Here I allways run no 'standard' services (not part of windows itself), =
like
xmail, exchange, sql, ... with a user account for each service (so i =
can
view processes owned by him, in nt logs, limit accesses with rights, =
)!!
Simply create a account (say named XmailServer), place it in =
But I will report if something stranges happens again. As i told the
XMailservers crashed exactly at the same time, they are in different
pl= aces and the start time was NOT the same.
=20
Very mystic ...
Not just 2.4 but 2.4.1. The problem is with kernels 2.4.2 and up.
XMail 1.18 runs now
How about putting in smtprelay.tab all non-routable private subnets per
RFC or some kind of wildcard or special entry that matches the subnets
of all installed network cards in the xmail server?
For example, case 1:
smtprelay.tab
10.0.0.0/8
169.254.0.0/16
172.16.0.0/12
192.168.0.0/16
or case
Repeating this response since I didn't get a copy when I sent it this
morning.
--
How about putting in smtprelay.tab all non-routable private subnets per
RFC or some kind of wildcard or special entry that matches the subnets
of all installed network cards in the xmail server?
For example,
I guess I'm not trying to stifle it, but like everyone here, I have my =
opinions.
I do have to ask how many times does Davide have to say no before people =
realize that he's not going to make the change? People may not be being =
ungrateful, but beating this dead horse isn't going to make him
Hi all,
I would find usefull some tool that could bring me a quick overview of how
bussy is currently XMail - especially how many e-mails to be sent are in
queue (i.e. when some customer starts a mailing to several thousands
addresses). Is there any easy way to do it? Or is there any tool (for
If open source just means ' please shut up' than closed source would be
a much better alternative. I think that as a maintainer you should
listen to the people using the software. This does not mean doing
everything what people ask but listening. If there are things which the
maintainer does not
Davide doesn't hate documentation but the users who DON'T READ IT. He just
want to make it as simple as possible. Besides, he already stated that he
changed his opinion regarding this issue, so now would be a realy good time
to close this thread and let the MAN work - what he does best.
Matic
Complainers,
I do not usually get into these debates, but I know how hard it is
developing little pieces of software here and there. So I can only
imagine how much Davide has on his plate. Davide has never said, don't
write documentation. If you are going to use opensource, than you have
I think 'complaining' and 'suggesting' are getting confused here.
And personally I don't want to use anything else but I think it is in
the interest of everyone to have better documentation. Volunteers would
be needed to do that.
=20
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Benny
Well, suggesting turns into complaining. Thats why there are 20+ emails
on this issue.
Yes, you would need volunteers if you want to make the documentation
better. As previously stated by Dale Qualls, there is another effort
in documentation, so you could join up with that person to give
Nobody is complaining. All everybody is doing is suggesting that XMail
should not ship as an open relay. The open relay issue is an extremely
obvious issue. No email server should ever ship as an open relay,
regardless if it is free or paid for. And it is a very easy fix. One line
of one tab
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
This is the same thing we all asked Microsoft to do with IIS.
You seem to forget that MS (note not $ but S) has quite a few ppl for tech
support, and users do not send emails directly to billg when something
does not work as they expected. Anyway,
At 10:54 4/1/2004, you wrote:
Why ship an email server as an open relay? There is no valid reason.
I don't mean to be rude, nor to step on anyone's toes, but... Are you
willing to answer the flood of email resulting from people downloading the
product and not being able to figure out why they
My=20twopenneth=20to=20the=20open=20relay=20debate=20:)
If=20I=20was=20writing=20XMail=20i=20would=20make=20private=20addresses=20=
(as=20suggested=20previously)=20open=20relays=20(i.e.=2010.x,=20192.x=20an=
d=20172.x)=20and=20everything=20else=20restricted.
At 11:02 4/1/2004, you wrote:
I also created a new
distribution list [EMAIL PROTECTED] where I will forward all
messages coming from lame users, and your addresses are already subscribed
:-)
If this is not simply humor, you can add me to that list. I'm not an expert
in every setting or option
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Tracy wrote:
If this is not simply humor, you can add me to that list. I'm not an expert
in every setting or option (not by far) but I can certainly handle the
basics of configuration.
It was a joke ;) Actually, since it's Apr 1, I could have done better :-)
- Davide
Hi All,
I believe that Dale and Benny are refering to my 'Beginner's Guide' in a
previous thread. Unfortunately my guide is designed specifically for Linux
users (although it probably is helpful for other unix like OSes). I don't
have any other types of servers to experiment with and have gone
Me too, davide.
ben
Tracy wrote:
At 11:02 4/1/2004, you wrote:
I also created a new
distribution list [EMAIL PROTECTED] where I will forward all
messages coming from lame users, and your addresses are already subscribed
:-)
If this is not simply humor, you can add me to that list.
Damnit! I forgot about fools day!!! Yeah, you should have said 2.0 is
out! hahaha
Maybe not funny at first, but we would have seen the humor.
Ben
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Tracy wrote:
If this is not simply humor, you can add me to that list. I'm not an expert
in every
I too, am using Linux(SuSE to be exact). Do you have the link Jeffrey?
I would like to look at it to see if there is anything I can add to it,
as far as plugins and such.
Thanks,
Ben
Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
Hi All,
I believe that Dale and Benny are refering to my 'Beginner's Guide' in a
On Thursday 01 April 2004 11:38, Benny wrote:
I too, am using Linux(SuSE to be exact). Do you have the link Jeffrey?
I would like to look at it to see if there is anything I can add to it,
as far as plugins and such.
Sure
http://www.ubaight.com/xmail/BeginnersGuide.html
-
To unsubscribe from
Damnit! I forgot about fools day!!! Yeah, you should have
said 2.0 is
out! hahaha
This one was excellent. OK - let's stop this thread here.
--Harald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the
Has anyone come across a webmin module for xmail?
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Healy
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 10:28 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [xmail] Webmin
Has anyone come across a webmin module for xmail?
Bill,
I don't believe there is a webmin
I am running XMail v1.17 on Win2K. It was about a month ago that I
upgraded to v1.17 and installed Spam Assassin and XAV/Mcafee
filtering. For the most part, everything has been working very well.
This morning, we had some power trouble, and the UPS which my mail server
was plugged into
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Here I allways run no 'standard' services (not part of windows itself), =
like
xmail, exchange, sql, ... with a user account for each service (so i =
can
view processes owned by him, in nt logs, limit accesses with rights, =
)!!
Simply create a account (say named
Is anyone else getting all of these =3D20?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of David Stebbings
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
I agree, the you missed something is not a good start.
How hard can it be to take an existing working xav setup (as noted
22/08/2003 version of exe) and replace the exe with a newer one. Also
verify and update if needed, the ini file for any new options. In the
latest xav.zip I also tried the
Yup...you're not seeing things. :-)
Is anyone else getting all of these =3D20?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of David Stebbings
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default
Yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M Jenck
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 1:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
Is anyone else getting all of these =3D20?
Mike
-Original
A Hex Markup in MIME :) Someone needs to fix their parser :)
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Default Open Relay @ Davide
Yes
-Original Message-
From:
Rob,
We tried the same things (modify the included ini file, modify the return
code in the xav.tab that is called by filters.out.tab and filters.in.tab)
On our server, when we try to use XAV.
1) the temp directories under the xav tree never disappear.
2) the xav.exe processes never end
3)
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Jason Badry wrote:
I am running XMail v1.17 on Win2K. It was about a month ago that I
upgraded to v1.17 and installed Spam Assassin and XAV/Mcafee
filtering. For the most part, everything has been working very well.
This morning, we had some power trouble, and the
You can limit the number of calls to SA, it's a start option it has. when
it reaches
it's limit will queue all the other calls it gets.
Right now on a wbel, I have it limit SA and Clamav to nly allow 4 messages
to
be scanned at one time.
This helps seens as my SA foot print is 78 megs :)
--
Sounds awfully similar.
Will let you know - no activity yet.
Rob :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Xmail
Sent: Friday, 2 April 2004 12:47 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated.
Rob,
We tried
36 matches
Mail list logo
