As seen in different forums arround the web, seems in TB v3.x AUTH PLAIN and
AUTH LOGIN are now considered NOT SECURE, and TB 3 fails to use them if not
currently using a 'secure' connection (STARTTLS or pure SSMTP connection)
with the smtp server.
I don't understand why in they new 'security
I think you don't need any .NET Framework 3.x (compact or not) but only VC++
2008 redistributables (include vc++2008 runtime libs, as is MSVCR90.dll)
(normally installing .Net framework 3.x is only necessary when using ..Net
objects/... Pure C/C++ code should not need them, just C/C++ runtime
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Phillip R. Shaw
Envoyé : mardi 19 janvier 2010 16:43
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] xmail 1.25 problem with a smtp headers
I am receiving emails from yahoo groups and am
In any cases, rfc2822 said that email lines should be no more than 998
characters (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-2.1.1) including
headers lines. (section 2.2.3)
so Yahoo is sending X-YMail-OSG headers that break the rfc
I think where is nothing to do except convince Yahoo to
Here is a test message as queried by Davide for a little problem
Please don't reply :)
Francis
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
file
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello Davide
What I need is to force xmail to send to a specific domain
via a specific
server support using only auth login clients
So first I should create an entry in smtpfw.tab. easy :)
But I did not remember (nothing in doc
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Francesco Vertova
Envoyé : jeudi 17 décembre 2009 10:10
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] Patches: IPv6 and SSL
At 08.41 17/12/09, Stephan Mueller wrote:
I am
Hello Davide
What I need is to force xmail to send to a specific domain via a specific
server support using only auth login clients
So first I should create an entry in smtpfw.tab. easy :)
But I did not remember (nothing in doc at smtpfw.tab section) if
'userauth/smtp' files are taken into
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : jeudi 17 décembre 2009 21:54
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] Patches: IPv6 and SSL
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Stephan Müller wrote:
That is a
Hello Spyros
Install somethink like Xmail Queue Manager :) (link on xmailserver.org)
You will then be able to seen xmail queue then delete the message
Regards
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org [mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de
la part de Spyros
A simple xmail filter that check destination emails from a list could do the
job.
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Dale
Envoyé : mercredi 21 octobre 2009 17:36
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail]
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de fred
Envoyé : mercredi 14 octobre 2009 19:25
À : 'XMail Users Mailing List'
Objet : Re: [xmail] Multiple from inside mail headers
Yes, my current SPF script is at that level, I will
Hello Fred
As this is a filter, the choice made to use 'return-path' in place of 'from'
is filter specific, not related to xmail
To help you we need to know more about this filter, how it works,
parameters, ...
Self-written filter or found on the net ?
Do you have source code for this filter (or
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Gilad Odinak
Envoyé : mardi 6 octobre 2009 07:57
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : [xmail] relay email for an individual email address
I want to forward all email to
Hello
Mixing source code files from various versions for same projet (like here
openssl libs) is not a good think and generaly end with errors at compile
time as many files are version depends (and some times os dependent
especialy for the good header file to use) :-/
I think you should first
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : mercredi 30 septembre 2009 20:37
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k
Can you try to get
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : mardi 29 septembre 2009 19:32
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, CLEMENT
Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
As said, ctrlclnt don't crash at all, at end of job
(action correctly
completed at xmail server side, and ctrlclnt output
correct and complete,
nothing missing), it seems to 'freeze' for about 30
seconds (waiting for a
timeout
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de CLEMENT Francis
Envoyé : mardi 29 septembre 2009 08:27
À : 'XMail Users Mailing List'
Objet : Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k
-Message d'origine
, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello Davide
Context :
Server : W2K server SP4, xmail 1.26
WorkStation : W2K workstation SP4, ctrlclnt.exe copied from
xmail 1.26
server (so exactly same binary)
When running CtrlClnt from the workstation all ok, output
result is ok,
ctrlclnt exit immediatly and exit
, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de CLEMENT Francis
Envoyé : vendredi 25 septembre 2009 14:14
À : 'XMail Users Mailing List'
Objet : Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return
value on w2k
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : lundi 28 septembre 2009 16:27
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, CLEMENT
Hello Davide
Context :
Server : W2K server SP4, xmail 1.26
WorkStation : W2K workstation SP4, ctrlclnt.exe copied from xmail 1.26
server (so exactly same binary)
When running CtrlClnt from the workstation all ok, output result is ok,
ctrlclnt exit immediatly and exit code (errorlevel) is 0
Same
, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Server : W2K server SP4, xmail 1.26
WorkStation : W2K workstation SP4, ctrlclnt.exe copied from xmail 1.26
server (so exactly same binary)
When running CtrlClnt from the workstation all ok, output
result is ok,
ctrlclnt exit immediatly and exit code (errorlevel) is 0
Same
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : lundi 7 septembre 2009 19:55
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] ERDNS weirdness
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
My post was about
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : lundi 7 septembre 2009 16:47
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] ERDNS weirdness
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Davide
Ssl certificates are based on server name, so you can use it on xmail ONLY
if your xmail server use same name (and generaly a ip that resolve to same
name)
So if your ssl cert is for www.atinet.com.br, you xmail server should
resolve to www.atinet.com.br (from ip and from smtp banners I think)
Basicaly, migration to new server with new version is easy :
- Install OLD version to new server (yes OLD so here 1.23)
- copy complete old xmailroot to new server
- verify that this OLD version on new server is ok (pop, smtp, ...)
Then finally complete 1.23 to 1.26 transition :
- stop xmail on
Hello
One of my customers received this bounce from xmail after sending a mail :
(xxx = sender email with 'correct domain' that exist and correctly setup
in dns systems:), yyy recipent email, some data changed)
De : groupeab.com PostMaster
sender domain must exist (#5.7.1)
Hi Francis,
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
I 'googled' for this error and found could be dns problem on sender
domain
setup, but my server mx.groupeab.com is correctly
registered in dns A, MX
and Reverse DNS too ...
if the recipient's server is the only one
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Tjeerd Makel
Envoyé : mercredi 8 juillet 2009 11:45
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] Help needed for unknow foreign server error 553
sorry, your enve lope sender
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : mercredi 8 juillet 2009 16:18
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] Help needed for unknow foreign server error 553
sorry, your enve lope sender
Dale
You could try to 'manually' (telnet) connect to your xmail server in the
'blocked' situation (no space) and see what is the response.
Is 'esmail.esblah.blah.com' your (obfuscated) server name ? if not, the
error 5xx is generated by another server in the route to you server (another
server
Hello Paul
Simple way :
- First get back your hosts file to previous state, no need to change it at
all to force xmail :)
- Get greatnorthernsnowcat.com mx ip (current mx seems to be
mail.greatnorthernsnowcat.com, at ip 208.64.136.91)
- In xmail smtpfwd.tab file add a line like this :
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : dimanche 1 février 2009 00:15
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] SMTP error: 501 Syntax error in parameters or
arguments: (-31)
On Sun, 1 Feb
to everybody !
Francis
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : lundi 1 décembre 2008 18:30
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] glst 0.27 xnet bug ?
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Should the mnet/xnat setting bellow
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : vendredi 28 novembre 2008 22:54
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] glst 0.27 xnet bug ?
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Many isp's have smtp servers mixed
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : jeudi 27 novembre 2008 18:34
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] glst 0.27 xnet bug ?
mnet masking is applied *before* xnet whitelisting.
Supposing it's the good way
Hello Davide
I upgraded recently to glst 0.27 due to mnet problem (recent discussion on
this list)
Now, trying to send a mail from the server itself I got a rejection 'try
later' from glst even if the 'sender ip' is excluded with an xnet setting :
Actual glst.conf xnet and mnet :
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de CLEMENT Francis
Envoyé : jeudi 27 novembre 2008 09:58
À : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] glst 0.27 xnet bug ?
Hello Davide
I upgraded recently to glst 0.27 due to mnet problem (recent
discussion
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Filip Supera
Envoyé : jeudi 27 novembre 2008 13:24
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] Is anyone having problems with spamhaus?
Francesco Vertova :
Hi all,
zen.spamhaus.org has been catching
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Charlie Qualls
Envoyé : mardi 18 novembre 2008 14:21
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] new problem for me
Hello Xmail,
My mail server has been running flawlessly for a long time.
Now the last
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Charlie Qualls
Envoyé : mardi 18 novembre 2008 15:52
À : XMail Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [xmail] new problem for me
Hello CLEMENT,
I think I found the problem. My log files have filled the var
volume.
I think you are using an old version of GLST. Get the new one:
http://www.xmailserver.org/glst-mod.html
I double-checked it, and it works as expected.
- Davide
Seems I missed some annoncement about a 0.27 (nor a 0.26 ...) :-/
Thanks Davide, I will install this none
Francis
-
To
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de K=C3=B6vesdi =
Gy=C3=B6rgy
Envoy=C3=A9 : vendredi 7 novembre 2008 09:33
=C3=80 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] xmail+glst
Hi,
I have xmail installed on OpenWRT (on Asus WL500gP), and it works =
fine.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Kovesdi Gyorgy
Envoye : vendredi 7 novembre 2008 13:23
A : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] log file
generr=0
rejerr=3
Thanx, it worx!
Strange think that you didn't get these values, these are the
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rosario Pingaro
Envoye : vendredi 7 novembre 2008 12:25
A : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: glst.conf
then another problem is that some mail client are sending mail
using the
private ip of the
Hello Davide
My server (w2k) does not use SmartDNSHost setting so not a problem with any
local dns server
But sometimes I get this error in the spool :
ErrCode = -108
ErrString = Truncated UDP DNS response
What can be the reason for this error ? :
What can I check against ?
Thanks
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 7 novembre 2008 17:22
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] Re: ErrString =3D Truncated UDP DNS response
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
=20
Hello
Check glst.conf file for returned values !
Correct values should be :
generr=3D0
rejerr=3D3
Should be read :
generr=0
rejerr=3
(bad utf8 handling by ecartis :( )
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rosario Pingaro
Envoye : vendredi 7 novembre 2008 10:18
A : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] glst.conf
I added this lines to glst.conf to whitelist my cusotmers' ip:
xnet=93.88.96.0,255.255.240.0
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rosario Pingaro
Envoy=E9 : samedi 25 octobre 2008 21:58
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] glst on an only smtp server
In our design we have two mail servers, one for pop3 and one for smtp.
The GLST
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 22 octobre 2008 02:57
=C0 : XMail mailing list
Objet : [xmail] Re: email address validation (RFC2822...)
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Francis
=20
As RFC2822 is for the DATA section of an smtp transaction, it is not to =
be
considered at smtp level :)
At smtp level you should only refer to RFC 2821 :)
RFC 2821 (smtp protocol) says somethink about MAIL FROM and RCPT TO =
syntaxes
and checks:
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de gbainbridge
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 8 octobre 2008 01:28
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Incoming mails bouncing
Since posting my previous query, I have set-up an MX record to=20
point to my
server,
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de gbainbridge
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 8 octobre 2008 01:13
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Problem with pop3links
How does the content of your pop3links.tab file look like?
This is it. Note that
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de gbainbridge
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 8 octobre 2008 13:40
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Problem with pop3links
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
=20
=20
You have only one pop3 account at mail.myisp.com
It is currently:
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ALLOW 1
OK
Then various server.tab file parameters (SmtpConfig if used, disable
temporaly custmaplist in case, ...)
SmtpConfig mail-auth
Offending configuration found :)
If you set SmtpConfig like this you imply that ALL
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mardi 30 septembre 2008 15:01
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] Re: Question/Suggestion about smtp logs and=20
CustMapsList
or spammers. tab
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, CLEMENT
Hello Davide
Actually I have CustMapsList settings with :0, meaning wait for auth
before reject
In this configuration, each time a sender is in the 'rbl', and it does not
'auth' I have two entries in smtp logs, sample entries :
mx.groupeab.com mx.groupeab.com 201.78.167.81
Better place is mailproc.tab file in any cases as you are sure you will =
run
the attachment check only for the needed users/redirects (can easily =
change
for a user when not at all redirected to google, so only mailproc need
changes for the redirect and removing the filter, ...)
In fact
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mardi 16 septembre 2008 20:19
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Problem with empty DefaultSMTPGateways
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Oliver St=F6neberg wrote:
There is a
From time to time, after posting to this list, I receive this mail :
=
Received: from smtp.paradisegalleries.com ([206.71.164.135]:53787)
by mx.groupeab.com with [XMail 1.25 ESMTP Server]
id S49CB17 for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from ;
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:07:39
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Stefano Pascucci
Envoy=E9 : lundi 15 septembre 2008 20:42
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Question about spam-address.tab filtering
Hi all
I have noticed an annoying problem regarding
Just a question :
Does an 'mv' convert CRLF to CR ? I don't remember that :/
Just a suggestion :
Except if the copy/transfert program used to pass mail files from the
windows system to the linux system have options to convert crlf to cr, =
I
think if Rob want to fully convert windows maibox
Does an 'mv' convert CRLF to CR ? I don't remember that :/
must be read as :
Does an 'mv' convert CRLF to LF ? I don't remember that :/
-^^=20
:)
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de CLEMENT Francis
Envoy=E9
Hello Edinilson
Seems strange because here i use w2k all patchs (I just run again
windowsupdate either critical or not to be sure, all is installed, none
waiting in 'queue' ;) ) with xmail 1.25 (not tryed yet 1.26-prexx) and =
never
had this drwatson with neither ctrlclnt nor xmail
Are you sure
Hello Edinilson
First at all, can you confirm if the clients IPs are /aren't presently =
in
the blacklists mentionned ?
Any entries in spammers.tab file that could match they IPs ?
At third retry, can you confirm that auth login is involved (in smtp =
log
file, last field confirm auth showing
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 12 juin 2008 07:50
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: XMail 1.25 Win32
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
I don=B4t know exactly why but drwtsn32.exe
Hello Davide and guys
I just received this NDR when trying to send to the destination domain
mail.sy :
ErrCode = -109
ErrString = Unable to get UDP DNS response
SMAIL SMTP-Send EDNS = mail.sy SMTP = myserverfqdn From = senderemail
To = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Failed !
SMTP-Error = Unable to get UDP
Does any others parts of you FreeBsd changed recently ? (some packages
updates, new software install, or dependencies for the aboves, =
especialy
core system components or openssl, ...)
Did you use last 1.25 'stable' or previous 'pre' version ?
Can you try the other 1.25 version ? (older or
Simply add this mailproc.tab file to any SERVER2 accounts :
smtprelay[TAB]SERVER1_fqdn_or_ip
(you can add automaticaly this file using your sync batch on each server2
created account)
Alternate solution easier to 'sync' :
Don't create 'mailboxes' on server2 when doing sync with server1 but
Deal Mr Hal Dell
It was just a joke, because your Postini presentation looked like a
'promotional' mail, so take it like a joke :)
Sorry if I offended you, it was not wanted.
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Hal Dell
Envoy=E9 :
I suggested Mr Har Dell to simply add another ip to xmail server, then
lookup down xmail to accept only postini servers on this ip with a =
firewall
rule, and use a smtpconfig Mailauth for original xmail ip.
Setup will be :
Xmail server with two ips :
- current one, with no changes in current
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Hal Dell
Envoy=E9 : lundi 5 mai 2008 17:55
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
However, you have to understand this is a huge issue
for my customers and a lot of my customers
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 03/05/08 06:49
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
On Fri, 2 May 2008, David Lord wrote:
On 2 May 2008 at 10:27, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello...
For those of you who don't know Postini -- the company was founded
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 30/04/08 22:06
Objet: [xmail] Re: another glst example of not picking up trips
I'll be darned. I just turned on the logs and did a quick test and the
logging works fine. I can't believe I never knew that was
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dale Qualls
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 30 avril 2008 04:09
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] glst issue with trips not being recognized
Davide (or anyone):
First of all, thanks in advance for any help I
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de fred
Envoy=E9 : mardi 29 avril 2008 22:08
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Problem receiving mails from specific domain
UPDATE:
It does NOT work if I remove everything in filters.post-data.tab
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart Mortelmans
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 30 avril 2008 11:14
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Problem receiving mails from specific domain
PS : Notice that the order in your post-data filters
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dale Qualls
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 30 avril 2008 14:28
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: glst issue with trips not being recognized
Thanks for your response, Francis, I appreciate it.
Am I missing
First you definitively have to enable xmail filter logs.
What is your glst database size at this time ?
I remember I had some problems when the GDM glst database reached =
10MB in
size (seems only on win32 servers), so I had to run a batch to clean up =
it
regulary (each night did the job keeping
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Oliver St=F6neberg
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 30 avril 2008 17:01
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Invalid mail addresses?
Today I recognised, that some mails with invalid mail addresses were=20
received
:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Oliver St=F6neberg wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Seems there was some post about this.
The BIG figure is when the final domain have multiple
mx servers.
Suppose the final domain have two mx and one is
misconfigured and return
a 5xx
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Harald Schneider
Envoy=E9 : lundi 28 avril 2008 13:31
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Compiling XMail 1.25 fails on OSX Leopard
Compiling fails with
$ OSTYPE=3DDarwin make -f Makefile.bsd
gcc -o
: xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Compiling XMail 1.25 fails on OSX Leopard
I see
/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/usr/lib/libkvm.dylib
which is not in the system's search path. Anything I can tweak with =20
this ?
-- Harald
Am 28.04.2008 um 15:27 schrieb CLEMENT Francis:
-Message
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 25/04/08 10:33
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
At 06.45 25/04/08, you wrote:
Greylisting is not working as well as it used to... Verizon, Hotmail
and
Yahoo Mail seem to not re-send correctly when Graylisting is
Many of us use free solutions easy to interface with xmail :)
Even if Postini is a great product (don't know, never heard about it until
you posted your problem), it seems it does not 'support' smtp auth (many
other products free or not can) as xmail miss some functionalities.
So no one is perfect
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 24/04/08 05:21
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
Dear Francis -
Effectively, it seems the MailAuth feature does not take into
account the 'WhiteList' parameter in the smtp.ipprop.tab file.
But should it be the
Another possibility, as I said, is to use :
- xmail CustMapList (I use spamhaust.org very good)
- Davide glst for xmail (excluding auth users with eax setting in smtp-in
filter)
- some av filter for xmail
With this solution, you stop more than 90% spams/viruses (for me it's
actually more than 99%
Cool :)
Thanks Davide !
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 24/04/08 17:17
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Hal Dell wrote:
Dear Clement Francis / Davide -
First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Date: 24/04/08 17:04
Objet: [xmail] Re: multiple smtprelay servers for custdomains and 5xx er
rors
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Seems there was some post about this.
The BIG figure is when the final
After re-read rfc2821 I find this :
4.2.5 Reply Codes After DATA and the Subsequent CRLF.CRLF
snip to last paragraph
When an SMTP server returns a permanent error status (5yz) code after
the DATA command is completely with CRLF.CRLF, it MUST NOT make
any subsequent attempt to
: 23/04/08 05:57
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
Dear Clement Francis / Davide -
First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax says :
Address selection mask are formed by an IP address
(network) plus the number of valid bits inside the network mask
[...snip...]
96.227.65.4/32
First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax says :
Address selection mask are formed by an IP address (network) plus the
number of valid bits inside the network mask
So change this 'smtp.ipprop.tab' line :
96.227.65.4 WhiteList=1
with this this one :
96.227.65.4/32WhiteList=1
You are right, and I can add that the 'with' value is not rfc compliant ( it
must content a 'iana' defined protocol, here SMTP, nothing else, but many
smtp software add here the software name and version)
But consider this rfc 2821 text about 'gateways' :
---
3.8.2 Received Lines in
Seems there was some post about this.
The BIG figure is when the final domain have multiple mx servers.
Suppose the final domain have two mx and one is misconfigured and return
a 5xx.
So if xmail tries first the 'bad' server, what to do next ?
On a atomic try/retry cycle, you have two choices
xmail using 85MB ram ?
Here on a win2000 server, it take up 15MB max (on low traffic it use 7MB
average) !?!?
Could you give us some information about your server setup ? (os, version,
ram, ...) and xmail CMD_LINE parameters ?
And some 'bad' destination domains to have some real example (the no
All is in the 'doc' :) !
But I will give you some point of 'doc' view :
The basic method is to setup xmail normaly (domain, accounts) then use =
a
mailproc.tab file per user that content :
redirect[tab]finaladdress
(see doc about mailproc.tab files)
BUT a very simple way, if this server
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
