Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
> leaves its glibc wrapper.
>
> I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
> goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust makefile to compile the code.
> So, the
Hi Philippe,
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:41 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:25 +0200, Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
> > leaves its glibc wrapper.
> >
> > I included here a test suite whi
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:25 +0200, Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
> leaves its glibc wrapper.
>
> I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
> goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust make
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
>> In the mean-time, please run your test with Xenomai 2.5.4.
>>
>
> will try to setup everything. it may take an hour too.
>
> i can guess that it will fail too because i have an impression that this
> issue confused you, so it is highly possible that the issue has n
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:08 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:27 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> What are the contents of this linker script? I did not ask to compare
> >> gcc -print-file-name=libc.so with the same file on the tar
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:27 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> What are the contents of this linker script? I did not ask to compare
>> gcc -print-file-name=libc.so with the same file on the target. I asked
>> to compare:
>> gcc -print-file-name=libc.so (or if it i
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:27 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:06 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> No. As witnessed by the mess
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:06 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
No. As witnessed by the message:
./xeno-shmem-fork: relocation error: ./xeno-shmem-fork: symbol
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:06 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> No. As witnessed by the message:
> >> ./xeno-shmem-fork: relocation error: ./xeno-shmem-fork: symbol getpid,
> >> version GLIBC_2.0 n
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> No. As witnessed by the message:
>> ./xeno-shmem-fork: relocation error: ./xeno-shmem-fork: symbol getpid,
>> version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
>
>
> have you se
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
> >>> le
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
>>> leaves its glibc wrapper.
>>>
>>> I included here a test suite which can be eas
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
>>> leaves its glibc wrapper.
>>>
>>> I included here a test suite which can be eas
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
> > leaves its glibc wrapper.
> >
> > I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
> > go
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
> > leaves its glibc wrapper.
> >
> > I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
> > go
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
> leaves its glibc wrapper.
>
> I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
> goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust makefile to compile the code.
> So, the
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust makefile to compile the code.
So, the console is missing output from line #89. We
17 matches
Mail list logo
