified for not only the new DXpedition mode, but more importantly for normal day to day FT8 operations.” On the contrary, Rich, it is

Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?

2018-03-22 Thread Randall Hansen
How about using the JT 9 space since there is almost no one using it Thanks so On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 14:19 Rich - K1HTV wrote: > *As we all know, when bands are open, it is not unusual to find the > standard FT8 frequencies packed, end-to-end with stations. The waterfall