Yes, you are right, it is ok for 2.6.35-x86-trace.Thank you very much.
2011/9/5 Jan Kiszka
> On 2011-09-05 04:32, rainbow wrote:
> > hi,
> > I did a test for ftrace-xenomai on x86_64 test just now:
> > the environment is : OS: debian 6.0 gcc-4.1
> > I use origin/queues/2.6.37-x86 branch on git
>
On 2011-09-05 04:32, rainbow wrote:
> hi,
> I did a test for ftrace-xenomai on x86_64 test just now:
> the environment is : OS: debian 6.0 gcc-4.1
> I use origin/queues/2.6.37-x86 branch on git
> git://git.kiszka.org/ipipe-2.6for linux kernel and use branch
> origin/queues/ftrace on git git://
> gi
hi,
I did a test for ftrace-xenomai on x86_64 test just now:
the environment is : OS: debian 6.0 gcc-4.1
I use origin/queues/2.6.37-x86 branch on git
git://git.kiszka.org/ipipe-2.6for linux kernel and use branch
origin/queues/ftrace on git git://
git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git
then I do as the fol
Thank you for so detailed answers!! I will test it.
2011/9/4 Jan Kiszka
> On 2011-09-04 15:16, rainbow wrote:
> > 2011/9/4 Jan Kiszka
> >
> >> On 2011-09-04 14:21, rainbow wrote:
> >>> Is the ipipe patch the same as patch like
> >>> adeos-ipipe-2.6.37.6-x86-2.9-02.patch,
> >>
> >> Except that t
On 2011-09-04 15:16, rainbow wrote:
> 2011/9/4 Jan Kiszka
>
>> On 2011-09-04 14:21, rainbow wrote:
>>> Is the ipipe patch the same as patch like
>>> adeos-ipipe-2.6.37.6-x86-2.9-02.patch,
>>
>> Except that the trace branch is for 2.6.35, yes. More precisely it is
>> now the same, I just pushed th
2011/9/4 Jan Kiszka
> On 2011-09-04 14:21, rainbow wrote:
> > Is the ipipe patch the same as patch like
> > adeos-ipipe-2.6.37.6-x86-2.9-02.patch,
>
> Except that the trace branch is for 2.6.35, yes. More precisely it is
> now the same, I just pushed the latest version that includes two more
> ba
On 2011-09-04 14:21, rainbow wrote:
> Is the ipipe patch the same as patch like
> adeos-ipipe-2.6.37.6-x86-2.9-02.patch,
Except that the trace branch is for 2.6.35, yes. More precisely it is
now the same, I just pushed the latest version that includes two more
backported ipipe fixes.
> I know the
Is the ipipe patch the same as patch like
adeos-ipipe-2.6.37.6-x86-2.9-02.patch, I know the latter is xenomai patch
and after I patch it, I can see "Real-time sub-system ---> " Option. But If
I use 2.6.35-x86-trace which contains ,there is no such option.
Another problem is that there are so many
On 2011-09-04 13:49, rainbow wrote:
> you mean I use remotes/origin/queues/2.6.37-x86 branch and use the ipipe
> patch for 2.6.37 then install them on x86_64, the ftrace can work?I will
> have a try, thank you!
Use the 2.6.35-x86-trace, it already contains the ipipe patch, and build
it for x86-64.
you mean I use remotes/origin/queues/2.6.37-x86 branch and use the ipipe
patch for 2.6.37 then install them on x86_64, the ftrace can work?I will
have a try, thank you!
2011/9/4 Jan Kiszka
> On 2011-09-04 07:10, rainbow wrote:
> > Sorry to reply so late, I did a test about install ftrace on xeno
On 2011-09-04 07:10, rainbow wrote:
> Sorry to reply so late, I did a test about install ftrace on xenomai. the
> following is my procedure:
> #git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git queues/ftrace
> #git://git.kiszka.org/ipipe-2.6 queues/2.6.35-x86-trace
> #cd queues/ftrace
> #git checkout -b remote
Sorry to reply so late, I did a test about install ftrace on xenomai. the
following is my procedure:
#git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git queues/ftrace
#git://git.kiszka.org/ipipe-2.6 queues/2.6.35-x86-trace
#cd queues/ftrace
#git checkout -b remotes/origin/queues/ftrace
origin/queues/2.6.35-x86
On 2011-09-03 04:52, rainbow wrote:
> hi,all,I want to use ftrace in xenomai-2.5.6,but when I use git://
> git.kiszka.org/ipipe.git queues/2.6.35-x86-trace to get the linux
> kernel,there is no option about xenomai or ipipe . If I want to patch the
> xenomai patch,there are some problem. How should
13 matches
Mail list logo
