[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Bill!
RAF,

You raise a lot of questions here.  I'll try to answer in a general way rather 
than going through them one by one.

IMO...

All judgement and classifications are from YOUR point-of-view.  So when I said 
'sincere student' I meant a person who is sincerely seeking relief from 
suffering.  That is all.  I used the word 'student' because in the context of 
the saying there was also a teacher, but certainly there are many who sincerely 
seek relief from suffering who do not have an access to a teacher.  The person 
seeking relief is the only one who can judge whether he/she is really 'sincere' 
or not.

I don't contend that there is only one way or one set of techniques to do this. 
 There are many ways (paths/techniques) to alleviate suffering.  Zen is just a 
name for one category which include Japanese Soto and Rinzai Zen Buddhism and 
many others.  Chan Buddhism is very similar.  Modern Western Zen Buddhist 
teachings can be effective.  I do draw a line somewhere though.  Not just 
EVERYTHING is zen as some seem to want to believe.  I'm not saying that 
whatever others practice is wrong or ineffective, but I will say from time to 
time that what they describe is not zen - IMO...

My point was just that if the seeker is sincere there are many ways available 
and these are not limited to tutoring by an experienced teacher.  Personally I 
think going the teacher route is the best way, but that's probably because it 
worked well for me.

...Bill!
 

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:

 On 12/9/2012 10:15 PM, Bill! wrote:
  a sincere student
 
 I have no reason to doubt the truth of that statement, but it raises a 
 question in my mind, in regard to what qualifies a student to be 
 considered sincere, /and by whom/? Obviously, if someone 'hangs 
 around' a zendo or sangha for some reason other than attaining their own 
 realization, that is insincere, but what about the (granted, probably 
 unusual, but not merely hypothetical) case of a layman who has no 
 contact with teachers, sanghas, or even other Buddhist laypersons, and 
 pursues a practice for decades: /can/ such a person be insincere? What 
 would the term signify, if applied in such a case? If, for instance, 
 they 'use' some of the techniques that sangha-members also use: is there 
 anyone who can say that their usage of these ancient techniques is in 
 some way unjustified, let alone 'insincere'? Perhaps because the 'goal' 
 is 'non-standard'? That might be considered heresy, by some, (by whom, 
 and on what 'authority'?) but insincerity?
 
 On my view, the Great Way 'belongs' to anyone who sets out upon it; is 
 that in accordance with your own view? Also, I think the analogy to a 
 'way' breaks down if we consider the fact that someone might utilize the 
 ancient means to attain a state which, let us suppose, might not be 
 recognized as 'correct' by someone who is (or merely believes they are) 
 the heir of a tradition. Such an heir might well not be willing to grant 
 inka, but have they any objective basis on which to judge that someone 
 who chose to attain that non-standard realization is insincere?
 
 Just thinking about it.







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Bill!
Joe has expressed below my understanding of inca.  It is a permission to teach, 
and does imply that the recipient both wants to and is able (in the opinion of 
his teacher)to teach.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Joe desert_woodworker@... wrote:

 RAF,
 
  and what did they or their heirs say in regard to their awards of inka?
 
 By the way, when it comes to _inka_, a thought comes to mind about what it 
 signifies.
 
 Inka is given to a student who has awakened, and who has finished the formal 
 part of training in the Master's lineage.  But there are two other conditions 
 which must obtain.  These are, that the student must want to teach; and, that 
 the student must be ABLE to teach.  The student's feeling able to teach 
 sometimes depends on the student having a place to teach, a space, a setting, 
 in which to teach (rather than just out in the open air, for example).
 
 So, Inka is a seal of approval of a student's realization and worth, and an 
 acknowledgement that the teacher knows that the student wants to teach and 
 that he/she CAN teach.  On the latter point, the student has probably served 
 as an apprentice teacher under the master, and been trained in teaching, and 
 has demonstrated ability, there, and been accepted by students training under 
 him/her.
 
 I've just given a little fleshing-out of what I've gathered over the years 
 that inka means.
 
 Yet, I find no answer to your question arising in me over the past days.
 
 Now, *these* answers are publicly available: my teacher Sheng Yen writes 
 something of his training and experience and his being given authority to 
 teach in two lineages of China, in his autobiography, FOOTPRINTS IN THE SNOW 
 -- THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF A CHINESE BUDDHIST MONK, 2008, Doubleday.  It's a 
 small book, 208 pages, and he calls this account of his life 
 impressionistic, and not a perfect record  (I don't think I've known 
 another autobiographer ever to admit that).
 
 --Joe
 
 
  R A Fonda rafonda@ wrote:
 
  On 12/9/2012 11:10 AM, Joe wrote:
   There are confirmatory signs which a teacher can recognize
  
  I find myself more interested in the occasions when a /teacher/ emits a 
  sign of /their/ illumination. Might you, or Bill, share with us some 
  instances you have encountered in your time immersed in the American zen 
  scene? You have mentioned Bernie whatshisname and Aitken, for instance; 
  what did they do or say that stands out in your memory? Of course, I 
  don't mean to confine such observations to them, and what did they or 
  their heirs say in regard to their awards of inka?







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread mike brown
RAF,
If cultures manifest the genetic propensities and capacities of their 
demography, then what does that say about the American people/culture and the 
dropping of the atomic bomb on those 2 civilian populated cities?
Mike

--- On Tue, 11/12/12, R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com wrote:

From: R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion  and zen
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, 11 December, 2012, 15:07
















 



  



  
  
  
  
  
On 12/10/2012 10:31 PM, mike brown wrote:

  I`d say the social parasites are very few in number (at
least on the lower end of the economic scale). 



You'll note that I gave 'pride of place' to the kleptocrats,
  who do damage all out of proportion to their numbers, not least
  through their unholy alliance with the political elites.




  People are born into ghettoes and slums thru no fault of
their own. Like famine, these places exist because of the
economic system we have inherited. 



Cultures manifest the genetic propensities and capacities of
  their demography. Consider Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs Detroit in 1945,
  compared to today ...




  Let`s also not forget that ... a pool of unemployed is great
for the capitalist class to keep wages low.



Quite true (and I was a worker and hourly wage earner, except
  when I created my own jobs) and that is precisely why the
  political elite love having a pool of illegal immigrant labor to
  depress wages and keep workers 'job scared'.



RAF

  




 









  










Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Edgar Owen
Joe,

Yes, that's right. Historically most monks and masters have all been beggars 
depending on food donated by working people

Edgar



On Dec 10, 2012, at 9:33 PM, Joe wrote:

 Merle,
 
 Historically, those old places lived on the handouts and donations of others, 
 already!, themselves!, and they had to be very, very careful about who they 
 let in. In old China, there was even some sanction by the government, and the 
 monasteries had to be extra scrupulous and truly frugal, and squeeze every 
 resource to dedicate them for their established students, and for the 
 best-of-the-best incoming neophyte candidates. They were like sports teams!: 
 they didn't just recruit every neighborhood waif drifting in, to shoot some 
 hoops. They knew how to recognize talent. And there was an established way of 
 proving one's fervor and stamina. If you failed those tests, they sent you 
 home to your parents.
 
 This is called true compassion! It resulted in a vibrant teaching system, and 
 the preservation of the living Dharma, to this day.
 
 Else, we would not even be typing here! ;-)
 
 The monasteries were Places of the Way, not way-places (not Inns).
 
 I prostrate to those old teachers, head-monks, head-nuns, and those 
 Gate-Keepers. And to the folks who applied and tried, but who were not suited 
 to that life, and were turned away.
 
 --Joe
 
 - Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:
 
  compassion doeth not judge.
  
  .if a man needth shelter and food for a thousand nights that is what must 
  be done in the name of universal love and compassion.
  
  ..none of us know another man's journey...
 
 



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Edgar Owen
RAF,

Yes, there was a horrible story on the news just yesterday of parents down in 
W. Virginia encouraging their kids to fail their school classes so they could 
continue to claim they were 'disabled' and collect $500/month disability 
payments on their kids...

As you say, generosity towards the poor often perpetuates their poverty Any 
generosity on the part of the government should be aimed at improving the 
underlying condition rather than perpetuating it...

Edgar



On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:27 PM, R A Fonda wrote:

 On 12/10/2012 9:33 PM, Joe wrote:
 
 those old places lived on the handouts and donations of others, already!, 
 themselves!, and they had to be very, very careful about who they let in.
 
 Very true, but even today, let us imagine merle walking up to a modern 
 American zen center and telling them that her superior vision of compassion 
 obliges them to become homeless shelters, giving needy people a thousand 
 days of food and shelter, or ten days, or even one day.
 
 One could hardly ask for a better example of how some people confuse higher 
 consciousness with their self-righteous generosity with other people's 
 money. I have no problem with them demonstrating compassion  by giving their 
 assets away ... I wonder how many homeless people she has living in HER 
 'squat'? The problem is that they band together to empower politicians to 
 steal from the productive, and the political elites then share the loot with 
 their kleptocrat allies or waste it on wars, or pay off their client 
 electorates such as the government 'workers' and very little gets spent on 
 the needy, many of whom, unfortunately, were social parasites rather than 
 people who just had some bad luck. However, government mismanagement 
 (including taking so much from the productive workers and investors) has now 
 crippled the economy, so that there really ARE a lot of people who would LIKE 
 to work, but there just aren't any jobs for them. Moreover, there are about 
 the same number of unemployed American citizens as there are illegal 
 immigrants, and people who share merle's views are SO compassionate toward 
 those illegal immigrants that they don't stop to think how cruel it is for 
 American workers to lose their homes because 'compassion' precludes reserving 
 jobs for our own citizens.
 
 RAF
 
 



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Edgar Owen
Mike,

Couldn't agree more. All the so called 'royal's should be put to work in the 
fields! Let them do some real work for a change!

They are the biggest, most expensive social parasites of all

Edgar



On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:46 PM, mike brown wrote:

 the biggest welfare cheats are the queen.. and her hangers on..
 
 I saw a great quote on Facebook:  `So Kate Middleton is pregnant.. I thought 
 it was government policy to discourage those who don`t work to have 
 children`.  Awesome!
 
 Mike
 
 --- On Tue, 11/12/12, Merle Lester merlewiit...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
 From: Merle Lester merlewiit...@yahoo.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, 11 December, 2012, 14:35
 
  
 
  yes mike..spot on...that is exactly how it is..
 
 .however  the old story still holds a punch..those dam dole bludgers... lazy 
 pricks...go get a job.. makes those who are safe and secure so so self 
 righteous..i can do it why cannot you?
 . the biggest welfare cheats are the queen of england and her hangers on... 
 where oh where is the guillotine?...merle
 
  
 Comrade RAF,
 
 I`d say the social parasites are very few in number (at least on the lower 
 end of the economic scale). People are born into ghettoes and slums thru no 
 fault of their own. Like famine, these places exist because of the economic 
 system we have inherited. It`s easy for those who have inherited wealth, or 
 who have had lucky breaks, to exhort others to `pull themselves up by their 
 bootstraps`. Let`s also not forget that governments often squash attempts at 
 self sufficiency in communes etc. and a pool of unemployed is great for the 
 capitalist class to keep wages low.
 
 Bother Mike
 
 --- On Tue, 11/12/12, R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com wrote:
 
 From: R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, 11 December, 2012, 14:27
 
  
 On 12/10/2012 9:33 PM, Joe wrote:
 those old places lived on the handouts and donations of others, already!, 
 themselves!, and they had to be very, very careful about who they let in.
 
 Very true, but even today, let us imagine merle walking up to a modern 
 American zen center and telling them that her superior vision of compassion 
 obliges them to become homeless shelters, giving needy people a thousand 
 days of food and shelter, or ten days, or even one day.
 
 One could hardly ask for a better example of how some people confuse higher 
 consciousness with their self-righteous generosity with other people's 
 money. I have no problem with them demonstrating compassion  by giving their 
 assets away ... I wonder how many homeless people she has living in HER 
 'squat'? The problem is that they band together to empower politicians to 
 steal from the productive, and the political elites then share the loot with 
 their kleptocrat allies or waste it on wars, or pay off their client 
 electorates such as the government 'workers' and very little gets spent on 
 the needy, many of whom, unfortunately, were social parasites rather than 
 people who just had some bad luck. However, government mismanagement 
 (including taking so much from the productive workers and investors) has now 
 crippled the economy, so that there really ARE a lot of people who would LIKE 
 to work, but there just aren't any jobs for them. Moreover, there are about 
 the same number of unemployed American citizens as there are illegal 
 immigrants, and people who share merle's views are SO compassionate toward 
 those illegal immigrants that they don't stop to think how cruel it is for 
 American workers to lose their homes because 'compassion' precludes reserving 
 jobs for our own citizens.
 
 RAF
 
 
 
 



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Edgar Owen
Joe, and Merle,

More PC nonsense Joe. There are greater population densities in all the slums 
of the world than in elite wealthy neighborhoods.

AND they need Buddhist teaching a lot more than the very well off.

I agree with Merle here. Is it true compassion or more a desire to make a 
profit and become well known?

Edgar




On Dec 10, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Joe wrote:

 Merle,
 
 Please don't let your prejudices blacken your heart toward Subhana Barzaghi, 
 Roshi.
 
 She lives in Sydney because it's a high population center, and *THERE ARE 
 PEOPLE* there WHO WANT TO *LEARN*. If she lived at the foot of your hill, 
 instead, who the hell would she have to teach? Only YOU!? ;-)
 
 You see? Don't be so silly; please.
 
 Trust me. She is a wonderful radical. You are a Tory by comparison. I doubt 
 you'd last ten seconds under her eye, or in her compassionate care. ;-)
 
 And, ...I know you would *LOVE* her.
 
 Right, not much of her art on her site at present. What happened? Used to be 
 tons. 
 
 Just Google her full name, and maybe add art to the string. You may find 
 her paintings depicted elsewhere.
 
 Her art is in many books; some of them are Zen books.
 
 She could maybe have taught Mister Kandinsky something about The Spiritual 
 in Art. Or, certainly inspired him, at least in his writing, where it seems 
 to me it would have helped. ;-)
 
 --Joe
 
  Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:
 
   i check it out...yes i have googled her beforethank you for your 
  interest
  
  .not much of her art there...
  
   will i send her a message?..
  
  mmm 
  
  i am concerned she bases herself in mosman sydney.. very expensive upper 
  crust area...
  
  i believe we need to reach out to the poor and needy.
   to do the work of buddha and christ..
  
  .and following in their paths we discard the need to charge money..
  to give is to give freely.
  .to love is to love wholeheartedly..
  to care is to care without strings attached.
  .you give till you can give no more and then you give again.
  .that is the path to enlightenment..
  let the teacher come to the mountain top.
   then we will see...
  have a wise and precious day.. for you will not see this day again. 
 
 



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

Joe,

I was very impressed by this:

 By the time Vinoba had reached the conference, two thousand acres had 
been given back to the poorest villagers. Inspired by Vinoba's work, 
Vimala also walked across India from east to west and north to south and 
eventually ten million acres of land was given back to the landless poor 
without a single hand from the bureaucracy. 


Two important factors here:

The land was FREELY GIVEN, which is a true act of compassion

The land was not TAKEN by the government, which is simply THEFT

Too many people consider themselves compassionate because they are 
willing to empower the government to steal from some to give to others 
they consider more deserving.


I concede that some people deserve to have assets confiscated because 
they stole from others. For instance, Jon Corzine stole some of my 
hard-earned retirement funds, but since he is a crony and fund-raiser 
for Obama, not one penny of his ill-gotten gains have been taken for the 
benefit of those he victimized; he remains a billionaire and has never 
even been charged with a crime. If I could take his money and distribute 
it to those from whom he stole, I would do so, but that would simply be 
justice. To feel so 'compassionate' toward the poor that I help to 
empower the government to steal money from productive people to give to 
others is neither justice nor compassion.



RAF


Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

On 12/11/2012 5:49 AM, mike brown wrote:
what does that say about the American people/culture and the dropping 
of the atomic bomb on those 2 civilian populated cities?


First, let me say that I believe the US DROVE the Japanese into that 
war, and that the American people who supported that, and our other 
'discretionary wars' are criminals.


Then consider that the people who were adults then, and had some 
complicity in those war crimes, seem (in most cases) to have escaped any 
consequences, or even benefited.


OTOH, those of us who were too young to be guilty are now suffering the 
natural consequences of our nation's evil history ... the parents have 
eaten sour grapes and the children's teeth are set on edge.


I want to believe that those who seem to escape this life without 
suffering the consequences of their evil acts will be reborn to suffer, 
as, for instance, in the coming collapse and die-off.


RAF


Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

On 12/11/2012 8:51 AM, Edgar Owen wrote:

Any generosity on the part of the government


The main problem with government generosity is that the government 
doesn't HAVE anything to give that it did not TAKE from someone. Now 
some user fees, and resource extraction taxes, etc... are more or less 
'theft-free' but they don't come close to covering the costs of our 
bloated US government. Worse, the political elites have made such an 
awful mess of things that huge numbers of people are impoverished and 
unemployed and NEED assistance. Worse still, this leads a majority of 
the electorate to vote for a government that promises to fill their rice 
bowl.


I fear there is no solution except for this dystopia to collapse and the 
unsustainable population to crash.


RAF


Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

On 12/11/2012 3:02 AM, Bill! wrote:
when I said 'sincere student' I meant a person who is sincerely 
seeking relief from suffering. 


Thank you; I had wondered if that quotation about sincerity (in response 
to my query about what light some of these teachers had emitted) was a 
hint that it was a sign of insincerity to ask such questions. You note 
that I did not take any offense, if such were the case, but simply 
considered whether one who practices only for their own benefit, without 
interaction with teachers, sangha, or even other laypersons, /could/ be 
considered insincere.


We seem to be in essential agreement, here:

The person seeking relief is the only one who can judge whether he/she 
is really 'sincere' or not.

and here as well:
Not just EVERYTHING is zen as some seem to want to believe. I'm not 
saying that whatever others practice is wrong or ineffective, but I 
will say from time to time that what they describe is not zen - IMO...


As I put it:

 Is this Zen? Who cares?! 

meaning no disrespect to the tradition that I revere enough to follow 
for decades, but only saying, that I can ACCEPT, without agreement, the 
view that some might have that I am not manifesting what THEY believe is 
Zen, but view the Way I am working out for myself to be appropriate for me.


RAF


[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
Merle,

You know your geography and neighborhoods there much better than I.  Who knows 
where the teacher sometimes teaches.  Do you know her full teaching schedule?  
We only know where she is based.  The fact that she is at Melbourne, often, 
tickles me, too: one of my dearest friends and Dharma sisters practices there.  
;-)

Note that Subhana is also a psychiatrist: maybe she's really *needed* in 
money-bags-town!, or whatever it's called.

As far as Mr. Kandinsky is concerned, it's only his writing that I found 
lackluster, not his Art ...as I've told you four times!

Subhana is such an accomplished person!, and younger than I am.  By 2 1/2 
years.  She's not even sixty, yet, Merle.

--Joe

 Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 no art..i cannot find any joe it would be on her site if it was so 
why are you knocking kandinsky?..i doubt if subhana's would match his master 
pieces...
  yes sydney..yes however..mosman is where the money bags lie..blacktown is 
 packed with people...why not do a few sessions there...?...you do not know if 
 people will listen unless you try..merle






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Edgar Owen
Yes, I agree

Edgar



On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:02 AM, R A Fonda wrote:

 On 12/11/2012 8:51 AM, Edgar Owen wrote:
 
 Any generosity on the part of the government
 
 The main problem with government generosity is that the government doesn't 
 HAVE anything to give that it did not TAKE from someone. Now some user fees, 
 and resource extraction taxes, etc... are more or less 'theft-free' but they 
 don't come close to covering the costs of our bloated US government. Worse, 
 the political elites have made such an awful mess of things that huge numbers 
 of people are impoverished and unemployed and NEED assistance. Worse still, 
 this leads a majority of the electorate to vote for a government that 
 promises to fill their rice bowl. 
 
 I fear there is no solution except for this dystopia to collapse and the 
 unsustainable population to crash. 
 
 RAF
 
 



[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
RAF,

I disagree with your simply statement.  I find it simplistic.

In a DEMOCRATIC society -- which India is -- a social contract among the people 
establishes a constitution and a government.  The imposition of taxes and even 
taking of lands as eminent domain for social purposes is a function of 
Legislature.  Such taking did not happen in the case of the lands that were 
given for occupation by the Untouchables, which you feel impressed by.  I am 
also impressed by the donors' generosity (or motivation by guilt; or, worse, 
income- or real-estate-tax-avoidance incentive).

But, now, I know that people directly connected with tax payments and takings 
often feel ripped-off, and say they do, but they forget in that instance about 
the social contract.  And, I claim so do you when you write...

 ...TAKEN by the government, which is simply THEFT

It's a small point, which I extract from your appreciative comment about a 
small piece of Subhana's teisho, but I think it betrays a mis-understanding of 
the social contract on your part, or else you are letting your personal anger 
about something take center-stage.   Do you listen to a lot of pot-boiler AM 
radio in daytime in USA?  Does hatred and lack of understanding of the social 
contract pollute all the *rest* of your politics, too?  It's an important 
point, RAF.  To consider.  Not to expound upon here, however.

You think you are an Individual, but in fact you are also a member of Society.

All this leads back to Zen practice, you know, and -- we hope -- to Awakening!

With wishes,

--Joe

- R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:

 Joe,
 
 I was very impressed by this:
 
   By the time Vinoba had reached the conference, two thousand acres had 
 been given back to the poorest villagers. Inspired by Vinoba's work, 
 Vimala also walked across India from east to west and north to south and 
 eventually ten million acres of land was given back to the landless poor 
 without a single hand from the bureaucracy. 
 
 Two important factors here:
 
 The land was FREELY GIVEN, which is a true act of compassion
 
 The land was not TAKEN by the government, which is simply THEFT
 
 Too many people consider themselves compassionate because they are 
 willing to empower the government to steal from some to give to others 
 they consider more deserving.
 
 I concede that some people deserve to have assets confiscated because 
 they stole from others. For instance, Jon Corzine stole some of my 
 hard-earned retirement funds, but since he is a crony and fund-raiser 
 for Obama, not one penny of his ill-gotten gains have been taken for the 
 benefit of those he victimized; he remains a billionaire and has never 
 even been charged with a crime. If I could take his money and distribute 
 it to those from whom he stole, I would do so, but that would simply be 
 justice. To feel so 'compassionate' toward the poor that I help to 
 empower the government to steal money from productive people to give to 
 others is neither justice nor compassion.






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
RAF,

To give you the Zen perspective on the matter you close with, trust me, there 
is NO such person (neither the they, nor me).

 I am not manifesting what THEY believe is Zen, but view the Way I am working 
 out for myself to be appropriate for me.

And yet, we practice.  This is called daily life, daily practice.

--Joe

 R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:

 On 12/11/2012 3:02 AM, Bill! wrote:
  when I said 'sincere student' I meant a person who is sincerely 
  seeking relief from suffering. 
 
 Thank you; I had wondered if that quotation about sincerity (in response 
 to my query about what light some of these teachers had emitted) was a 
 hint that it was a sign of insincerity to ask such questions. You note 
 that I did not take any offense, if such were the case, but simply 
 considered whether one who practices only for their own benefit, without 
 interaction with teachers, sangha, or even other laypersons, /could/ be 
 considered insincere.
 
 We seem to be in essential agreement, here:
 
  The person seeking relief is the only one who can judge whether he/she 
  is really 'sincere' or not.
 and here as well:
  Not just EVERYTHING is zen as some seem to want to believe. I'm not 
  saying that whatever others practice is wrong or ineffective, but I 
  will say from time to time that what they describe is not zen - IMO...
 
 As I put it:
 
   Is this Zen? Who cares?! 
 
 meaning no disrespect to the tradition that I revere enough to follow 
 for decades, but only saying, that I can ACCEPT, without agreement, the 
 view that some might have that I am not manifesting what THEY believe is 
 Zen, but view the Way I am working out for myself to be appropriate for me.






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

On 12/11/2012 11:01 AM, Joe wrote:

I disagree with your simply statement. I find it simplistic.


That is unsurprising, as most people accept the idea that if a MAJORITY 
of your fellow inhabitants of a territory agree to rob you, and divide 
the loot according to a democratic procedure that it is no longer a 
crime, as it would be if the recipients directly assaulted you on the 
street. Actually, I see it as WORSE, because so much of that loot no 
longer goes to the life needs of your fellow inhabitants, but is 
dissipated on WARS and the kleptocrat cronies of the political elites.


I know that people directly connected with tax payments and takings 
often feel ripped-off, and say they do,


Imagine that; and do you find that unenlightened of them?

It's a small point, which I extract from your appreciative comment 
about a small piece of Subhana's teisho, but I think it betrays a 
mis-understanding of the social contract on your part


I think it is a MAJOR point, but first let me comment on your innuendo 
that I lack the intellectual capacity to develop my own views of such 
matters and am influenced by


a lot of pot-boiler AM radio in daytime in USA? 


I NEVER listen to radio or watch TV, but I do confess to having been 
influenced by/some/ of what Lysander Spooner wrote, among others who 
have given the social contract a lot deeper thought than you appear to 
have.


Does hatred 


So I am a 'hater' because I want to dispose of my earnings according to 
my own priorities, which includes /personal/ acts of charity toward 
those I have the karma to encounter?


and lack of understanding of the social contract 


see above

pollute all the *rest* of your politics, too? 


Oh, absolutely: my feelings about personal freedom and government 
tyranny certainly do pollute my views on the social contract, but I 
don't really have any politics, as I despair of any improvement in the 
sociopolitical sphere (regarding it from the perspective of evolutionary 
psychology and seeing it as the manifestation of the population's 
genetic propensities and capacities) and only hope to leave my family 
able to survive the predicable collapse of this dystopia.



It's an important point, RAF.


Oh, I agree that it is important, but don't think there is anything that 
can be done to ameliorate it, except through personal acts of 
providence. You may recall that the Buddha said everything was unfolding 
as it must.


RAF


[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
RAF,

Do I know how to elicit a response from the tender, or don't I?  ;-)

I'm glad we're done with that.

When it comes to the social contract and all it contains, it is ineffectual (of 
you) to try to gang up on the majority when you are in the minority.  But, keep 
trying; after all, that's how a majority is BUILT!  Failing a new majority, 
there is Legal recourse for those who believe they have been offended.

Feeling begrudged, alone, will not change things, except to further deteriorate 
the state of one's health and one's civility.

Or, there may be better countries with better systems for you to move to.  It 
may not be too late/soon!  Merle likes Australia, I think.

--Joe

PS I *do* sometimes listen to US-daytime-AM-talk radio: I find it's good to 
know what tunes the devil is playing.

Granted, it's a very difficult Yoga (to sit still for).

 R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:

 On 12/11/2012 11:01 AM, Joe wrote:
  I disagree with your simply statement. I find it simplistic.
 
 That is unsurprising, as most people accept the idea that if a MAJORITY 
 of your fellow inhabitants of a territory agree to rob you, and divide 
 the loot according to a democratic procedure that it is no longer a 
 crime, as it would be if the recipients directly assaulted you on the 
 street. [snip]





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Edgar Owen
Joe,

You believe in an idealized and rather naive view of society. The truth is much 
different, controlled mainly by special interests for their own benefit with 
benefits to the rest of society only sufficient to quell revolt...

Always has been such to greater or lesser degree and likely always will be...

Edgar



On Dec 11, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Joe wrote:

 RAF,
 
 I disagree with your simply statement. I find it simplistic.
 
 In a DEMOCRATIC society -- which India is -- a social contract among the 
 people establishes a constitution and a government. The imposition of taxes 
 and even taking of lands as eminent domain for social purposes is a 
 function of Legislature. Such taking did not happen in the case of the lands 
 that were given for occupation by the Untouchables, which you feel impressed 
 by. I am also impressed by the donors' generosity (or motivation by guilt; 
 or, worse, income- or real-estate-tax-avoidance incentive).
 
 But, now, I know that people directly connected with tax payments and takings 
 often feel ripped-off, and say they do, but they forget in that instance 
 about the social contract. And, I claim so do you when you write...
 
  ...TAKEN by the government, which is simply THEFT
 
 It's a small point, which I extract from your appreciative comment about a 
 small piece of Subhana's teisho, but I think it betrays a mis-understanding 
 of the social contract on your part, or else you are letting your personal 
 anger about something take center-stage. Do you listen to a lot of pot-boiler 
 AM radio in daytime in USA? Does hatred and lack of understanding of the 
 social contract pollute all the *rest* of your politics, too? It's an 
 important point, RAF. To consider. Not to expound upon here, however.
 
 You think you are an Individual, but in fact you are also a member of Society.
 
 All this leads back to Zen practice, you know, and -- we hope -- to Awakening!
 
 With wishes,
 
 --Joe
 
 - R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:
 
  Joe,
  
  I was very impressed by this:
  
   By the time Vinoba had reached the conference, two thousand acres had 
  been given back to the poorest villagers. Inspired by Vinoba's work, 
  Vimala also walked across India from east to west and north to south and 
  eventually ten million acres of land was given back to the landless poor 
  without a single hand from the bureaucracy. 
  
  Two important factors here:
  
  The land was FREELY GIVEN, which is a true act of compassion
  
  The land was not TAKEN by the government, which is simply THEFT
  
  Too many people consider themselves compassionate because they are 
  willing to empower the government to steal from some to give to others 
  they consider more deserving.
  
  I concede that some people deserve to have assets confiscated because 
  they stole from others. For instance, Jon Corzine stole some of my 
  hard-earned retirement funds, but since he is a crony and fund-raiser 
  for Obama, not one penny of his ill-gotten gains have been taken for the 
  benefit of those he victimized; he remains a billionaire and has never 
  even been charged with a crime. If I could take his money and distribute 
  it to those from whom he stole, I would do so, but that would simply be 
  justice. To feel so 'compassionate' toward the poor that I help to 
  empower the government to steal money from productive people to give to 
  others is neither justice nor compassion.
 
 



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance to the
mind's freedom?

It looks to me like it is, but perhaps we shouldn't argue politics and tax
policy here?

Rather than share my partisan arguments, let me simply state that
reasonable people do disagree about these issues. Personally I am grateful
to have been born into a society that believes in vaccination public
schools voting research moon missions and the like.  the society finds it
sensible to pay me for tasks which are enjoyable and allow me to learn and
to master myself, and that seems fine.  I didn't create the society nor
more than a bit of its wealth, so I don't feel like much more than a
temporary steward of the assets I control.

I do know not everyone shares such a perspective, and there's no profit in
arguing. I speak to offer the lurkers the data that the idea of capitalism
without a fixed idea of a personal self can take many forms.

Yours in praeteritio,

--Chris
On Dec 11, 2012 8:52 AM, R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com wrote:



 On 12/11/2012 11:01 AM, Joe wrote:

 I disagree with your simply statement. I find it simplistic.


 That is unsurprising, as most people accept the idea that if a MAJORITY of
 your fellow inhabitants of a territory agree to rob you, and divide the
 loot according to a democratic procedure that it is no longer a crime, as
 it would be if the recipients directly assaulted you on the street.
 Actually, I see it as WORSE, because so much of that loot no longer goes to
 the life needs of your fellow inhabitants, but is dissipated on WARS and
 the kleptocrat cronies of the political elites.

  I know that people directly connected with tax payments and takings often
 feel ripped-off, and say they do,


 Imagine that; and do you find that unenlightened of them?

  It's a small point, which I extract from your appreciative comment about
 a small piece of Subhana's teisho, but I think it betrays a
 mis-understanding of the social contract on your part


 I think it is a MAJOR point, but first let me comment on your innuendo
 that I lack the intellectual capacity to develop my own views of such
 matters and am influenced by

 a lot of pot-boiler AM radio in daytime in USA?


 I NEVER listen to radio or watch TV, but I do confess to having been
 influenced by* some* of what Lysander Spooner wrote, among others who
 have given the social contract a lot deeper thought than you appear to
 have.

 Does hatred


 So I am a 'hater' because I want to dispose of my earnings according to my
 own priorities, which includes *personal* acts of charity toward those I
 have the karma to encounter?

 and lack of understanding of the social contract


 see above

 pollute all the *rest* of your politics, too?


 Oh, absolutely: my feelings about personal freedom and government tyranny
 certainly do pollute my views on the social contract, but I don't
 really have any politics, as I despair of any improvement in the
 sociopolitical sphere (regarding it from the perspective of evolutionary
 psychology and seeing it as the manifestation of the population's genetic
 propensities and capacities) and only hope to leave my family able to
 survive the predicable collapse of this dystopia.

  It's an important point, RAF.


 Oh, I agree that it is important, but don't think there is anything that
 can be done to ameliorate it, except through personal acts of providence.
 You may recall that the Buddha said everything was unfolding as it must.

 RAF


 


[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
Edgar,

Well, you're only half-right.

I know that there is an ideal.  And I know that the real never matches an 
ideal.  And, that's why our (USA) Founders gave us a PROCESS.

I don't believe in an ideal.  Yet, we recognize one.  And our process exists 
to help to keep us on track.  Our Constitution and our changing body of Laws 
provide a structure.  Even the Constitution itself is susceptible to amendment.

In practice, there are very large meanderings from the ideal, always.  And as 
the river zigs and zags, there is flood-insurance to give us some confidence 
that we will emerge from inundation, if we are inundated.

What is the flood-insurance for you?

--Joe

 Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Joe,
 
 You believe in an idealized and rather naive view of society. The truth is 
 much different, controlled mainly by special interests for their own benefit 
 with benefits to the rest of society only sufficient to quell revolt...
 
 Always has been such to greater or lesser degree and likely always will be...






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
Chris,

The question itself speaks volumes.

 Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance to the 
 mind's freedom?

Well done!  It is certainly on-topic, and is eloquent.

I'm impressed by planning and decision-making that's guided by consideration 
for and appreciation of others' future stewardship.  I think of the Seven 
Generations planning of actions taken by certain Native American tribal 
councils, the making of decisions with a concern and consideration for how 
planned actions, if executed, might effect even the seventh following 
generation of people and culture after the elders' actions.

Such planning probably could not have taken into account the arrival of 
Europeans in America, and I don't know if the Seven Generations principle 
remains in play on Native Reservations to this day.

--Joe

- Chris Austin-Lane chris@... wrote:

 Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance to the
 mind's freedom?
 
 It looks to me like it is, but perhaps we shouldn't argue politics and tax
 policy here?
 
 Rather than share my partisan arguments, let me simply state that
 reasonable people do disagree about these issues. Personally I am grateful
 to have been born into a society that believes in vaccination public
 schools voting research moon missions and the like.  the society finds it
 sensible to pay me for tasks which are enjoyable and allow me to learn and
 to master myself, and that seems fine.  I didn't create the society nor
 more than a bit of its wealth, so I don't feel like much more than a
 temporary steward of the assets I control.
 
 I do know not everyone shares such a perspective, and there's no profit in
 arguing. I speak to offer the lurkers the data that the idea of capitalism
 without a fixed idea of a personal self can take many forms.
 
 Yours in praeteritio,






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
The truth is indescribable.

But if the society is.sufficiently flexible as to avoid revolt, that seems
pretty good according to historical standards.
On Dec 11, 2012 10:00 AM, Edgar Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:



 Joe,

 You believe in an idealized and rather naive view of society. The truth is
 much different, controlled mainly by special interests for their own
 benefit with benefits to the rest of society only sufficient to quell
 revolt...

 Always has been such to greater or lesser degree and likely always will
 be...

 Edgar



 On Dec 11, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Joe wrote:



 RAF,

 I disagree with your simply statement. I find it simplistic.

 In a DEMOCRATIC society -- which India is -- a social contract among the
 people establishes a constitution and a government. The imposition of taxes
 and even taking of lands as eminent domain for social purposes is a
 function of Legislature. Such taking did not happen in the case of the
 lands that were given for occupation by the Untouchables, which you feel
 impressed by. I am also impressed by the donors' generosity (or motivation
 by guilt; or, worse, income- or real-estate-tax-avoidance incentive).

 But, now, I know that people directly connected with tax payments and
 takings often feel ripped-off, and say they do, but they forget in that
 instance about the social contract. And, I claim so do you when you write...

  ...TAKEN by the government, which is simply THEFT

 It's a small point, which I extract from your appreciative comment about a
 small piece of Subhana's teisho, but I think it betrays a mis-understanding
 of the social contract on your part, or else you are letting your personal
 anger about something take center-stage. Do you listen to a lot of
 pot-boiler AM radio in daytime in USA? Does hatred and lack of
 understanding of the social contract pollute all the *rest* of your
 politics, too? It's an important point, RAF. To consider. Not to expound
 upon here, however.

 You think you are an Individual, but in fact you are also a member of
 Society.

 All this leads back to Zen practice, you know, and -- we hope -- to
 Awakening!

 With wishes,

 --Joe

 - R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:
 
  Joe,
 
  I was very impressed by this:
 
   By the time Vinoba had reached the conference, two thousand acres had
  been given back to the poorest villagers. Inspired by Vinoba's work,
  Vimala also walked across India from east to west and north to south and
  eventually ten million acres of land was given back to the landless poor
  without a single hand from the bureaucracy. 
 
  Two important factors here:
 
  The land was FREELY GIVEN, which is a true act of compassion
 
  The land was not TAKEN by the government, which is simply THEFT
 
  Too many people consider themselves compassionate because they are
  willing to empower the government to steal from some to give to others
  they consider more deserving.
 
  I concede that some people deserve to have assets confiscated because
  they stole from others. For instance, Jon Corzine stole some of my
  hard-earned retirement funds, but since he is a crony and fund-raiser
  for Obama, not one penny of his ill-gotten gains have been taken for the
  benefit of those he victimized; he remains a billionaire and has never
  even been charged with a crime. If I could take his money and distribute
  it to those from whom he stole, I would do so, but that would simply be
  justice. To feel so 'compassionate' toward the poor that I help to
  empower the government to steal money from productive people to give to
  others is neither justice nor compassion.




 


Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

Chris,

I find this a very congenial response:

On 12/11/2012 1:04 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:


Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance 
to the mind's freedom?


No doubt, but I found poverty and concerns about how to provide for my 
family to have been a much greater distraction.



perhaps we shouldn't argue politics and tax policy here?

Such topics are important, not because we can solve or settle anything 
here (or elsewhere, for that matter) but rather because Joe, for 
instance, considers ones views on such matters to be indications of a 
person's spiritual 'state' ... I do too, but from a very different 
perspective.


  reasonable people do disagree about these issues.



Indeed.


Personally I am grateful to have been born into a society that

It is only natural that you approve of a society that fills your 
rice-bowl; when/if you experience that social order 'sharing' what YOU 
have earned through doing something other people valued enough to PAY 
you for, then you may attain a different perspective. All the talk of 
'sharing' obfuscates the fact that SOMEBODY had to give up whatever is 
given by society (and don't forget the waste that manifests itself as 
such 'side-effects' as wars and millions of people in jail) and the very 
people (such as Jon Corzine) who ought to have to give up ill-gotten 
wealth are the last to suffer such extractions. The great bulk of 
government is paid for by ordinary workers through hidden taxes such as 
inflation, fuel and sales taxes, and all that sort of thing.


RAF


Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
I certainly pay taxes, which I assume is what you mean by 'sharing'. I
don't really care about the amount, tho I wish the process were simpler. I
have had errors in my returns for like three of the last four years,
causing a great deal of worry and confusion.  as I said I don't really feel
like I suffer to get the money.

One of my elderly relatives lost his lifetime savings in the dot com bust.
his response was to apologize to his wife, stop day trading, and resume his
life work of veterinary medicine, on a part time basis.  to me it seems he
gave up on the idea of wealth as a path to happiness and resumed the
experience of meaningful work as a path towards a fulfilling life.  i hope
to respond with comparable equanimity if I have a similar experience.

Is there some other society you wish you'd been born into rather that the
one you were?
On Dec 11, 2012 10:35 AM, R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com wrote:



 Chris,

 I find this a very congenial response:

 On 12/11/2012 1:04 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:

 Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance to
 the mind's freedom?

 No doubt, but I found poverty and concerns about how to provide for my
 family to have been a much greater distraction.

  perhaps we shouldn't argue politics and tax policy here?

 Such topics are important, not because we can solve or settle anything
 here (or elsewhere, for that matter) but rather because Joe, for instance,
 considers ones views on such matters to be indications of a person's
 spiritual 'state' ... I do too, but from a very different perspective.

   reasonable people do disagree about these issues.


 Indeed.

  Personally I am grateful to have been born into a society that

 It is only natural that you approve of a society that fills your
 rice-bowl; when/if you experience that social order 'sharing' what YOU have
 earned through doing something other people valued enough to PAY you for,
 then you may attain a different perspective. All the talk of 'sharing'
 obfuscates the fact that SOMEBODY had to give up whatever is given by
 society (and don't forget the waste that manifests itself as such
 'side-effects' as wars and millions of people in jail) and the very people
 (such as Jon Corzine) who ought to have to give up ill-gotten wealth are
 the last to suffer such extractions. The great bulk of government is paid
 for by ordinary workers through hidden taxes such as inflation, fuel and
 sales taxes, and all that sort of thing.

 RAF


 


[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
RAF,

Now, now.  That's surely garbled.  Give me a quote and let's see if we can show 
you how you misinterpreted it.

--Joe

 R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:

 Such topics are important, not because we can solve or settle anything 
 here (or elsewhere, for that matter) but rather because Joe, for 
 instance, considers ones views on such matters to be indications of a 
 person's spiritual 'state' ... I do too, but from a very different 
 perspective.






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

On 12/11/2012 1:59 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
Is there some other society you wish you'd been born into rather that 
the one you were? 


Not the kind of thing I dwell on, but, since you ask, I consider it 
karma to have been born where/when I was and to have the opportunity to 
encounter both science and the dharma and to have had the capacity to 
appreciate both of them. I have been quite fortunate in many other 
respects as well, and if you think me dissatisfied with my circumstances 
you misunderstand me.


That said, I foresee that the human prospect is grim and the fact that I 
wont have to live through it is another thing for which I am grateful.


RAF


Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Edgar Owen
Joe,

The process the founders set up has been long subverted

Edgar



On Dec 11, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Joe wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 Well, you're only half-right.
 
 I know that there is an ideal. And I know that the real never matches an 
 ideal. And, that's why our (USA) Founders gave us a PROCESS.
 
 I don't believe in an ideal. Yet, we recognize one. And our process exists 
 to help to keep us on track. Our Constitution and our changing body of Laws 
 provide a structure. Even the Constitution itself is susceptible to amendment.
 
 In practice, there are very large meanderings from the ideal, always. And as 
 the river zigs and zags, there is flood-insurance to give us some confidence 
 that we will emerge from inundation, if we are inundated.
 
 What is the flood-insurance for you?
 
 --Joe
 
  Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
  Joe,
  
  You believe in an idealized and rather naive view of society. The truth is 
  much different, controlled mainly by special interests for their own 
  benefit with benefits to the rest of society only sufficient to quell 
  revolt...
  
  Always has been such to greater or lesser degree and likely always will 
  be...
 
 



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Edgar Owen
Joe,

Perhaps, but the belief in taking other people's property and redistributing it 
without their consent is an even more egregious attachment...

Edgar



On Dec 11, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Joe wrote:

 Chris,
 
 The question itself speaks volumes.
 
 Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance to the 
 mind's freedom?
 
 Well done!  It is certainly on-topic, and is eloquent.
 
 I'm impressed by planning and decision-making that's guided by consideration 
 for and appreciation of others' future stewardship.  I think of the Seven 
 Generations planning of actions taken by certain Native American tribal 
 councils, the making of decisions with a concern and consideration for how 
 planned actions, if executed, might effect even the seventh following 
 generation of people and culture after the elders' actions.
 
 Such planning probably could not have taken into account the arrival of 
 Europeans in America, and I don't know if the Seven Generations principle 
 remains in play on Native Reservations to this day.
 
 --Joe
 
 - Chris Austin-Lane chris@... wrote:
 
 Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance to the
 mind's freedom?
 
 It looks to me like it is, but perhaps we shouldn't argue politics and tax
 policy here?
 
 Rather than share my partisan arguments, let me simply state that
 reasonable people do disagree about these issues. Personally I am grateful
 to have been born into a society that believes in vaccination public
 schools voting research moon missions and the like.  the society finds it
 sensible to pay me for tasks which are enjoyable and allow me to learn and
 to master myself, and that seems fine.  I didn't create the society nor
 more than a bit of its wealth, so I don't feel like much more than a
 temporary steward of the assets I control.
 
 I do know not everyone shares such a perspective, and there's no profit in
 arguing. I speak to offer the lurkers the data that the idea of capitalism
 without a fixed idea of a personal self can take many forms.
 
 Yours in praeteritio,
 
 





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread ChrisAustinLane
Of course current science predicts rather grim things long term anyways - 
difficult to envision any non-reversible computation lasting more than a 
hundred trillion years or so from now. 

As the poster in my mom's laundry room said:  Look to this day, for it is life, 
the very life of life. 

And it seems like you might grudgingly agree that this is the best of all 
possible worlds. Do you really think your kids and grand kids will have less 
wonder, joy and love than you have enjoyed?

Thanks,
Chris Austin-Lane
Sent from a cell phone

On Dec 11, 2012, at 11:32, R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com wrote:

 
 
 On 12/11/2012 1:59 PM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:
 
 Is there some other society you wish you'd been born into rather that the 
 one you were? 
 
 Not the kind of thing I dwell on, but, since you ask, I consider it karma to 
 have been born where/when I was and to have the opportunity to encounter both 
 science and the dharma and to have had the capacity to appreciate both of 
 them. I have been quite fortunate in many other respects as well, and if you 
 think me dissatisfied with my circumstances you misunderstand me.
 
 That said, I foresee that the human prospect is grim and the fact that I wont 
 have to live through it is another thing for which I am grateful.
 
 RAF
 
 
 


Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

On 12/11/2012 2:55 PM, ChrisAustinLane wrote:
Of course current science predicts rather grim things long term 
anyways - difficult to envision any non-reversible computation lasting 
more than a hundred trillion years or so from now.


Chris, I am /glad/ you think the way you do.

As the poster in my mom's laundry room said:  Look to this day, for it 
is life, the very life of life.


True enough. If you think that is ALL there is to it, see above comment.

And it seems like you might grudgingly agree that this is the best of 
all possible worlds.


For /US/ ... why else would we /be here now/?

RAF


Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread ChrisAustinLane
Deleting all the agreement and replying to the rest . . . 

Thanks,
Chris Austin-Lane
Sent from a cell phone

On Dec 11, 2012, at 12:19, R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com wrote:

 As the poster in my mom's laundry room said:  Look to this day, for it is 
 life, the very life of life.
 
 True enough. If you think that is ALL there is to it, see above comment.

That is all I see or experience. Thoughts, eh, you know how that is. 

 
 And it seems like you might grudgingly agree that this is the best of all 
 possible worlds.
 
 For US ... why else would we be here now?

A good koan. Why are we here now?  Puzzling over the absurdity of it, i have no 
choice but laughingly to see the here now!  And then turn the (electric) timer 
off and put the pasta into the boiling water. 

I do expect my offspring and their friends and co-journeyers to have a similar 
mixed bag of good and ill in their moments as I find in my moments. It, this 
fascinating and fundamentally marvelous experience, is why I enthusiastically 
embraced the urge to procreate. 


 
 RAF
 
 
 


[Zen] The Maker - YouTube

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester



entertainment...merle


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDXOioU_OKM











Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester


 
 australia..has medicare... universal health insurance. for starters..at moment 
there is a strong socialistic outlook government based on caring and 
sharing...
 but soon to be rolled by a right wing fanatical Catholic liberal...with an eye 
to the throne...
and a mind to getting back to the business of helping the rich evade taxes... 
sucks the little people in with his one line mantras... i'll do it right for 
you...

 where do i migrate to when the lunatic that he is... get's his hands on the 
wheel to steer the good ship lollypop back to the land of greed...?.

.merle

  
RAF,

Do I know how to elicit a response from the tender, or don't I?  ;-)

I'm glad we're done with that.

When it comes to the social contract and all it contains, it is ineffectual (of 
you) to try to gang up on the majority when you are in the minority.  But, keep 
trying; after all, that's how a majority is BUILT!  Failing a new majority, 
there is Legal recourse for those who believe they have been offended.

Feeling begrudged, alone, will not change things, except to further deteriorate 
the state of one's health and one's civility.

Or, there may be better countries with better systems for you to move to.  It 
may not be too late/soon!  Merle likes Australia, I think.

--Joe

PS I *do* sometimes listen to US-daytime-AM-talk radio: I find it's good to 
know what tunes the devil is playing.

Granted, it's a very difficult Yoga (to sit still for).

 R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:

 On 12/11/2012 11:01 AM, Joe wrote:
  I disagree with your simply statement. I find it simplistic.
 
 That is unsurprising, as most people accept the idea that if a MAJORITY 
 of your fellow inhabitants of a territory agree to rob you, and divide 
 the loot according to a democratic procedure that it is no longer a 
 crime, as it would be if the recipients directly assaulted you on the 
 street. [snip]


 

Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester


 joe..you seem to be enthralled with her...yet you have never met her...

easy to write and tell to all how beautiful we are how righteous, how 
learned,..blah blah...face to face tells another story...
 ok i'll send her an email... we will see...
 so you think being a head shrink makes her more desirable as a person of 
quality..i think not...i read r.d. laing when i was 20 plus..there are head 
shrinks and head shrinks...careful what you wish for..

.i found kandinsky u beaut...writings and all...try mondrian and klee's 
writings..that'll be the test...but it's okay joe each to his own...

send me info on stars and i'll happily say no it's all too much...

love ain't in cyber space honey...meet subhana..then let us talk again..

.she has a pic of her on website that looks years younger..she might be a big 
fat lard lump..who knows..and where is all her art?..yes good question

..merle you are such a cynic..no i am not...just being a tad realistic...

so the question remains will she the holy one step down from her golden 
throne to reply to me... the nobodies email...

yes that is the question...

merle


  
Merle,

You know your geography and neighborhoods there much better than I.  Who knows 
where the teacher sometimes teaches.  Do you know her full teaching schedule?  
We only know where she is based.  The fact that she is at Melbourne, often, 
tickles me, too: one of my dearest friends and Dharma sisters practices there.  
;-)

Note that Subhana is also a psychiatrist: maybe she's really *needed* in 
money-bags-town!, or whatever it's called.

As far as Mr. Kandinsky is concerned, it's only his writing that I found 
lackluster, not his Art ...as I've told you four times!

Subhana is such an accomplished person!, and younger than I am.  By 2 1/2 
years.  She's not even sixty, yet, Merle.

--Joe

 Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 no art..i cannot find any joe it would be on her site if it was so 
why are you knocking kandinsky?..i doubt if subhana's would match his master 
pieces...
  yes sydney..yes however..mosman is where the money bags lie..blacktown is 
 packed with people...why not do a few sessions there...?...you do not know if 
 people will listen unless you try..merle


 

Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester


 edgar..you betcha...they sure need buddha..the poor...but not to be bamboozled 
and manipulated...but to be set free...
the land of money making and folk posing as holy folk..why do they hover in 
those rich areas?
good works in the name of buddha and christ must be freely given
 merle


  
Joe, and Merle,

More PC nonsense Joe. There are greater population densities in all the slums 
of the world than in elite wealthy neighborhoods.

AND they need Buddhist teaching a lot more than the very well off.

I agree with Merle here. Is it true compassion or more a desire to make a 
profit and become well known?

Edgar





On Dec 10, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Joe wrote:

  
Merle,

Please don't let your prejudices blacken your heart toward Subhana Barzaghi, 
Roshi.

She lives in Sydney because it's a high population center, and *THERE ARE 
PEOPLE* there WHO WANT TO *LEARN*.  If she lived at the foot of your hill, 
instead, who the hell would she have to teach?  Only YOU!?  ;-)

You see?  Don't be so silly; please.

Trust me.  She is a wonderful radical.  You are a Tory by comparison.  I doubt 
you'd last ten seconds under her eye, or in her compassionate care.  ;-)

And, ...I know you would *LOVE* her.

Right, not much of her art on her site at present.  What happened?  Used to be 
tons. 

Just Google her full name, and maybe add art to the string.  You may find 
her paintings depicted elsewhere.

Her art is in many books; some of them are Zen books.

She could maybe have taught Mister Kandinsky something about The Spiritual in 
Art.  Or, certainly inspired him, at least in his writing, where it seems to 
me it would have helped.   ;-)

--Joe

 Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

  i check it out...yes i have googled her beforethank you for your 
 interest
 
 .not much of her art there...
 
  will i send her a message?..
 
 mmm 
 
 i am concerned she bases herself in mosman sydney.. very expensive upper 
 crust area...
 
 i believe we need to reach out to the poor and needy.
  to do the work of buddha and christ..
 
 .and following in their paths we discard the need to charge money..
 to give is to give freely.
 .to love is to love wholeheartedly..
 to care is to care without strings attached.
 .you give till you can give no more and then you give again.
 .that is the path to enlightenment..
 let the teacher come to the mountain top.
  then we will see...
 have a wise and precious day.. for you will not see this day again. 



 

Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester


 
 agreed...and all the bullshit hangers on  can go with them that or the 
guillotine!...let's start a revolution!...merle


  
Mike,

Couldn't agree more. All the so called 'royal's should be put to work in the 
fields! Let them do some real work for a change!

They are the biggest, most expensive social parasites of all

Edgar




On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:46 PM, mike brown wrote:

  
the biggest welfare cheats are the queen.. and her hangers on..


I saw a great quote on Facebook:  `So Kate Middleton is pregnant.. I thought 
it was government policy to discourage those who don`t work to have children`. 
 Awesome!


Mike

--- On Tue, 11/12/12, Merle Lester merlewiit...@yahoo.com wrote:


From: Merle Lester merlewiit...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion  and zen
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, 11 December, 2012, 14:35


  


 yes mike..spot on...that is exactly how it is..


.however  the old story still holds a punch..those dam dole bludgers... lazy 
pricks...go get a job.. makes those who are safe and secure so so self 
righteous..i can do it why cannot you?
. the biggest welfare cheats are the queen of england and her hangers on... 
where oh where is the guillotine?...merle


  
Comrade RAF,


I`d say the social parasites are very few in number (at least on the lower 
end of the economic scale). People are born into ghettoes and slums thru no 
fault of their own. Like famine, these places exist because of the economic 
system we have inherited. It`s easy for those who have inherited wealth, or 
who have had lucky breaks, to exhort others to `pull themselves up by their 
bootstraps`. Let`s also not forget that governments often squash attempts at 
self sufficiency in communes etc. and a pool of unemployed is great for the 
capitalist class to keep wages low.


Bother Mike

--- On Tue, 11/12/12, R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com wrote:


From: R A Fonda
 rafo...@frontier.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion  and zen
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, 11 December, 2012, 14:27


  
On 12/10/2012 9:33 PM, Joe wrote: 
those old places lived on the handouts and donations of others, already!, 
themselves!, and they had to be very, very careful about who they let in.
Very true, but even today, let us imagine merle walking up to a modern 
American zen center and telling them that her superior vision of compassion 
obliges them to become homeless shelters, giving needy people a thousand 
days of food and shelter, or ten days, or even one day.

One could hardly ask for a better example of how some people
  confuse higher consciousness with their self-righteous
  generosity with other people's money. I have no problem with them 
demonstrating compassion  by giving their assets away ... I wonder how many 
homeless people she has living in HER 'squat'? The problem is that they band 
together to empower politicians to steal from the productive, and the political 
elites then share the loot with their kleptocrat allies or waste it on wars, or 
pay off their client electorates such as the government 'workers' and very 
little gets spent on the needy, many of whom, unfortunately, were social 
parasites rather than people who just had some bad luck. However, government 
mismanagement (including taking so much from the productive workers and 
investors) has now crippled the economy, so that there really ARE a lot of 
people who would LIKE to work, but there just aren't any jobs for them. 
Moreover, there are about the same number of unemployed American citizens as 
there are illegal immigrants, and people who share merle's
 views are SO compassionate toward those illegal immigrants that they don't 
stop to think how cruel it is for American workers to lose their homes because 
'compassion' precludes reserving jobs for our own citizens.

RAF
 

 

 

Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread mike brown
RAF,
those of us too young to be guilty..
How does that line above fit in with the genetic propensity to drop nuclear 
bombs on Japan (or at least wage war)?
Mike 

--- On Wed, 12/12/12, R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com wrote:

From: R A Fonda rafo...@frontier.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion  and zen
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 12 December, 2012, 1:48
















 



  



  
  
  
  
  
On 12/11/2012 5:49 AM, mike brown wrote:

  what does that say about the American people/culture and the
dropping of the atomic bomb on those 2 civilian populated
cities?



First, let me say that I believe the US DROVE the Japanese into
  that war, and that the American people who supported that, and our
  other 'discretionary wars' are criminals.

  

  Then consider that the people who were adults then, and had some
  complicity in those war crimes, seem (in most cases) to have
  escaped any consequences, or even benefited.

  

  OTOH, those of us who were too young to be guilty are now
  suffering the natural consequences of our nation's evil history
  ... the parents have eaten sour grapes and the children's teeth
  are set on edge.

  

  I want to believe that those who seem to escape this life without
  suffering the consequences of their evil acts will be reborn to
  suffer, as, for instance, in the coming collapse and die-off.



RAF

  




 









  










[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
Merle,

Will you let us know what you get into after being in touch with Subhana?  She 
may have some suggestions about Zen practice, or some observations about art 
and zen which would interest people, here.

She's in the line that various teachers here are in, including our late Pat 
Hawk Roshi, and she has often been to Tucson.  Most recently there was a 
meeting of all the Diamond Sangha Teachers Circle here, while our teacher Pat 
was still living, and he hosted the 25 or so of them at his retreat just north 
of town, bordering the Saguaro National Monument West, at Picture Rocks.  
Beautiful petroglyphs there -- not by painting, as in Australia, but by 
pounding, using a rock tool to abrade the mountain by pummeling.  The Hohokam 
tribe, about 800 years ago.

I have no special affinity for psychiatrists, but her profession closely 
exercises her concern for people thereby, and there-through, as does her zen 
teaching and her artwork.  And, she expresses herself well in words, and art.  
I have always had respect for people in the helping-professions, maybe because 
mine is far from that.  Unless you call keeping the planet safe from the 
largest catastrophic ecological disaster -- impact of a large asteroid or comet 
-- helping.   But the Yoga teaching and introductory meditation instruction 
and dharma teaching is more along the lines of immediate helping, nowadays, for 
me, although I do not practice medicine or social work.

Again, I think Kandinsky's art is great.  No need to recommend other painters 
I'm already very well familiar with, and I am not dissatisfied in any way by 
Mr. K.

I think you might love Subhana because she is from your hemisphere, and 
country, teaches Zen, and she paints.  And, any other reason you may find.  ;-)

She is a very close associate of two teachers I've practiced with in Arizona, 
the late Pat Hawk Roshi, and John Tarrant Roshi, and those two teachers often 
told glowing stories about her.  I don't mind at all if you mention this to 
her, although I don't see why to do so, unless just to tell her that it was 
from a zen astronomer in Tucson from whom you received word that there's a 
Zen-teacher Painter in Sydney (and Melbourne).

Thanks for your trust!,

--Joe

 Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 joe..you seem to be enthralled with her...yet you have never met her...
 
 easy to write and tell to all how beautiful we are how righteous, how 
 learned,..blah blah...face to face tells another story...
 ok i'll send her an email... we will see...






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread R A Fonda

On 12/11/2012 7:23 PM, mike brown wrote:

those of us too young to be guilty..

How does that line above fit in with the genetic propensity to drop 
nuclear bombs on Japan (or at least wage war)?


Short answer: a baby already has genetic propensities, but has not had 
time to manifest many of them; it has not done anything evil ... yet. I 
was just saying that those of us who were too young to support the 
political warmakers had no responsibility for their nuclear atrocities, 
yet we are living in a nation diminished by that and so many other evil 
acts. Of course, realistically, individual citizens could do little to 
stop the elites, but might NOT, for instance, have volunteered to fight. 
Nor is it likely the Japanese would have refrained from using nukes on 
us if they had been able to; it seems to me they were only restrained by 
capacity, rather than propensity, so I am not saying Americans were 
especially evil, but that they had the national capacity to wage 
imperialistic war, and were attracted to/supportive of the sort of 
political elites who were inclined to use that  power.


All human populations have the propensity to wage war, though it /does 
/seem to be more highly expressed in some ethnies and cultures. The 
thing that has made America such a menace is the national 
economic-industrial- resource (rather than genetic) capacity to sustain 
technological warfare. I did not mean to imply that the American 
population had a particularly war-like genetic propensity, but, rather, 
that they do not have any particular social /virtues/ that would make 
them resistant to the manipulation of their political elites. Right off 
hand I can't think of /any/ ethny that /has/ resisted the imperialistic 
ambitions of the political power-seekers. We humans come from ancestors 
who were selected /for/ fitness competition rather than pacifism. On the 
other hand we were also selected for cooperation, so we have a 
propensity to cooperate in waging war.


RAF


[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Bill!
Edgar,

You wrote:
Is it true compassion or more a desire to make a profit and become well known?

One of my points in this discussion is that YOU cannot know the motives of 
someone else.  You may certainly speculate on them, but only they know their 
motives - if indeed they have any.

If you have a motive or goal of being compassionate you have already missed the 
mark.  True compassion (like all other things associated with zen practice) are 
done without a motive.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Joe, and Merle,
 
 More PC nonsense Joe. There are greater population densities in all the slums 
 of the world than in elite wealthy neighborhoods.
 
 AND they need Buddhist teaching a lot more than the very well off.
 
 I agree with Merle here. Is it true compassion or more a desire to make a 
 profit and become well known?
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 
 On Dec 10, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Joe wrote:
 
  Merle,
  
  Please don't let your prejudices blacken your heart toward Subhana 
  Barzaghi, Roshi.
  
  She lives in Sydney because it's a high population center, and *THERE ARE 
  PEOPLE* there WHO WANT TO *LEARN*. If she lived at the foot of your hill, 
  instead, who the hell would she have to teach? Only YOU!? ;-)
  
  You see? Don't be so silly; please.
  
  Trust me. She is a wonderful radical. You are a Tory by comparison. I doubt 
  you'd last ten seconds under her eye, or in her compassionate care. ;-)
  
  And, ...I know you would *LOVE* her.
  
  Right, not much of her art on her site at present. What happened? Used to 
  be tons. 
  
  Just Google her full name, and maybe add art to the string. You may find 
  her paintings depicted elsewhere.
  
  Her art is in many books; some of them are Zen books.
  
  She could maybe have taught Mister Kandinsky something about The Spiritual 
  in Art. Or, certainly inspired him, at least in his writing, where it 
  seems to me it would have helped. ;-)
  
  --Joe
  
   Merle Lester merlewiitpom@ wrote:
  
i check it out...yes i have googled her beforethank you for your 
   interest
   
   .not much of her art there...
   
will i send her a message?..
   
   mmm 
   
   i am concerned she bases herself in mosman sydney.. very expensive upper 
   crust area...
   
   i believe we need to reach out to the poor and needy.
to do the work of buddha and christ..
   
   .and following in their paths we discard the need to charge money..
   to give is to give freely.
   .to love is to love wholeheartedly..
   to care is to care without strings attached.
   .you give till you can give no more and then you give again.
   .that is the path to enlightenment..
   let the teacher come to the mountain top.
then we will see...
   have a wise and precious day.. for you will not see this day again. 
  
 






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Bill!
RAF,

You're beginning to sound like a sour grapes Tea Bagger.

If you are, get over it and take heed of a stanza from a song by Leonard Cohen:

It's coming from the sorrow in the street, 
the holy places where the races meet; 
from the homicidal bitchin' 
that goes down in every kitchen 
to determine who will serve and who will eat. 
From the wells of disappointment 
where the women kneel to pray 
for the grace of God in the desert here 
and the desert far away: 
Democracy is coming to the U.S.A. - Democracy by Leonard Cohen

That song is about democracy, not plutocracy...

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:

 On 12/11/2012 8:51 AM, Edgar Owen wrote:
  Any generosity on the part of the government
 
 The main problem with government generosity is that the government 
 doesn't HAVE anything to give that it did not TAKE from someone. Now 
 some user fees, and resource extraction taxes, etc... are more or less 
 'theft-free' but they don't come close to covering the costs of our 
 bloated US government. Worse, the political elites have made such an 
 awful mess of things that huge numbers of people are impoverished and 
 unemployed and NEED assistance. Worse still, this leads a majority of 
 the electorate to vote for a government that promises to fill their rice 
 bowl.
 
 I fear there is no solution except for this dystopia to collapse and the 
 unsustainable population to crash.
 
 RAF






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Bill!
Edgar,

Until we as a society can successfully establish a communistic economic system 
socialism is the best system we can strive for.  Right now the best we can do 
is try to restrain and regulate our native  capitalism with wealth 
redistribution tactics as are employed by our current form of Keynesian 
economics and continue to move it closer and closer to socialism.

But maybe someday we can actually aspire to communism...we can only hope.

...Bill!   

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Joe,
 
 Perhaps, but the belief in taking other people's property and redistributing 
 it without their consent is an even more egregious attachment...
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On Dec 11, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Joe wrote:
 
  Chris,
  
  The question itself speaks volumes.
  
  Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance to 
  the mind's freedom?
  
  Well done!  It is certainly on-topic, and is eloquent.
  
  I'm impressed by planning and decision-making that's guided by 
  consideration for and appreciation of others' future stewardship.  I think 
  of the Seven Generations planning of actions taken by certain Native 
  American tribal councils, the making of decisions with a concern and 
  consideration for how planned actions, if executed, might effect even the 
  seventh following generation of people and culture after the elders' 
  actions.
  
  Such planning probably could not have taken into account the arrival of 
  Europeans in America, and I don't know if the Seven Generations principle 
  remains in play on Native Reservations to this day.
  
  --Joe
  
  - Chris Austin-Lane chris@ wrote:
  
  Can one's belief in personal ownership be an attachment, a hindrance to the
  mind's freedom?
  
  It looks to me like it is, but perhaps we shouldn't argue politics and tax
  policy here?
  
  Rather than share my partisan arguments, let me simply state that
  reasonable people do disagree about these issues. Personally I am grateful
  to have been born into a society that believes in vaccination public
  schools voting research moon missions and the like.  the society finds it
  sensible to pay me for tasks which are enjoyable and allow me to learn and
  to master myself, and that seems fine.  I didn't create the society nor
  more than a bit of its wealth, so I don't feel like much more than a
  temporary steward of the assets I control.
  
  I do know not everyone shares such a perspective, and there's no profit in
  arguing. I speak to offer the lurkers the data that the idea of capitalism
  without a fixed idea of a personal self can take many forms.
  
  Yours in praeteritio,
  
 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
Bill!,

I heard a funny story about Keynes.  He was at an international conference once 
on Economics -- what else?  or maybe it was Keynesian Economics -- and he was 
famous by then, and everybody knew Keynesian Economics.  He talked with his 
wife by phone one night during the conference, and she asked him how it was 
going.  He had to tell her:

Well, dear, there are 35 Keynesians here, and I find that I am the only 
non-Keynesian!

--Joe

PS (but I really don't know how his own thinking evolved over his rather short 
lifetime).

 Bill! BillSmart@... wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 Until we as a society can successfully establish a communistic economic 
 system socialism is the best system we can strive for.  Right now the best we 
 can do is try to restrain and regulate our native  capitalism with wealth 
 redistribution tactics as are employed by our current form of Keynesian 
 economics and continue to move it closer and closer to socialism.
 
 But maybe someday we can actually aspire to communism...we can only hope.






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Joe
Merle,

You mean you don't see Bill!'s sly ironic grin?

Or, maybe I don't see yours!  ;-)

--Joe

 Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 bill good one...we see common ground here!..merle

 
 Bill! wrote:
  
 Edgar,
 
  Until we as a society can successfully establish a communistic economic 
  system socialism is the best system we can strive for. 
[snip]





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester


 
 good one billmerle
  
RAF,

You're beginning to sound like a sour grapes Tea Bagger.

If you are, get over it and take heed of a stanza from a song by Leonard Cohen:

It's coming from the sorrow in the street, 
the holy places where the races meet; 
from the homicidal bitchin' 
that goes down in every kitchen 
to determine who will serve and who will eat. 
From the wells of disappointment 
where the women kneel to pray 
for the grace of God in the desert here 
and the desert far away: 
Democracy is coming to the U.S.A. - Democracy by Leonard Cohen

That song is about democracy, not plutocracy...

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, R A Fonda rafonda@... wrote:

 On 12/11/2012 8:51 AM, Edgar Owen wrote:
  Any generosity on the part of the government
 
 The main problem with government generosity is that the government 
 doesn't HAVE anything to give that it did not TAKE from someone. Now 
 some user fees, and resource extraction taxes, etc... are more or less 
 'theft-free' but they don't come close to covering the costs of our 
 bloated US government. Worse, the political elites have made such an 
 awful mess of things that huge numbers of people are impoverished and 
 unemployed and NEED assistance. Worse still, this leads a majority of 
 the electorate to vote for a government that promises to fill their rice 
 bowl.
 
 I fear there is no solution except for this dystopia to collapse and the 
 unsustainable population to crash.
 
 RAF



 

Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester


 
 joe..where is his grin?? merle
  
Merle,

You mean you don't see Bill!'s sly ironic grin?

Or, maybe I don't see yours!  ;-)

--Joe

 Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 bill good one...we see common ground here!..merle

 
 Bill! wrote:
  
 Edgar,
 
  Until we as a society can successfully establish a communistic economic 
  system socialism is the best system we can strive for. 
[snip]


 

[Zen] Fw: Chomsky: 'Right To Work' more correctly 'right to be exploited'

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester











 


 



CHOMSKY: 'RIGHT TO WORK' MORE CORRECTLY 'RIGHT TO BE EXPLOITED' -


 


Liberty Underground News reports:


The ruling Forces of Greed (FOG) have successfully passed a bill in Michigan 
to make the state a ˘right to work˙ state, even as masses of working class 
people were pepper sprayed by police for protesting the bill. The euphemism 
˘right to work˙ has been more correctly identified as ╢the right to be 
exploitedâ•˙ by Noam Chomsky. 


 


It is particularly distressing to see this happen in Michigan, where 
working class protesters died and were injured standing up to goons hired by 
the ruling FOG, in order to create strong unions such as the United Auto 
Workers.


 


˙Right to work˙ laws allow workers to opt out of unions, thereby 
destroying solidarity, the only power unions have. Those workers who opt out 
enjoy the benefits of union membership without paying the dues, eventually 
causing the union to become a disunion, too weak to stand up to the ruling 
FOG, the transnational investors and transnational corporations that don't 
give a damn about this country or its people other than what they can steal 
after shipping out our jobs, polluting our environment, and bribing our 
elections for control.ˇ


 


 






Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from 
the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of 
forming such opinions.
    -- Albert Einstein





Re: [Zen] Re: Compassion and zen

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester


 joe...yes joe i will send you the email before i forward it to her..okay..you 
are kind indeed to point me to this direction... with christmas coming...time 
is tight..spent 2 hours weeding in garden...my zen activity..in motion 
meditation..love weeding began it as a child... and so good for you...what have 
i done today of worth..rang a friend who is struggling to come to terms with 
his health...they cannot pin point what is wrong..though blood tests reveal 
something is a miss...he let himself go to seed..retired at 40 from social 
worker...to sit and eat..and thinking he had only a mind forgot his body..the 
temple..and thus grew into a fat lard lump..then had a heart attack..now he 
cares for body in mid 60;s..too late maybe... we will see..take it easy joe...i 
was a helper..i was an art teacher..my aim was to bring out what was already 
there..to encourage the soul to fly freely... merle


  
Merle,

Will you let us know what you get into after being in touch with Subhana?  She 
may have some suggestions about Zen practice, or some observations about art 
and zen which would interest people, here.

She's in the line that various teachers here are in, including our late Pat 
Hawk Roshi, and she has often been to Tucson.  Most recently there was a 
meeting of all the Diamond Sangha Teachers Circle here, while our teacher Pat 
was still living, and he hosted the 25 or so of them at his retreat just north 
of town, bordering the Saguaro National Monument West, at Picture Rocks.  
Beautiful petroglyphs there -- not by painting, as in Australia, but by 
pounding, using a rock tool to abrade the mountain by pummeling.  The Hohokam 
tribe, about 800 years ago.

I have no special affinity for psychiatrists, but her profession closely 
exercises her concern for people thereby, and there-through, as does her zen 
teaching and her artwork.  And, she expresses herself well in words, and art.  
I have always had respect for people in the helping-professions, maybe because 
mine is far from that.  Unless you call keeping the planet safe from the 
largest catastrophic ecological disaster -- impact of a large asteroid or comet 
-- helping.   But the Yoga teaching and introductory meditation instruction 
and dharma teaching is more along the lines of immediate helping, nowadays, for 
me, although I do not practice medicine or social work.

Again, I think Kandinsky's art is great.  No need to recommend other painters 
I'm already very well familiar with, and I am not dissatisfied in any way by 
Mr. K.

I think you might love Subhana because she is from your hemisphere, and 
country, teaches Zen, and she paints.  And, any other reason you may find.  ;-)

She is a very close associate of two teachers I've practiced with in Arizona, 
the late Pat Hawk Roshi, and John Tarrant Roshi, and those two teachers often 
told glowing stories about her.  I don't mind at all if you mention this to 
her, although I don't see why to do so, unless just to tell her that it was 
from a zen astronomer in Tucson from whom you received word that there's a 
Zen-teacher Painter in Sydney (and Melbourne).

Thanks for your trust!,

--Joe

 Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 joe..you seem to be enthralled with her...yet you have never met her...
 
 easy to write and tell to all how beautiful we are how righteous, how 
 learned,..blah blah...face to face tells another story...
 ok i'll send her an email... we will see...


 

[Zen] Fw: http://www.thewaysidechapel.com/

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester
joe..here is an example of the good shepherd at work..brilliant!..no strings 
attached..help for the needy..merle



http://www.thewaysidechapel.com/

[Zen] Re: Just Enough Faith Volunteers - dedicated to maintaining the true meaning of SERVING the Homeless and others in need.

2012-12-11 Thread Merle Lester


again joe..no strings attached..

no holy than thou..no need for  why

what must be done is done with a good heart...

all the work of the good shepherd... 

as they say too much navel gazing can bring about sterility of enlightenment.

.and the old story emerges...the caterpillar with a 100 legs..he forgot which 
leg to move first

 so he became was rooted to the spot forever more... never knowing he could move

action speaks louder than words..

the good shepherd is out their doing the work of christ and buddha without 
signalling..look at me look at me...look i am enlightened and radiant like a 
sunbeam 

true sunbeams radiate light through good deeds..

that is the way..that is the only path to enlightenment..

to do and be good works...

enjoy your day..

for it will not pass your way again as such..

merle

http://www.jefvolunteers.org/index.html