Hi,
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
the way Debian maintained a patch to the ssh package is the
reason why a bug could remain unnoticed during two years in Debian
distributions, including so-called stable distributions. So, maybe it
is time for a change.
First, it doesn't matter most how you
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
the way Debian maintained a patch to the ssh package is the
reason why a bug could remain unnoticed during two years in Debian
distributions, including so-called stable distributions. So,
Hi,
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
What I criticize is patching without submitting patches upstream, or
without consulting upstream package maintainers, or making debian
patches hard to apply upstream.
I both submitted to Xenomai upstream and provided an easy patch (not
even assuming the
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
What I criticize is patching without submitting patches upstream, or
without consulting upstream package maintainers, or making debian
patches hard to apply upstream.
I both submitted to
Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Shipping the xenomai tarball with the debian directory has a real added
value: it allows people to build debian package without anything else,
this is an unofficial package, of course, but it can be built before the
Debian
Hi,
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
So feel free to do a 2.4.4 (or whatever) release soon. :-)
(For integrating the Debian changes in addition to the respective
upstream changes, just remove the man pages in debian/,
debian/xenomai-runtime.manpages and the /bin/bash patch.)
I would
Hi,
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Shipping the xenomai tarball with the debian directory has a real added
value: it allows people to build debian package without anything else,
this is an unofficial package, of course, but it can be built before the
Debian patch is generated.
Well, for people
Roland Stigge wrote:
[Warning: First in a series of several issues applicable to
xenomai.org's code.]
Hi,
at http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xenomai.html, you can find the latest
version of Debian's package xenomai. The diff to xenomai 2.4.3
applies to the normal Xenomai
Hi Gilles,
thanks for your response. ;-)))
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
I am trying to merge the debian changes back into Xenomai, however, I
have two problems:
- I can not find back the 2.4.3-4 patch, I only find 2.4.3-7;
No problem - always just take the latest one, currently 2.4.3-7.
- I
Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi Gilles,
thanks for your response. ;-)))
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
I am trying to merge the debian changes back into Xenomai, however, I
have two problems:
- I can not find back the 2.4.3-4 patch, I only find 2.4.3-7;
No problem - always just take
Roland Stigge wrote:
[Warning: First in a series of several issues applicable to
xenomai.org's code.]
Hi,
at http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xenomai.html, you can find the latest
version of Debian's package xenomai. The diff to xenomai 2.4.3
applies to the normal Xenomai
[Warning: First in a series of several issues applicable to
xenomai.org's code.]
Hi,
at http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xenomai.html, you can find the latest
version of Debian's package xenomai. The diff to xenomai 2.4.3
applies to the normal Xenomai distribution with an empty debian/ directory.
Hi,
I hope you don't mind that we move this to the xenomai-core mailing list
with CC, since I fear the same questions will be raised again there at
some point.
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Now the next question: You are providing i386 packages so far. Do you
have plans for x86-64 as well?
The respective
Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
I hope you don't mind that we move this to the xenomai-core mailing list
with CC, since I fear the same questions will be raised again there at
some point.
Valid point!
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Now the next question: You are providing i386 packages so far. Do you
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Also, xenomai could run in a IA64 ..
Anyone tested it? I can just declare it in the Debian package. If it's
untested, maybe I need to dedicate one of the IA64 machines here to
Xenomai... :-)
Roland
___
Xenomai-core
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Ah, I see... that powerpc already failed. :-
Of course... The DEBIAN/control hackery is operating on an
architecture independent package (linux-patch-xenomai), while only
building the architecture dependent packages on the build daemons...
Will be fixed in next revision...
OK, to recall this message (and lift it to the list):
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Hi,
this mail should be sent to Paul, but I would like to share with the xenomai
developers. Probably then should be sent to the xenomai-core list, but I have
looked the list and it has a high traffic
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Hi,
this mail should be sent to Paul, but I would like to share with the xenomai
developers. Probably then should be sent to the xenomai-core list, but I
have
looked the list and it has a high traffic (for me now) and I'm not a
developer. So
18 matches
Mail list logo
