[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1372?page=history ]
cargilld resolved XERCESC-1372:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Use StdInParse -v=always -n -s XML schema validation doesn't seems to work in sa
XML schema validation doesn't seems to work in samples
--
Key: XERCESC-1372
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1372
Project: Xerces-C++
Type: Bug
Components: Samples/Tests
Versions:
Xercex C++ 2.6.0. sample program PSVIWriter fails to validate a valid W3C XML
schema and instance.
--
Key: XERCESC-1324
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1324
.
> Xercex C++ 2.6.0. sample program PSVIWriter fails to validate a valid W3C XML
> schema and instance.
> --
>
> Key: XERCESC-1324
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/b
> As a suggestion for the entire mailing list, why don't we use the "vote
> for this bug" feature of Jira? At least we can have a feeling of
> what the users really think is urgent to fix.
Yep, I certainly did. Of course, I can't vote for my own. ;-)
This is exactly what I was asking, essentiall
As a suggestion for the entire mailing list, why don't we use the "vote for
this bug" feature of Jira? At least we can have a feeling of what the users
really think is urgent to fix.
Alberto
At 15.38 23/09/2004 -0400, Scott Cantor wrote:
> While it's no guarantee, referencing specific bug number
> While it's no guarantee, referencing specific bug numbers that are
> show-stoppers for you will certainly help increase the likelihood of
> them getting fixed. Patches, of course, help even more ;)
I'm sure, but since somebody else already pointed to one and got deafening
silence, I had sort o
On Sep 23, 2004, at 12:16 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
While the list is discussing the importance of adhering to standards,
is
there any hope of getting a few simple XML schema bugs fixed before
the next
release (e.g. xml:lang is unusable, anyType doesn't handle arbitrary
ttributes)? Most of
TED]
nworld.com> cc:
Subject: Re: Validating XML Schema
instance against XMLSche
I have a similar problem. Any pointers on where SQC can be obtained?
D ^ DAndrew E Wilson
< A > AV technology consultant (UK)
D v D Tel +44 7710 727636, or +44 1753 885549
Hi,
So it seems that according to xerces-c 2.5.0 W3's XMLSchema.xsd is
not a
valid XML Sche
Hi,
So it seems that according to xerces-c 2.5.0 W3's XMLSchema.xsd is
not a
valid XML Schema instance. Any clues are appreciated.
It is not a valid schema in the general sense. There are explicit
allowances the the specs make for the schema for schema . As Alby
says, there are also many
At 19.39 24/06/2004 +, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
Good day,
I am trying to validating XML Schema instance against W3's XML Schema
schema. Here is what I have:
[..]
So it seems that according to xerces-c 2.5.0 W3's XMLSchema.xsd is not a
valid XML Schema instance. Any clues are appreciat
Good day,
I am trying to validating XML Schema instance against W3's XML Schema
schema. Here is what I have:
(1) test.xsd with the following content:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25495
XSModel::getComponents(XSConstants::TYPE_DEFINITION) returning type definitions from
standard XML Schema namespace as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25495
XSModel::getComponents(XSConstants::TYPE_DEFINITION) returning type definitions from
standard XML Schema namespace as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25495
XSModel::getComponents(XSConstants::TYPE_DEFINITION) returning type definitions from
standard XML Schema namespace as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25495
XSModel::getComponents(XSConstants::TYPE_DEFINITION) returning type definitions from
standard XML Schema namespace as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25495
XSModel::getComponents(XSConstants::TYPE_DEFINITION) returning type definitions from
standard XML Schema namespace as well.
Summary: XSModel::getComponents(XSConstants::TYPE_DEFINITION)
returning type definitions from standard XML
>> |
>> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>|
>> |cc: (bcc: David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
&
> |
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> |cc: (bcc: David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
>You might want to take a look at this page:
>http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipent.html
>Thanks,
>Anand.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Hieu Bui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:17 PM
>To:
;Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:17 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FW: Validation against XML schema without internet
>connection
>
>Hi,
>
>I've tried looking at the documentation for DOMEntityResolver and have not
>had much luck implementing w
;Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:17 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FW: Validation against XML schema without internet
>connection
>
>Hi,
>
>I've tried looking at the documentation for DOMEntityResolver and have not
>had much luck implementing w
TECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:17 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FW: Validation against XML schema without internet
>connection
>
>Hi,
>
>I've tried looking at the documentation for DOMEntityResolver and have not
>had much luck implementi
TECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:17 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FW: Validation against XML schema without internet
>connection
>
>Hi,
>
>I've tried looking at the documentation for DOMEntityResolver and have not
>had much luck implementi
ityresolver doesn't provide an inputsource.
>> >
>> >/ Erik
>> >
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Ilan Nehama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Sent: den 18 september 2003 10:49
>> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Erik
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ilan Nehama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: den 18 september 2003 10:49
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: RE: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
> >>
>
the entityresolver doesn't provide an inputsource.
>
>/ Erik
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ilan Nehama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: den 18 september 2003 10:49
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Validation against XML schema without
Original Message-
> From: Ilan Nehama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 18 september 2003 10:49
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
>
> Thanks for the quick response
>
> After writing the EntityResolver that find
|
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| cc:
|
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
>
> Hi
>
> I want to validate a locally stored XML file against a locally stored
XSD
> file using xerces 2.2.0 .
> I am using a unix machine that often does not have connection to t
Hi
I want to validate a locally stored XML file against a locally stored XSD
file using xerces 2.2.0 .
I am using a unix machine that often does not have connection to the global
web.
Whenever the connection is down, the parsing collapses.
How can I configure the DOMParser or change my files to p
Title: XML Schema
Hi
Aliza,
The Name and
UnNamed Groups that appear in content models ( group,choice,sequence and all)
can be used only for reprtesenting the element and not the
attributes.
This is not possible using XML Schema instead
you can use XSL validation(Using Xalan) for finding
Title: XML Schema
Hi
Aliza,
The Name and
UnNamed Groups that appear in content models ( group,choice,sequence and all)
can be used only for reprtesenting the element and not the
attributes.
If that is your
requirement you can use XSl validation(Using Xalan) for finding
it.
Best
Hi,
this is not possible in XML Schema.
Gareth
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Aliza Nagauker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question regarding XML schema indicators.
>
> I have an element that has attributes, but only one of the attributes can be
> define in each element.
>
Title: XML Schema
Hello,
I have a question regarding XML schema indicators.
I have an element that has attributes, but only one of the attributes can be define in each element.
Can I use the choice indicator for attributes as well as for elements?
Is the following legal
Hello all,
I have a question about validating a document that contains both a DOCTYPE
and an XML Schema. My scenerio is that I'm producing the document in C++,
and the consumer (which I have no control over) uses Java (xerces-j).
It is convenient for me to use a couple of internal entities
Hey all,
Im just finishing off the DOMTypeInfo stuff and have a querry that
a hope a schema person may know. What should the type for namespace
attributes be? The schema spec defines types for the xsi attributes but I
can find no reference to other ones. Anyone know?
Gareth
--
Garet
how about sax parsing?
- Original Message -
From: "Bagepalli, Kiran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:51 AM
Subject: Parsing XML schema as a stream
> Is there any way I can parse a schema file in a stream. For a schem
Is there any way I can parse a schema file in a stream. For a schema in a
physical file, I created a in-memory XML instance document(as InputSource)
and referred to this physical schema. However if the schema is in a stream
how will I achieve this. Is there a way not to really have an instance
doc
like. Better post
> your xml and schema files for further investigation.
>
> Tinny
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bing-Bing Chai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:24 PM
> Subject: question
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:24 PM
Subject: question on XML schema validation
> Hi,
>
> I was testing the XML Schema validation functionalities with the sample
program DOMPrint (Xerces 1.7). I ran it with a
> modified XML file personal-schema.xml. And got t
Hi,
I was testing the XML Schema validation functionalities with the sample program
DOMPrint (Xerces 1.7). I ran it with a
modified XML file personal-schema.xml. And got the error message "An error occurred
during parsing" with no further
details. What I did was to add another schem
ginal Message-
From: Dean Roddey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
If you are having trouble even accessing them locally, I'd say figure that
out first. I can'
don't have a control port, don't buy it!"
- Original Message -
From: "Carlo Agopian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:57 AM
Subject: RE: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
> Yes,
]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
When you moved them locally, did you update the original document to make
the references relative? Probably so, but I try not to assume anything. Does
your build of
Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.charmedquark.com
"If it don't have a control port, don't buy it!"
- Original Message -
From: "Carlo Agopian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:27 PM
Subject: RE: Vali
e that may cause this. Thanks!
Carlo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dean Roddey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
I would assume in your case that
From: "Carlo Agopian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:30 PM
Subject: RE: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
> I'm running into similar problems. Has anybody out there been successfull
> with schema
April 17, 2002 2:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Validation against XML schema without internet connection
Hi,
I'm using Xerces C++ 1.7 and quite new to XML.
I'd like to validate my XML against a XML Schema when parsing, but it
doesn't work. The schema or referenced resour
I forgot about using XMLspy for testing because the same reason. It was NOT
pure w3c Schemas.
regards,
Alfredo
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Jeronymo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Martes, 05 de Marzo de 2002 02:04 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XML Schema Validation W3C
Ok. I have to thank you all that helped me. I am sorry but I don't remember the
guy who told me: "Maybe XML Spy is too flexible?" or something like that.
It turned out that he was correct. XML Spy lets you do whatever you wish with
schemas. I downloaded XSV and finally my schemas are correct, a
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6001
DOM parser does not stop to allocate memory and starves when it validates against a
XML schema which uses a xsd:choice with maxOccurs="4000"
Summary: DOM parser does not stop to allocate memory and starves
when it validates against a
Great. Normally, the parser version is reflected in the library name. So, for the next
release of the parser, the library name will include the version (i.e.
xerces-c_1_6_1.dll for win32).
Khaled
Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Khaled Noaman wrote:
>
> > On windows, I am getting error
I've previously logged this problem, bugzilla #5786, which I belive has been fixed in
the overnight builds (thanks to Khaled).
I'd be interested if this build fixes your problems because as I say it cured the
schema errors, however, I now see unexpected validation errors, bugzilla #5807.
I'm ac
hi sam
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Radovan Chytracek wrote:
>
> > > I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents against my XML
> > > schema under Linux then I'd be happy!
> >
> > Have you tried the
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, John Utz wrote:
> can you provide a tie-breaker?
>
> asserting that XMLSpy says it's ok is not really sufficient. I would
> suggest bringing a third tool into the mix and see what happens.
Found one (thanks to Radovan Chytracek) - TIBCO's Turbo XML 2.2 accepts
the schema and
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Radovan Chytracek wrote:
> > I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents against my XML
> > schema under Linux then I'd be happy!
>
> Have you tried the Turbo XML 2.2 from www.extensibility.com?
Thanks for the tip - I'll give i
Hi,
> I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents against my XML
> schema under Linux then I'd be happy!
Have you tried the Turbo XML 2.2 from www.extensibility.com?
Radovan
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, John Utz wrote:
> can you provide a tie-breaker?
>
> asserting that XMLSpy says it's ok is not really sufficient. I would
> suggest bringing a third tool into the mix and see what happens.
I wish. If I could get a single tool to validate documents agai
't be validated against
xerces and i am beginning to suspect that XMLSpy was the only tool used in
the creation of this standard :-(.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Sam Tregar wrote:
> Hello. I'm attempting to use Xerces-C++ package to validate documents
> against an XML Schema. I'm recievin
Hello. I'm attempting to use Xerces-C++ package to validate documents
against an XML Schema. I'm recieving this error:
Error at file /home/sam/doc.xml, line 5, char 85
Message: No circular definitions are allowed:
'http://bricolage.sourceforge.net/assets.xsd,conta
I am just reposting this question, because I would
love to know more on this topic.
best regards to you all,
Oliver
-Original Message-
From: Juan Chu Chow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: access to the XML Schema
Hi
Hi all,
I'm developing an application that needs to make use of the
XML Schema, that is, i need to examine the actual XML Schema
document to discover its type relationships, rather than using
it only for validation.
Since the Xerces parser is able to validate on an XML Schema,
I was wond
Andrew,
Which version of Xerces-C++ are you using?
Both the built-in datatypes "int" and "anyURI" are added in Xerces-C++
1.5.2. If you are using Xerces-C++ 1.5.1 or below, then the support were
not there yet. Please upgrade to our latest release.
Tinny
Andrew Hain wrote:
> I am having a pr
> For example, in my schema I specify "xsd:integer", and all is fine. But
> if I use the derived "xsd:int", the parser fails to find the type ("Type
> not found in "). I also have the same problem
> with the primitive type "anyURI".
Any types you define are in your namespace, not XML Schema's nam
I am having a problem with XML Schemas, resolving some of the datatypes.
For example, in my schema I specify "xsd:integer", and all is fine. But
if I use the derived "xsd:int", the parser fails to find the type ("Type
not found in "). I also have the same problem
with the primitive type "anyUR
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:55:23 +0100, Norbert Kintzler wrote:
>In a XML import/export I need to transport text inside element attributes
>preserving line breaks.
Any reason you cannot use a tag? (convert to/from that tag on
ex/import)
Ciao, Jürgen
--
Jürgen Hermann, Developer ([EMAIL PROTECTE
validation, it works correct that
way.
With Schema validation (which I need to use) the line breaks are converted
to normal spaces ( ). I tried different built-in types without luck.
Then I defined my own type, which - according to my understanding of the
XML Schema specificaion - should preserve
t: Friday, July 06, 2001 6:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: XML - Schema Validator
>
>
> Hi,
> I am a newcomer to the XML technology.
> Basically I have XML files which needs to be validated
> against my schema
> file.
>
> I have downloaded the Xerc
Hi,
I am a newcomer to the XML technology.
Basically I have XML files which needs to be validated against my schema
file.
I have downloaded the Xerces version for Unix. and I was thinking of
creating a program with command line arguments which would typically
take a Schema file(.xsd) and a dire
;David E. Cleary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/04/2001 03:55:02 PM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To: "Xerces-C-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject: XML Schema Resolver proposal
>
> Currently it is a requirement to use xsi:sch
Currently it is a requirement to use xsi:schemaLocation and
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation in your XML instance data in order to get
Xerces to do schema validation. The XML Schema Recommendation explicitly
states that the inclusion of these attributes are only hints and there is no
mandate that
This is to convey my interest in having the "xsd:include" feature
implemented in the Xerces C implementation.
Thank you.
M. Pinto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
Hi,
just to know how is going the W3C Rec XML Schema porting for Xerces-C.
Any date for the "launch day" ?
regards,
Alfredo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
many Java solutions, and few
C++ options. I suppose it goes to cross-platform issues...
- kaoruAngel
- Original Message -
From: "Arnold, Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:42 PM
Subject: RE: XML Schema-- Does ANY C++
Definitely the Xerces-C implementation of schema is underway. Currently, The Oracle
XML Parser for C++ supports an previous working draft of XML schema, check
http://technet.oracle.com/tech/xml/xdk_cpp/index.htm
-
To
real experience with Java?
Thank you for your help. Hopefully someone will surprise me with a C++
library that supports them :)
- kaoruAngel
- Original Message -
From: "Cem Karan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:42 AM
Subje
Cem, and the list,
>I don't know of a C++ solution to your problems, but if I might ask you
>this: can you mix the Java and C++ code you have together? Using the
>JNI you should be able to access the Java parser/whatever from C++.
I've recently found a problem on both Solaris and Redhat Linux
I don't know of a C++ solution to your problems, but if I might ask you
this: can you mix the Java and C++ code you have together? Using the
JNI you should be able to access the Java parser/whatever from C++. The
downside will be speed to some degree (although on the mac and linux
sides, that sh
gies, and am in love
withthe added control over the types of data given by schemas. It's also
justknow that I'm realizing that Xerces does not support them... Does ANY
XMLlibrary exist that supports the XML Schema draft?? It seems as if
there*are* a few options out there, b
with DTD's. However, there doesn't seem to be any explicit
> support for floating point data. Do we have to subclass,
> say, the Transcoder to accomodate floats?
>
> In the meantime, I started looking at XML Schema. I wrote
> a .xsd file and a .xml file that us
OK, now I'm confused. The web page says
"Initial support for XML Schema (draft W3C standard)
is also provided."
under the xerces section. It does not qualify this
as applying to xerces-j only. I wish I'd known this...
-Pete
> -Original Message-
> From:
Yes, partial support should be available before summer. Stay tuned.
Tinny
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seem to be any explicit
support for floating point data. Do we have to subclass,
say, the Transcoder to accomodate floats?
In the meantime, I started looking at XML Schema. I wrote
a .xsd file and a .xml file that uses the .xsd file. I came
to find out that Xerces C does not support XML S
85 matches
Mail list logo
