Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust makefile to compile the code.
So, the console is missing output from line #89. We
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust makefile to compile the code.
So, the
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
goes wrong. It
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
goes wrong. It
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:33 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
No. As witnessed by the message:
./xeno-shmem-fork: relocation error: ./xeno-shmem-fork: symbol getpid,
version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
have you seen that
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:06 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
No. As witnessed by the message:
./xeno-shmem-fork: relocation error: ./xeno-shmem-fork: symbol getpid,
version GLIBC_2.0 not defined
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:06 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
No. As witnessed by the message:
./xeno-shmem-fork: relocation error: ./xeno-shmem-fork: symbol getpid,
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:27 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:06 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:40 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
No. As witnessed by the message:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:27 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
What are the contents of this linker script? I did not ask to compare
gcc -print-file-name=libc.so with the same file on the target. I asked
to compare:
gcc -print-file-name=libc.so (or if it is a
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:08 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:27 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
What are the contents of this linker script? I did not ask to compare
gcc -print-file-name=libc.so with the same file on the target. I
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
In the mean-time, please run your test with Xenomai 2.5.4.
will try to setup everything. it may take an hour too.
i can guess that it will fail too because i have an impression that this
issue confused you, so it is highly possible that the issue has not been
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:25 +0200, Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust makefile
Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
Hello,
I found recently that large application uses to segfault before fork()
leaves its glibc wrapper.
I included here a test suite which can be easily used to verify what
goes wrong. It may be necessary to adjust makefile to compile the code.
So, the
16 matches
Mail list logo
