Hi All,
After a good study with help of mailing list, we fix
on porting Xenomai to our ustom board running with
Mips4k .
what I understand is we have Adeos with Xenomai, and
realtime capability of Xenomai.
our ultimate goal is realtime. To Begin with port of
Xenomai I would like to know , in
somshekar kadam wrote:
Hi All,
After a good study with help of mailing list, we fix
on porting Xenomai to our ustom board running with
Mips4k .
what I understand is we have Adeos with Xenomai, and
realtime capability of Xenomai.
our ultimate goal is realtime. To Begin with port of
Xenomai I
somshekar kadam wrote:
Hi All,
After a good study with help of mailing list, we fix
on porting Xenomai to our ustom board running with
Mips4k .
Nice to hear. :)
what I understand is we have Adeos with Xenomai, and
realtime capability of Xenomai.
Yep.
our ultimate goal is realtime.
Hi Jan,
To begin with porting I need some help you people,
I dont see an announcement of Xenomai start, who are
the Authors and maintainers of this I know were very
well its you and Philipe Gerum and others also whom i
dont know. As I need to put all this in a document ,
can help me on this.
Miguel Angel Alvarez wrote:
I am also very intrerested in this kind of porting guidance, because I
have to evaluate the difficulties in porting Xenomai (and Adeos) into
Coldfire v4 (m68k) architecture.
See this posting for the Adeos part:
somshekar kadam wrote:
Hi Jan,
To begin with porting I need some help you people,
I dont see an announcement of Xenomai start, who are
the Authors and maintainers of this I know were very
well its you and Philipe Gerum and others also whom i
dont know. As I need to put all this in a
Hi Wolfgang,
in the process of preparing to merge rtdm_irq_enable into
rtdm_irq_request I would like to check if the attached patch is ok, thus
we could finally drop rtdm_irq_enable once the API is refactored. Please
check carefully when the first IRQs may happen and what the handler
expects to
somshekar kadam wrote:
HI Jan,
I am runnng the testsuite given by RTAI and Xenomai,
I need to this figures to compare on performance for
the doc to port XENOMAI on MIPS.
I see RTAI gives results in nanoseconds and XENOMAI in
microsecond, so i should say latency with Xenomai is
Hi Neelu,
please start a new thread when switching the topic, don't reply to
existing ones (CC'ing people who may not want this).
somshekar kadam wrote:
HI Jan,
I am runnng the testsuite given by RTAI and Xenomai,
I need to this figures to compare on performance for
the doc to port
HI Jan,
I am runnng the testsuite given by RTAI and Xenomai,
I need to this figures to compare on performance for
the doc to port XENOMAI on MIPS.
I see RTAI gives results in nanoseconds and XENOMAI in
microsecond, so i should say latency with Xenomai is
3000 micrsecond where as RTAI its 3000
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
in the process of preparing to merge rtdm_irq_enable into
rtdm_irq_request I would like to check if the attached patch is ok, thus
we could finally drop rtdm_irq_enable once the API is refactored. Please
check carefully when the first IRQs may happen and what the
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
in the process of preparing to merge rtdm_irq_enable into
rtdm_irq_request I would like to check if the attached patch is ok, thus
we could finally drop rtdm_irq_enable once the API is refactored. Please
check carefully when the
12 matches
Mail list logo
