Hi,
I'm getting weird errors while trying to install openindiana 151a on a
Dell R715 with a PERC H200 (based on an LSI SAS 2008). Any time the OS
tries to access the drives (for whatever reason), I get this dumped into
syslog:
genunix: WARNING: Device
On 05/16/2012 09:45 AM, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Hi,
are those DELL branded WD disks? DELL tends to manipulate the
firmware of the drives so that power handling with Solaris fails.
If this is the case here:
Easiest way to make it work is to modify /kernel/drv/sd.conf and
add an entry
On 05/16/2012 09:45 AM, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Hi,
are those DELL branded WD disks? DELL tends to manipulate the firmware of
the drives so that power handling with Solaris fails. If this is the case
here:
Easiest way to make it work is to modify /kernel/drv/sd.conf and add an
entry
Hi All,
I have FC LUNs from NetApp FAS 3240 mapped to two SPARC T4-2 clustered
nodes running Veritas Cluster Server software. For now, the
configuration on NetApp is as follows:
/vol/EBUSApp/EBUSApp 100G
online MBSUN04 : 0 MBSUN05 : 0
Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
We know that large redundancy is highly recommended for
big HDDs, so in-place autoexpansion of the raidz1 pool
onto 3Tb disks is out of the question.
Before I started to use my thumper, I reconfigured it to use RAID-Z2.
This allows me to just replace disks
IMHO
Just use whole stack of Vcs
Vxfm vxfs
Sent from my iPhone
On May 16, 2012, at 5:20 AM, Bruce McGill brucemcgill@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have FC LUNs from NetApp FAS 3240 mapped to two SPARC T4-2 clustered
nodes running Veritas Cluster Server software. For now, the
Hi Bruce,
My opinions and two cents are inline. Take them with appropriate
amounts of salt ;)
On 05/16/12 04:20 AM, Bruce McGill wrote:
Hi All,
I have FC LUNs from NetApp FAS 3240 mapped to two SPARC T4-2 clustered
nodes running Veritas Cluster Server software. For now, the
configuration
I have a small server at home (HP Proliant Micro N36) that I use
for file, DNS, DHCP, etc. services. I currently have a zpool of four
mirrored 1 TB Seagate ES2 SATA drives. Well, it was a zpool of four
until last night when one of the drives died. ZFS did it's job and all
the data is still OK.
On 05/16/2012 10:17 AM, Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
One thing came up while trying this - I'm on a text install
image system, so my / is a ramdisk. Any ideas how I can change
the sd.conf on the USB disk or reload the driver configuration on
the fly? I tried looking for the file on the USB
2012-05-16 6:18, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
You forgot IDEA #6 where you take advantage of the fact that zfs can be
told to use sparse files as partitions. This is rather like your IDEA #3
but does not require that disks be partitioned.
This is somewhat the method of making missing devices when
2012-05-16 13:30, Joerg Schilling написал:
Jim Klimovjimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
We know that large redundancy is highly recommended for
big HDDs, so in-place autoexpansion of the raidz1 pool
onto 3Tb disks is out of the question.
Before I started to use my thumper, I reconfigured it to use
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
Your idea actually evolved for me into another (#7?), which
is simple and apparent enough to be ingenious ;)
DO use the partitions, but split the 2.73Tb drives into a
roughly 2.5Tb partition followed by a 250Gb partition of
Hello fellow BOFH,
I also went by that title in a previous life ;)
2012-05-16 21:58, bofh wrote:
Err, why go to all that trouble? Replace one disk per pool. Wait for
resilver to finish. Replace next disk. Once all/enough disks have
been replaced, turn on autoexpand, and you're done.
As
There's something going on then. I have 7x 3TB disk at home, in
raidz3, so about 12TB usable. 2.5TB actually used. Scrubbing takes
about 2.5 hours. I had done the resilvering as well, and that did not
take 15 hours/drive. Copying 3TBs onto 2.5 SATA drives did take more
than a day, but a 2.5
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Jim Klimov wrote:
Your idea actually evolved for me into another (#7?), which
is simple and apparent enough to be ingenious ;)
DO use the partitions, but split the 2.73Tb drives into a
roughly 2.5Tb partition followed by a 250Gb partition of
the same size as vdevs of the
bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
There's something going on then. I have 7x 3TB disk at home, in
raidz3, so about 12TB usable. 2.5TB actually used. Scrubbing takes
about 2.5 hours. I had done the resilvering as well, and that did not
take 15 hours/drive. Copying 3TBs onto 2.5 SATA drives
2012-05-16 22:21, bofh wrote:
There's something going on then. I have 7x 3TB disk at home, in
raidz3, so about 12TB usable. 2.5TB actually used. Scrubbing takes
about 2.5 hours. I had done the resilvering as well, and that did not
take 15 hours/drive.
That is the critical moment ;)
The
Does anyone know what the minimum value for zfs_arc_max should be set
to? Does it depend on the amount of memory on the system, and - if so -
is there a formula, or percentage, to use to determine what the minimum
value is?
Thanks
Richard Paynter
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail,
On May 16, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Paynter, Richard
richard.payn...@infocrossing.com wrote:
Does anyone know what the minimum value for zfs_arc_max should be set to?
Does it depend on the amount of memory on the system, and – if so – is there
a formula, or percentage, to use to determine what
2012-05-15 19:17, casper@oracle.com wrote:
Your old release of Solaris (nearly three years old) doesn't support
disks over 2TB, I would think.
(A 3TB is 3E12, the 2TB limit is 2^41 and the difference is around 800Gb)
While this was proven correct by my initial experiments,
it seems that
20 matches
Mail list logo
