A 'separate small group' wasn't exactly my proposal, Take: I simply
suggested that rather than simply assuming or asserting that there is an
issue with overcrowding and pushing for something to be done, we should take
a more scientific approach.
What would help address the claim (hypothesis) that the HF FT8 allocations
are "overcrowded"?
For example, we could systematically collect, collate and analyze our
ALL.TXT files for things such as:
* How many stations are using FT8 on each of the HF bands
* The proportion of FT8 overs that are repeats of previous overs,
suggesting communications failures due to factors such as QRM, QRN, QSB etc.
* Trends i.e. how these factors vary over time
73
Gary ZL2iFB
From: Tsutsumi Takehiko <ja5...@outlook.com>
Sent: Saturday, 24 March 2018 12:53 p.m.
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] New FT8 Frequencies?
Hi,
I support ZL2iFB Gary's proposal to setup a separate small group to discuss
about default frequencies of wsjt-x from the productiveness.
Regards,
take
de JA5AEA
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
