Nothing to be worried about, its a big undertaking and should take a
lot of time, but be aware that the more algs you know the easier it is
to pick up more, it's an exponential learning curve from my experience.
I finished L1, just need a couple more T1 and I'll have all the no CP.
You're
approach.
Gilles.
2005/12/13, Doug Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Who here wants STM optimized algs? We aren't Corners First
people
here, I used to search only in STM on principle, but I no longer
feel it holds much potential. I use it a lot for my ELL though,
but
that's totally different
What do you mean by double-Sune? Are you refering to the H1 cases? I
already have those. The one where there is no EP is my slowest, feel
free to work on that one, it's the only non-trivial one there I
think, the ohter's are easy/fast. Work on the other H-Orientation
cases, I don't think many
BOOO
--- In zbmethod@yahoogroups.com, Johannes Laire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In zbmethod@yahoogroups.com, Bob Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haha, finally somebody new voted with a new opinion! :)
~ Bob
I did it :P
I just can't believe that it's possible to solve
It was unfortunate that Chris had to leave so early at our last
meeting.
I was hoping to get in some of those Advanced Team BLD solves with
him as you call it. I know his numbering system better than he does.
And we have very similar naming scheme for the ZBF2Ls.
The only problem is that I
Thanks Bob!
Made me sit down and count up the cases I know w.r.t the
probabilities. I was ONE case away from knowing more than Chris (at
least on paper) for ZBLL. I was a bit suprised at the high percentages
here. So anyhow I decided to learn one more case: T1 with edges H.
That did the trick
Correction: +mirrors only, I counted inverses separately.
I can generate the algs and give an average move statistic on this
using ACube. It would take ACube less than 1 minute on my newest
machine to generate. It would take me like 5-10 minutes all together
to report on my findings.
Right
