On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 08:40:57PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a link or email to contact Alan Cox? I would be willing to test
a beta version if one is available.
You can post a request on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I know he
reads that list.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED
(/usr/X11R6/bin/X) and the modules in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules. This
worked without a problem.
I would recommend backing up your entire /usr/X11R6 directory and
/etc/X11 directory before trying any similar procedure.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of XFree86.
You might get lucky and someone is familiar with the specific version
you are running, but that is not too likely.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
The XFree86 driver doesn't use interrupts, but I find it very strange
that the chip's IRQ is connected to IRQ 0.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
.
Are you using or not using the Matrox HAL? If you are using it, try
Option NoHal in the Device section.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
in debugging this? If so contact me at
the below email.
I wrote to the Matrox list too but got no answer.
In my opinion Matrox cards are only supported for windows, so
I will never buy one in the future.
Sadly, this assertion may be correct.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED
support high color.
Since my machine is not networkable yet, I have not been able to extract the log
file to submit with this e-mail.
Can you copy it to a disk?
Can you paste the Section Device and Section Screen at least?
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED
to recover it.
Are you using matroxfb or not? If you are, try without; if you aren't,
try with.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:10:29PM +0400, vladkon wrote:
Please help
Looks like the Rendition driver isn't loading libddc.a. Was this one of
Eric Wittry's fixes?
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to figure out
how to setup the modes on the maven. However, Shaun Jackman kindly went
into Windows and dumped the maven registers in various TV modes, and
produced a standalone program to setup TV modes. Eventually I'll
integrate that code.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
xfs the font
server.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
with xvidtune to
see if it can help? Or perhaps try a lower resolution. Does the
monitor work correctly at that resolution and refresh rate on a
different video card, or on the same video card running windows?
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
] root]# ddcprobe
Videocard DDC probe results
Description: NVIDIA Corporation NV34 Board - p162-1nz
Memory (MB): 128
Monitor DDC probe results
Monitor DDC Probe failed.
What was your point? I've missed it
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital
/openbox ?
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Yes and next screen is
Fatal error
cannot moce old logfile var/log/XFree86.0.log.old
Check this file. Make sure it doesn't have strange permissions and that
the filesystem is not full. If necessary delete all the XFree86 log
files from that directory.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED
It's using 8-bit color depth, which will make things look pretty rotten.
In the Screen section, change the Depth and the DefaultDepth to 24 and
see if that meets more with your expectations.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
will be mostly separate anyway.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 05:06:25AM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
I have two bugs open on the mga driver that I'd like some feedback on:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098
This one implements I2C support for G-series cards with single-chip
dualhead support
time now. You don't seem to be using
mga_hal, which is what I was blaming it on. I'm glad you've produced a
testcase so hopefully I can track this down. Thanks!
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
] [size=16M]
Thanks for any insights!
SFK
--- Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 08:18:13PM -0700, Scott Kiesling wrote:
I am trying to configure xfree on an old machine which I have just
installed
Gentoo on, but can't get it to start. The errors from
) CIRRUS(0): I2C initialization failed
Can you lspci -vvv and post the block corresponding to your card? Also,
is this a PCI or ISA card?
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the DacG and
MGA-TVO are ignored completely, so do these cards have two TMDS
transmitters (one for each monitor on the cable)? Or are the TMDS
chips internal to the dual digital cables?
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a
picture on both heads, so something is right in my config :-).
You still need the HAL. (I haven't gotten Maven mode setup working
yet.)
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
dual-monitor cable (included with certain Matrox products) or
using a DVI-to-HD15 adapter. If you need this adapter and it's not
included with your Matrox product, contact your computer vendor.
And the picture they should is of a G550 with only one DVI connector.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL
occurs, you get a server segfault.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
cards.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:35:21PM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote:
I have two bugs open on the mga driver that I'd like some feedback on:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098
mga_maven.h seems to be missing from
http
head with it though.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:37:08PM +0100, Mulcahy, Damien wrote:
Folks,
Does xFree86 4.4.0 support the NEdit GUI text editor for Unix?
Are you having a specific problem? NEdit, like any X11 application,
should have no problems on XFree86 of any sort.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED
XFConfig86 file as well as the
Have you compiled XFree86 yourself from source, or is this someone's
binary distribution? The first few lines of the log file were not
included.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; these
server crashes should not be resulting in system hangs.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
card and at
least one multi-mga configuration.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[drm] failed to load kernel module agpgart
[drm] failed to load kernel module mga
(II) MGA(0): [drm] drmOpen failed
nforce2? If you aren't running kernel 2.6, you need a kernel patch for
agpgart support.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
' (4.3.0) which should have the support
for this card.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
from higher level functions. Depending what intel did, they could
have made this really easy on you or really hard on you. :)
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
was able
to find a few functions containing port i/o with no problem in only a
few seconds.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 06:48:38AM -0500, L. Jensen wrote:
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:07 am, Ryan Underwood wrote:
To clarify, I did this:
$ sudo dd if=/dev/mem of=/tmp/bios bs=1 skip=786432 count=32768
Thanks, this is a good tip. To be clear, I am disassembling using the command
your pointer device. Does NetBSD put it at
/dev/psaux like Linux? If not, you need to change that in your XFree86
config file.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
type of support from the kernel?
No. That is also an accelerated driver which uses the hardware features
of the card to speed typical GUI drawing operations. The VESA
framebuffer and/or the kernel framebuffer will usually not have any form
of acceleration for graphics primitives.
--
Ryan
the manufacturers are not releasing
programming information for their latest chips. 2D performance should
be excellent on any card you choose.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be a best option.
IIRC, Radeon 9800 is R350 which is not supported in DRI.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
can't setup a fault to drop you into your own code afaik.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and not a lot of people saying I've got em... :)
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:31:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:41:07AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
That's not entirely true... Some people do have /some/ of the
R300 specs under NDA
for NVidia hardware yet, I would not hold my breath. The most
likely thing that will happen without documentation is that someone will
put together framebuffer console support for it.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of that to ensure that it is
all done in a legal fashion.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
code could be even more dangerous than NDAs
that come right out and say you can't publish source. The latter
stops you from going any further right at the beginning, but the former
could waste a lot of time and money and ruin your day if the company got
the wrong attitude down the road.
--
Ryan
-Voodoo3 are all available online and would be
good reading material if you have never seen one before.
There are some 3dlabs and mga databooks floating around on the net but I
don't know if they are legal to obtain/link to.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
freedom with closed source licenses,
but feel free to elaborate.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is the docs for the VSA based cards (voodoo4/voodoo5)? I have
been unable to locate them.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-use the code under X11 license. Did
you even ask him?
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in the glory days of DRI, that is all the better for us;
but I do not think we should begrudge NDA development at all, because it
strikes what is IMO a fair balance between the interests of the hardware
manufacture and the interests of the open source community and users.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED
/listinfo/xfree86
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/mesa in the 'Mesa' module and
XFree86 is under /cvs/dri in the 'xc' module.
The documentation could be a little more clear on the procedure to
bootstrap from CVS.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
system including what is attached to what
port on the matrox card?
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
( current ) ) {
ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
break;
}
which means I guess there is a signal that something isn't handling if
it is just sitting there. I'm not sure if this is an application level
problem or at the server.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
and single head G400?
Of course, I've never actually seen one of these.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(either not around or wasn't compiled with support for it). I
thought I fixed it with a oneliner in that patch but it turns out that
I was using the wrong config at the time to test it.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:13:50PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
--- Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
No code was copied, only some defines. I need other people to check
the
code and tell me if it will break on other video cards. I only have
a
G400 DH
much hope into Rendition documentation ever seeing
the light of day.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Could not init font path element unix/:7100, removing from list!
Fatal server error:
could not open default font 'fixed'
Something has happened to your font server (xfs). Try restarting it.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
driver, instead of the VESA
driver? Note that there were recently some issues with the S3 driver
(something with line drawing) that a fix was checked into CVS for.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that does. I
can't remember the name of it.
Is there any documentation for Permedia 1/2/3 cards available? I do
have a couple of these laying around, and wouldn't mind taking a look
into bootstrapping DRI support.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED
the only one that has that problem. :)
I have a G400MAX running dualhead with Matrox HAL, kernel 2.4.22,
XFree86 4.3.0 on Debian.
--
Ryan Underwood, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
around and can be had for next to nothing. The 3D speed is
sufficient in UT but probably not for any newer commercial games.
--
Ryan Underwood, nemesis at icequake.net, icq=10317253
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman
/pub/PC/driver/index.htm
More information:
http://kyro2insttool.sourceforge.net/
http://klt.sourceforge.net/
--
Ryan Underwood, nemesis at icequake.net, icq=10317253
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
of the
power saving modes in the first place. ;)
Thanks,
--
Ryan Underwood, nemesis at icequake.net, icq=10317253
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:36:30PM -0500, Ryan Underwood wrote:
BTW, does anyone have DPMS working on the second head of a G400? On my
setup, DPMS works fine on the first head, but on the second head never
powers off when the server goes into power saving mode -- instead, it
displays some
not cover
all of the available options. My best bet has been search mailing lists
for people with similar configurations and go from there :)
Good luck,
--
Ryan Underwood, nemesis at icequake.net, icq=10317253
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
PROTECTED]
i have experianced this problem persistently. it will be very kind of you
if you can give me some advice on this issue.
It would help if you posted a log, or at the very least, the version of
XFree86 and the operating system you use.
--
Ryan Underwood, nemesis at icequake.net, icq
--
Ryan Underwood, nemesis at icequake.net, icq=10317253
Section ServerLayout
Identifier Dualhead
Screen Screen 0 LeftOf Screen 1
# Screen Screen 0
Screen Screen 1
InputDeviceMouse1 CorePointer
InputDeviceKeyboard1
Note the addition of the '4' in each 4X-certified model.
--
Ryan Underwood, nemesis at icequake.net, icq=10317253
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
for it.
--
Ryan Underwood, nemesis at icequake.net, icq=10317253
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 9:54 PM
Subject: [XFree86] mga on 4.3.0?
Hi,
Is anyone having success using a MGA G400 with DRI on 4.3.0? Ever since
I upgraded to the preliminary 4.3.0 debian packages from
76 matches
Mail list logo
