On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:47 PM, River Tarnell
ri...@loreley.flyingparchment.org.uk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Ahrens:
does this mean that without an account on the NFS server, a user cannot see
his
current disk use / quota?
That's correct.
in this
Will this work with Linux rquota clients, too?
Olga
On 4/1/09, Matthew Ahrens matthew.ahr...@sun.com wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Matthew Ahrens matthew.ahr...@sun.com
wrote:
River Tarnell wrote:
Matthew Ahrens:
ZFS user quotas (like other
River Tarnell wrote:
Matthew Ahrens:
ZFS user quotas (like other zfs properties) will not be accessible over NFS;
you must be on the machine running zfs to manipulate them.
does this mean that without an account on the NFS server, a user cannot see
his
current disk use / quota?
That's
casper@sun.com wrote:
River Tarnell wrote:
Matthew Ahrens:
ZFS user quotas (like other zfs properties) will not be accessible over NFS;
you must be on the machine running zfs to manipulate them.
does this mean that without an account on the NFS server, a user cannot see his
current disk
Hello Matthew,
Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 9:16:42 PM, you wrote:
MA Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Excellent news.
Wouldn't it be better if logical disk usage would be accounted and not
physical - I mean when compression is enabled should quota be
accounted based by a logical file
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 9:16:42 PM, you wrote:
MA Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Excellent news.
Wouldn't it be better if logical disk usage would be accounted and not
physical - I mean when compression is enabled should quota be
accounted
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 9:16:42 PM, you wrote:
MA Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Excellent news.
Wouldn't it be better if logical disk usage would be accounted and not
physical - I mean when compression is enabled should quota be
accounted
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 5:32:25 PM, you wrote:
RE Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 9:16:42 PM, you wrote:
MA Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Excellent news.
Wouldn't it be better if logical disk usage would be accounted and not
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:58:34AM +0200, casper@sun.com wrote:
I know that this is one of the additional protocols developed for NFSv2
and NFSv3; does NFSv4 has a similar mechanism to get the quota?
Yes, NFSv4.0 and 4.1 both provide the same quota information retrieval
interface, three
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:04:47AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
If we had the .zfs/props/propname RFE implemented that would allow
users to see this regardless of what file sharing protocol they use.
As well as lots of other very interesting info about the filesystem.
Indeed!
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Matthew Ahrens matthew.ahr...@sun.com wrote:
River Tarnell wrote:
Matthew Ahrens:
ZFS user quotas (like other zfs properties) will not be accessible over
NFS;
you must be on the machine running zfs to manipulate them.
does this mean that
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
So from a user perspective isn't it a little bit confusing as he
managed to write more data than he thinks he is allowed to.
Pleasant surprises tend to be tolerated :-)
Until it comes time to back that data up. It is conceivable for users
to
Hello Bob,
Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 7:14:46 PM, you wrote:
BF On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
So from a user perspective isn't it a little bit confusing as he
managed to write more data than he thinks he is allowed to.
Pleasant surprises tend to be tolerated :-)
BF Until it
[ re-sending to the list address - stupid thunderbird still doesn't have
reply-to-list :-( ]
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Bob,
Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 7:14:46 PM, you wrote:
...
BF Until it comes time to back that data up. It is conceivable for users
BF to create a DOS for the backup
FYI, I filed this PSARC case yesterday, and expect to integrate into
OpenSolaris in April. Your comments are welcome.
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/204/
--matt
---BeginMessage---
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun
2009/3/31 Matthew Ahrens matthew.ahr...@sun.com:
4. New Properties
user/group space accounting information and quotas can be manipulated
with 4 new properties:
zfs get userused@user fs|snap
zfs get groupused@group fs|snap
zfs get userquota@user fs|snap
zfs get groupquota@group fs|snap
Hello Matthew,
Excellent news.
Wouldn't it be better if logical disk usage would be accounted and not
physical - I mean when compression is enabled should quota be
accounted based by a logical file size or physical as in du?
I'm not saying which one is better just raising the question.
--
much cheering ensues!
2009/3/31 Matthew Ahrens matthew.ahr...@sun.com:
FYI, I filed this PSARC case yesterday, and expect to integrate into
OpenSolaris in April. Your comments are welcome.
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/204/
--matt
-- Forwarded message --
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:37:02PM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
The user or group is specified using one of the following forms:
posix name (eg. ahrens)
posix numeric id (eg. 126829)
sid name (eg. ahr...@sun)
sid numeric id (eg. S-1-12345-12423-125829)
How does this work with zones?
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Excellent news.
Wouldn't it be better if logical disk usage would be accounted and not
physical - I mean when compression is enabled should quota be
accounted based by a logical file size or physical as in du?
]
The compressed space *is* the amount of
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:16:42PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Excellent news.
Wouldn't it be better if logical disk usage would be accounted and not
physical - I mean when compression is enabled should quota be
accounted based by a logical file
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:37:02PM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
The user or group is specified using one of the following forms:
posix name (eg. ahrens)
posix numeric id (eg. 126829)
sid name (eg. ahr...@sun)
sid numeric id (eg. S-1-12345-12423-125829)
How does this work
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:25:35PM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
quote case materials
These new properties are not printed by zfs get all, since that could
generate a huge amount of output, which would not be very well
organized. The new zfs userspace subcommand should be used instead.
Ah, I
Nicolas Williams wrote:
We could also
disallow them from doing zfs get useru...@name pool/zoned/fs, just make
it an error to prevent them from seeing something other than what they
intended.
I don't see why the g-z admin should not get this data.
They can of course still get the data by
On 31 March, 2009 - Matthew Ahrens sent me these 10K bytes:
FYI, I filed this PSARC case yesterday, and expect to integrate into
OpenSolaris in April. Your comments are welcome.
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/204/
Quota reporting over NFS or for userland apps like Samba?
Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 31 March, 2009 - Matthew Ahrens sent me these 10K bytes:
FYI, I filed this PSARC case yesterday, and expect to integrate into
OpenSolaris in April. Your comments are welcome.
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/204/
Quota reporting over NFS or for userland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Ahrens:
ZFS user quotas (like other zfs properties) will not be accessible over NFS;
you must be on the machine running zfs to manipulate them.
does this mean that without an account on the NFS server, a user cannot see his
current disk use
River Tarnell wrote:
Matthew Ahrens:
ZFS user quotas (like other zfs properties) will not be accessible over NFS;
you must be on the machine running zfs to manipulate them.
does this mean that without an account on the NFS server, a user cannot see his
current disk use / quota?
That's
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Matthew Ahrens matthew.ahr...@sun.com wrote:
River Tarnell wrote:
Matthew Ahrens:
ZFS user quotas (like other zfs properties) will not be accessible over
NFS;
you must be on the machine running zfs to manipulate them.
does this mean that without an account
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Ahrens:
does this mean that without an account on the NFS server, a user cannot see
his
current disk use / quota?
That's correct.
in this case, might i suggest at least an RFE to add ZFS quota support to
rquotad? i'm sure we aren't the
30 matches
Mail list logo
